District Superintendent Claims 14-Year-Old Student Bullied Her By Using Her Photo In A Criminal Justice Class Project

from the the-only-adult-here-is-the-one-pulling-her-daughter-out-of-this-district dept

14-year-old Lucero Tovar’s project for her criminal justice class was supposed to depict the inside of a courtroom. In an unexpected turn of events, her diorama instead proved an unlikely theory: there’s a child running Texas’ Santa Maria Independent School District.

A 14-year-old Texas student was suspended last week after she created a diorama of a courtroom using pictures of school board members to represent various people in her project, including a prosecutor and “fake” defendant.

The assignment, which was due Oct. 20, was to create a miniaturized 3D courtroom setting, she told KGBT-TV.

She decided to use photos of school district personnel and elected board members, which she printed out from the Santa Maria Independent School District’s website.

Tovar also used photos of family members and relatives, along with various dead presidents, to ensure every “person” in her diorama had a face.

But one of the people “depicted” in her diorama had a problem with her face being used: Santa Maria ISD superintendent Maria Chavez.


As you can see from this screengrab of KGBT’s report, Chavez’s face was applied to the “defendant’s” body.


Somehow, Superintendent Chavez was informed of Tovar’s criminal justice project, resulting in Tovar being called to her school’s office.

“The principal just looks at me and is like, ‘You know why you’re in here right?’” Tovar explained. “I said no. She said, ‘You’re harassing people.’ And I was like, ‘Huh?’ For me, I was like, ‘What?’”

Tovar adds: “She just told me that I was harassing and that she’s going to suspend me for 4 days.”

Tovar’s mother — perhaps realizing there would be no reasoning with the childlike-but-in-all-the-wrong-ways entity running the district — pulled her child from the school rather than deal with the ridiculous suspension.

If you think I’m being too harsh on Maria Chavez (and by extension, everyone under her command), read on. The suspension notice obtained by KGBT says the following:

You are hereby advised that Lucero Tovar is assigned an In-School-Suspension (ISS) from Santa Maria High School for the following Code of Conduct violation(s): damaging innuendo message on class project to another’s reputation — district personnel.

After dodging KGBT reporter Ryan Wolf for an entire day, Maria Chavez finally answered one of his phone calls and made the following statements.

Chavez did not want to appear on camera but said over the telephone how she felt Tovar’s depiction of her and others was “bullying” to personnel…

Chavez said she found the rationale behind her face on the defendant in an orange jumpsuit as “politically” motivated, “distasteful” and a complete deviation from the project’s “requirements.”

And while Chavez found it “distasteful,” she told Wolf none of the board members, whose faces are also featured in the project, complained to her about harassment or a damaged reputation.

Chavez also claims Tovar’s project caused a “disruption,” which is a really lame way to shift blame to the victim. (Meaning the actual victim — Lucero Tovar — and not the fake victim who’s supposed to be acting like an adult.) There would have been no disruption if school personnel hadn’t somehow arrived at the conclusion that Tovar’s use of district personnel photos was a form of bullying.

What’s even sadder than Chavez’s gratuitous display of power is that she continues to maintain the pretense that this is really about Tovar’s unwillingness to follow the project’s instructions. This assertion (and nothing to back it up) leads to non-sequiturious paragraphs like the following:

There was no written description required, according to Tovar.

Tovar said she was just trying to be creative with the assignment and used photos of her relatives as well.

Wolf asked the superintendent if the teacher listed any requirements to students ahead of the assignment to which she responded “yes.”

Unless the instructions specifically stated that no photos of district personnel were to be used, then this assertion is a painfully stupid attempt at misdirection. Even if there were certain instructions Tovar didn’t follow, the worst she should have expected was a low grade from her teacher, not accusations of bullying from the district superintendent and a suspension.

What makes it even stupider is Chavez’s actions following the assertion that Tovar didn’t follow the project guidelines.

[Chavez] also said [the project instructions] would be faxed over to Action 4 News around noon time.

They were never received as of 11 p.m. Wednesday.

Maria Chavez may not have liked her face being pasted to an orange jumpsuited body, but the proper response for someone in her position would have been to tell the teacher or administrator that brought it to her attention to find something productive to do with their time. Instead, she chose to be the victim in a situation that clearly wasn’t crying out for anyone to fill that role. To become the victim, she had to turn a 14-year-old student into someone capable of intimidating the top of the district’s organization chart. Now, because she chose to fully inhabit the victim role, she’s exposed herself as someone incapable of filling the role of district superintendent and unworthy of the trust inherent to the position.

