SWAT Team Raids House And Kills Homeowner Because Criminal Who Burglarized The House Told Them To

from the get-cops-to-do-your-bidding-using-this-one-simple-trick! dept

We've heard complaints that warrant requirements for searches are an obstacle to efficient crime fighting. Here's a timeline of an incident that led to the death of a homeowner during a SWAT team raid in search of drugs it never found. (via PoliceMisconduct.net)

Late Sept. 22nd/early A.M. Sept. 23rd: David and Teresa Hooks' home was burglarized. Among the items stolen was their SUV.

Sept. 23rd, 3:45 pm: After a brief investigation, the Laurens County Sheriff's Dept. issues an arrest warrant for suspect Rodney Garrett.

Sept. 24th, 3:45 pm: 24 hours later, Garrett is in police custody, turning himself in after becoming "fearful for his life" when he realized a bag he stole from the Hooks' home contained crystal meth. He confessed to the burglary, vehicle theft and "other crimes." (It must be noted that this version of events comes from the warrant application. Hooks' attorney's statement merely says Garrett was "taken into custody.")

Sept. 24th, 9:56 pm: Six hours, later the Laurens County "drug task force" has its warrant application for a search of Hooks' house signed by Judge Snell, based almost solely on the statements made by an admitted felon in their custody.

From a statement by the Hooks' attorney, Mitch Shook:

The facts submitted to Deputy Magistrate Snell to convince her that probable cause existed to issue the warrant consisted of the statement by Rodney Garrett a confessed burglar, thief, and a meth addict who was under the influence at the time of his arrest that the approximately 20 grams of methamphetamine, a digital scale, and 2 firearms found on him at the time of arrest had been stolen by him out of another vehicle at the Hooks home.
The warrant application also lists an investigation from 2009 as more "probable cause."
In the warrant application, Laurens investigator Chris Brewer wrote that he knew Hooks and his home address from a previous investigation. Brewer said a suspect claimed he had been supplying "multiple ounces" of methamphetamine to Hooks, who re-sold it.

Shook says that investigation was done in 2009. Neither Shook or the Sheriff's department stated the outcome of that investigation.
The timeline continues. One hour later -- at 10:55 PM -- Hooks' home is raided and David Hooks is shot dead.

Here's the police version:
The Laurens County Sheriff's office says Hooks was shot after he got out a firearm and started showing aggression.
Here's his wife's version:
He says Teresa Hooks, David's wife, looked outside and saw people with hoods during the evening of the drug search. He says she woke her husband up, thinking the burglars were back. He says Hooks then armed himself.
Which seems plausible. Less than 48 hours had passed and Hooks would have had no idea he was on the receiving end of a drug task force "investigation." The word "investigation" receives the scariest of scare quotes, considering it mostly consisted of a multiple felon trying to explain away the gun, scale and meth in his possession. If the suspect had claimed he didn't rob Hooks' house, the police wouldn't have believed him. But when this same suspect starts blabbering about finding meth during his robbery, the cops are all ears, as though he were Abraham Lincoln himself, swearing on a stack of Bibles.

How do we know all of this is bullshit? Because the police spent almost as much time searching Hooks' house -- nearly two days -- as it did between the point Hooks' house was invaded the first time (by confessed burglar Rodney Garrett) and the second time (by the SWAT team).
[A]fter taking over the scene at around 11:55 p.m. on the 24th of September the GBI conducted a thorough search of the property that lasted until approximately 8:00 p.m. Friday, September 26th. That search of some 44 hours conducted by numerous agents with the GBI resulted in not one item of contraband being found! This has been confirmed to the family by the GBI and is evidenced by the return of the original search warrant which was finally filed in court on September 29th and indicates that nothing was seized pursuant to the search warrant.
In between these two periods of 40+ hours was a flashpoint: the raid itself. The task force shot Hooks dead in his own home, pursuing the self-serving pipe dreams of a meth addict. The SWAT team broke down the back door and fired "no less than 16 shots" at David Hooks, some blindly through an adjacent wall. Hooks had every right to pick up his weapon and investigate this second home invasion. But in doing so, he gave every raiding officer all the justification needed to shoot first -- and shoot often.

