That Time A Star Trek Captain And A Physicist Got Tricked Into Doing A Documentary On Geocentrism

from the all-hail-the-earth dept

What with the democratization of filmmaking technology, we’ve seen a relative explosion in films, as production has been opened to a whole population that would otherwise be unable to produce their wares. This, by and large, is a good thing. The barriers to entry have been lowered, streaming sites like YouTube provide an avenue for distribution, and we all get as many cute puppy videos as we can possibly handle. The flipside is that there are some jackasses out there who put out terrible crap. The whole Innocence Of Muslims fiasco is but one example, with actors reportedly being duped, controversial producers who remained in the shadows, and a finished product that would be most at home in the nearest dumpster. The technology is a great thing, but that doesn’t mean there aren’t pitfalls, and those lending their names to films and shows need to be careful about what they’re getting into.

Like Kate Mulgrew, for instance. The former Star Trek captain apparently did some voiceover work for a film that pushes the theory of geocentrism (Earth as the center of the universe).

Kate Mulgrew—best known as that show’s Captain Janeway—has lent her familiar voice to The Principle, an upcoming documentary about the belief that the Earth is the center of the universe. The film has been in the works for a while, though it’s mostly been as ignored as those who have propagated the theory of Geocentrism past the 17th century. In a post on her Facebook page, the actress addressed that discussion, denying any involvement beyond being a hired gun who maybe should have asked a few more questions:

“I understand there has been some controversy about my participation in a documentary called THE PRINCIPLE. Let me assure everyone that I completely agree with the eminent physicist Lawrence Krauss, who was himself misrepresented in the film, and who has written a succinct rebuttal in SLATE. I am not a geocentrist, nor am I in any way a proponent of geocentrism. More importantly, I do not subscribe to anything Robert Sungenis has written regarding science and history and, had I known of his involvement, would most certainly have avoided this documentary. I was a voice for hire, and a misinformed one, at that. I apologize for any confusion that my voice on this trailer may have caused.”

Lawrence Krauss, should you not know, is a famous physicist that would push the idea of geocentrism as much as he’d claim the moon was made of cheese (it’s not by the way…). He published an article in Slate stating that he’s unaware of how he ended up in the film, but it probably resulted from filmmakers pulling clips of him from around the internet and editing them in such a way as to make it sound like he supported the theory. Krauss, being smart, refuses to dignify the film with any legal action.

The man behind the film is Robert Sungenis, who has dedicated his life to arguing for geocentrism, among other crackpot nonsense.

Sungenis—who has a Ph.D. in religious studies from “a private distance-learning institution in Republic of Vanuatu”—has used those credentials to establish a career as a leading proponent of Geocentrism, based on an understanding of astrophysics drawn from that most esteemed of scientific manuals, the Bible. In addition to denying anyone can prove the Earth revolves around the sun, he’s also well known for denying anyone can prove 6 million Jews died during the Holocaust. He’s also claimed that Jews are in league with Satan to take over the planet.

Delightful. In any case, it would be very easy and understandable for Mulgrew and Krauss to be royally pissed over this and pursue legal action. In fact, in light of the recent ruling in favor of Cindy Garcia, Mulgrew may even have a copyright claim to make, as ridiculous as that is. What a wonderful world of litigation Judge Kozinski has opened for us all, despite his proclamation on how rarely his ruling could be enforced. We’re mere weeks away, yet here’s another situation in which an actress who should have done her homework can point to Cindy Garcia’s victory and claim copyright. Fortunately, Mulgrew seems to understand what Kozinski did not: that she was a “voice for hire” and that a good deal of the responsibility for knowing what she was lending her voice (and thus credibility) to is her own.

I’d argue that a little public refuting without any legal action, which would only serve to put The Principle in the headlines, and a more proactive approach to vetting the material before committing to a project is all that’s required. After all, it’s not like any substantial number of people will take this film seriously. As long as the public knows some of those involved were duped, that should be the end of it.

Filed Under: , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “That Time A Star Trek Captain And A Physicist Got Tricked Into Doing A Documentary On Geocentrism”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
43 Comments
Fushta (profile) says:

Re: Doctor of Astrodiscombobulation

That’s pretty amazing that Vanuatu has a “distance-learning institution,” since they didn’t even exist until Survivor was filmed there in 2004.

