Metropolitan Police Says They're 'Not Prepared' To Reveal How Often They Abuse Anti-Terror Law To Spy On Journalists
from the must-take-a-lot-of-time-to-count-'em-all-up dept
So we recently wrote about how the Metropolitan Police in the UK abused an anti-terror law, the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA), to dig into a journalist’s phone records without any judicial oversight as the police sought to minimize a scandal relating to an incident (Plebgate) involving the police. That led many to wonder just how often the police abuse that law to get records from journalists with no oversight. The answer appears to be “screw you, we’re not saying.” Or the equivalent of that with a friendly British accent:
Asked how many times they have used Ripa to seize telephone or email records belonging to journalists, Scotland Yard said: ?We are not prepared to discuss.?
The line between “not prepared” and “oh fuck, we don’t have to reveal that, do we?” appears to be fairly blurry.
Filed Under: journalists, metropolitan police, privacy, ripa, scotland yard, surveillance
Comments on “Metropolitan Police Says They're 'Not Prepared' To Reveal How Often They Abuse Anti-Terror Law To Spy On Journalists”
Let loose the hounds...
Or in this case lawyers, because I don’t imagine anything short of a court order will be able to pry that bit of information loose.
If they aren’t willing to answer the question, odds are it’s because the number is rather high, or at least significantly higher than they think they could successfully justify before a real court.
Re: Let loose the hounds...
That. It seems to me that revealing the number would not jeopardize security or ongoing investigations alone. What seems clear from all that is happening in the UK is that the Government is not ready to discuss and apply democracy at all.
Re: Re: Let loose the hounds...
Due to a small misunderstanding the UK government assumed that democracy was that..just a DEMO….now that we’ve seen it, it can be safely rolled up and put in the cupboard under the stairs.
Re: Let loose the hounds...
I think 1 is a number they would have difficulty justifying before a real court
Re: Let loose the hounds...
Better make sure you’re white when you submit that legal case otherwise you might get accidentally shot four times in the head on the London Underground…..
Because Terrorism.
It is the key that unlocks all of the behavior that is against the rights people thought that had and should really make them wonder when they slid into a dictatorship that America would be bombing if only they had oil.
Re: Because Terrorism.
Ok, Lets turn it around and apply all the hot button excuses for why they have to turn it over. I am convinced the terrorists are holding a gun to their spouses head and forcing them to violate our rights. Is that a lousy excuse? Sure. Is it any worse then their excuse for violating the laws? No it is not!!
Re: Re: Because Terrorism.
The UK and US governments are the leading exporters of terrorism in the world. As well as creating false terrorism plots to keep their citizens on edge and distracted from the constant abuses by said governments
the UK police are taking leaves out of USA police books! had the USA perhaps been a bit more democratic instead of becoming a ‘Police State’, maybe allies wouldn’t be so keen to imitate, to ignore authority, thinking they are the law and no one can question what they do!
the world is becoming worse by the day and it’s not just because of disgraceful acts performed by terrorists, it’s the similarity between what terrorists do and our very own law enforcement services. no democratic, self respecting country should be afraid of what might happen if you’re stopped by a police officer. you could end up on a cold slab down the morgue, like so many more seem to these days!
Re: Re:
Oh come on, you have nothing to fear, in either the USA or the UK, when stopped by the police if you have done nothing wrong (and have not accidentally transgressed any of the myriad of laws that criminalize perfectly reasonable behaviour, and broken no “secret” laws, and have the right color skin, and the right accent, and dress properly, and are in the right part of town, and have the right connections, and are a member of the social elite – all of which are subject to change without notice)
How can you possible call this a ‘Police State’?
Re: Re: Re:
“and are not carrying a camera in a public space” should be in there too.
I meet the other criteria easily enough but still worry when I’m out taking pictures.
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Just dont be taking them with your iGun.
It is amazing how many criminals want to work in law enforcement.
Re: Re:
Well why wouldn’t they, other than law enforcement, politics, or the board of large companies, where else could you get complete immunity for any crimes you may commit?
Re: Re: Re:
Hollywood
To protect and serve… our corporate and governmental masters.
When will they ever learn?
In this information era, someone WILL find out the answer, and someone will report it to the public that cares to know the answer, period.
When will these institutions get that? #holdingbreath
(I know, they won’t, probably ever)
When you do bad stuff, the bad stuff gets discussed in the media. The simple solution?
Do good/the right stuff.
(and yes, it is that easy)
Re: When will they ever learn?
Yes someone will report it to the public that cares to know. What will happen then? Nothing at all.
The public that cares to know is a miniscule part of the population. So small as to be easily ignored by the government and political parties in general.
All they need to do is pay lip services to privacy and then scream “terrorism” or “for the children” and then the majority of the population are satisfied.
Asked how many times they have used Ripa to seize telephone or email records belonging to journalists, Scotland Yard said: “We are not prepared to discuss.”
They asked the question wrong , It should have been asked , out of all the journalists , how many haven’t you used Ripa seizures of telephone and emails on.
Think of the Children!!!! We have to save them from the mean truth telling journalists. /s
Asked how many times they have used Ripa to seize telephone or email records belonging to journalists, Scotland Yard said: “We are not prepared to discuss.”
Whoever had the guts to ask that question better have clean phone records.
It might be an accurate answer
If they abuse the anti-terror law in this way a lot, they might not know how many times they’ve done it without doing a formal accounting. If that’s the case, they could honestly be unprepared to answer the question.
Re: It might be an accurate answer
So in short…
We have done it so many times we have literally lost count and are not prepared to reveal an answer to that question!
Re: It might be an accurate answer
Taking cues from the NSA you mean?
‘While yes we may have scooped up an absolutely insane amount of personal data, it would be a violation of people’s privacy if we actually went through and counted how many have had their privacy violated by us!’
seems like a similar answer to the one given by the CoLP! the UK is coming up fast! wont be long before it’s neck-and-neck with the USA in the ‘law enforcement being self-serving ass holes’ race!!
Same shit the US is doing with their NSL letters….feelin’ pretty democratic lately, oh wait I mean authoritarian.
What are they worried for. They get away with openly breaking the law over the biggest things, why would they not be bragging about how they broke the laws in this instance.
I somehow doubt their internal affairs division is going to sit up and take notice of the departments criminality from this problem.
Do a crime that would get a regular citizen sent away for life, get a promotion. Beat someone to death, get paid leave while they sort you did nothing wrong. Claim they feared for their lives and that trumps the law they have no clue about and yet they somehow represent.
History
The UK is and has been for decades the ‘Mini me’ of the USA
That's fine
I’m not prepared to pay anymore taxes to fund MY police… that’s right you still work for us the people.