He's too dead to be charged with forcing law enforcement weapons to discharge (because they fire themselves so often in official police statements), and he died as the result of a speedy judge-jury-executioner process that hinged on the arbitrary credulity of the Sheriff's Department and its drug task force. To call this willing suspension of disbelief an "investigation" is to strip the word of all meaning. (And beat it. And send it naked and bruised into the harsh winter, etc.) A late-night raid has all sort of deadly implications that could have been avoided by an actual investigation. Now, the department has blood on its hands and a lawyer on its trail -- all because a burglar told some law enforcement officers whatever came to mind during his interrogation.


Reader Comments

The First Word

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    Rikuo (profile), 8 Oct 2014 @ 10:29am

    So basically, SWAT has just put paid assassins out of business with this latest move. Before, if you wanted to bump someone off, you had to pay a third party thousands, tens or probably millions.
    Now, you just need a confessed drug addict burglar, while high on his drug of choice, to say he got the drugs from the person he burgled. That's all the justification SWAT needs to go in guns blazing, to kill someone.

    Excuse me a mo. I'm going put in a call to SWAT that a certain man of African American origin living in a certain famous house on Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington DC keeps meth in his desk. How do I know he keeps meth in his desk officer? Why, this meth that I'm currently high on and desperately trying to explain the origins of in such a way that I hope will draw attention away from myself was found by me in that desk while I was busy robbing it!
    Psst. Make sure you bring lots of guns!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Bob, 8 Oct 2014 @ 2:43pm

      At least we know the USSS will let them right in.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 8 Oct 2014 @ 3:32pm

      Re:

      Well put.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 8 Oct 2014 @ 4:43pm

      Re:

      I imagine they were probably all decked out in their beloved military-style duds as well. I mean, what's the point in having all that stuff if you can't take it and play with it?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2014 @ 7:08am

      Re:

      "if you wanted to bump someone off, you had to pay a third party thousands, tens or probably millions. "

      How would you know? Have you ever hired a hit man or have you ever done this type of work for hire?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2014 @ 7:40am

        Re: Re:

        Do you have an invoice from such a person to disprove this assessment? Given the range of payment from $1,000-$1,000,000 it is highly likely the actual cost of hiring such a party is within that range. The travel costs alone could easily exceed $1,000 so it is not a far-fetched estimate, although it is quite a broad one.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    That One Guy (profile), 8 Oct 2014 @ 2:16pm

    The facts submitted to Deputy Magistrate Snell to convince her that probable cause existed to issue the warrant consisted of the statement by Rodney Garrett a confessed burglar, thief, and a meth addict who was under the influence at the time of his arrest

    They believed him because they wanted to.

    No matter that their 'source' was stoned out of his mind at the time, his claims gave them an excuse to play 'cops and robbers' with all that gear they love so much, and they'd be damned if they ignored the opportunity by doing something completely insane, like, I dunno, not going in guns blazing, in the middle of the night, busting into a house that had been recently robbed, where the homeowners, thanks to the recently robbery, would already be suspicious of any dark figures sneaking around or looking like they were trying to break in.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Alien Rebel (profile), 8 Oct 2014 @ 3:21pm

      Re:

      Naturally, the #2 option of using modern up-the-wazoo surveillance capabilities to gather evidence over time and then make an arrest at some no-fuss-no-muss time and place would be unthinkable. I guess no matter how easy it gets to hack into all the intimate details of a citizen's life, playing SWAT Team is always gonna be much more fun than playing Geek squad.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 8 Oct 2014 @ 6:08pm

        Re: Re:

        playing Geek squad.

        Pffft. You can tell a Judge 'the clown in your courtroom is playing games with his address to avoid the court system' via your filing in the case then the Judge writes an order where the Judge chastises the landlord doing an eviction for citing the wrong address.

        "playing Geek Squad" - why bother if the Judges are too lazy to read the Squad reporting?

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Oct 2014 @ 2:33pm

    'all because a burglar told some law enforcement officers whatever came to mind during his interrogation'

    or could it have been that the police WANTED to go to Hooks place, do a search for drugs because he had got away with something, in the polices eyes maybe, in 2009 and the shooting was just the icing on the cake for them?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 8 Oct 2014 @ 2:39pm

      Re:

      Makes me wonder if they're parallel constructing crimes for their targets now.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      psiu, 8 Oct 2014 @ 3:02pm

      Response to: Anonymous Coward on Oct 8th, 2014 @ 2:33pm

      Assuming it was even the Hooks at that time. "The house at 101 Main Street! let's get the bastards!" "Hey boss, didn't someone else buy that?" "Shut up Johnson, you'll never make Sergeant with all that thinking!"

