Senate Intelligence Committee Agrees To Declassify Key Points Of CIA Torture Report

from the good-news dept

While not entirely unexpected, it's good to see that the Senate Intelligence Committee has finally voted to declassify the key parts of the massive 6,300 page report on the CIA's torture program. As we've been discussing for months, this report, which cost $40 million and has been progressing for years, has been the subject of a pretty big fight from the CIA. It was expected that the Intelligence Committee would approve declassifying the executive summary -- which itself runs 480 pages -- along with "20 findings and conclusions" from the report. It seemed clear that the Democrats on the committee would support declassification (and President Obama has supported it as well), though it was unclear if Republicans would. Yesterday, we noted that Republican Senator Susan Collins announced her support for declassification, while also directly calling the CIA's program "torture," -- something that others on the committee have been afraid to do.

What's a bit surprising is that the vote wasn't even close: 11 to 3 in favor of declassifying the report, and even the highest ranking Republican, Saxby Chambliss voted in favor of declassification, though he did so under what appears to be a bit of a protest. His statement about the vote certainly sounds like sour grapes, rather than strong support:
"Today, I voted in favor of sending a portion of this majority report to the executive branch for declassification. Despite the report’s significant errors, omissions, and assumptions—as well as a lot of cherry-picking of the facts—I want the American people to be able to see it and judge for themselves. In addition, this study has been an expensive, partisan distraction that has hindered the committee’s ability to provide oversight of current national security issues, including NSA reforms, cybersecurity, Russia, Syria, and Afghanistan. I hope we can put this behind us and focus on the national security challenges at hand.

While I agree with some of the conclusions in this report, I take strong exception to the notion that the CIA’s detention and interrogation program did not provide intelligence that was helpful in disrupting terrorist attacks or tracking down Usama bin Ladin. This claim contradicts the factual record and is just flat wrong. Intelligence was gained from detainees in the program, both before and after the application of enhanced interrogation techniques, which played an important role in disrupting terrorist plots and aided our overall counterterrorism operations over the past decade."
Another Republican on the committee, Tom Coburn also called it torture, though he insisted that the CIA did it in "good faith" and voted "present" rather than in favor of declassification.
“I agree that some of the more extreme Enhanced Interrogation Techniques (EITs) could be considered torture, and that in the future this country should not rely on such techniques. Yet, at the time, they had legal sanction. Readers of the report will make their own judgments about how they were implemented. I believe that the CIA acted imperfectly, but in good faith and under great urgency to prevent an attack from a little understood enemy that had brought devastation to our shores."
Feinstein was willing to call it "a stain on our history that must never again be allowed to happen" but refused to call it torture.

Of course, the "fight" is not over yet. There will certainly be a fight over how the declassification is handled and the public won't see the report for many, many months. Senator Mark Udall, who has been a big critic of the intelligence community for a while, has asked that the CIA not handle the declassification itself, knowing that it will over-classify:
"Following today’s historic vote, the president faces what I believe should be a straightforward question. He can defer declassification decisions to the CIA — which has demonstrated an inability to face the truth about this program — or pass this authority to the Director of National Intelligence or hold on to the redaction pen himself. The president needs to understand that the CIA’s clear conflict of interest here requires that the White House step in and manage this process."
Of course, throughout the past few weeks, more and more details of what's in the report have been leaked to the press (including some more leaks today, which we'll try to write about shortly)...
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: cia, declassification, dianne feinstein, mark udall, saxby chambliss, senate, senate intelligence committee, tom coburn, torture


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Pragmatic, 9 Apr 2014 @ 5:39am

    Re: Ways of getting information from someone

    All of that is ineffective, Shadow-Slider

    To preface, if you have been captured and don't want to divulge information,

    First let them ask politely, then pretend you don't know the answer.
    If they don't give up and let you go, goto
    Second let them ask rudely,then pretend you don't know the answer.
    If they don't give up and let you go, goto
    Third let them offer a bribe, then pretend you don't know the answer.
    If they don't give up and let you go, goto
    3b Let them threaten destruction of personal property, then pretend you don't know the answer.
    If they don't give up and let you go, goto
    1.3b.i provide a plausible alternative to the truth.
    If they don't give up and let you go, goto
    3c let them destroy personal property and repeat the lie.
    If they don't give up and let you go, goto
    Fourth Let them threaten imprisonment and repeat the lie.
    If they don't give up and let you go, goto
    Fifth let them threaten to torture you, and repeat the lie.
    If they don't give up and let you go, goto
    Sixth let them threaten you with your death, and repeat the lie.
    If they don't give up and let you go, goto
    Seven let them threaten to imprison your family, and repeat the lie. Plead for mercy and insist as often as you can that this is true. Swear by everything you can think of that it's true.
    If they don't give up and let you go, goto
    Eight let them threaten to torture your family, and repeat the lie. Plead for mercy and insist as often as you can that this is true. Swear by everything you can think of that it's true.
    If they don't give up and let you go, goto
    Nine let them threaten to kill your family, and repeat the lie. Plead for mercy and insist as often as you can that this is true. Swear by everything you can think of that it's true.
    If they don't give up and let you go, goto
    Ten let them imprison them, and repeat the lie. Plead for mercy and insist as often as you can that this is true. Swear by everything you can think of that it's true.
    If they don't give up and let you go, goto
    Eleven let them torture you, and repeat the lie. Plead for mercy and insist as often as you can that this is true. Swear by everything you can think of that it's true. Complain about how much it hurts and ask them if they're even human.
    If they don't give up and let you go, goto
    Twelve let them imprison your family, and repeat the lie. Weep piteously and insist that everything you've said is true. Plead for mercy and insist as often as you can that this is true. Swear by everything you can think of that it's true. Question the humanity of your captors and try to get them to understand what it is to be a father/mother/son, etc.
    If they don't give up and let you go, goto
    Thirteen let them torture your family in front of you,
    and repeat the lie.
    If they don't give up and let you go, goto
    Fourteen let them kill your family front of you, and repeat the lie.
    If they don't give up and let you go, after number ten they either don't know or won't tell you. Eleven through
    Fourteen are for sadists only and provide no useful information.

    FIFY

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Special Affiliate Offer

Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.