Dutch Court Sets Aside National Data Retention Law
from the provisionally-enforceable dept
Back in January, we wrote about a legal challenge to the Netherlands’ data retention law by a group of civil rights organizations. This was because the Dutch government had decided to ignore the important ruling by Europe’s highest court, the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU), that blanket data retention was “invalid.” Now, a court in The Hague has ruled the government was wrong to do so:
Dutch providers are no longer required to retain internet and phone traffic data. The telecommunications data retention law, that was fought in court by various privacy groups and small ISPs, is invalid.
That was ruled (.pdf, in Dutch) by the court of The Hague on Wednesday. The data retention law violated the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, specifically regarding the right to protection of private life and protection of personal data.
As that report from Nu.nl, translated by Matthijs R. Koot on his blog, makes clear, the court’s judgment affects all kinds of telecoms — both Internet and phone traffic data — and all communication providers. This is the judge’s reasoning:
The judge finds that the collected data are too easily accessible for crimes that are not serious. The plaintiffs stated that, technically, theft of a bicycle could lead to access to data, although the government stated this does not happen.
“Fact of the matter is that the possibility exists and that no safeguards exist to limit access to the data to what is strictly necessary to fight (only) serious crime”, according to the judge.
The court also finds it to be incorrect that no prior court approval is needed to access the data.
The judge’s ruling is only “provisonally enforeable”, and the Dutch government may appeal against it. But even if it does, it has a larger problem with its policy in this area. Although it claims a new data retention bill will be compatible with the CJEU ruling, the Netherlands’ Data Protection Authority has already said that it is still too intrusive for a number of reasons. Clearly, the European debate over what is a reasonable and proportionate level of data retention — if any — has a long way to go yet, both in the Netherlands and elsewhere.
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and +glynmoody on Google+
Filed Under: data retention, eu, netherlands
Comments on “Dutch Court Sets Aside National Data Retention Law”
The dutch gov is considering that right now (dutch):
https://www.security.nl/posting/421576/Justitie+overweegt+hoger+beroep+tegen+uitspraak+bewaarplicht
i’ll bet you that the UK government just carries on using it, because it ignored the EU ruling, just like the Netherlands did. on top of that, all that any government/national spy agency needs to do is SAY it is complying, while carrying on doing as it wants. it can do that until there is a serious check made and then figure out what to do! the downside i suppose is when it comes to trying to prosecute someone/something and it has to hand over where and how it got the evidence being used
This shit law was brought on us by the UK. I am still waiting for them to leave the EU so others would stop associating that opressive police state with Europe.
I can see why saving the data for a determined interval would be useful for law enforcement and maybe there could be some mechanism to implement such retention. However there are plenty of issues with such thing: Govt abuse (we know any Government WILL abuse anything if there’s an opening), data leak (via hacking such as what happened in Australia), profiling etc. Better go without.
Goodluck to the dutch
If all data would be stored it would just be a matter of time before it was hacked or used from the wrong purposes i think.