Mi Amiga: One Michigan School District's Three-Decades-Old Hero Computer That Still Manages HVAC Today

from the salute dept

As I'm sure I've mentioned in the past, I've worked most of my professional life in the tech industry, specifically working for a managed services consultant in Chicago. One of the things we do is advise our clients on hardware rotations. Client machines, like desktops and laptops for instance, are typically recommended on a four to five year rotation. Because, let's face it, a five year old computer is either functionally worthless or is probably hanging onto a single strand of twisted copper before crapping out entirely, amirite?

Please don't send this post to my customers. Why? Well, because this is the story of the Grand Rapids Public School System in Michigan and the Commodore Amiga, originally bought during the Reagan administration, that is still running the schools' heating and air conditioning today.

The Commodore Amiga was new to GRPS in the early 1980s and it has been working tirelessly ever since. GRPS Maintenance Supervisor Tim Hopkins said that the computer was purchased with money from an energy bond in the 1980s. It replaced a computer that was “about the size of a refrigerator.” The computer is responsible for turning the heat and the air conditioners on and off for 19 school buildings.
Great. My HP laptop from six years ago has the keys falling off the keyboard and I'm pretty sure the fans inside the chassis have had their fins whisked down to tiny little fan-nubs, but this beast from the cold war times is still making sure little Johnny doesn't get sweaty during his lunch period. What's insane about all of this is the intricacy with which the whole thing manages to work. The computer controls the boilers, fans and pumps, while also monitoring temperatures within the schools... and it was programmed by a local high school student in the 80's. Not only that, but because the Amiga is a thing that belongs in a museum somewhere, whenever the school district needs help with the machine they still go back to that very same "programmer" who is all grown up now and happens to still live in the area. I mean, just listen to this.
“It’s a very unique product. It operates on a 1200-bit modem,” said Hopkins. “How it runs, the software that it’s running, is unique to Commodore.”

Hopkins said the system runs on a radio frequency that sends a signal to school buildings, which reply within a matter of seconds with the status of each building. The only problem is that the computer operates on the same frequency as some of the walkie-talkies used by the maintenance department.

“Because they share the same frequency as our maintenance communications radios and operations maintenance radios — it depends on what we’re doing — yes, they do interfere,” Hopkins said.

If that happens, “we have to clear the radio and get everyone off of it for up to 15 minutes.”
The school had received funds to address infrastructure problems from something called the "Warm Safe and Dry" bond in 2011, which seems like it was named specifically to get the schools' HVAC systems up to date. But GRPS was all, "eh, fuck it, this thing's still running like a champ, so let's put our ancient computer down the priority list." And it looks like it was the right decision. The Amiga runs day and night to this day, with only some minor inconveniences and replacement parts getting in the way of saying this thing is working flawlessly.

The article notes that the locals there are considering a new $175 million bond proposal that would free up money for the school system to replace the Amiga with a modern system that would cost something like $2 million or so. If it passes, Hopkins is expecting it to be a high priority, which will result in the sad day when we have to retire the old girl and put her out to pasture. In the meantime, this machine deserves some kind of Ironman award. We salute you, Commodore!


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    JoeT, 17 Jun 2015 @ 10:54pm

    Number 1 IT rule

    If it ain't broke, don't fix it!!!!!!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Frank Cox, 17 Jun 2015 @ 10:57pm

    $2 million to replace it

    How is it that it will cost two million dollars to replace a computer that cost (maybe) $3000 in the 80's? Even if they have to replace all of the sensors and hook everything up via their lan instead of the radio system that's currently in use... Two Million Dollars?!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      JoeCool (profile), 18 Jun 2015 @ 12:03am

      Re: $2 million to replace it

      $2M to replace not just the computer, but also all the controls as well as a new heater/cooler that can be controlled via computer. Remember, the ENTIRE SYSTEM is 30 years old, not just the computer.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      GreatGreenGeek, 18 Jun 2015 @ 9:27am

      Re: $2 million to replace it

      Chances are not only are they replacing the computer, but they're also replacing many of the control components that have been in place, too. I do lots of work for schools, so things like:

