And Of Course, The Attempts To Trademark 'Je Suis Charlie' Have Begun
from the just-stop-it dept
Last week, you may have heard, the main "rallying cry" in response to the attack at satirical French magazine Charlie Hebdo was "Je Suis Charlie." That was all over the media (social and mainstream). On Friday, Roberto Ledesma warned the world not to try to trademark the phrase, noting that it would end badly and you'd be mocked and ridiculed for doing so.I write this post on the off chance that anyone considering filing a trademark application for JE SUIS CHARLIE — or any future trending rallying cries — finds it, reads it and reconsiders. Here’s why:It's a great article that goes into a lot more detail, including lots of other examples (including a few we've covered) about idiots trying to trademark "Occupy Wall Street," "Boston Strong," "Hands Up Don't Shoot," "I Can't Breathe" and various other "rallying cries." They all failed, and they just made the applicant look bad.
- The USPTO will refuse your application.
- You will not get your money back.
- You may be publicly ridiculed.
So don’t even try. It’s as simple as that.
Applicants must also realize that there is no right to confidentiality in the information disclosed in a USPTO trademark application, including your name and address. The press may come calling. You may get trolled on social media. You will upset masses of people who feel the phrase is part of something much larger than any single person or entity’s business ambitions. They will be repulsed by your actions. I wonder how the woman who filed the I CAN’T BREATHE trademark application feels about all the negative attention she has received.That was Saturday. On Tuesday, we get from IP Kat: BREAKING NEWS: someone wants to register 'Je suis Charlie' as a trademark.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: je suis charlie, trademark
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
ha ha ha
They openly reveal to all the type of douche bags they are, and therefore they deservingly reap the negativity of others.
But I am pleasantly shocked the the USPTO rejected them... I guess they just did not pay the right people or political players enough to get their way. If Disney did it... they probably would have gotten it! Well... so long as they do not pull the application after a backlash.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: ha ha ha
I like that they are clearly labelling what they are going to use the trademark for: soap/cosmetics, clothes, many kinds of paper-articles and some strange category.
Economically milking a tragedy by cornering the merchandise market is fairly disgusting from a moral standpoint.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
INPI
Press release:
http://www.inpi.fr/fr/l-inpi/espace-presse/communiques-de-presse/detail-communique/article/m arque-je-suis-charlie-5968.html?cHash=29c53578373d677cdc62bca45557f40f
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: INPI
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Might have matched his other application
(I'm not sure if that's grammatically correct, but it does give me the rare chance to say 'pardon my French' legitimately.)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Might have matched his other application
That translated fine according to my four years of French in High-school, and confirmed with google French -> English translation.
French -> English translation: "I am an idiot"
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Might have matched his other application
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Words that matter
"Je suis un grand gros idiot?"
Seriously stupid.
In attempting to trademark a phrase that's become legendary already, the applicants fail to understand that they're also trying to trademark a common name.
Hey, I want to trademark mine! Think they'll let me?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Needed change
That should be changed to will. Anyone who tries to make a quick buck off of a tragedy deserves to be ruthlessly, publicly mocked for their actions. They deserve loud and repeated scorn and ridicule for letting greed stomp flat their common sense and decency, to the point that their name is forever linked to their attempt to cash in on the suffering of others.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Ahem. It's not a surprise and it's going to happen every time there is such thing. It may be much more damning to the applicant this time given the reaction and the reach is much, much stronger and wider than usual.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
US Application for JE SUIS CHARLIE filed as well
http://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=86499802&caseType=SERIAL_NO&searchType=statusSearch
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: US Application for JE SUIS CHARLIE filed as well
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: US Application for JE SUIS CHARLIE filed as well
Current Status: Disbarred
This member is prohibited from practicing law in California by order of the California Supreme Court.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Not necessarily about owning the phrase
It's not that every idea, thought, concept, and phrase must be owned, but simply the fact that you want to ensure random companies are not commercializing "Je Suis Charlie"
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Wouldn't Revlon already have dibs on that?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Add Your Comment
Add A Reply