Quentin Tarantino Tries, Tries Again Against Gawker: Claims Direct Infringement Because Gawker Knew Page Numbers

from the interesting-theories dept

So about a week ago, we noted that Quentin Tarantino had lost big in his bizarre lawsuit against Gawker for publishing a link to a script he was working on for The Hateful Eight, which had been rumored to have been leaked all over Hollywood. The judge pointed out that Tarantino's wacky theories on contributory copyright infringement made no sense, because they couldn't even show any direct copyright infringement. Of course, Tarantino's lawyers were given a chance to try again, and try again they have with an even more wacky theory. They're now charging Gawker with direct copyright infringement, not for linking to the script, but because they claim someone at Gawker must have downloaded the script, and they prove that because Gawker writers knew how many pages there were in the script.
On January 23, 2014, after Gawker obtained the Screenplay Download URL in response to its request for leak of an unauthorized infringing copy of the Screenplay, Gawker itself illegally downloaded to its computers an unauthorized infringing PDF copy of the Screenplay -- read it and learned that the PDF download document was 146 pages -- directly infringing Tarantino’s copyright.
Tarantino also claims that they induced the person who uploaded the screenplay to AnonFiles to do so and that Gawker's reporters "fabricated a story" about how the document had been made publicly available. It's not clear how Tarantino or his lawyers could possibly know that. Either way, the lawsuit remains quite a stretch -- and certainly could create serious problems for other journalists if the theories that Tarantino is presenting are considered valid copyright infringement.

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1. icon
    johnjac (profile), May 2nd, 2014 @ 12:21pm

    If GI Joe taught us anything, it is "Knowing is half the Battle"

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Michael, May 2nd, 2014 @ 12:32pm

    How does that exchange go down between his attorneys?

    Attorney 1: Damn. The judge saw through our crazy plan. How can be bill more time to this thing?
    Attorney 2: Well, we cannot prove they contributed to copyright infringement without proving SOMEONE infringed. Can we prove that they infringed?
    Attorney 1: How would we do that? We would need to prove they read it.
    Attorney 2: Well, they did know how many pages the script had.
    Attorney 1: Hmm...that's a good point. How could someone possibly know the total number of pages something has without having at least looked at it?
    Junior Attorney: Well, they could have looked at any number of online sources that referenced the number of pages.
    Attorney 1: Shut up and start filing motions.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 2nd, 2014 @ 12:40pm

    i cant believe that Tarantino would lower himself like this! anyone would think he was associated with the entertainment industries and Hollywood! oh! but he is! ! forgot that!

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    bshock, May 2nd, 2014 @ 3:38pm

    In the words of Longfellow...

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    bshock, May 2nd, 2014 @ 3:38pm

    In the words of Longfellow...

    Whom the gods would destroy, they first make mad.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6. icon
    Bergman (profile), May 2nd, 2014 @ 5:46pm


    Which mean that Tarantino has already at least half lost it. Not that that is news...

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7. icon
    art guerrilla (profile), May 2nd, 2014 @ 5:56pm

    i still don't get it...

    ...SO WHAT .0001% of the population who are film-geeks or industry insiders saw the script ?
    i read LOTR a dozen times, yet I STILL WOULD HAVE KILLED to see just about ANY movies done of it...
    i can't IMAGINE ANY movie -whether i had an abiding interest or not- that i would NOT see because i read a story, or novel, or screenplay of it, that is just weird...
    but that fucker always struck me as more than weird enough...

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads


Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.