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Crazy Canuck, 8 Oct 2014 @ 5:31pm

        Re: Response to: Anonymous Coward on Oct 8th, 2014 @ 2:33pm

        We actually have a commercial that's been playing on the air for the past year. It has a couple settling into bed then all of a sudden a heavily armed swat team comes busting in through the windows and doors with a helicopter shining a searchlight into the room. The people in the bed are all shocked sitting there in bed when all of a sudden one of the swat guys says "Wait a second, you aren't cartel." The guy in the bed says "We just bought this place." The police guy replies "Didn't your realtor tell you about this place?" To which the man replies "We didn't use a realtor." Then they all just look at each other sort of awkwardly.

        It was a commercial from the local realtor association where they add some tag line at the end of the commercial like "Realtors may have more information than you do."

        I think it falls in the same category as the "You wouldn't download a car" type ads.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          GEMont (profile), 9 Oct 2014 @ 6:30am

          Re: Re: Response to: Anonymous Coward on Oct 8th, 2014 @ 2:33pm

          To me that commercial simply points out the fact that the Feds and the Cartel have a deal.

          The Feds raid the Cartel House regularly, and the Cartel raises the cost of their product (due to police interference) regularly, claiming scarcity of product.

          The Feds knew it was a Cartel House, because they were just there the previous month, and the month before that and so on.

          Its an economic marriage. A business model.

          Both sides in the War on Drugs, earn their livelihood from the war and thus both sides wholeheartedly want the War on Drugs to continue.

          Only the public (the couple who bought the house) suffer any real harm from this occupational hazard.

          ---

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      GEMont (profile), 9 Oct 2014 @ 6:32am

      Re:

      That actually sounds like the most likely case actually.

      Sadly, because the criminals happen to be cops, we will never be allowed to know the truth of this affair.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Oct 2014 @ 2:36pm

    Another day, another badge wearing murderer.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    any moose cow word, 8 Oct 2014 @ 2:47pm

    This is the kind of BS you would expect from a military dictatorship or the old Soviet Union, not here in the US. Wait, this is still the US? We aren't all that far from that.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Oct 2014 @ 3:03pm

    (And beat it. And send it naked and bruised into the harsh winter, ..

    upons its return then sacrifice it to Ulatek, and dance around it while burning the Constitution in effigy.

    FtFY

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 8 Oct 2014 @ 10:35pm

      Re: (And beat it. And send it naked and bruised into the harsh winter, ..

      why "in effigy"?.. burn the damn ORIGINAL... it's useless these days and worse than toilet paper from all the shit it has taken.

      (At least toilet paper still has some use and when you get it - it's clean.)

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        nasch (profile), 9 Oct 2014 @ 6:05am

        Re: Re: (And beat it. And send it naked and bruised into the harsh winter, ..

        why "in effigy"?.. burn the damn ORIGINAL...

        I think most people don't know what effigy means.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        Cal (profile), 9 Oct 2014 @ 1:50pm

        Re: Re: (And beat it. And send it naked and bruised into the harsh winter, ..

        "... it's useless these days... "

        Why are you blaming the US Constitution? IT assigned these duties to us, "We the people" exactly so these things would not occur. WE are the militia of the several states, it is our duty to train and carry weapons to be able to:

        - Enforce the US Constitution and each state's Constitution,
        - Enforce and keep the “Laws of the Union” (which is constitutional laws ONLY),
        - Protect the country against all enemies both domestic and foreign, and
        - “to suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions”.

        US Constitution, Article I, Section. 8, Clause 11: “To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water”.

        This - Letters of Marque and Reprisal - is using private citizens in their own privately owned crafts to defend the USA and her people, this is using the Militia.

        Clause 15: “To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel invasions.

        The militia of each state is taxed with the defense of the USA and her people, not just with the defense of their state; and they are to be armed with weapons that can repel any invasions bearing modern weapons of war. Congress is required to provide those military grade weapons for the militias - NOT to the LE's, NOT to foreign terrorists, NOT to foreign countries - in Clause 16.

        Clause 16: “To provide for organizing, ARMING, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress”.

        Joel Barlow, Revolutionary War veteran, American whose political writings were debated on the floor of Parliament said of the US Constitution: "… not only permitting every man to arm, but obliging him to arm.”

        Thomas J. Jackson: “The patriot volunteer, fighting for country and his rights, makes the most reliable soldier on earth.”

