CIA Still Acting Like A Domestic Surveillance Agency, Despite Instructions Otherwise

from the the-only-way-to-make-this-country-safe-is-to-watch-its-citizens-as-much-as-possi dept

The ACLU has received another document dump from the government as a result of its FOIA lawsuits, with this bundle dealing with the CIA's activities. This isn't directly related to the late Friday evening doc dump announced by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, which dealt more with the CIA's counterterrorism activities leading up to the 9/11 attacks, but there is some overlap.

Most of what the ACLU is highlighting from this pile of documents is the CIA's domestic surveillance activities. Ideally -- and according to the agency's own directives -- the amount of domestic surveillance it should be performing is almost none at all. It is charged with collecting and disseminating foreign intelligence and counterintelligence. It is allowed to track certain activities of Americans abroad, but for the most part, it is not supposed to be a domestic surveillance agency.

Despite this, the CIA has done so repeatedly. Back in the 70s, the Church Committee uncovered domestic surveillance by the agency, targeting anti-war activists and political dissenters, as well as multiple joint programs with the FBI that -- over the course of thirty years -- resulted in the interception and opening of millions of pieces of US first class mail.

Under Executive Order 120333, the CIA's domestic powers have expanded. No one knows to what extent the CIA performs domestic surveillance thanks to heavy redactions, but it appears to be just as widespread today, thanks mainly to its connection at the FISA Court: the FBI.

Although EO 12333, AR 2-2, and Annex B prohibit the agency from engaging in electronic surveillance within the United States, the CIA can nevertheless ask the FBI to do its bidding:

By partnering with the FBI, the CIA has done things like collect Americans' financial records in bulk under Section 215. A just-released Annex hints at other surveillance powers as well:
Annex B explains that the CIA may "use a monitoring device within the United States under circumstances in which a warrant would not be required for law enforcement purposes if the CIA General Counsel concurs."
Unfortunately, other details have been redacted, so it's not clear exactly what sort of "monitoring devices" the CIA is using. It appears to believe that -- despite its foreign priorities -- it can engage in any sort of warrantless domestic surveillance US law enforcement agencies can.

And it appears its domestic activities aren't all that limited. The ACLU has obtained Inspector General's reports that detail the extent of the CIA's US-focused spying activities. The heading "Intelligence Activities Conducted by CIA within the United States" is followed by "dozens" of redacted pages.

So, lots of bad news for privacy and civil liberties enthusiasts, with presumably more to come once some of this heavy redaction is cleared away. On the bright side, the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board is moving towards tackling the CIA's activities under Executive Order 120333. While this may not result in sweeping changes to the agency's programs, it should at least provide more insight into its domestic activities.

Filed Under: cia, domestic surveillance, surveillance

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  1. identicon
    GEMont, 19 Jun 2015 @ 12:31am

    Re: Re: Why is anyone surprised?

    "The fact that these alphabet agency ass-clowns think they can get away with anything makes a mockery of the Constitution and Bill of Rights."

    Actually, there's a really good chance that the mockery was made directly after 9/11, when the Constitution and the Bill of Rights were rewritten by the men and women who are now "acting as if they can get away with anything" - because they probably can get away with anything according to the new secretly re-interpreted Constitution and Bill of Rights.

    In fact, the solutions you mentioned - citizens arrest, continental congress - may now be illegal, according to the new secretly re-interpreted Constitution and Bill of Rights.

    It may now be legally considered as an act of "terrorism" to publicly mention either of these once-upon-a-time public solutions to criminal government in concert with words that describe government overthrow.

    That means that should you speak publicly about these solutions they can just arrest and detain you without a warrant and without charge, and keep you locked up for as long as they want without having to tell anyone where you went or why.

    Secretly re-interpreting the Constitution of the United States after 9/11 "because Terrorists", is how they made Extraordinary Rendition of American citizens legal.

    It is not a far stretch to imagine that same secret re-interpretation making the continental congress illegal.


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter

Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Show Now: Takedown
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads


Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.