      - Radiator control valves
      - Classroom thermostats
      - Damper actuators (and possibly the dampers themselves if not well maintained)
      - Temperature sensors
      - Duct static pressure sensors
      - Packaged AC controllers
      - Network JACE boxes
      - variable frequency drive gateways (and maybe VFDs themselves)
      - boiler controls
      - boiler stack dampers
      - motor start/stop controls

      That adds up. Generally, schools do these upgrades for energy efficiency purposes, so there are also some other capital investments (like a new boilers). Generally, for a reasonably sized single school, a whole new HVAC control system can run between $250k (elementary) to $1M+ (high school).

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    You are being watched (profile), 17 Jun 2015 @ 11:29pm

    Here's to you, Commodore.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 17 Jun 2015 @ 11:43pm

    1200 bit dial-up modem? What are they going to do when POTS dissappears in a few years. There are already places now where POTS is not avialable, even here in one part of Sacramento.

    If they switch to a modern PC, they will have to connect through the LAN, since virtually every computer made now cannot use a dial-up modem.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      MrTroy (profile), 18 Jun 2015 @ 12:16am

      Re:

      And what makes you think the computer is connected to the POTS? Reading the article, it's much more likely that the modem is providing the DAC for connecting to the radio network.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Christopher (profile), 18 Jun 2015 @ 6:08am

      What?

      "If they switch to a modern PC, they will have to connect through the LAN, since virtually every computer made now cannot use a dial-up modem."

      Why not? Virtually every computer I've seen over the past 20 years either has a modem card, modem built in, or USB capabilities which then allows for a modem. So, please, elaborate specifically.

      -C

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      John Fenderson (profile), 18 Jun 2015 @ 6:22am

      Re:

      "virtually every computer made now cannot use a dial-up modem."


      Huh? I've yet to see a computer that can't use a modem.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 18 Jun 2015 @ 7:13am

      Re:

      Amigas use ethernet cards. This story, what a coincidence, I'm cleaning out old stuff and am getting rid of three Amiga A4000s. Old computers really do hold up well.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Rekrul, 18 Jun 2015 @ 1:41pm

        Re: Re:

        This story, what a coincidence, I'm cleaning out old stuff and am getting rid of three Amiga A4000s. Old computers really do hold up well.

        What are you going to do with them? I hope you're not going to junk them!

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Anonymous Coward, 19 Jun 2015 @ 6:35pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          I don't know what to do with 'em. Know of anywhere that would recycle or utilize them?

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Rekrul, 20 Jun 2015 @ 7:37pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            I don't know what to do with 'em. Know of anywhere that would recycle or utilize them?

            Absolutely! There's still a lot of Amiga users around who will gladly buy them from you for a fair price.

            Go to;

            http://www.lemonamiga.com

            Go to the forums and post them in the Supermarket forum.

            If you're not interested in selling them and just want to get rid of them, offer them for the cost of postage and I guarantee you'll find someone who will gladly take them.

            If it's an old, non-Intel computer, I guarantee that there are collectors who would love to add it to their collection. I'd love to take one of them, but I'm kind of short on money at the moment. Still, I'd rather see them go to other Amiga enthusiasts than for you to junk/recycle them.

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    MrTroy (profile), 18 Jun 2015 @ 12:26am

    They don't make 'em like they used to

    This is very impressive; I'm not sure how likely a commodity computer made today is to even last thirty years. Even enterprise systems aren't made with the kind of tolerances to last that long.

    The more dense fabrication technologies and faster clock speeds means that parts wear faster, and break earlier. It looks like Seagate's Barracuda ES.2 Near-Line Serial ATA drive is 80% likely to survive 30 years without a failure (http://knowledge.seagate.com/articles/en_US/FAQ/174791en?language=en_US), but a quick search didn't yield anything immediately useful for RAM or other components.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Lawrence D’Oliveiro, 18 Jun 2015 @ 1:09am

      Re: They don't make 'em like they used to

      If you’re referring to hard drives, then they never made them like that.