        Thomas Jefferson:“Every citizen should be a soldier. This was the case with the Greeks and Romans, and must be that of every free state.”

        Thomas Jefferson: "None but an armed nation can dispense with a standing army. To keep ours armed and disciplined is therefore at all times important."

        Richard Henry Lee, Member of the First U.S. Senate: "To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of people always possess arms..."

        Daniel Webster: "Hold on, my friends, to the Constitution and to the Republic for which it stands. Miracles do not cluster, and what has happened once in 6000 years, may not happen again. Hold on to the Constitution, for if the
        American Constitution should fail, there will be anarchy throughout the world."

        Abraham Lincoln: ""We, the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow men who pervert the Constitution."

        James Madison: An efficient militia is authorized and contemplated by the Constitution and required by the spirit and safety of free government.

        Richard Henry Lee: "A militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves …"

        George Mason, Co-author of the Second Amendment: "I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people except for a few public officials. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."

        Thomas Jefferson: "The Constitution of most of our states (and of the United States) assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed and that they are entitled to freedom of person, freedom of religion, freedom of property, and freedom of press."



        BTW, what those "cops" did qualifies as terrorism against the American people:

        28 C.F.R. Section 0.85 Terrorism is defined as “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives”.

        Does this sound familiar to anyone? Change a few words and it IS gun control.

        SA Oberfuhrer of Bad Tolz, March, 1933: "All military type firearms are to be handed in immediately ... The SS,
        SA and Stahlhelm give every responsible opportunity of campaigning with them. Therefore anyone who does not belong to one of the above-named organizations and who unjustifiably nevertheless keeps his weapon ... must be regarded as an enemy of the national government."

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      David, 9 Oct 2014 @ 8:03am

      Re: (And beat it. And send it naked and bruised into the harsh winter, ..

      Where's Den to save you?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2014 @ 3:24pm

      Re: (And beat it. And send it naked and bruised into the harsh winter, ..

      This is 'Murica. In this country, we sacrifice to Satan, not to some furriner.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Oct 2014 @ 3:25pm

    The fact that they did not simply walk up to the house with 2 officers and say they had questions about the robbery is sad. They had a perfect reason to be let into the house by the homeowners with no hesitation

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Smoked Pork, 8 Oct 2014 @ 4:08pm

    3 cheers for smoked pork

    And the police wonder why they have an image problem and why people cheer when cops are shot dead. The police are supposed to serve and protect, not shoot and kill innocent people in their houses. The cops who shot him should take their guns and blow themselves away.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Oct 2014 @ 4:13pm

    My guess , They'll all walk away free men with no record of the incident.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Oct 2014 @ 4:24pm

    They have to use it

    Because Laurens County, Georgia, population 48,000, has a swat team.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Oct 2014 @ 4:29pm

    Well duh!

    The police were right to believe the meth addict felon.

    Drug king pins with a house full of contraband always call the cops when they get robbed!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Oct 2014 @ 4:54pm

    From what I've heard, there is no accurate record of the number of times police kill citizens.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Crazy Canuck, 8 Oct 2014 @ 5:36pm

      Re:

      Samantha Bee just did a segment mocking that on The Daily Show the other night.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      That One Guy (profile), 8 Oct 2014 @ 6:28pm

      'We don't track those numbers'

      Tracking the number of deaths of police? Vital, absolutely necessary to show how dangerous the job is and justify increases in the level of firearms and gear they are allowed to use.

      Tracking the number of deaths caused by police? Well, those are all accidents you know, and there's just so many other, much more important things to focus on, and clearly anyone who would be interested in these statistics have it out for the police, so for 'officer safety' it's best to just not track or report that sort of thing.

      Yeah, it's in their best interest not to have those statistics available, and even if they were, you can bet 99% of the deaths suffered by police would be classified as intentional murder(so no 'accidental death', and certainly no 'self-defense against the officer'), while 99% of deaths cause by police would be 'accidental' and 'self-defense'.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Oct 2014 @ 6:01pm

    First thought reading the headline:
    *peep*, comedians most have a hard time to top reality.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 8 Oct 2014 @ 7:48pm

      Re:

      Comedians are not even trying anymore, they are now just reporting. You know, that thing that the press stopped doing a long time ago...

