Separate And Unequal: Gen. Petraeus Facing Mild Wrist Slap For Leaking Eight Books Full Of Classified Info To His Mistress

from the granted-Most-Favored-Leaker-status dept

The administration still wants to punish whistleblowers and leakers, but only if it can do it with logic borrowed from Animal Farm. When it comes to prosecution, some leakers are more equal than others.

John Kiriakou -- who exposed a single CIA operative's name while exposing its waterboarding tactics -- spent more time in jail than former CIA director Leon Panetta, who has spent (at last count) a grand total of 0 days locked up for leaking tons of classified info to Zero Dark Thirty's screenwriter, Mark Boal.

Of course, some leaks just aren't leaks, at least not according to the government. Kiriakou's were wrong. Panetta's were right. And Kiriakou spent three years in prison for a lesser "crime."

Thomas Drake faced a potential 35-year sentence for his exposure of wasteful NSA spending. The government's case against him self-imploded, however, resulting in a guilty plea to a misdemeanor and no jail time.

General Petraeus, who leaked classified information to his mistress, is in line to receive the lightest of wrist slaps for his indiscretion: two years probation and a $40,000 fine. The lightness of the sentence suggested by government prosecutors belies the extent of Petraeus' wrongdoing.

What he handed over to his mistress far surpasses anything the above whistleblowers "leaked."

While he was commander of coalition forces in Afghanistan, Petraeus “maintained bound, five-by-eight inch notebooks that contained his daily schedule and classified and unclassified notes he took during official meetings, conferences and briefings,” the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Western District of North Carolina writes in a statement of fact regarding the case...

All eight books “collectively contained classified information regarding the identifies of covert officers, war strategy, intelligence capabilities and mechanisms, diplomatic discussions, quotes and deliberative discussions from high-level National Security Council meetings… and discussions with the president of the United States.”

The books also contained “national defense information, including top secret/SCI and code word information,” according to the court papers. In other words: These weren’t just ordinary secrets. This was highly, highly classified material.
On top of that, he lied to the government about these books, first in the form of a sworn statement...
Petreaus retained those Black Books after he signed his debriefing agreement upon leaving DOD, in which he attested “I give my assurance that there is no classified material in my possession, custody, or control at this time.” He kept those Black Books in an unlocked desk drawer.
And again to investigating FBI agents.
In an interview on October 26, 2012, he told the FBI:

(a) he had never provided any classified information to his biographer, and (b) he had never facilitated the provision of classified information to his biographer.
Simply lying to the FBI has consequences far greater than those Petraeus will face. But that's because he's General Petraeus and you're not -- as 22-year-old Kirstie Barratt recently discovered.
United States Attorney Bill Nettles stated today that Kirstie Elaine Philome Barratt, age 22, of Fort Mill, South Carolina was sentenced to 24 months’ imprisonment today after earlier pleading guilty to making a false statement to a federal agent, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1001. United States District Judge Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. imposed the term of imprisonment, which will be followed by a 3 year term of supervised release. In October, Barratt plead straight up to the charge without a plea agreement. Barratt also may face deportation as a result of her guilty plea. During the sentencing hearing, Judge Anderson granted the government’s motion for an upward departure from the federal guidelines sentencing range of 0 to 6 months, noting that this was a “rare” case and that Barratt “knowingly placed a law enforcement officer’s life in jeopardy” by her false statement.
Petraeus was a trusted member of the military and the CIA. And he turned over eight books worth of classified info to his biographer/mistress just because she asked. But because he's part of the administration's arbitrarily-selected "in crowd," and because he didn't embarrass the government as much as he embarrassed himself, he's facing a sentence of nearly nothing. His suggested punishment will have zero effect on his current position at a top equity firm and his life will suffer none of the disruptions Kiriakou and Drake experienced. He'll be $40,000 poorer -- and with "deterrents" like these being deployed -- none the wiser.