      I remember a saying from PC Magazine from around 1990, plus or minus a few years: “Hard drives used to be expensive and unreliable, but that’s changed: now they’re inexpensive and unreliable”.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Stephen, 18 Jun 2015 @ 1:46am

        Re: Re: They don't make 'em like they used to

        “Hard drives used to be expensive and unreliable, but that’s changed: now they’re inexpensive and unreliable”
        That depends on the kind of hard drive you're talking about. I used to work as an IT tech at an educational institution. Back in the mid-1990s when the Internet was first starting up the department I worked for bought a file server from Apple with a 1GB hard drive for email and the like. That drive ran 24/7 without any hardware problems for over a decade.

        In contrast, when the department had to buy a second drive for that server (a 4 GB one, IIRC) for that same server, rather than buying a server-rated hard drive (which would have been fairly expensive) they chose to save money and buy a non-server rated model instead.

        That drive failed within about twelve months, forcing the powers-that-be to go out and buy another. Again they chose to buy a non-server rated model.

        It too barely lasted twelve months before suffering a hardware failure. This time they learnt their lesson and bought a server-rated drive, one which lasted until they finally retired the machine harlf a decade or more later.

        Moral of the story: not all hard drives are equal. You get what you pay for.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Lawrence D’Oliveiro, 18 Jun 2015 @ 2:15am

          Re: Apple ... drive ran 24/7 without any hardware problems for over a decade.

          Apple never made hard drives.

          Hard drives have a failure rate of maybe 3-6% per year. So yes, there is a better-than-50-50 chance that a drive will last for 10 years.

          I had one of the first Mac II machines in 1987. That batch of drives had a known “stiction” tendency, which meant that, one day, you would turn the machine on, and the drive wouldn’t spin up. Mine failed with just a month to go on the warranty.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • icon
            DSchneider (profile), 18 Jun 2015 @ 8:42am

            Re: Re: Apple ... drive ran 24/7 without any hardware problems for over a decade.

            I don't thing he was trying to say it was an Apple hard drive, just a system from Apple with a hard drive. You could replace Apple with any other manufacturer (Dell, HP, Compaq) and the statement would still be correct.

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • icon
            Chronno S. Trigger (profile), 18 Jun 2015 @ 8:52am

            Re: Re: Apple ... drive ran 24/7 without any hardware problems for over a decade.

            "Apple never made hard drives."

            Yes they did, it was called a Widget. There's a reason why they don't make hard drives now. They also made their own floppy drives (called Twiggy), they didn't make those for long ether.

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • icon
            John Fenderson (profile), 18 Jun 2015 @ 8:57am

            Re: Re: Apple ... drive ran 24/7 without any hardware problems for over a decade.

            "Hard drives have a failure rate of maybe 3-6% per year."

            Also, if your hard drive is going to fail, it's overwhelmingly likely that it will happen in the first 6 to 12 months of use. If your hard drive survives that initial period, the odds are very good that it will live for decades (with the usual caveats: I'm assuming that you don't abuse it, how heavily the drive is used affects lifespan, and I'm talking about hard drives that don't have design problems).

            In my 30 years or so as a developer, I've only had a single hard drive failure. Every drive I've replaced, I've done so because I needed a bigger drive. I have two drives on a server right now that I bought 20 years ago, and they're still working flawlessly.

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            • identicon
              Lawrence D’Oliveiro, 18 Jun 2015 @ 3:33pm

              Re: Also, if your hard drive is going to fail, it's overwhelmingly likely that it will happen in the first 6 to 12 months of use

              Studies of hundreds of thousands of hard drive failures indicate that this effect is only minor.

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            • identicon
              Lawrence D’Oliveiro, 18 Jun 2015 @ 3:36pm

              Re: n my 30 years or so as a developer, I've only had a single hard drive failure

              In my 30-year career, I have seen lots of hard drive failures, both in my own gear and in my clients’. That’s why I think it’s a really good idea to run regular badblocks scans to try to pick up problems before actual data is affected.

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Stephen, 18 Jun 2015 @ 1:20pm

            Re: Re: Apple ... drive ran 24/7 without any hardware problems for over a decade.

