Twitter Just Cut Off Politwoops In Another Effort To Keep The Platform Closed

from the twits dept

Mike recently made the case that in the information age, platforms would do better to be open rather than closed. Being open means allowing that thing you started to branch off in many directions making you more useful to more people. Being closed means you get control. Yay. One of the examples of a platform that had initially been open and has since been becoming more closed is Twitter. What once began as a platform that was built up by users and outside groups all making even better use of Twitter than Twitter had managed for itself, has since devolved into stories of staunch refusal to allow the evolution to continue.

The most recent example of this is, sadly, that Twitter appears to have eighty-sixed Politwoops, the wonderful project for preserving the tweets deleted by government officials and public officials.

Twitter’s decision to pull the plug on Politwoops is a reminder of how the Internet isn’t truly a public square. Our shared conversations are increasingly taking place in privately owned and managed walled gardens, which means that the politics that occur in such conversations are subject to private rules. (In this case, Twitter’s terms of service for usage of its API.) Days after Politwoops launched in 2012, Twitter contacted the Sunlight Foundation and told us, "Your service violates our API Terms of Service on a fundamental level." We explained the goals of the project and agreed to create a human curation workflow to ensure that the site screened out corrected low-value tweets like typos, links and Twitter handles. We implemented this layer of journalistic judgment with blessings from Twitter and the site continued.

We are truly mystified as to what prompted the change of heart, and it's deeply disappointing to see Twitter kill a project they had supported since 2012. It is also disturbing to us that our feed was cut almost three weeks ago and our only direct communication came from Twitter last night, when we were told that their decision was not something that we could appeal, and, most surprisingly, they were not interested in reviewing any of the email conversation from 2012. Clearly, something changed — and we’re not likely to ever know what it was.
You can sense the boiling anger and pure confusion beneath the surface of the text. Twitter, which had been fully aware of what Politwoops was, did, and why, had allowed the service to operate for years and then suddenly pulled the plug for the same reason it gave initially before dismissing that reason. This would be enough to infuriate any developer, nevermind one focused solely on creating more openness and accountability. It must feel like a slap in the face to the Sunlight Foundation to have the opposite of their aims be utilized in the shuttering of their service.

That said, why did Twitter do this? Well, in a statement to Gawker, who had reported on the topic, Twitter indicated this was all about user privacy.
Earlier today we spoke to the Sunlight Foundation, to tell them we will not restore Twitter API access for their Politwoops site. We strongly support Sunlight’s mission of increasing transparency in politics and using civic tech and open data to hold government accountable to constituents, but preserving deleted Tweets violates our developer agreement. Honoring the expectation of user privacy for all accounts is a priority for us, whether the user is anonymous or a member of Congress.
Which tells us nothing, exactly as I'm sure Twitter intended. This is simply a recitation of the excuse, not the reason why the decision made in 2012 suddenly got reversed with very little communication to the Sunlight Foundation. So what's the answer?

Control, of course. The doors that close on once-open platforms operate on greased hinges, it seems, where the smallest thrust on those doors causes them to slam shut. Twitter is allowed to do this, of course, but closing the platform that still uses the "@" symbol and retweets, both conceived of by people outside of Twitter, isn't a recipe for continued relevance.


Reader Comments

The First Word

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    farooge (profile), 4 Jun 2015 @ 2:17pm

    Am I really missing anything by never, ever, using my Twitter account? If it's important Buzzfeed will have clickbait up within minutes ... and I'm not saying that's bad. They 'bait' me because they follow up a lot of 'real' stories with real reporting.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Jessie (profile), 4 Jun 2015 @ 2:22pm

    My guess: Trying not to piss off the candidates for 2016. Stay on their good side so they can minimize the contributions they need to make to get what they want.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    That One Other Not So Random Guy, 4 Jun 2015 @ 2:29pm

    Whats Twitter?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    ChurchHatesTucker (profile), 4 Jun 2015 @ 2:37pm

    Question

    Do you really need an API to do this?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    That One Guy (profile), 4 Jun 2015 @ 2:39pm

    Tinfoil hat time?

    So am I the only one who's first thought as to the probable reason for suddenly pulling the plug like this was that it was thanks to a threat by some public figure who discovered that it's hard to re-write history when people can point to what was actually said, versus what they were claiming was said?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      That One Other Not So Random Guy, 4 Jun 2015 @ 2:50pm

      Re: Tinfoil hat time?