Filed Under: , , , ,
Companies: santa maria high school

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “District Superintendent Claims 14-Year-Old Student Bullied Her By Using Her Photo In A Criminal Justice Class Project”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
85 Comments
Anon E. Mous (profile) says:

Seriously, this superintend ought to apologize to this kid and offer to carry her books to class for a week.

Harassment, I doubt this girl even met this superintendent, obviously Mrs.Chavez is a little too sensitive, perhaps that’s from criticism of the school board by parents, but to chastise this girl for it because of the girl used Chavez’s picture in a diorama is beyond stupidity.

I highly doubt any court or person who is of rational mind would see this as harassment, obviously the other people whose pictures were used didn’t see an issue.

Maybe someone needs some sensitivity training, and I am not talking about the student. Mrs Chavez will be lucky if the school board isn’t on the end of a lawsuit over this

Anonymous Coward says:

You know, I used to smile at my grandpa when he said “Everything was better in the good old days” but now I tend to agree with him. Looking back to when I was 14, my whole class would be in prision, probably for life, if we did today what we did then.

Land of the free (highest prison population world wide) and the home of the brave(afraid of everything)…

David says:

Re: Re:

You know, I used to smile at my grandpa when he said “Everything was better in the good old days” but now I tend to agree with him. Looking back to when I was 14, my whole class would be in prision, probably for life, if we did today what we did then.

Can you prove that the world wouldn’t be a better place for it?

Anonymous Coward says:

When I was in high school 20 years ago, some of my friends made a flyer to announce a gig their band was playing. The flyer used a photo of the vice principle with a cut out image of the bottom of a toilet seat in front so it looked like the vice principle was getting his head dunked in the toilet.

Instead of the students who made the flyer getting a suspension or any form of punishment, the vice principle framed a copy of the flyer and put it up in his office. His philosophy on student conduct was that if the worst students were doing was making fun of him rather than getting into fights or doing drugs on campus, he’d gladly laugh at himself along with the students.

tqk (profile) says:

What's wrong with you people?!? This is a *hate* crime!

The kid is obviously racist assuming Chicanos are ordinarily seen wearing orange jumpsuits, and everyone knows they’re forever in trouble with the law. Ask Arizona. I’m surprised Chavez isn’t in trauma counseling for this vicious attack on her ancestry and parentage!

Uh, was that over the top? I would love to hear what her employees are saying about this, if they can manage to stop laughing long enough to say anything. Their lunchroom that day must’ve sounded like a comedy club. Way to improve staff morale, Chavez. Madre de dios!

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: What is wrong with schools

Because somehow it has become a society where youths are punished worse than adults, but with much harsher rules.
Basically they a taught to fear, obey and not criticize people with more power than themselves, or the hammer will fall hard. This is also the way law enforcement, corporations and politicians wish the public would behave like.
I guess they have decided to try the “catch them while they are young” approach.

Quiet Lurcker says:

Re: What is wrong with schools

I think you answer boils down to about three things.

First, judging by what I’ve heard of “teachers’ education” from a friend who just recently got both her certificate and her degree, I suspect much of the problem stems from what the teachers are learning prior to starting their careers.

Second, federal influence in the form of monetary subsidies either granted or withheld, increased or decreased could – probably does – strongly influence school policies, and not necessarily in the good way envisioned by the feds.

Third – and this is the sad one – the current generation of teachers and administrators were quite possibly coddled as children and young men and women, so did not develop the necessary coping skills.

tqk (profile) says:

Re: Re: What is wrong with schools

Fourth – they’re cowed into compliance to their bureaucratic overlords’ world view, however perverse that may be.

Teachers have their stifling New World Order bureaucratic regime pushing them from one side, and parents and PTA expectations for their precious snowflakes demanding favor from the other.

Why anyone wants the job mystifies me. They’re professional masochists.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: What is wrong with schools

Most problems in public education stems from the administration not the teachers.

You have tossed both teachers and administrators into the same bag, this is either just being lazy or it is intentional misinformation. School board members and administrators are politicians and typically know little about education even though a few of them may have been employed as a teacher in the past. Many parents and community members are tiring of the continual teacher disparagement emanating from the anti public school echo chamber. These anti public education people do not have the student’s best interest in mind, they are after the public tax dollar and a possible future political career.

Public school policy is a local affair, typically controlled by the “elected” school board at a county level. Federal influence is placed upon the State, not the school board nor the county. Possibly you have been confused by the debate about common core.

Not sure what to make of your last comment. Teachers and administrators are very different, professionally and socially. To claim the are the same implies ignorance.

John85851 (profile) says:

Re: Re: What is wrong with schools

Third – and this is the sad one – the current generation of teachers and administrators were quite possibly coddled as children and young men and women, so did not develop the necessary coping skills.
I agree completely.

