Latest In Cable Astroturfing: If You Squint, Twist, Spin And Mislead With Apples To Oranges Comparisons, US Broadband Is Great!

from the because-it's-not dept

For the past few months, I'd been pitched a few times from people (often somehow, if in murky ways, connected to the broadband industry) arguing that all those stories about how the US is far behind in broadband is untrue if you just looked at certain states. The basic argument is that since the US is so large, it's not fair to compare it to, say, South Korea. Instead, they claim, if you just look at a few states in the US, those states compare quite well to this country or that country. Of course, to make a total fruit basket out of mixed metaphors, this is pretty blatant cherry picking apples to compare to oranges. We haven't written any of those stories, but apparently someone went and created a misleading infographic to try to make the point on a site called "the Connectivist."
However, as Chris Morran brilliantly dissects over at Consumerist, the whole argument is bogus:
The only way to do a true apples to apples comparison would be to look at the data for areas with similar conditions, including population size and area, which the Connectivist doesn’t do.

The site simply glosses over the fact that while broadband in the U.S. is improving, it’s still not a world leader in deploying high-speed Internet access to its citizens.

Even though nearly three-quarters of the U.S. has access to what the FCC currently defines as “broadband,” meaning at least 4Mbps downstream, that’s still not a high enough percentage to get it into the top 10 globally. In fact, that percentage barely puts the U.S. in the 40 of all nations.

Likewise, only 39% of Americans have access to 10 Mbps service, which is what many people now consider the minimum acceptable standard for broadband. That ranks higher, putting the U.S. within the top 15 worldwide, but still pales in comparison to world leaders like Sweden (56%), the Netherlands (52%), and Romania (50%).
Morran notes, sarcastically, that the Connectivist seems to ignore all of this... and then suggests a reason why:
Maybe it has something to do with an organization you won’t see mentioned on the Connectivist until you get to its “About” page, where it just happens to mention that “The Connectivist is an online magazine created in partnership with the National Cable & Telecommunications Association.”
Ah yes, the NCTA, better known as the major trade/lobbying group for the cable industry. The very same NCTA that recently tried to set up a painfully awkward attempt at sounding cool and young to attract younger people to its anti-net neutrality stance -- and when confronted with the fact it was behind that campaign, said, "What led you to the conclusion this is an NCTA effort?" At least this time it's officially buried in the fine print, but really, NCTA, if your argument is so compelling, why is it that you always have to set up fake groups to push it?
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: astroturfing, broadband, competition, misleading, speeds, us
Companies: connectivist, ncta


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 24 Oct 2014 @ 1:28pm

    Apples to oranges? More like apples to durians, and it's the USA that's offering the less pleasant of the two.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Geno0wl (profile), 24 Oct 2014 @ 1:46pm

    Thanking I actually live in Ohio

    Local Telco here is actually installing Fiber across the city. Offering 1 Gbps for $90 a month against TWC.
    http://www.cincinnatibell.com/internet/

    After actually getting Fiber with dedicated speeds(no "up to" BS) I will never go back to cable.
    Trying to pull in customers with compelling products and actual competition. It is amazing!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Jeremy2020 (profile), 24 Oct 2014 @ 3:24pm

      Re: Thanking I actually live in Ohio

      I'm stuck with TWC. I would love to get Grande, a local provider that offers a competitive package.

      My choices are TWC or AT&T...SO MUCH COMPETITION

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        John Fenderson (profile), 24 Oct 2014 @ 4:31pm

        Re: Re: Thanking I actually live in Ohio

        You're lucky! That's TWICE as many options as I have!

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 25 Oct 2014 @ 11:41am

        Re: Re: Thanking I actually live in Ohio

        Dont forget HughesNet as an option! Hahaha. When I had the choice of that vs dialup, I choose dialup (at least I could play online games).

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 24 Oct 2014 @ 1:46pm

    When compared to other countries*, the US broadband industry is 100% better in every aspect and ranks #1 in the world!



    *without any internet at all

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    johnjac (profile), 24 Oct 2014 @ 2:03pm

    No really

    No really THIS POST isn't about #GamerGate

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 24 Oct 2014 @ 3:38pm

    If the cable industry had been smart, they'd have hired critics like Mike Masnick and Carl Bode Long ago. Comcast certainly knows the benefits of buying out one's enemies. Though in the internet age, taking out one critic just means that another will soon pop up and take his place. But still, it's probably much cheaper than buying out competing firms and then shutting them down and then paying off the politicians to allow it to happen.

