FBI Spent Years 'Researching' The Lyrics To 'Louie, Louie' Before Realizing The Copyright Office Must Have Them

from the really,-now? dept

Last week, as you may or may not have heard, a guy named Jack Ely passed away at the age of 71. The name may not be that familiar, but the voice almost certainly is. Jack Ely was -- fairly briefly -- the lead singer of the Kingsmen, and happened to do a cover song in a single take under poor conditions, that created one of the most memorable songs in rock and roll history, also known as Louie Louie:
You know the song. You also know the lyrics are completely indecipherable. However, with Ely's death, there's been renewed attention to the fact that the FBI spent nearly two years investigating the damn song. It is just as ridiculous as it sounds, but the FBI has released the file on its investigation and it's a rather hilarious read. It turns out it wasn't just the FBI, but involved the FCC and the Post Office:
Apparently, the government was being inundated with claims from people (some of which you can see in the file) insisting that they had heard the indecipherable lyrics were actually "obscene." If you want to see the supposedly "obscene" interpretation of the lyrics, there's one set on page 14 [pdf] of the document, though I warn you, even the falsely heard "obscene" lyrics are not particularly obscene by today's standards (and I'm at a loss as to how they're that obscene by the standards of 1963, frankly). On page 22, there's another, mostly different set of falsely heard "obscene" lyrics that at least includes the word "fuck." On page 35, yet another version with both "fuck" and "bitch."

There are lots of documents about the FBI playing the record, repeatedly, at different speeds, and all coming to the conclusion that you and I and everyone else already knows: the lyrics are basically indecipherable.
And again:
There are a few more times this determination was made, in part because after the FBI had already gone through the whole investigation, J. Edgar Hoover reopened it after a concerned parent wrote him a letter -- complaining that whether or not the real lyrics are obscene, it doesn't matter because teens can hear the obscene lyrics and "every teenager in the country 'heard' the obscene not the copywritten lyric." There are also letters to Attorney General Robert Kennedy that include lines like "these morons have gone too far," and "This land of ours is headed for an extreme state of moral degradation what with this record, the biggest hit movies and the sex and violence exploited on T.V. How can we stamp out this menace? ? ? ?" Really.
But, in the end, as everyone knows, the song is simply indecipherable, rather than obscene.

And that's because the band was in a tiny studio with just three mics, played a single take of the song and Ely had to scream at a microphone on the ceiling trying to have his voice heard above the instruments (a task he basically failed at doing). But, the idea that there was a mystery to the lyrics is kind of ridiculous for a few reasons, the first one being that the song is a cover song, and the FBI could have easily listened to a few of the earlier versions of the song, such as the original by Richard Berry, or another popular one by Rockin Robin Roberts and The Fabulous Wailers (the one that inspired the Kingsmen to do the cover). You can hear both those and another one right here. Their lyrics are a lot more intelligible in all of those versions, and you can pretty quickly tell that the lyrics to the Kingsmen version is supposed to be the Rockin Robin Roberts version.

Also, as Marc Randazza notes, it took nearly two years for someone in the FBI to think, hey, isn't the song registered at the Copyright Office down the street? Maybe we should send someone over there to find out what it says? This was after the FBI had reached out to the record label (who gave them the accurate lyrics) along with the original author of the song, Richard Berry, who told them the lyrics. Oddly, apparently, the FBI never bothered to ask Ely himself what he sang, though I'm sure he would have said the same damn lyrics, which are below:

Still, what a bizarre story of moral panics, FBI and governmental overreach, the First Amendment... and a bit of copyright thrown in just for fun.

Oh, and as a general postscript, for all the hand wringing about possible obscenities in the song... there actually is one. Just not in the lyrics. At 54 seconds into the song, the drummer Lynn Easton actually fumbled his drumsticks banging them together and yells out "fuck." The FBI never caught on to that, but you can actually hear it if you listen...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  1. identicon
    Shane, 9 May 2015 @ 11:13am

    Re: Re:

    Mike A said

    "Good. Now square up the inane intrusiveness, banal malevolence and regulatory capture omnipresent in our beloved federal government with your support for the governments jurisdiction over stronger net neutrality rules.
    then Mike Masnick said:

    "Do you support the First Amendment, or do you see that as "intrusive government interference"?"

    I suspect you didn't get the point. He is talking about the politicians actions, you are talking about the rhetoric the politicians use to sell their actions to the public.
    Freedom of speech is very important. I suspect that Mike A, you and I all agree on this. The question that Mike A. seems to be asking is this: Can we trust the same govt that has been colluding with big business against the community at large to, at the same time, keep big business from suppressing free speech? Is that not what many grass root supporters of Net Neutrality are concerned about?
    But the way Net Neutrality will be written and enforced will be by the govt and their big business partners (not you or I). If Net Neutrality (as enforced by govt/big business - not you or I) is so dangerous to big business, then why are so many corporations backing it?
    Corporate lobbyists (not you or I) will be writing the legislation and influencing how it is enforced to protect their interests. Big businesses hire lobbyists at top dollar because they understand how the system works and know the new laws can be used against them so they are getting heavily involved in "supporting it" in order to subvert it toward their own benefit. This is Realpolitik. A hundred or so years ago we called this phenomena Mercantilism. But now that term is no longer used. In fact the red squiggles show up as if it is an invented term. As a result Mercantilism is lumped in under the free market label, causing a lot of wasted conflict by people who are actually opposed to the same thing but call it different names.
    Here are some examples of Mercantilism in modern times. Tax laws are routinely written for billionaires by billionaires. Established businesses like Monsanto have their "former" employees and major stockholders sitting in high level positions in the FDA (which is supposed to regulate businesses like Monsanto). NAFTA was written by large international businesses and excluded the interest of small businesses. Uncounted amounts of money has been spent (and has continued to be spent to bail out the banks while lower class people (who the govt pays lip service to protecting) get kicked out of their homes.
    Concerns over any group, corporate or government, interfering with people's free speech is a valid concern. But there are those who do not see Net Neutrality (as implemented with today's form of government) as being trusted with that role of preventing it.

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: I Invented Email
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads


Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.