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Greevar (profile), 8 Oct 2014 @ 6:27pm

    If this keeps happening, people are going to start arming themselves against the police.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      That One Guy (profile), 8 Oct 2014 @ 6:38pm

      Self-fulfilling prophecy

      The police arm themselves with more and more military grade gear because they see the public as a threat, and treat them accordingly, and in turn the public sees the police as a threat, and treat them accordingly.

      Keeping people in line and compliant through fear works... to a point. Push too far though, crank up the intimidation and fear enough, and people will switch from defensive, to offensive means to deal with the perceived threat(because once someone is in fear of their life, what do they have to lose?) and once that happens, things are going to be nasty indeed.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Oct 2014 @ 7:23pm

    Just because you can serve no-knock warrants in the middle of the night doesn't mean it's always the best course of action.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 8 Oct 2014 @ 10:41pm

      Re:

      it WAS NOT a "no-knock" warrant. It was a normal one where they were supposed to TALK to the guy before the search.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2014 @ 1:09am

        Re: Re:

        In the police minds they are above the laws. The laws do not apply to the police and citizens have no rights. If any citizen does not get on their knees and start groveling as soon as a cop comes near they are a threat.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        nasch (profile), 9 Oct 2014 @ 6:18am

        Re: Re:

        it WAS NOT a "no-knock" warrant. It was a normal one where they were supposed to TALK to the guy before the search.

        I don't see that in the linked article, do you have a reference?

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          art guerrilla (profile), 9 Oct 2014 @ 8:46am

          Re: Re: Re:

          it was in the link to the 'policemisconduct' article...

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • icon
            nasch (profile), 9 Oct 2014 @ 1:33pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            Got it: "Despite the fact that the illegal search warrant did not have a “no knock” clause the Drug Task Force and SRT members broke down the back door of the family’s home and entered firing in excess of 16 shots."

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Oct 2014 @ 7:48pm

    I'm sure the thugs involved will be grated total immunity and possibly a promotion.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    New Mexico Mark, 8 Oct 2014 @ 7:59pm

    "To protect and serve"

    That statement used to imply that those in law enforcement were expected to protect and serve the public, even at great personal risk.

    Now it is hard to even find, but if still used it apparently is interpreted to mean protecting LEOs at all cost while serving an ever-expanding legal machine.

    "You know the score, pal! If you're not cop, you're 'little people'."

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Oct 2014 @ 8:15pm

    Remember, not only can SWAT teams legally throw flashbangs at babies and injure them, but they also have the full support of the local trolls.

    Doubtlessly this new bit of information has them rubbing their hands in glee. An army of psychopaths with deadly weapons at their beck and call for legal assassination? I wouldn't be surprised if the notion made Whatever jizz his pants or something.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    tomczerniawski, 8 Oct 2014 @ 9:24pm

    The land of the free... and the home... of the... BANG BANG BANG BANG BANG DAKKADAKKADAKKADAKKADAKKA BANG BANG BANG BOOM "LOWER YOUR WEAPON!"

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Oct 2014 @ 9:42pm

    i think i've seen this. did the cop drop his coffee cup after the felon left?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2014 @ 1:08am

    Swatting turns deadly. Was only a matter of time.

    Thugs in uniform willing to shoot pets dead just for being near them, beat up people that get in their way. Did anyone expect them not to continue with the time honoured tradition of break into a home shoot first then say "were the police"

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2014 @ 4:38am

      Re:

      I wonder if they have the sense to check the addresses for influential people first. Since it'd get their problem solved pretty damn quickly if someone swatted the governor. After that they'd be lucky to have a SWAT team.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2014 @ 1:13am

    Why would you send a swat team to do a search, don't people play enough Counter Strike and watch enough Tom Clancy movie that the SWAT is lethal force only.

    What did the higher up expected the swat to do?
    Knock politely on the door, in full swat gear, and ask if they can do a sudden search of the property based on the word of a witness that hasn't proven themself?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2014 @ 4:10am

    There really is no justice in this world

    The more times I read about situations like this, the sadder I get about the country I live in. There really is no justice here. The police (i.e. government) can shoot anyone for any trumped up reason and somehow no charges are ever filed.

    The swat team that nearly blew up the kid in Atlanta was just let off by a grand jury. They too didn't find much of anything and were acting on a tip from a known felon.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    AJ, 9 Oct 2014 @ 4:22am

    This is nothing less than state sanctioned murder. The commander of this squad of idiots should be held accountable, as well as the judge that signed the warrant.