    But it does make one wonder, what would happen if Comcast were to become Techdirt's and DSLreports primary advertiser? Would the content change much? Well, if history is any guide, it all depends on what's more important, money or respect.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      John Fenderson (profile), 24 Oct 2014 @ 4:18pm

      Re:

      "what would happen if Comcast were to become Techdirt's and DSLreports primary advertiser?"

      Probably nothing, or the loss of those advertisers. Techdirt has, after all, lost major advertisers before because they didn't like Techdirt's coverage of a pet issue.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 24 Oct 2014 @ 5:00pm

        Re: Re:

        "Techdirt has, after all, lost major advertisers before because they didn't like Techdirt's coverage of a pet issue."

        That's always welcome news, regardless of whatever constitutes a "major" advertiser (>5% of revenue? 10%?). Any names or story links you might know of?

        The notable issue is whenever only one or two advertisers carries the whole operation. I'm thinking of the tobacco industry decades ago, whose massive advertising flow of dollars literally had all forms of commercial media by the balls.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          John Fenderson (profile), 24 Oct 2014 @ 5:15pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          I'm working from memory here -- perhaps someone on the Techdirt staff can clarify or correct me -- but I seem to remember that Techdirt lost IBM over it's SOPA coverage.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          Mike Masnick (profile), 25 Oct 2014 @ 5:00am

          Re: Re: Re:

          That's always welcome news, regardless of whatever constitutes a "major" advertiser (>5% of revenue? 10%?). Any names or story links you might know of?

          I'm not going to directly name names because, honestly, I don't think that's fair. It wasn't a public situation -- it was a series of discussions that happened in private, some of which I discussed in this post:

          https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140707/10055427801/want-in-depth-coverage-net-neutrality-cr owdfund-our-reporting-double-your-impact.shtml

          And, fwiw, it turned out to be significantly more than 50% of our ad revenue. Thankfully, we don't only rely on ad revenue to stay in business, but I will say that thanks to the SOPA coverage we went from ad revenue being a profit center to ad revenue not even covering our server costs in most months. Basically, we had a long term deal with certain sponsors that kept the site profitable -- and they all went away.

          If we only had to rely on ad revenue these days, we'd have gone out of business a long time ago. So, no, we're not the types to cave in to the demands of advertisers.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      That One Guy (profile), 24 Oct 2014 @ 5:40pm

      Re:

      But it does make one wonder, what would happen if Comcast were to become Techdirt's and DSLreports primary advertiser?

      Money can buy many things, but one of the things it can't buy is a solid reputation built up over many years. The people who run TD know this, so I imagine even in that scenario not much would change(except perhaps some not-so-happy emails from angry Comcast reps the next time they were mentioned).

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Atkray (profile), 24 Oct 2014 @ 9:30pm

      Re:

      The insider shop has the option to silence Techdirt.
      $1 mil a day or $100,000,001 a year.

      I don't think you could buy the staff to write what you want, they all seem to be afflicted with those pesky ethics things.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 24 Oct 2014 @ 6:56pm

    Anyone notice the infographics mention of Kansas as raising its average speed by 90%. Notice how they don't mention that that is probably due to Google Fiber in Kansas City pushing out the upper range of the available speeds? I'm sure the big ISPs that aren't Google would be quite happy to let Google spend money on infrastructure and then use Google's progress in their own advertising statistics to imply that they are doing substantially more than they actually are.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    McCrea (profile), 24 Oct 2014 @ 11:58pm

    This implies stats can be manipulated?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    James Comey, 25 Oct 2014 @ 1:53am

    Of course, to make a total fruit basket out of mixed metaphors, this is pretty blatant cherry picking apples to compare to oranges.
    You'd best stay the hell out of my parking lot, if you know what's good for the gander's handbasket of golden eggs.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Make this the First Word or Last Word. No thanks. (get credits or sign in to see balance)    
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Sponsored Promotion
Public Money, Public Code - Sign The Open Letter at publiccode.eu
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.