by Mike Masnick
Tue, Apr 15th 2014 5:16am
Somewhat late to the game (by about a week), after the Heartbleed vulnerability was publicly revealed, and a few days after it was reported and denied that the NSA was already well aware of Heartbleed and exploiting it, the NSA has put out a one page PDF about Heartbleed. This seems like something of a too little, too late effort by the NSA to live up to its semi-promise of a "bias" towards revealing vulnerabilities over exploiting them. However, that leads to the simple question that plenty of people should be asking: given everything you've learned about the NSA recently (or, well, for years), would you trust the NSA's advice on how to deal with Heartbleed? Not that I think the NSA would publicly suggest anything bad, but at this point, the NSA has a serious trust problem in convincing anyone engaged in computer security that they have their best interests in mind.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- NSA Makes Pitch For Section 702 Approval While Its 702 Requests Aren't Being Approved By The Court
- Former Spies' Dubious Claim: Release Of NSA's Windows Exploits Has Seriously Harmed National Security
- Latest Exploit Dump By Shadow Brokers Contains Easy-To-Use Windows Exploits, Most Already Patched By Microsoft
- Oh, Sure, Now Congress Is Serious About Asking NSA About Surveillance On Americans
- DOJ Memo Shows NSA And White House Lawyers Mainly Unconcerned About Evidence Obligations In Criminal Trials