It is really insulting to assume that the American Godfather and his negotiators do not have the best interest of their customers in mind just because they are holding omert? in high regard and don’t burden their subjects with details.

The mouthpiece speaks……..thanks for living to expectations, thanks for fighting for the little guy………oh wait, nevermind, cant change your stripes i guess, too many “important” folks……”everytime i get out, they pull me back in”, huh…….well then, in that case offcourse i understand /s

Re; your May 1, 2014 article entitled “Obama Complains That TPP Critics Are ‘Conspiracy Theorists’ Who ‘Lack Knowledge’ About Negotiations”, you & your readers, et al, may not have had the opportunity to consider the following differences between ‘Conspiracy Theories’ & ‘Global Economic Arrangements’.

SECRET TPPartnership, C-CITreaty & CETA TRIBUNALS are INSIDER TRADING; corp. Canada tells China to “Hit the Road” if Chinese style anti-corruption Blows “Arrangements” between Can. Lobbyists’ Clients & Parties’ Executives (W.A.D. Accord*)? NON Shareholders HAVE TO PAY the arranged PENALTIES.

(CAN) – Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s attempts to maintain the secrecy provisions in the Canada – China Investment Treaty (C-CIT; FIPPA) & the Canada – European Union CETA may be unraveling by way of the Canadian Senate, which is being threatened with being abolished, et al.

There are several reasons for the secrecy (“omerta”) of the dispute resolution tribunals. They are:

1) To Protect the parties to the treaty, &/or, agreement, ie. corporate sponsors, from having to reveal to the non shareholding tax payers the existing arrangements that it has with its own government. For instance, the Canadian W.A.D. Accord suggests that corporate Canada’s lobbyists pay considerations to the executives of the political parties for two main reasons:

A) to promote corporate Canada’s agenda with governing party(ies) by:

i) reducing its taxes & thus, the “net increase” in taxes for non shareholders

&

ii) increase its funding for “economic development” which covers the cost of, among other things, the present & future advocacy, ie. lobbying & the cost of the considerations that corporate Canada pays out, etc. It may be regrettable that given the source of the accessed “economic development” funds, ie. those 95% – 99% of Canadians who are non shareholding tax payers there is a great deal of room for discressionary spending & its abuse

and

B) to protect corporate Canada’s agenda by paying the other (non governing) political parties considerations in order to limit the scope of the “opposition” to manageable issues that can be compromised in order that “opposing” parties can claim victories (at least a limited victory) for their constituents. Under this arrangement both, the politicians & the lobbyists’ clients are protected from scrutiny by the role of the parties’ executives.

2) To Protect the parties to the treaty, &/or, agreement, ie. corporate sponsor from having to reveal to the each others’ corporate sponsors their existing arrangements that it has with its own government & thus, each counties’ corporate sponsors are not obliged to share the benefits & considerations (& future considerations) that they receive from their respective governments ie. their non shareholding taxpayers. Often the benefits are shared as an inducement to conduct business together in the more convenient jurisdictions.

3) To Protect the parties to one treaty, &/or, agreement (referred to as the “original” treaty/agreement) from having to reveal to third parties the nature, &/or, details of their “original” arrangements to other third parties who may want to enter into a treaty, &/or, agreement with either of the parties to the “original” agreement/treaty.That is to say, that acquiring & having privileged information of an outsiders treaties, &/or, agreements will cause contention as the third party will undoubtedly insist upon more favorable terms & conditions to a new treaty/agreement than the original treaty/agreement. For example; “You did this with them, so I insist upon more, or, I’ll deal with them, or, others”. The European Union is particularly interested in preventing the Canada – European Union CETA from becoming divisive whereby individual EU member countries may be enticed, &/or, coerced into making preferential, but, “very secretive” side deals with corporate Canada, et al.

By preventing the non shareholding taxpayers from learning about the aforementioned reasons for the tribunals’ secrecy whereby the non shareholding taxpayers pay for the increase in the value of the shareholders’ stocks & dividends is insider trading & stock manipulation.