What's most disgusting about Petraeus' cakewalk of a proposed sentence is that he himself took a hypocritical hardline stance on leaking after Kiriakou's sentencing.
When John Kiriakou pled guilty on October 23, 2012 to crimes having to do with sharing a single covert officer’s identity just days before Petraeus would lie to the FBI about sharing, among other things, numerous covert officers’ identities with his mistress, Petraeus sent out a memo to the CIA stating,

"Oaths do matter, and there are indeed consequences for those who believe they are above the laws that protect our fellow officers and enable American intelligence agencies to operate with the requisite degree of secrecy."
Yeah. "Oaths matter." Except when you're the one uttering them, right? Apparently, a "requisite degree of secrecy" means stashing eight books full of classified info in an unlocked desk drawer and handing them out to your clandestine SO in hopes of keeping your knob biography as polished as possible.

This administration is severely hypocritical, but seemingly no more so than in its treatment of whistleblowers. There are those who will be persecuted and punished and those whose similar indiscretions will be waved away by government prosecutors. The problem is: you may not know which of these faces of the administration you'll be facing when you decide to start blowing the whistle. Chances are -- given this administration's track record -- it will be the vindictive, angry administration that continually hopes to "send a message" with each new whistleblower/leaker prosecuted.

Those on the inside of the military/industrial/surveillance supercomplex -- who leak under the name of "anonymous official" to aid filmmakers, deploy talking points or steer narratives -- will never see this side of the two-faced administration. Their leaks are more equal than others.


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    Ninja (profile), 4 Mar 2015 @ 2:50am

    High court, Low court. To the peasants the full weight of the law, to the colleagues a wrist slap and some giggles.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      art guerrilla (profile), 4 Mar 2015 @ 7:25am

      Re:

      gee, you don't think he has knowledge/evidence of other USG skullduggery, skeletons in closets, and where the bodies are buried that he used to extort favorable terms ? ? ?

      goshies, i'm certain *that* can't be the case...

      (when you are being threatened by goons of the state, it helps if you can (credibly) threaten back; otherwise you are going to be steamrolled flatter than a fritter...)

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 4 Mar 2015 @ 10:50am

        Re: Re:

        The classified information in Petraeus's 5X8s might have actually angered some very powerful government people. However, the unclassified information almost certainly terrified them.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 4 Mar 2015 @ 4:59am

    I dont understand what you are upset about. It has always been this way, everywhere. Just because one country built a succesful propaganda machine and convinced its entire population that they are all equal and live in a free democracy.
    Only a blind idiot would believe this even after seeing countless examples of it being bullshit.
    But dont worry, history repeats itself and they are really pushing for it these days...

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    David, 4 Mar 2015 @ 5:19am

    Well, she was his mistress

    Nudge nudge wink wink say no more. Human weakness. Nudge nudge wink wink say no more.

    That's something one can sympathize with and forgive.

    In contrast, Snowden, Kiriakou et al committed their crimes because of possessing strong morals and character, and love of and belief in their country.

    That's unforgivable and has no place in the U.S. government. They must be rooted out and made an example of. It took the government literally centuries to stamp out the treacherous teachings of Washington, Jefferson, Madison and their revolutionary ilk.

    This poison needs to be eradicated before it spreads again. Fortunately, it's well under control.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Oblate (profile), 4 Mar 2015 @ 6:11am

    Difference between what you believe and what you know...

    "... there are indeed consequences for those who believe they are above the laws..."


    This highlights the difference between those who believe they are above the law, and those who know they are.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 4 Mar 2015 @ 10:13am

      Re: Difference between what you believe and what you know...

      Actually, Kirakou and Snowden didn't believe they were above the law though. They believed they were within the law due to the circumstances under which they were "breaking" it. Exposing criminal behavior committed by the government is not supposed to be a violation of the law.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 4 Mar 2015 @ 2:21pm

      Re: Difference between what you believe and what you know...