            Apple never made hard drives.
            I never said they did. This was an Apple file SERVER I was talking about. It ran Apple A/UX (A/UX==Apple Unix. As distinct from the BSD Unix now running OS X.)

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Lawrence D’Oliveiro, 18 Jun 2015 @ 2:16am

          Re: non-server rated model instead.

          Studies of hundreds of thousands of hard drive failures show no significant difference in reliability between “enterprise” (which I presume is what you mean by “server-rated”) and “consumer” drives. Though there is definitely a wide gulf in price.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • icon
            Bamboo Harvester (profile), 18 Jun 2015 @ 3:59am

            Re: Re: non-server rated model instead.

            "Back in the day" :) we used to purchase "rated" (which eventually was renamed "server grade") Maxtor XT1140 drives at a tremendous premium. The only difference between them and the "consumer" model was that Maxtor guaranteed zero bad blocks (MFM drives, couldn't map bad blocks to the inner spindle unused space).

            They also added a zero to the MTBF on the drives. As another person pointed out, when one failed it was usually the drive electronics, not the platters or the motors.

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            • identicon
              Lawrence D’Oliveiro, 18 Jun 2015 @ 3:32pm

              Re: Maxtor guaranteed zero bad blocks

              I don’t think anybody does that now, for any kind of hard drive. The firmware is supposed to take care of bad-block remapping. Assuming it notices in time...

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Planned Obsolescence, 18 Jun 2015 @ 1:08am

    Planned Obsolescence

    Planned Obsolescence, period.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    spodula, 18 Jun 2015 @ 1:11am

    age

    Its not too surprising it survived.
    While disk drives and fans items wear out, Mostly i've found with pre-1990's machines that if they survive the first year, they will keep going indefinitely, caps allowing.

    Mainly because they tended to be vastly over-engineered and the components weren't under nearly as much thermal stress as modern computers.

    Electrolytic Caps drying out are an issue, but as long as you know about it, and change them after about 20 years or so, It will probably be giving someone joy in another 20 years.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    JamesF (profile), 18 Jun 2015 @ 3:09am

    While it’s an impressive statement on the build quality of the Amiga, it’s a damning statement on the schools administration.

    I wonder what the impact would have been if the machine failed? Say a pipe bursts and destroys the machine and everything on it? Whether you replaced with a new system, or found an old Amiga and had the programmer replicate the original system you are looking at weeks. From the context I suspect that this is a cooling rather than a heating issue, but what if it happened mid-winter? I don’t know what Michigan winter weather is like, but over here in the UK, that would see the school closed until it was sorted. It would end someones career.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 18 Jun 2015 @ 8:29am

      Re:

      There are quite a few administrators that do like to cut corners but that may not be the case all the time. School's don't have money just to drop 2 million in a new system without cutting something major, like busses, music, sports, etc. A lot of times, for those types of purchases, needs to be done by a bond. The town then needs to vote on it. What ends up happening is the town will vote against it since it increases taxes and you have to make do with what you have. Since it is expensive to run a bond, you wait two or three years. Do a study to see what people expect and then if it is positive run another bond.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 18 Jun 2015 @ 8:49am

        Re: Re:

        True about bonds. The major point there is that a school district (at least in my area) is only allowed one bond election every year. If it fails they have to wait another year. So if something were to happen that they needed to spend money today they would have to take that money from other things.

        Example: years ago during the winter break a high school in a neighboring city had the gas utility inspect all their gas powered equipment. The hot water boiler for the cafeteria got 'red tagged', which means they can't use it again; it has to be replaced. The district had to go through and postpone enough projects to free up the money to buy and have installed a new boiler. This was one thing they couldn't wait on: the health department would not allow cafeteria operation without hot water.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      nasch (profile), 18 Jun 2015 @ 2:21pm

      Re:

      I wonder what the impact would have been if the machine failed?

      Does this story give you some reason they should have expected it to fail?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Bamboo Harvester (profile), 18 Jun 2015 @ 3:56am

    Not all that surprising

    There's a LOT of equipment out there still running from the same period. You just don't usually hear about it.