    If the judge signs the warrant, then he should be accountable if later it is found that the evidence did not support his signing it in the first place. Common sense starts creeping into things when you suddenly have accountability.

    What SHOULD have happened is this: Judge; You mean to tell me that you have a drug addict in custody, that't currently high, brought up on a number of charges, that CLAIMS he got his drugs from robbing a home and you want to conduct a search? How about you go up and ring the door bell and talk to the citizen, have a conversation with them at the scene, if you have any reason at all while your there to suspect something nefarious, then fine, I'll sign and you can conduct your search, but as it stands I'll need more than the word of a fucked up drug addict before you go busting down the door.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Coyne Tibbets (profile), 9 Oct 2014 @ 4:47am

    It's All Right

    Garrett, the burglar told the cops whatever their rubber hose told him to tell them.

    But it's okay. Since they can't blame Hook (dead guys can't fry) they'll blame Garrett: He'll soon be up for first degree murder.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2014 @ 5:01am

    everytime I read a story like this I think "Do they truly regret their actions now?" and I just can't imagine they do.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    GEMont (profile), 9 Oct 2014 @ 5:54am

    End the War on Common Sense

    Drug use at its absolute worst, is a medical problem.

    By making it a moral problem and making drug use and possession and manufacture illegal, we have accomplished two amazing feats.

    1. We have caused to manifest an extremely lucrative contraband economy that has made millionaires and billionaires of numerous criminals world-wide, over the last half century, who have been using that money as bribes to buy immunity from prosecution, while hiring armies of men to carry out the process of marketing their wares unfettered.

    Our Law Enforcement Agencies have militarized at tax payer's expense, to keep up with the Drug Dealing Joneses, but have, for half a century, lost every battle, while the "enemy" has continuously grown in size and power.

    We call this a War, but only the public suffers casualties, while the warriors on both sides of the law reap massive monetary benefits.

    2. We have put thousands of otherwise innocent young people in prison for self medicating and left them there as the playthings of murderers, rapists, robbers and worse. We call this morality.

    As long as Law Enforcement wields the laws of morality against citizens who misuse medicines, this awful situation will continue to escalate as it has done since the day the War on Drugs was first declared. As the escalation of the losing war on drugs grows, so too will the atrocities and injustices suffered by the public escalate, as the police try harder to win a single battle.

    End the War on Drugs and you end this entire cycle.
    End the Legislation of Morality and you end all such cycles.

    As a benefit, you take away the most lucrative contraband that organized crime has ever had and cut their profits by 80-90 percent overnight, and therefor also end their ability to run the government through bribery and graft.

    Drug abusers need medical attention and care.
    Drug users, like all other citizens, need to be protected from morality legislators.

    ---

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      art guerrilla (profile), 10 Oct 2014 @ 9:52am

      Re: End the War on Common Sense

      and i'm telling you the war on (some) drugs is working just fine...
      IF you are a 1%-er...

      YOU 99% are expecting it is something to 'protect and serve' *THEM*; wave up, sheeple, it is ALL ABOUT the benjamins...

      and NOT for us, but for the 1%: the banksters would be insolvent if it wasn't for laundering drug money... the prison-industrial komplex would go wanting for young black men to torture if it wasn't for the war one (some) people... and corrupt politicians would have to actually do some legislating on our behalf if they didn't have a myriad of distracting hot button issues to deflect and distract us with...

      (said hot button issues like abortion, school prayer, etc have NOTHING to do with 99% of us 99% of the time, but let's talk about that happy horseshit instead of tackling real problems that would mean going against the interest of the korporatocracy...)

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    underlying causes, 9 Oct 2014 @ 6:42am

    the US prosecutorial system, the "curveball" syndrome: telling people what they want to hear

    (Note: "Curveball" was the CIA codename for the Iraqi defector who told fanciful tales of Iraq's secret "weapons of mass destruction" program that the Bush administration blindly accepted at face value ... leading to the ill-fated Iraq war)

    It's surprising to see that no one pointed out that the root of the problem is the US prosecutorial system, in which suspects are heavily pressured to "name names" to get their own criminal charges reduced to a less draconian level. (and cops, under career pressure to find and convict as many people as possible, are more than happy to jump at any such 'naming of names')

    People caught with drugs who refuse to rat-out their dealers or smoking buddies will end up getting the book thrown at them, while those who 'turn informant' and work with police to ensnare others get rewarded (even when they're lying). Amid the pressure to "tell cops what they want to hear," quite often they make up stories (the more colorful, the better) in the blind hope that the people they name just might have drugs on them, and therefore they could get their jail sentence cut in half as a result of a lucky guess. (and even if the cops find nothing, these faux-informers rarely hurt themselves by telling such lies)

    An alarmingly high proportion of SWAT raids are approved by a judge who bases the warrant on nothing more than the say-so of a disreputable criminal who has a strong incentive to lie and make up stories.