      There's no such thing as right and wrong. There's only what you can get away with and what you can't.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    jim, 4 Mar 2015 @ 6:40am

    must

    Be worse then I thought, he gave in, plead guilty. To avoid the tribunal of friends? Must have been direct treason, and betrayal, you know, the firing squad type, if it was anything. He's gotten what I suspect or hope snowden/manning should have gotten. Their level there are few if any secrets, bosses level, firing squad secrets. But then he's repented and said worse things about the clintons...and got away with it then, special? No, protected class ass yes.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 4 Mar 2015 @ 6:40am

    Until there is real punishment being handed down, real consequences to their actions, there can never be peaceful change.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 4 Mar 2015 @ 6:55am

      Re:

      Exactly. We know there isn't, but if there was any sense of consistency from the government, Petraeus would be in a cell.

      This article is the best example about what hacks me off about my government today. The gov't is so much about their secrets. They have managed to create a world about themselves where they can make everything a secret, and claim the release of even the smallest "secret" the gravest of crimes.

      Then this joker comes around and spills a bunch of them. If the secrets are really so damn important that legal FOIA requests for them drown in redactor's ink, then why does a release of this scope merit so little punishment? They should really drop the facade and admit that the secrets have nothing to do with the information, and everthing to do with the power it lets them have over others, including the citizens and Constitution they swear to protect.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        nasch (profile), 4 Mar 2015 @ 7:43pm

        Re: Re:

        They should really drop the facade and admit that the secrets have nothing to do with the information, and everthing to do with the power it lets them have over others, including the citizens and Constitution they swear to protect.

        But admitting that would undermine that power.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 4 Mar 2015 @ 6:51am

    and Snowden is a traitor deserving of the death penalty! what a difference a name makes!!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      David, 4 Mar 2015 @ 8:05am

      Re:

      Petraeus only impressed his mistress. Snowden the whole world. Petraeus embarrassed himself. Snowden embarrassed the U.S. government. Petraeus betrayed his country for selfish reasons. Snowden exposed the betrayers of his country for patriotic reasons.

      Really, totally different scale here. Cleaning up after Petraeus is going to be a lot easier than cleaning up after Snowden.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 4 Mar 2015 @ 6:57am

    So one rule for him whilst others get charged with espionage and tortured pre trial.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 4 Mar 2015 @ 7:04am

    Embarrassment of the Ruling Power in the First Degree.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Ambrellite, 4 Mar 2015 @ 8:59am

    Widespread abuses, no answers

    It's the role of judges to prevent these kinds of hypocrisy from becoming endemic. Unfortunately, abuses of prosecutorial discretion are very difficult to adjudicate, even without obsessive executive secrecy and an awful statute.

    Profligate misconduct by prosecutors gives an idea of the scale of the problem. Judges just don't have the tools to bring prosecutors in line, and they need a dysfunctional congress to help repair the crumbling justice system.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 4 Mar 2015 @ 10:10am

    He's a traitor, whose cost the lives of our operatives.........oh no wait, he's one of us, never mind

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Uriel-238 (profile), 4 Mar 2015 @ 10:56am

    "The administration's arbitrarily-selected 'in crowd'"

    Ah, the Council Of Grand Dukes It's good to be friends to the king.

    During the cold war it was a common belief that women were useless in tradecraft, despite the countless stories that trickled from WWII covert operations (and, when they crossed Ian Flemming, served as inspiration for Mrs. Moneypenny.) The Soviets oddly had the same attitude because...boobs, I guess.

    And yet, the KGB was famous for their sparrows, whether as the foil in a honey trap or if a long-term relationship could be established (many were), a pillow-talk source in perpetuity. In those cases, the honey trap often came later when the affair was losing its passion.

    (While the CIA preferred to focus more on techy electronic surveillance solutions, don't think we didn't have our seductresses and honey traps. They were difficult to insert and exfiltrate behind the iron curtain, but lonely sailors and neutral ports.)

    So, it's hard for me to imagine a freaking general being so incautious. Coming from an era of nuclear threats this is positively unthinkable.

    Either this slap-on-the-wrist is going to be followed by a terrible medical onset six months from now (heart attacks are a favorite) or our administration is really just that incompetent. And they will likely underestimate partisan activity.

    Ugh.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 4 Mar 2015 @ 11:21am

    speaking of leaks ...

    When Vice President Dick Cheney ordered his top lieutenant I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby to leak the identity of an undercover CIA agent (Valerie Plame) as revenge because her husband had exposed some of Bush's many lies, no one ever expected Cheney or Libby to actually go to prison for a crime that any "normal" person would certainly go to prison for.