    The airwing controls on the Space Shuttles are controlled by a Tandy Color Computer 3 motherboard, running OS-9. Yeah, the $400 CoCo3 game machine from 1986 or so is what brought those Shuttles in to land safely.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 18 Jun 2015 @ 5:35am

      Re: Not all that surprising

      Not all that surprised. On a high risk application like the space shuttle you want your electronics to be as 'dumb' as possible. Less of a chance of malfunction.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 18 Jun 2015 @ 5:22am

    virtulize it

    go do what the banks do for their account, start up a virtual amiga (amiga in a box) modernise the sensor links then move the hvac software onto virtual server.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Groaker (profile), 18 Jun 2015 @ 5:29am

    I wrote a system that was still running after three decades (ca 1980,) and for all I know may be celebrating its 35th bday. It did everything the enduser wanted, was flexible, and was built to feed SAS (Statistical Analysis System) as well as produce the reports and graphs needed. The last I heard the only difficult was in getting parts and 5 1/4" diskettes.

    There were mainframe systems built in the '60s 1999 whose only problem was that they had to undergo Y2K remediation.

    The cost of replacing the software just to keep up with the hardware would be incredible, would stall progress where needed, and would stultify programmer analysts. It is far more cost efficient to write emulators so the old software will run.

    This is true for a lot of fields as well as computing. My father told me that many locomotive lathes that had been built during the civil war were still running. These things were so big that a man could had to stand in the lathe pan to adjust the machine.

    Why replace something that is working well when that capital can be spent on something worth improving. And yes, there are Amiga OS emulators so that even if the hardware can't be directly replaced, an Amiga environment can be substituted to run the old software.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 18 Jun 2015 @ 5:36am

    Because, let's face it, a five year old computer is either functionally worthless or is probably hanging onto a single strand of twisted copper before crapping out entirely, amirite?
    That's what Linux is for!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      John Fenderson (profile), 18 Jun 2015 @ 6:25am

      Re:

      All but one of my personal servers are more than 10 years old and going strong. It's likely that I'll get at least another 10 years out of them.

      But yes, they all run Linux. Maybe that is the secret to immortality!

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Howard, 18 Jun 2015 @ 6:27am

    I propose that upon retirement, it be placed in a museum.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Andrew (profile), 18 Jun 2015 @ 6:27am

    My wife's using a 5yo laptop for work. No issues. Last week I got a new PC, it's my 3rd since Jan 2000 (and it's a refurb, just like the last one in Feb 2009). And I have an emergency win7 laptop, that was made in 2005 (dell e1705) that's mainly used as a media hub (it has firewire and a line-in, in a laptop)

    And in the mid-90s, I ran all the records of my fathers business on a dragon32 (what the TRS-80 coco was based on) which I used right up til i moved to the states in 03 - had a 7 year uptime at one point, and the warranty stickers are STILL on all the case screws.

    I think you're overestimating the fragility of older computers

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 18 Jun 2015 @ 7:29am

      Re:

      Actually, the TRS-80 CoCo was released 2 year prior to the Dragon. The Dragon design was based off a reference design that Motorola brought to Tandy as a starting point for the design of the CoCo 2. I will say, though, the Dragon was a nice machine. Kind of wish Tandy hadn't gone cheap on the CoCo 2 compared to it's British cousin.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 18 Jun 2015 @ 8:42am

      Re:

      I will disagree. All computers have a major failure point, it really only depends on when it will happen and did yours survive it.

      Apple eMacs popped capacitors.
      Old LCD iMacs would suffer display malfunctions.
      Optiplex 260-280 also had capacitor problems.
      Optiplex 620. Power supply failures.

      The one thing about all of these computers, is if it survived the about a year after peak failure, it probably wasn't going to fail.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      DSchneider (profile), 18 Jun 2015 @ 8:51am

      Re:

      Typically it's not the hardware that makes a system outdated, but the software. If you're running software from the era that the system was created in, it will run just as fast as it did back then. It's only when you try to install new software on an old system that things slow to a crawl as the new software is expecting allot more resources than the system can give.

