German Government Blocks Ed Snowden From Testifying Before Parliament So As Not To Upset The US
from the we-delicate-flowers dept
A month ago, we wrote about how the German Parliament was opening hearings in the NSA’s surveillance of German citizens (including Chancellor Angela Merkel) and that some of the lawmakers wanted Ed Snowden to testify (either in person, or providing evidence remotely). At the time, it was noted that “analysts believe Merkel’s government will find a way to sidestep such a move.” And, indeed, that’s exactly what’s happened. The German government has blocked any such testimony for fear of upsetting the American government.
In a letter to members of a parliamentary committee obtained by Süddeutsche Zeitung, government officials say a personal invitation for the US whistleblower would “run counter to the political interests of the Federal Republic”, and “put a grave and permanent strain” on US-German relations.
Because the American government is apparently so insecure that it can’t handle Ed Snowden testifying to the German Parliament? Really? Sometimes, when you look at world diplomacy, it looks like a bunch of elementary school kids. What happened to mature adults who can disagree about things without it causing an international incident?
Apparently, the Green Party is looking to challenge this decision, but it seems unlikely to change.
Filed Under: angela merkel, diplomacy, ed snowden, germany, nsa, surveillance
Comments on “German Government Blocks Ed Snowden From Testifying Before Parliament So As Not To Upset The US”
'Move along, nothing to see'
Well, if nothing else, such a move does make it pretty clear just how the rest of the ‘hearings’ over the NSA’s spying will go, and the eventual outcome.
‘Nope, nothing to see here, our buddies in the good old USA would never conduct massive data scooping on an indiscriminate, wide level against the German people and politicians, so no need to make a fuss about it or investigate any further.’
WE WANT THE TRUTH! Except when it might hurt someone’s feelings, then we don’t want that truth.
Re: Re:
SERIOUSLY! What are they? Canada?
I don't understand German rules, but...
Why does the executive have any say on who gets to speak in parliament? I can understand they may have power to block physical entry into the nation, but how does the executive have power to block remote testimony?
Re: I don't understand German rules, but...
Taking a second look, and reading the source article, it looks like they ‘only’ blocked him coming to Germany to give his testimony personally, instead limiting it to a ‘written questionnaire’, which they apparently feel should be sufficient.
As for the why, well, this might have something to do with it:
‘…it has emerged hours before Angela Merkel travels to Washington for a meeting with Barack Obama.’
Though I imagine this is the more likely reason:
‘Last June the German foreign ministry rejected Snowden’s application for asylum because it was not submitted in person on German soil. If Snowden had been invited as a witness, he could have met these requirements.‘
Denying the chance for him to give his testimony in person also means they don’t find themselves in the position of scrambling for another reason to deny him asylum, since their previous excuse would be moot at that point, and once he was in Germany there would likely be a pretty hefty push to grant him asylum.
Re: Re: I don't understand German rules, but...
In addition, I don’t think it’s beyond the realm of possibility that the questionnaire having to be posted ro e-mailed increases the likelihood of doctoring by US agents.
Maybe my tin-foil band is growing into a hat. I don’t know. But the US has been acting the it’s the onyl game in town for at least a decade and a half, if not longer.
Re: Re: Re: I don't understand German rules, but...
Intercepting the questionnaire, and changing it to make it look like he’s saying something other than what he’s actually saying, either to cover their actions, or make him look bad… with all the other things the spy agencies have been caught doing(especially considering the presence of what amounts to character assassination programs they utilize against ‘enemies’), honestly, at this point I wouldn’t put it past them.
Funnily enough, and somewhat on that same topic, one of, if not the main reasons they wanted him to give his testimony in person was worries that the Russians would be able to affect or interfere with his testimony if he did it via video.
Germany is such a good little client-state.
Uncle Sam says, “sit”, and Germany obeys.
Re: Re:
Germany is still an occupied country without any sovereignty. We don’t even have a peace treaty from WW2 yet.
US-occupied Germany
It’s a shame that Germany has never really gotten past it’s post-war occupation. More than just a puppet state, for all intents and purposes, Germany is still an occupied nation. Except for the Russians, the armies that invaded Germany 70 years ago never left, and the laws put in place by that foreign military occupation are still on the books.