But you would think that someone who takes a job as a school administrator, which deals with kids, would have a thick-skin when it comes to kids.

Plus, is this issue really that big of a deal for this lady? The girl used photos of a lot of people, but no one else is complaining that they were “bullied” by having their face as the judge or lawyer or whatever else.
I think another poster got it correct that this lady might have had a run-in with the law and the diorama made her think the girl found about it.

ANON (profile) says:

principal

I had a school principal tell me once he would see me in jail. Within a year he was in jail himself for having sex with a student in my class (the same class his own daughter was in) and an ugly student at that…

Seems this principal’s face would go good in a lot of images and across the web, be quite funny if this got viral enough to make the bitch quit.

Anonymous Coward says:

and just when is she (Chavez) likely to be suspended? thought so. never! as with any and all incidents of any and all description, the person acting like a total jerk gets to punish the down-trodden people who do not have some highfaluting title to their name! how the fuck these people ever get to these positions, i’ll never understand!

Bryan Carson (profile) says:

Too bad I don't live in Texas

1If I were in Texas I wouuld offer to represent Lucero Tovar pro bono. This is a governmental action, bringing up violations of the 1st amendment as many have stated. However, it also appears to violate both procedural and substantive due process. Depending on the family’s socioeconomic status, there may also be a 14th amendment equal protection problem. (Too bad minors are no linger considered a suspect classification.) definitely Ms. Tovar has a §1983 claim.

As both a lawye and an educator with a doctoratre in ed, this sounds like an A± assignment to me. I don’t blame the parents for sending Ms. Tovar to another district. As much as they may have wanted to fight, the best interests of the child mean that they should get her elsewhere.

The Streisand Effect may shed some light on Ms. Chavez, the (unnamed) principal, and goings-on in Santa Maria Independent School District. If the superintendent had sued over this rediculous incident, it would have been a SLAPP and subject to the Texas Anti-SLAPP provisions. What is needed now, however, is a SLFPP, a Straegic Lawsuit FOR Public Participation.

So I hope some Texas lawyer will help the family out. By the way, having read the original stories and comments, KGBT reporter Ryan Wolf from KGBT sounds like an excellent journalist.

tqk (profile) says:

Re: Re: Too bad I don't live in Texas

It sounds like rather than take the lawsuit route, they enrolled her in a school in another district.

They removed her ASAP from an obviously abusive situation. That doesn’t preclude suing the pants off Chavez and the fools who hired her and supported her decision. I’d be on my hands and knees begging for forgiveness and voluntarily signing up for sensitivity counseling right now if it was me, which it never would be.

I’d also like to take this opportunity to say, shove it up your ass, Mr. MacCaulay (my grade eight math teacher). I imagine every kid who’s ever been forced to endure public school has some petty tyrant in his past s/he still resents being forced to endure.

tqk (profile) says:

Re: Re:

Why are 14 year old students attending a “criminal justice” class rather than a civics class?

It doesn’t appear that recent generations learned anything in civics class. They appear to equate it with nap time. So, if they can’t be bothered to learn about their rights, now they can learn about the consequences, ie. how to defend yourself when you’re inevitably dragged into court for whatever reason.

Watch out for that Judge Chavez. She’s a hangin’ judge.

tqk (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re: Re:

That wasn’t attacking the younger generation. I’m surprised anyone took it that way. I wouldn’t bother to stay awake for the pap shoved at kids these days either. Just look at the story we’re commenting on. Chavez’ actions are asinine. How any adult could think her reaction was reasonable, I can’t imagine. Way to earn the respect of your charges, not!

tqk (profile) says:

Re: Innocence is a Crime

Tovar should not have to deal with this distraught superintendant for this.

On the other hand, the kid’s getting a valuable lesson in abuse of authority, and she’s going to come out of it smelling like roses, possibly even rich. That’s a lot more than most get from public school. Earned college tuition before she reached fifteen. Think of the street cred she’s going to walk away with; took down a superintendant at only fourteen!

Fom here on no teacher, no matter where she winds up, is going to take this kid at face value. She’s golden. 🙂

Geno0wl (profile) says:

Why only the Superintendent getting hate?

When clearly there are two other adults here that are just as much at blame. Those two adults being the teacher and the principal.
BOTH of them had to look at the diorama filled with various sets of people(Her family, dead presidents, and faculty) and think to themselves….”Man something needs to be done here!”. I can NOT fathom how two adults could even get to the point of even contacting the Superintendent in the first place.
Hate on the Superintendent, but make sure you hate on the teacher and principal for being giant idiots just as much

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...