The winner of that season was Chris Daugherty who was elected Ruler of Vanuatu for life. He is not to be confused with Chris Daughtry who is a soloist for the Vanuatu Bald Men’s Choir.

Anonymous Coward says:

I can not but wonder exactly what religious branch was his supposed specialty. Were it to be Islamic then we can understand the use of lies to get his tale told on film as I think I recall their belief is that is it ok to lie to non-believers of their faith.

Yet the article mentions drawing his scientific source from the bible. If he is a believer of Christianity, then one of it’s tenets is about lying if I remember correctly.

I would like to think that Mr. Sungenis is not really religiously oriented; at least not sanely. For which religion would want to claim him as one of their own?

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

If you go back to medieval times, you will see a catholic push for geocentrism and prosecution of anyone denying it. Thus, if not literally part of the bible (all religious understanding is interpretative to some extend), it is part of at least a historic religious tradition.

As for Islam, you are claiming a moral inferiority, much like Sungenis is claiming a moral superiority in denouncing jews and understanding earth as gods center-piece.

Mark Byron says:

Re: Sungenis is Catholic

When he’s not doing geocentrism, he’s a Catholic apologist on the right edge of Catholic thought; Pope Benedict would be a flaming liberal by comparison. I’ve seen is name come up over the years for being a couple notches “out there” for even my conservative Catholic blog-buddies.

Matthew M says:

Re: Re: Sungenis is Catholic

It has been noted that Bob Sungenis was previously employed as a catholic apologist with a traditionalist bent. That’s true.

Thing is, he went off the rails years ago. The local Catholic bishop some time ago ordered him to stop publishing his junk as ‘Catholic’. Such public denunciations are exceedingly rare. But Sungenis is a terrific fruitcake.

Within Reason says:

Re: Re:

Sungenis?who has a Ph.D. in religious studies from ?a private distance-learning institution in Republic of Vanuatu??has used those credentials to establish a career as a leading proponent of Geocentrism, based on an understanding of astrophysics drawn from that most esteemed of scientific manuals, the Bible.

Uh, Geocentrism isn’t in the Bible, it’s an old, abandoned Roman Catholic doctrine.

In addition to denying anyone can prove the Earth revolves around the sun

I presume he has a degree in “La la la, I can’t hear yoooouuuu!”

he?s also well known for denying anyone can prove 6 million Jews died during the Holocaust. He?s also claimed that Jews are in league with Satan to take over the planet.

Potential tagline for “THE PRINCIPLE”: See no stupid, hear no stupid, speak no stupid.

Mind you, that applies to anything Sungenis says.

smith says:

Re: your comment

“I can not but wonder exactly what religious branch was his supposed specialty. Were it to be Islamic then we can understand the use of lies to get his tale told on film as I think I recall their belief is that is it ok to lie to non-believers of their faith.”

christian religion lies too and probably even more than most others.
you white people like you are so hateful.

That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: Comment, what else...?

Here’s one of the big differences: Global warming? That has scientific backing, and a lot of it. There may be some minor quibbles over whether or not it’s human driven, but the scientific consensus is pretty solidly on the side that it is happening.

The idea that everything in the universe, or even just the solar system revolves around the earth, rather than the sun? That has the exact opposite of scientific backing, to the point that any reputable scientist or person that knows anything about the field, and isn’t getting their ‘scientific knowledge’ from a couple thousand years old book, will point out how arrogant, egotistical and laughable such an idea is, with pretty much no actual real science behind it.

MacCruiskeen says:

:Fortunately, Mulgrew seems to understand what Kozinski did not: that she was a “voice for hire”

Mulgrew is presumably enough of a professional that if she were doing a job like this for pay, there would have been some sort of contract spelling this out explicitly. And while one could say that actors should think about these things more carefully, clearly the producers are counting on the fact that often they do not. I mean, Mulgrew claims she was duped; what was Jonathan Frakes’ excuse for the alien autopsy TV special, or Mitch Pileggi for the moon hoax Fox special?

Critical Thinker says:

Airheads Incorporated

She got paid, didn’t do due diligence to see what she was narrating, and probably didn’t understand enough about science to realize what she was reading in the narrative. So what’s the gripe? This whole thing only reveals that she is scientifically illiterate. That’s why its called “acting.”

At least some nitwit politician didn’t try to put her on the board of NASA or the Smithsonian Air and Space Museum.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...