Magistrate Judge Recommends That Copyright Misuse Defense Be Allowed Against Copyright Troll Malibu Media

from the it's-something dept

It's rare, but every so often we'll see courts willing to entertain claims of copyright misuse. These are situations where copyright law is being so obviously abused for other purposes that a court slaps the abuser down. While it may not go anywhere, it appears that copyright trolling leaders, Malibu Media, who are single-handedly responsible for 40% of all copyright cases filed this year so far, may now have to respond to claims of copyright abuse. In one of its lawsuits, the defendant, Ben Miller, hit back with a long list of defenses, most of which have been rejected or set aside. However, a magistrate judge is recommending the copyright misuse defense be allowed to move forward:
Here, Defendant contends that “Plaintiff uses the same procedures of monitoring unsuspecting members of the public, directly connecting with the individual’s IP address, providing no ‘cease and desist’ notice, waiting until the evidence is destroyed, filing suit, and then offering to settle in exchange for dismissing the suit.” ... Plaintiff counters that “all it has ever done with respect to its copyrights is bring suits to enforce them; as a matter of law, doing so is not copyright misuse.”....

The Court finds that Defendant’s allegations are sufficient to support the affirmative defense. To the extent that the Plaintiff argues Defendant has failed to demonstrate, through his allegations, that the Plaintiff has “misused” the copyright law, the Court finds that such theory necessarily involves the issue of motive, which is generally reserved for the factfinder... (defendant must prove plaintiff “illegally extended its monopoly beyond the scope of the copyright or violated the public policies underlying the copyright laws”). Likewise, to the extent that the Plaintiff argues a “misuse” defense cannot be asserted if the allegation is merely that Plaintiff has filed a suit for infringement, the Court finds that Defendant has sufficiently argued more than the single allegation
The court need not go with this recommendation, but if it does, it could be worth watching closely. Remember, Malibu Media has already been in trouble for some of its practices, and others have long argued that the company is worse than Prenda with its tactics.

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    icon
    Mason Wheeler (profile), May 27th, 2014 @ 3:45pm

    Masnick just hates it when badly-written, overly-broad laws are enforced.

    (Did I do it right?)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    icon
    Xploding_Cobra (profile), May 27th, 2014 @ 3:49pm

    Re:

    Close no cigar. Needs more stupidity. 1 out of 10.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    icon
    That Anonymous Coward (profile), May 27th, 2014 @ 4:38pm

    Who knows we might actually finally get a court to look past the magic box told us, and look into how all of that happens.

    If there is anything the trolls hate, it is bright light looking into their caves.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 27th, 2014 @ 4:39pm

    I agree with Xploding_Cobra. Not enough cow bells and stupidity.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 27th, 2014 @ 8:07pm

    New Law

    If you are filing even 10% of the cases nationally you should be given a special "flooding the damn courts" fee.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    identicon
    Christenson, May 27th, 2014 @ 8:29pm

    Champerty, Champerty...

    Too bad Mr Miller hadn't heard about how the monitoring firm got paid!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    icon
    Ninja (profile), May 28th, 2014 @ 3:09am

    and others have long argued that the company is worse than Prenda with its tactics.

    Worse as in "they provide better comedy"? If so I must disagree.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    identicon
    Mr. Oizo, May 28th, 2014 @ 5:07am

    To entertain the trolls

    WTF has Google to do with this ?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    A trol, May 28th, 2014 @ 8:30am

    Re: To entertain the trolls

    GOOGLE SUX MIK LUVS GOOGL RAGERAGERAGE AT UNRELATED CRAP!
    Was that entertaining for you?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    icon
    G Thompson (profile), May 28th, 2014 @ 9:44am

    Re: To entertain the trolls

    What? Troll! EffOFf

    oh .. well thats what I though the WTF meant, probably not as strange and silly as your whole comment either

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
Advertisement
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Support Techdirt - Get Great Stuff!

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.