    And as a result, innocent people get SWATTED all the time.

    This is a much more common problem than police shootings, and probably ranks up there with 'civil forfeiture' as the most often abused violation of a person's civil rights at the hands of police.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Just Another Anonymous Troll, 9 Oct 2014 @ 7:08am

    In the Artemis Fowl series, the LEP cannot act on information provided by a felon unless that information is verified by an independent source.
    Just goes to show that the People are far more advanced than us.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Sergio, 9 Oct 2014 @ 7:42am

    wtf

    why would you send a SWAT team to search for drugs? mmmm...

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2014 @ 8:03am

    Wow - cops being lead by the nose from a criminal addict. Didnt see that one coming.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    WysiWyg (profile), 9 Oct 2014 @ 8:58am

    Am I the only one that found the judges name, Snell, to be really appropriate in an ironic way?

    I associated Snell with the german word Schnell (would probably be pronounced very similarly), which means fast.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2014 @ 1:10pm

    Their SWAT team should try to execute a weapons search at 942 Dr. Ben Hall Place, Fort Stewart, GA next. I'm sure they would be surprised at what they find there.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    got_runs? (profile), 9 Oct 2014 @ 1:11pm

    Dead until proven alive.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    John85851 (profile), 9 Oct 2014 @ 3:15pm

    We need to hold judges responsible

    The problem is with judges who want to "do something". Like other people are saying, how in the world did a judge approve this? And more importantly, why aren't we holding him or her responsible. After all, if the judge just told the police to talk with the people, the SWAT team wouldn't have banged in the door and shot the guy.

    I hope the couple's lawyer sues the judge and finds him or her responsible for the murder of the guy.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2014 @ 5:09pm

      Re: We need to hold judges responsible

      Because, as a general rule, judges are by law exempt from liability, even for huge fµckups or blatantly biased behavior. Judicial immunity allows them to literally screw people over with impunity, as it's not uncommon for judges to abuse their power.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    toadboy65 (profile), 9 Oct 2014 @ 4:20pm

    I noticed that the victim did not get off a shot, so I imagine he recognized the intruders as police. I live in a rural area. A reasonably safe place, but there is some meth in the area. My fear is that the police will come to my door by mistake. If that happens, I will probably be killed. It is offensive to me that as a veteran and law abiding citizen that I should have to worry about this. Home invaders sometimes yell "Police!Search Warrant!" when they break into a home. That happened about four miles from where I live. It is my duty to protect my family from those who would do them harm. If Jesus himself breaks down my door, I am going to try to stop him with whatever force I can muster. And I don't think the homeowner having a gun is a real issue here. I think we all know that he would have been executed if he had been brandishing a knife, or a golf club, or a fireplace poker.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Zonker, 9 Oct 2014 @ 6:00pm

      Re:

      Home invaders sometimes yell "Police!Search Warrant!" when they break into a home.
      That's how you know they're not police. The police don't knock or announce themselves when they break into your house.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Ed, 4 Apr 2015 @ 6:46am

      Re:

      Since it is your duty to protect your family from those who would do them harm, I'll assume that you've exterminated all of the police in your area.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Aerilus, 9 Oct 2014 @ 6:47pm

    I think these guys need to sit down and watch "SWAT" as part of their training. first you send the stupid fat cops then you send swat so they can make fun of there inadequacy. you dont send swat then call the regular cops to investigate swat murdering everyone thats not how it works in the movies.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Mark Harmon, 6 Dec 2014 @ 5:46pm

    Fuck The SWAT Team!

    Fuck the SWAT Team! The SWAT Team, in my opinion, is just a bunch of motherfuckers trying to fight crime! Shame on the SWAT Team! See you in hell, bitches!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Reverend Draco, 3 Apr 2015 @ 9:21pm

    End these cocksuckers

    The only cure for these brainfried psychopaths is 2 in the chest and 1 in the head.

    Fuck these cocksucking fuckwits.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Techdirt Logo Gear
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.