Therefore, corporate Canada, AFN & their traditional media outlets have more than just a vested interest in the continuation of the most vulnerable Canadians (95% – 99% of Native & non Native Canadians) deprivation of the information such as the comprehensive version of The W.A.D. Accord and the comprehensive versions of the Canada – China Investment Treaty, the Canada – European Union CET Agreement, et al, that include the mechanisms, procedures, practices used in the adjudications of the dispute resolution tribunal & its disbursement of its punitive awards.

And, while it may be regrettable that not all of the 95% – 99% most vulnerable, non shareholders are able, &/or, willing to move to a sovereign Quebec, or, other jurisdictions, in order to:

1) avoid the “unethical” & “inhumane” (see; The W.A.D. Accord), but, “legal” practices

and

2) start getting the relevant & quantitative information regarding the above, et al.

The issue of the secret tribunals raises some interesting questions that the “secret congress” of the lobbyists’ clients & the executives of the political parties have no intention of answering. For instance; what do the above arrangements say about the 95% – 99% of Canadians who are non shareholding tax payers & the version of “democracy” that they are developing in Canada in the context of the growing “global” economy

and

what do the above arrangements say about the accelerating growth of the disparity of the wealth between the shareholders (1% – 5% of Canadians, et al) & the non shareholders (95% – 99% of Canadians), et al?

What are you, the reader, learning about the Canada – China Investment Treaty that will help you to ascertain whether the Canada – European Union Agreement is better for you & perhaps, corporate Canada?

What are some of the other questions that the non shareholders need to ask

&

who can answer, &/or, is willing to answer (as opposed to “respond’ to) their questions that would make them willing participants & direct beneficiaries of the C-CIT & the CETA?

Have you & your family, friends & colleagues sent PM Harper & Mr. DAN HILTON (Executive Director of the Conservative Party) your:

“NOTIFICATION of Preexisting CHALLENGE to the CANADA ? CHINA

INVESTMENT TREATY”

and

“NOTIFICATION of Preexisting CHALLENGE to the CANADA – EUROPEAN UNION

COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC & TRADE AGREEMENT”

in order to enhance your opportunity to exculpate yourself from having to pay for:

1) the aforementioned Compensation that is embodied in The W.A.D. Accord

&

2) the costs, penalties, punitive damages that will be derived from the C-CITreaty

& the CETAgreement?

In conclusion, it may be regrettable that the C-CITreaty & the CETAgreement has, so far, been successful at giving corporate Canada & its representatives the much higher degree of legitimacy to their aforementioned secrecy (assisted by way of the international cache) that it needs in order for them to later, & once again, claim (see; NAFTA) that they are doing/did “their best” to protect the non shareholders from the over zealousness of their foreign Treaty, &/or, Agreement counterparts.

Is it not easier & just prudent to discuss the preexisting arrangements & challenges to the Treaty & the Agreement prior to ratifying them in order to determine which is more egregious than the other (or, are both equally egregious) & thus, avoid any of the secret “dispute” resolutions & its “hefty” costs to the beleaguered non shareholding taxpayers, et al? And, how much more will these costs further erode the non shareholding taxpayers health care (privatize), educational services, etc.?

How much has corporate Canada set aside to defend the CHALLENGES, et al, that corporate Canada & the non shareholders are anticipating? How far along are they in collecting this fund & how much more does corporate Canada & its shareholders need to set aside before the non shareholding taxpayers allow corporate Canada & its representatives to proceed?

Similarly, due to a psychiatrist’s previous linking of the deprivation of information with the unconscionably high rates of despair, disenchantment, suicides, unemployment, poverty, etc., that are found in many communities across Canada,

what are the various different ways that non shareholders can guarantee that corporate Canada & its shareholders have enough financial reserves set aside in order to pay for the CHALLENGES by the non shareholders and those who will be the new victims of the aforementioned deprivation of information?