    It was the perfect circlejerk. When caught, Libby would fall on his sword to protect the vice president, who would likewise protect the president, who as the only person in the country with the power to grant clemency or pardon Libby -- promptly did so the moment Libby's appeals had run out (after insisting for months that he would absolutely not interfere with the course of justice). So once again, a crime had been committed, the perpetrators were caught -- yet no one went to jail.

    Many of us (naïvely) believed Obama's promises that he would cancel the Bush administation's get-out-of-jail-free cards and actually start prosecuting at least some of the many Bush-era lawbreakers, but it eventually became obvious that Obama and Bush were just two sides of the same coin, equally corrupt and self-serving.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Padpaw (profile), 4 Mar 2015 @ 11:44am

    They don't give a dam when someone with power leaks info that gets people killed but the moment one of the little people leaks info all hell breaks loose.

    You ever wonder why the team that killed Osama bin laden all died together. Mostly because their whereabouts and info was leaked for political gain by Obama.

    Obama got 30 people killed by leaking information on purpose so he could score political points. Do you really expect his administration to penalize anyone that isn't a little person?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 4 Mar 2015 @ 4:29pm

    And what a surprise, Whatever is nowhere to be seen...

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Uriel-238 (profile), 4 Mar 2015 @ 4:45pm

    um...[Citation Needed]

    Robert O'Neil, who personally shot at Bin Laden appears to be very much alive, as is Mark Owen / Matt Bissonette. It's not easy for me to readily track the identities of the less public members of the Operation Neptune Spear insertion team.

    If you're referring to the Chinook shootdown in 2011 in which thirty Americans died including fifteen members of Seal Team Six, those weren't the same guys, being part of Gold Squadron. Red Squadron carried out Neptune Spear.

    We're certainly in an age when such a thing could happen, where the position of a transport could be leaked to the enemy because we wanted its passengers annihilated, but the ducks don't seem to line just right in this case.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      nasch (profile), 4 Mar 2015 @ 8:11pm

      Re: um...[Citation Needed]

      Thank you, I was wondering how it could be possible that the participants in the most famous special operation in recent history (maybe ever) could have all died and I didn't hear anything.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Pragmatic, 5 Mar 2015 @ 6:11am

        Re: Re: um...[Citation Needed]

        There's so much anti-Obama nonsense floating about that if anyone makes up mad lies about him, no one on the right questions it because it's just more **** to fling at him.

        Meanwhile, on the Dem side, they're waving pom poms and cheering for him. The only objective coverage I get of what the White House is actually up to is right here on Techdirt.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          nasch (profile), 5 Mar 2015 @ 7:24am

          Re: Re: Re: um...[Citation Needed]

          Meanwhile, on the Dem side, they're waving pom poms and cheering for him.

          I wouldn't say that. During the midterms hardly anyone wanted Obama to campaign for them.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          Uriel-238 (profile), 5 Mar 2015 @ 11:17am

          As much as I'd like to have more optimism for the human species...

          A lot of the anti-Obama sentiment expressed by bystanders in media has been on the grounds that he's a Kenyan Muslim Terrorist, and not, say, that he's completely failed regarding the transparency of his administration, that he's super-hostile to whistle-blowers despite his original claim otherwise, that he's pro-surveillance state, that he's allowing the CIA torture program.

          In short, he's got about the same integrity of any other 21st century US elected representative...which is a crying shame.

          After a campaign about hope and change (e.g. please undo all the terrible things Bush did), we got damn little in the way of actual reform. And with two candidates in a row who completely betrayed their identities as candidates (Remember Bush the Compassionate Conservative?) I know that I can't expect anything good from the next one, no matter how they behave when trying to win votes.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Anonymous Coward, 5 Mar 2015 @ 5:54pm

            Re: As much as I'd like to have more optimism for the human species...

            I'm quite positive the opponent in both presidential elections would have much better. /s

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    farooge (profile), 5 Mar 2015 @ 1:11pm

    help, SOS

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.