The Price Of Ignoring Free Internet Security Advice: Billboards Of Goatse

from the gaping-security-holes dept

Normally, when we talk about companies and institutions looking to silence security researchers and their ilk who have tried to expose potential threats, the story ends without tragedy. United Airlines, for instance, went on the attack on Chris Roberts, who may well be an idiot, for exposing in-flight WiFi security concerns. CyberLock decides to go legal on a researcher who had been trying desperately to contact them about a security flaw in a number of its electronic locks. Johns Hopkins, meanwhile, ordered the disappearing of a blog post detailing how its own servers might be compromised by the NSA (or used with permission) to defeat encryption schemes.

But in all of those cases, even if some shenanigans were had, there was no real damage done as a result of ignoring the security advice that those organizations subsequently attempted to silence. So, what is the consequence of ignoring that device? Well, as it turns out, the consequence is anus. Very, very, tragically, unfortunately infamous anus.

The affluent denizens of Atlanta’s Buckhead neighborhood received a fun treat this week when they looked up at the corner of Peachtree and East Paces Ferry: a famous internet man’s giant, ruddy, gaping spread asshole, displayed on an enormous digital billboard.

The billboard above [Techdirt editor: which I’m not posting, because obviously I’m not] is one of the thousands of YESCO digital billboards installed across the country. Naturally, it comes with an internet connection. The setup is exactly as insecure as you’d imagine: many of these electronic billboards are completely unprotected, dangling on the public internet without a password or any kind of firewall. This means it’s pretty simple to change the image displayed from a new AT&T offer to, say, Goatse.

Great, so because whoever is in charge of managing that electronic billboard couldn’t be bothered to take the advice any competent technology person who came across the setup, of which there must have been at least one, the great people of Atlanta were treated to one of the most disgusting images in human existence. I’m generally loathe to blame the victim, but the owner of a public-facing billboard must have some culpability when it comes to securing their display. And I say that there was at least one person who warned them about this, because at least one has come forward publicly.

Not only was this a case of incompetence, but gross negligence: security researcher Dan Tentler tweeted yesterday that he’d tried to warn this very same sign company that their software is easily penetrable by anyone with a computer and net connection and was told they were “not interested.” Even after the billboard was defaced, Tentler said the company still hadn’t secured its software.

Probably best to just sick the lawyers on Dan. After all, this all must be his fault, somehow.

Filed Under: , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “The Price Of Ignoring Free Internet Security Advice: Billboards Of Goatse”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
37 Comments
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

If you want it, here it is WARNING, GRAPHIC IMAGE LINK AHEAD http://imgur.com/5dWOEfv

I picked up the link from the Gawker article linked above and the link matches the one in the Reddit thread that the Gawker article referenced (the same link was also posted in the Gawker comments by the author of the article to avoid putting an uncensored asshole in the article itself). I say all of that to point out that, while I haven’t actually followed the link myself and don’t plan on doing so, I’m reasonably certain that it links to a picture of the billboard in question. You’re welcome.

ltlw0lf (profile) says:

Re: Re:

He obviously should have hacked them and updated their security settings. Being a concerned bystander is no defense

That has been tried in the past. Didn’t work so well.

The biggest problem is that even if you manage to hack the system and set the security settings, the FBI shows up at your door for hacking the system and the company presses charges because they can no longer get into their system because you updated their security settings. Nobody has GPG set up on their email browser, so they can’t decrypt the email you sent them with their updated passwords and instructions on how to log in and change the passwords.

Hopefully they’ll take the high road and fix their stuff without involving poor Ms. Streisand in the mix.

John Fenderson (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

“Hopefully they’ll take the high road and fix their stuff without involving poor Ms. Streisand in the mix.”

Not going to happen. There’s no money in taking the high road, and that’s the only thing that matters to companies. The Streisand Effect can change that economic computation by steering potential customers away.

Uriel-238 (profile) says:

Better digital vandalism than digital sabotage.

Stuxnet provided us a demonstration of the potential damage to which insecure net assets can lead. I’m glad that our first newsworthy attacks against critical internet security vulnerabilities resulted in public disgust rather than public casualties.

Still, I expect this is just the first of many shots. This one was across the bow.

John Fenderson (profile) says:

Re: Better digital vandalism than digital sabotage.

This isn’t even remotely the first of this type. This sort of thing has been going on for as long as digital billboards have existed. And before that, it was (and still is) quite common with electronic reader boards — even before the internet was used for them. In the pre-internet days, many such signs could be called up and programmed using a modem.

The only reason this is getting widespread mainstream news attention is because it involved goatse.

Uriel-238 (profile) says:

Re: Re: Better digital vandalism than digital sabotage.

Well, Goatse is about as close as one can get to Langford’s BLIT, a universal visual brown note. Fortunately, we haven’t discovered any killer pokes on the human being that can be delivered by image or audio file.

My experience with hackers (which goes back into the 80s) is more that they’re curious or mischievous than malicious, but some are. And the Stuxnet incident demonstrates that nations and ideological organizations will exploit such vulnerabilities to do damage if it is feasible to do so.

Just Another Anonymous Troll says:

Re:

When you want to humiliate someone with poor security, you don’t go subtle. Would it have gotten on Techdirt with “The Price Of Ignoring Free Internet Security Advice: Some Guy Makes A Minor Alteration To Your Billboard”? Besides, it’s probably a CFAA violation either way, might as well be hung for a sheep as a lamb.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...