On the other hand, are there actually any non shareholding taxpayers who think that corporate

Canada is actually anxious to explain to them, or, corporate China, or, corporate EU, just how effective their secretive relationship between:

1) lobbyists’ of corporate Canada

&

2) the executives of the parties that are operating in Canada

has been & is continuing to be?

And, finally, without:

1) a meaningful forum in which to “further question” the Treaty & Agreement without the fear of recriminations, etc.,

2) a predetermined list of circumstances whereby corporate Canada can terminate the Treaty & the Agreement without penalties, &/or, costs to the harmless non shareholding taxpayers

&

3) et al,

the ratification of the C-CITreaty & the CETAgreement will eliminate for most Canadians the last remnants of “democratically” effecting the treaty/agreement by the non shareholding taxpayers

& thus,

corporate Canada, et al, will finally be able to give these arrangements the luster of legitimacy that they need that is based upon the logic that “It can’t be another gilded cage that will cause another economic melt down like the “derivative type conspiracy”** that is continuing to debilitate international finance, etc., because there are just too many vanguards of industry promoting the public financing of the C-CITreaty & CETAgreement”.

The secrecy of the C-CITreaty & CETAgreement arrangements are not dissimilar to insider trading, whereby the shareholders who are on “the inside” use secret, &/or, privileged information to make money for themselves at the expense of the group that is on the “outside”, the non shareholding taxpayers, who are being deprived of the aforementioned information & thus, are being deprived of the opportunity to enjoy the direct benefits of the treaty/agreement. And, just as some of the means

to counter these arrangements are also not dissimilar to those counter

measures that can remedy insider trading & pay punitive damages, etc. to the harmless non shareholders. And, while it is likely that the “coveted” Chinese investor*** may have enough of the insider information regarding the more “unethical”, &/or, “inhumane” arrangements in the C-CITreaty to navigate the mechanisms of the secret dispute resolution tribunal in his favor & at the peril of corporate Canada, it may be regrettable that it is highly unlikely that the European Union has been as fortunate regarding the CETA arrangements. This disparity between China’s benefits from the C-CITreaty & the benefits that the EU may derive from their CETA will continue to be dangerously contentious.

And, finally, it may also be regrettable that there is yet another vulnerability that corporate Canada, especially its Alberta chapter, is particularly desperate to be kept secret for as long as possible and it only remains to be seen when it will be most advantageous to “leak” the secret & by which party.

* The W.A.D. Accord; Reference:

For those who may not be familiar with The WAD Accord, &/or, its recent developments, The Accord can be accessed on line by way of the submission entitled:

“Towards a More Informed Opinion regarding the Environmental Impact & Context of the NGP (Pipeline), et al”, Researched & Submitted by D.E.H.S., July 24, 2012 to the Enbridge Co.’s NGP Joint Review Panel..

Contact:

Ms. Colette Spagnuolo,

GatewayProcessAdvisor@ceaa-acee.gc.ca

Process Advisor, Northern Gateway Project

(22nd Floor, 160 Elgin St. Ottawa ON K1A 0H3)

regarding:

http://gatewaypanel.review-examen.gc/cl … r-eng.html

Public Registry; File #A43076

All letters of comment are under “F”. This comment is available

under the subfolder “S”.

Further questions?;

GatewayProcessAdvisor@ceaa-acee.gc.ca

For the other information that may lead the non shareholders, corporate China and corporate European Union & their shareholders & the non shareholders, et al, to a greater certainty regarding

what corporate Canada may be sharing with you regarding the accessing of the aforementioned, information & Canadian natural resources, et al, I can be contacted at:

David E.H. Smith, 2173 Bradford Ave., Sidney, British Columbia, CANADA. V8L 2C8.,

Non shareholders & the other potential participants in the C-CITreaty CETAgreement can access more of the relevant articles that have been researched & posted on Facebook (& several online newspapers, et al) at:

Facebook; “David Smith”, Sidney, British Columbia.

https://www.facebook.com/resea…

GOOGLE; “David E.H. Smith”; &/o, RECENT ARTICLES, LETTERS & NOTIFICATIONS by DEHS, below.