      10 year old software on a 10 year old system, no problem. 1 year old software on a 10 year old system, problem.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        John Fenderson (profile), 18 Jun 2015 @ 9:12am

        Re: Re:

        Yes, true. This also depends on the OS. If you're running Linux (for example -- I'm trying make a fanboy "Linux Rulez" comment), running modern software on ten year old systems is not generally a problem. There are a few exceptions (that can be worked around), but this is true as a general rule.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      nasch (profile), 18 Jun 2015 @ 2:26pm

      Re:


      I think you're overestimating the fragility of older computers


      I think you're overestimating the importance of anecdotal evidence.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Ntlgnce, 18 Jun 2015 @ 7:54am

    Really?

    Ever heard the phrase, " if it aint broke don't fix it"?. It aint broke. Who uses walkie talkies anymore? Heck kids don't even play with them anymore!! Do they even make them anymore?..
    2million to replace something that is not broken is a lot of money. 2 million on a heating and cooling system, That's worse then the email scams that are out there, ( 1 million on parts and 1 million on labor.). 2 million should build a new school. Anywho,,,,
    Mark my words. within the first year of the new "high tech" system, it will have failed 12 times, and had to be upgraded 52 times. I will say "I told you so" now, as when this actually happens, the story will be buried so far into the internet, I probably wont see it.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      John Fenderson (profile), 18 Jun 2015 @ 8:26am

      Re: Really?

      "Heck kids don't even play with them anymore!! Do they even make them anymore?.."

      They do indeed make them, and they remain a common and popular toy with kids. At with least the kids that I know.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 18 Jun 2015 @ 8:58am

      Re: Really?

      Schools don't work like that. They can't get money to replace a system when it fails. If they passed a bond to upgrade the building then that is the best time to replace on old hvac system. Labor is usually about 15-25% of the cost, not 50%. It also won't matter if it fails multiple time since part of that 2 million will be part of a multiyear contract with whoever installed the system. If they designed such a poor system, they will have to spend a lot of time repairing it and that would only cause the company to lose profit. After about 5 years, you don't renew the contract and have the staff managing it after that. Most of the bugs will be worked out and only needs to be maintained. To build a new school it is more like 20-30 million if you want to have around 20-30 classrooms with full facilities and meet standards. Land just to fit and support a school will cost about 2-3 million.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Chronno S. Trigger (profile), 18 Jun 2015 @ 9:06am

      Re: Really?

      2 million to replace 19 buildings worth of equipment and a system to communicate and run them? Sounds about right to me. And you would have to add another digit to your estimate to build a new school.

      I agree with you on the failure thing though. Any new system has it's problems that need to be ironed out. I'd bet the Amiga system had it's problems too until they all got fixed.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    AnonyBabs, 18 Jun 2015 @ 9:44am

    That Amiga is three times a lady!

    Srsly, my 9yo lappy is still going strong. It's not my primary anymore because MS Xp, but I keep some old programs on it and it's still a champ.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Dismembered3po (profile), 18 Jun 2015 @ 10:21am

    Think about this...

    So...what they're saying here is that IT security at the public school system is already better than Target's?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    REM(RND) (profile), 18 Jun 2015 @ 11:22am

    That's a WOPR of a system. Runs HVAC, plays a good game of chess, and has data rates (even with the 1200 baud modem) that would make any Comcast customer jealous. Please say it can decrypt nuclear launch codes, too!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    That One Other Not So Random Guy, 18 Jun 2015 @ 3:11pm

    a five year old computer is either functionally worthless or is probably hanging onto a single strand of twisted copper before crapping out entirely, amirite?

    Um... No. ExxonMobile still has NT machines in the testing labs because the cost to replace the software is astronomical and they still perform their intended function just fine.

    There are plenty of legacy systems running out there doing just fine. And so what if you have to buy an i486DX2 or two off of ebay to keep your client from having to spend thousands.

    I have seen POS systems with win 95 in smaller businesses with no plans of upgrading. One client was still running DOS 6.22. but it served his needs.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    John, 24 Oct 2016 @ 3:59pm

    Super

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Copying Is Not Theft
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.