      No. :)

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 4 Jun 2015 @ 2:51pm

      Re: Tinfoil hat time?

      I don't think so. I don't think an actual complaint from a public figure is necessary.

      A public figure would just stop using Twitter. I think Twitter knows this and just preemptively killed the project to make sure that 2016 candidates would want to use Twitter.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 5 Jun 2015 @ 11:22am

        Re: Re: Tinfoil hat time?

        Any public figure not using twitter would stand out as a bit of a luddite. That might be a great test for tech awareness.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    charliebrown (profile), 4 Jun 2015 @ 2:44pm

    It does Tell Us Something

    We strongly support Sunlight’s mission...
    Which tells us nothing...

    No, it tells us that Twitter is full of shit!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 4 Jun 2015 @ 2:57pm

    We need open source

    It's a shame to see this behavior, along with an app which is effectively malware, and practices of selling user data and invasive advertising but it's par for the course when it comes to proprietary software.

    Communications platforms like Twitter are too important to have their content controlled by a single actor. Distributed, open source software is what made the Internet the free and open platform it is today. It's also necessary for its long term health, and although the alternatives to Twitter like Pump.io leave a lot to be desired, they're worth supporting.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 4 Jun 2015 @ 3:02pm

      Re: We need open source

      We've HAD open source for 36 years, since Usenet was founded. Learn it. Use it. No, it's not full of pretty icons, and yes, you might actually have to learn something, but it was and still is so vastly superior to transient operations like Twitter that it's not even worth discussing the point.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 4 Jun 2015 @ 4:48pm

      Re: We need open source

      "Communications platforms like Twitter are too important to have their content controlled by a single actor. "

      It's Twitter's product. Who do YOU suggest should control it, and why? They chose to float it and people are free to choose whether to become shareholders. If you don't like what they do then you have choices:

      1/ Get elected to the board. Or become an interested investor and attempt to influence other investors to see your point of view.

      2/ Use another product.

      3/ Write your own. If it's good enough people will use it. Then you too can be rich and as obnoxious as you like about what you do with YOUR product.

      Last time I checked using Twitter wasn't compulsory. Same for Facebook, Google, and others. Make a better mousetrap and soon people will be saying the same thing about yours (would you be happy that control of your product was removed from you because the anonymous internet voted it so?)

      "what made the Internet the free and open platform it is today"

      So free you and anyone else can set up new offerings. Go ahead. Why wait for someone else?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 4 Jun 2015 @ 5:18pm

        Re: Re: We need open source

        I'm talking about communications infrastructure in the abstract, not calling for some takeover or regulation of Twitter.

        >Who do YOU suggest should control it

        No one, communications technology should use open standards like email, HTTP, and SIP (VoIP) which allow anyone to set up their own system that is compatible with the wider network and by their nature check the power of gatekeeper service providers like Twitter.

        The problem is that Twitter was never as open as some people like to think.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Anonymous Coward, 4 Jun 2015 @ 9:19pm

          Re: Re: Re: We need open source

          Once again: what you're asking for already exists and is stable, global, and nearly uncensorable. Why aren't you using it?

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    wizbang_fl, 4 Jun 2015 @ 3:03pm

    Wasn't that a duplicate of what already exists?

    For some reason I thought any political tweets were being captured by the national archive or archive.org

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 4 Jun 2015 @ 3:08pm

    It's not (only) about control, it's about creating an additional revenue stream

    I'll give credit to the PR person who came up with the timely "privacy" angle though, that's pretty clever.

    They still allow access to their "firehose" (all tweets), but now you'll have to pay a premium for it.

    http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/04/11/twitters-evolving-plans-to-make-money-from-its-data-stre am/?_r=1

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Stephen, 4 Jun 2015 @ 5:13pm

    Just Wondering

    I wonder which politician leaned on Twitter to close off their walled garden to Politwoops?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 4 Jun 2015 @ 6:37pm

    I don't get how this has anything to do with "privacy". A politician using his known account to publicly tweet has about the lowest expectation of privacy you can imagine. Deleting a tweet doesn't mean it never happened.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 5 Jun 2015 @ 12:52am

    "Communications platforms like Twitter are too important to have their content controlled by a single actor. "

    Well who are the ones who let Twitter become such an "important communications platform" in the first place?
    We the (dumb) people are those who put power in the hands of these media platform companies in the first place.
    Given humanity's history we should know better than to trust media channels with not selling out to big players. After all "fool's gotta eat"...

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: I Invented Email
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.