** “derivative type conspiracy”; “The $58 Trillion Elephant in the Room” by Jesse Eisinger. Upstart Business Journal, October 15, 2008, 8:00am EDT. Re; the “industrialized credit derivatives”

http://upstart.bizjournals.com…

*** the “coveted” Chinese investor; Who is the “coveted” Chinese investor who said:

“It’s not that we are racist when we are dealing with Canadians,

it’s just that we can’t stand the way that you suck up to us.”?

**********

GOOGLE; RECENT ARTICLES, LETTERS & NOTIFICATIONS by DEHS,

Reader Supported News (RSN)

1) CETA; IS corporate CANADA JUST continuing its “SUCKING UP” (C-CIT) & shi…”PURGING DOWN?,

2) FINANCIAL & HUMAN RIGHTS NEWS: EU – CAN. Comprehensive Economic & Trade Agreement (CETA): ‘EU may consider “Renditioning Info” as Condition of CETA Deal to Minimize “Unethical & Inhumane” Arrangements between Canadian lobbyists’ clients/parties’ executives; CHINA may follow in C-CITreaty’?,

3) WHY the AFN may be “DRAGGING its HEELS” on CRITICALLY N.B. ISSUES & Causing the Formation of a New First Nations Group?,

4) “NATIVE SUICIDES LINKED TO INFO. DEPRIVATION” HELP IS ON THE WAY?,

5) C-CI Treaty; “It’s Now SAFE…” CETA… Euros cautioned about corporate Canada,

6) (RSN) “CHINA’S KIND HELP from its MINISTRY of STATE SECURITY (MSS) maybe ACCEPTED by CSIS…”?,

7)> ?… WE ARE RACIST when it comes to dealing with CANADIANS…?? FINANCIAL & HUMAN RIGHTS NEWS; DEHS, Re; “A Response…” is not an answer to the questions raised in “C-CI Treaty; SPY/AGENT PROVOCATEUR…or, The RELUCTANT (Ethical & Humane) PATRIOT?,

8) Improving, or, Eliminating the China-Canada Investment Treaty via The WAD Accord,

9) FINANCIAL NEWS: Canada-European Union – Trade and Investment Enhancement Agreement (TIEA) The taxpayers/voters of Europe are cautioned… arrangements with corporate Canada,

10) ENBRIDGE; JRP: “TOWARDS a more INFORMED OPINION…”,

11)(RSN) CSIS; PRIVY COUNCIL; “The THREAT ASSESSMENT”; CSIS; re; NAFT Agreement, C-CI Treaty, CET Agreement, TP Partnership, et al. (Edited; Jan., 2014),

12) > Have you HELPED YOUR FAMILY & Friends by sending your NOTIFICATION of a PREEXISTING CHALLENGE?,

13) (RSN) SPY/AGENT PROVOCATEUR for corp. China-Canada, & their Investors, or, The RELUCTANT (Ethical & Humane) PATRIOT for the Most Vulnerable (99%) of Canadians-Chinese, et al?; The Mechanism for Ascertaining & Vote to stop, &/or, Improve the Canada-China FIPPA,

14) “A Response…” is not an answer to the questions raised in “C-CI Treaty…”,

15) Improving, or, Eliminating the China-Canada Investment Treaty via The WAD Accord (“China treaty uproar signals growing rift between Ottawa, grassroots conservatives”),

16) Eliminating, &/or, Improving the C-CI Treaty (FIPPA) by Using The WAD Accord & Ms. Elizabeth May’s (MP) letter,

17) (RSN) TIRED of Political BELIEFS; why not ask QUESTIONS that can form the basis for more INFORMED OPINIONS? See; Response to Ms. Elizabeth May – MP, Nov. 2, 2012 letter.A DIAGNOSTIC TEST of Canada’s Version of “DEMOCRACY”; SIMPLE, “DEMOCRATIC” QUESTIONS for “our”(?) Members of Parliament, et al.,

