Google Finally Stops Playing Mute On Net Neutrality, Says New Rules Won't Hurt Google Fiber In The Slightest

from the NOW-you-lend-a-hand? dept

While Google was a major player in the net neutrality fight early on, the company performed a stark about-face on the issue sometime around 2010. Google was responsible for co-writing the FCC's original, wimpy net neutrality rules alongside AT&T and Verizon, which were jam-packed with loopholes and ensured that wireless networks and devices weren't covered at all. When called out on this, Google pretty feebly insisted they weren't being inconsistent, though it was clear to most folks that the company had shifted lobbying strategies in the hopes of fostering a better relationship across both sides of the political aisle.

As a result, when net neutrality supporters needed Google the most during the Title II debate, Google remained silent. Recently, when asked about net neutrality during press events, the company simply refused to comment.

Now that the Title II tide has shifted without Google's help, the company has re-entered the discussion to once again support meaningful net neutrality rules. We noted a few weeks ago that Google told the FCC in a filing that Title-II based rules could actually help their Google Fiber deployment by streamlining the utility pole attachment process. Now in a conversation with the Washington Post, Google has made its clearest public statement in years regarding support for Title II net neutrality rules:
"The sort of open Internet rules that the [Federal Communications Commission] is currently discussing aren't an impediment to those plans," Google said in a statement, "and they didn't impact our decision to invest in Fiber."
That's of course in contrast with AT&T, Verizon, and Comcast, which continue to proclaim that if Title II neutrality rules are passed, they'll stop investing in broadband networks and people will lose their jobs. Of course, the fact is AT&T and Verizon were already dramatically cutting back on fixed-line broadband investment and cutting those jobs anyway, and in many of the areas Google is now looking at for Google Fiber deployments. Again, Title II is only a worry for ISPs interested in abusing their gatekeeper position to make an extra buck, and that's not Google Fiber's MO as a disruptive new market entry looking to make friends.

Regardless and whatever the motivation, it's nice to see Google join net neutrality supporters on the right side of the street again, even if it's a day late and a dollar short.

Filed Under: google fiber, net neutrality, open internet, title ii
Companies: google


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 30 Jan 2015 @ 4:53pm

    omg u goog shil why u no call for the deth pensltu for goog execs!!11!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 30 Jan 2015 @ 4:53pm

    I'm surprised Google took so long to comment on net neutrality, seeing as YouTube is the largest streaming service provider in the world.

    Eventually wired/wireless telcom operators were going to start extorting Google with paid prioritization fees. Fees the wired/wireless telcom industries would justify by saying their interrnet exchange point links are overly saturated and are too costly to upgrade.

    Even if Google offered to pay for the IXP link upgrade costs, themselves. Like Cogent offered to do, but Verizon, Comcast, AT&T, and Time Warner Cable declined Cogent's free upgrade offer.

    http://www.multichannel.com/news/content/cogent-ceo-we-ll-pay-peering-upgrades/355855

    It looks to me like Google was simply trying to keep from pissing off the wireless telcom industry heavyweights. Seeing as it has a strategic partnership with them. Through the sales of Android phones which operate on their wireless networks.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    That One Guy (profile), 30 Jan 2015 @ 9:32pm

    If you don't want it, I'll take it off your hands

    So if AT&T, Verizon, and Comcast are all insisting that Title II means they won't invest anymore, and Google is saying that Title II will have no impact on their decision to invest in broadband, then it seems to me the answer is simple: Stop giving the previous three companies any public money or perks related to broadband, and instead give it all to Google to use.

    If they don't want to bother investing in broadband, let someone who is still interested take up the slack.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2015 @ 1:46am

      Re: If you don't want it, I'll take it off your hands

      Or, better yet, make a purely non-profit corporation, force the ISPs to pay for their lats mile connections, and use that money to invest in upgrading.

      After all, if the infrastructure is onyl in the profitable areas, then it's not infrsstructure.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Ninja (profile), 2 Feb 2015 @ 4:12am

      Re: If you don't want it, I'll take it off your hands

      GOOGLE SHILL! BURN! GOOGLE IS EVIL!

      Ahem.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    PRMan, 1 Feb 2015 @ 4:51am

    FIOS

    Google should just buy out FIOS from Verizon and Frontier. If they no longer want to be in that business or support it, then Google could just take over. That would give them a lot of customers very quickly. And with just a hardware upgrade, they could probably take it to 1Gps cheaply and easily.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    chillinfart, 1 Feb 2015 @ 8:50am

    bull****

    Google took the opposite way in South America.

    One of his representatives in peru agreed with two issues against net neutrality: the brazilian MarcoCivil (that put exceptions and a red button on it's rules) and two attempts from MTC and OSIPTEL that broken net neutrality in 2013 and 2014.

    And FYI, that started after FCC visited our local IT regulator (OSIPTEL).

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Ninja (profile), 2 Feb 2015 @ 4:10am

      Re: bull****

      Weird, while it's not perfect the final version of Marco Civil seems very reasonable in the neutrality front. I might have misinterpreted though. Of course you may be talking about the first proposal from Mr Azeredo, it was terrible in any way.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    scatman, 2 Feb 2015 @ 6:23am

    why is it impossible

    Why is it impossible for several different Internet Service Providers to COMPETE for my business in each American city--the same way that several different gas stations and grocery stores COMPETE in most US cities?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      That One Guy (profile), 3 Feb 2015 @ 4:09am

      Re: why is it impossible

      Because that would cut into their profits, and they've collectively decided that it's better to let each of them have their own 'areas', and keep prices artificially high, rather than edge in on each other's turf, and have to lower prices to compete and draw in customers.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Fail, 3 Feb 2015 @ 5:56am

    The first mistake was assuming Google really gives a damn about consumers. As a business it's just good sense to see which side the ball drops on.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Special Affiliate Offer

Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.