At least now we know what it takes.
The NSA’s surveillance of German citizens doesn’t “put a grave and permanent strain” on US-German relations.”
The NSA’s surveillance of Chancellor Angela Merkel doesn’t “put a grave and permanent strain” on US-German relations.”
US agents kidnapping, sodomizing, drugging, torturing and shipping a German citizen (Khalid El-Masri) to Afghanistan – then dumping him without papers or money in a third country when they realized they had the wrong person – doesn’t “put a grave and permanent strain” on US-German relations.”
U.S. officials threatening the German Government to stop them issuing international warrants for those US agents, doesn’t “put a grave and permanent strain” on US-German relations.”
The US court system’s shameful failure in the El-Masri case doesn’t “put a grave and permanent strain” on US-German relations.”
But… you know…. *questioning* any of this… THAT will “put a grave and permanent strain” on US-German relations.”
Glad we cleared that up.
Re: At least now we know what it takes.
Most world leaders know very well what happens to countries that resist being US-controlled puppet states. The Middle East serves as a good example. Although these countries are essentially all repressive dictatorships (or absolute monarchies, same thing) those showed obedience to the US had their unelected leaders propped up against popular uprisings, while those that resisted US control suffered from CIA-trained-and-financed revolutionaries, and either became cruise-missile targets or were at least overtly threatened with it.
There are of course many ways to intimidate people, and if one method fails to work, there are multiple backups in the US arsenal. We still don’t know what proverbial skeletons might be in Angela Merkel’s closet (and learned through NSA spying) but such things make for convenient leverage to “influence” people.
Re: At least now we know what it takes.
Ah I see your problem..
you are confusing US-German relations with German-US relations.
Snowden 2016
Re: Re:
oh, hell yeah ! ! !
you know, i do believe i will write him in for nearly every office i vote on…
hell yeah…
Re: Re:
He’s not old enough…
A Farce
It just goes to show that the hearing is a farce intended to make German people think that somethingis being done about the US spying on them. This will lose Merkel a lot of support.
You can’t ask a questionare additional questions based on its answers. Banning someone with evidence from court is just wrong.
It is time all countries upset the US government together.
Re: A Farce
Agreed, they should upset them and I don’t mean emotionally. It is about time the world told them to fuck off.
Ostrich
Reminds me of the South Park episode where everyone was going to literally bury their heads in the sand to avoid upsetting muslims.
Say what
The USA spied on every German citizen and the German government is worried that getting to the bottom of that spying will hurt the feelings of the USA? Isn’t that arse about? Shouldn’t the German’s be pissed? Did the USA give a damn about hurting the German’s feeling when they decided to spy.
You can only care as much as the other side. But I suppose the other side isn’t the USA government. The USA & German governments are on the same side. Its their citizens they are opposing.
How weak can you get! I would have thought that after discovering the US spying on high level politicians that the Germans would liked to have rubbed the Yanks noses in the mess by allowing Snowden to speak.
and if the situation were reversed, the USA wouldn’t testify for fear of upsetting the Germans! yeah, right! who the hell are you kiddin? the truth is, everyone knows he would speak the truth and no one wants to have to hear it for fear of being forced to make some changes somewhere along the line. what a bunch of gutless fuckers they are!! i gave them more credit, more sense and more nerve than this!!
We're tough
Hey guys, we’re tough, we can take it.
I suppose there’s a few whiners in our government that would get their feelings hurt, but who cares about them?
As expected.
Germany still tryin to avoid any conflict. Not surprising after the attrocities of ww2 and the illegal courts.
Children?
When is that not the case?
Germany and other Nations should grow a few !!! Time to put some squeeze on our out of control Government I say.And it is time for others to step up to the plate and Tax the creeps who use their Nations to hide their real income……….weasel out of Tax Bills.Those type screw us and screw the Citizens of the Nation they use for low Taxes.
Time for the other Nations to stand up.
German Government Blocks Ed Snowden From Testifying Before Parliament So As Not To Upset The People Who Are Spying On Them All
FIFY