18) (RSN) SECRET C-CITreaty & CETA TRIBUNALS are INSIDER TRADING,

19) >”WELL, YOU SHOULD HAVE KNOWN”. – George H.W. Bush. Re; American police to operate on Canadian soil; arrangements between corporate America & corporate Canada; CETA & C-CIT.,

20) >The RED HERRING; The SENATE “SCANDAL”,

21) USING The WAD ACCORD to IMPROVE, &/or, ELIMINATE the C-CI Treaty (FIPPA); Response to Ms. Elizabeth May – MP, Nov. 2, 2012 letter.,

22) “Indigenous Economies” & “MUNICIPAL EMANCIPATION”,

23) (RSN) Non SHAREHOLDERS, Native & Non Native, are WHINING CAMP FOLLOWERS?,

24) “CONSIDERATIONS’ paid to ALL PARTIES to PROMOTE C-CITreaty & CETA, et al and to LIMIT “OPPOSITION” (see; The WAD Accord)?,

25) (RSN) INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE, or, INTELLIGENT SHARING; The Edge, or, Illusion for Who?,

26) (RSN) DEATH of FIRST NATIONS; NOW “SUE-ABLE” NATIVE “FIRST MUNICIPALITIES”; “EMANCIPATION” & “Indigenous Economies”)?,

27) (RSN) The Termination Plan for Native Canadians, ET AL; The COUNTER OFFER REFERENDUMS; The WAD Accord, The Notification of C-CI Treaty (CETA & TPP), The Termination Plan, The T.P. Counter Offer, et al,

28) GLOBAL LOBBYISTS’ MANAGERS ACKNOWLEDGE & understand REFERENDUMS on;”The WAD ACCORD’s COMPENSATION”, “NOTIFICATION of Preexisting CHALLENGES to C-CI Treaty” (& CET Agreement, TP Partnership, et al,) “The COUNTER OFFER to The Termination Plan for Native Canadians, ET AL”, et al?,

29) CHAIRMAN MAO’S LAST LAUGH? / The GREEN PARTY of CANADA, et al, LEAKs…,

30) (RSN) An OPEN LETTER to Canadian NON SHAREHOLDERS (both; Native & non Native), et al.145 years of corporate Canada using non shareholders’ tax dollars to be used to REWARD SHAREHOLDERS with punitive penalties paid by NON SHAREHOLDERS via NAFTA, C-CIT, CETA, TPP, et al, SECRET TRIBUNALS,

31) (RSN) TOWARDS A MORE INFORMED OPINION; The SHAREHOLDERS of the Global Corporate Economy VS. the NON SHAREHOLDERS; The Acceleration of The FINAL DISPARITY between the Rich & the Poor; Enbridge’s Northern Gateway (Pipeline) Project

see also;

1) (RSN) PRIME MINISTER HARPER, et al, YOU HAVE BEEN SERVED with; “NOTIFICATIONS of Preexisting CHALLENGES…C-CITreaty” & CETA…, TPP, et al,

2) PRESIDENT XI JINPING (CHINA); YOU HAVE BEEN SERVED with “The NOTIFICATION of Preexisting CHALLENGE…C-CITreaty”,

3) PRESIDENTS; H.V. ROMPUY (EU Council), J. BARROSO (EU Commission) & M. SCHULZ (EU Parliament); YOU HAVE BEEN SERVED with “The NOTIFICATION of Preexisting CHALLENGE…CETAgreement”,

4) PRESIDENTS/PRIME MINISTERS Trans Pacific nations; YOU HAVE BEEN SERVED with “The NOTIFICATION of Preexisting CHALLENGE… TPPartnership”

Anytime government labels the people as being “conspiracy theorists”, that’s a clear indicator that the people are right.