EFF Sues Over National Security Letters... But Can't Tell You Who Its Clients Are

from the because-secrecy dept

The ridiculous (and most likely illegal) gag orders around widely abused "National Security Letters" (NSLs) is pretty widely known. It's created absurd situations in which companies have had to go to court secretly without being able to admit that they were fighting on behalf of their users, except in rare cases where the gags are finally lifted.

Well, here we go again, as the EFF has challenged NSLs issued to two separate companies -- one telco and one internet company. However, because of the gag orders, EFF isn't even allowed to say who its clients are in these filings.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) filed two briefs on Friday challenging secret government demands for information known as National Security Letters (NSLs) with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The briefs—one filed on behalf of a telecom company and another for an Internet company—remain under seal because the government continues to insist that even identifying the companies involved might endanger national security.

While the facts surrounding the specific companies and the NSLs they are challenging cannot be disclosed, their legal positions are already public: the NSL statute is a violation of the First Amendment as well as the constitutional separation of powers.
We have yet to see any good reason for why the government can claim that the mere fact that a company has received a National Security Letter needs to be classified.

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    zip, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 9:51am

    But the vast majority of things that are classified have little or nothing to do with national security. If there's a compelling need to keep WWI-era documents classified nearly a century later, then surely the "needs to be kept secret" argument can be applied to virtually anything.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 9:54am

    Couldn't they have just simultaneously held a press release at the same time the suit was being filed before the court could issue a gag order?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 9:57am

    Re:

    No, because the NSL's are considered Classified information by the Government.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 9:58am

    We have yet to see any good reason for why the government can claim that the mere fact that a company has received a National Security Letter needs to be classified.


    I'm not sure I know what you meant to say there... is this it?

    We have not yet seen a good reason for the government to classify the mere fact that a company has received a National Security Letter.


    what you actually said (after pulling apart the convoluted grammar) was,

    We have yet to see any reason for the government to be accountable to us.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    identicon
    jackn, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 9:59am

    gag orders are only effective if you honor them. Who are they going to arrest? a corporation?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 9:59am

    Classified...

    Should only be for the Military or Foreign covert operations.

    Diplomacy, Policing, & Court should NEVER be allowed to EVER be Classified and neither should a Judge be able to issue a GAG order unless it is Military or Foreign covert operations in nature.

    Every problem the government has with its citizenry or vice versa should be a matter of public record PERIOD! Any kinda of secret enforcement policy can be used to remove you of any and all rights without recourse by any over zealous official.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7. This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
     
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 10:01am

    Does the EFF do ANYTHING but whine over stupid, sensationalistic nonsense? Who cares.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 10:02am

    Re:

    Security through obscurity. Hard to find what is important when you have to wade through a sea of classified data. I am against it but that is why I think it is all classified.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    jackn, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 10:04am

    Re:

    I care alot

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    identicon
    jilocasin, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 10:16am

    Possible reason....

    Wait a moment while I try to twist my thought processes into an approximation of a paranoid government spook.......

    The reason to keep the organization that receives a National Security Letter secret is that if the "target" uses that company and found out that they had just received a NSL then they would;

    1. Know we were tracking them
    2. Stop using that company
    3. Stop using that method of communication, bank account, brand of toothpaste

    [O.K. maybe not that last one.... maybe.]

    Normally we [the government] would only keep this information classified ['gagged'] until we brought the perpetrator to justice [filed a case in a court of law]. New terrorist threat models [government speak for ignoring the constitution] require us to continually collect intelligence on existing and emerging threats [ a.k.a. people we know are bad, people we think might be bad someday, and people we just don't like, heck everyone just to be safe]. Contrary to terrorist apologists [a.k.a. people who care about the constitution] these National Security Letter recipient non disclosure [gag] orders are not permanent, nor unending. Recipients are free to discuss them, once the terrorist threats to the country have been eliminated [so that would be just like the legal term for copyright limits, forever minus one day].


    See, that wasn't do hard to understand was it....[I think I need a mental shower now]?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 10:19am

    Re:

    This is needlessly combative. Verbose does not equal confusing.
    If you're here to pick grammar nits, then please leave. But if you must stay, there's a mismatched copula in the first sentence that doesn't seem to have bothered you.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 10:21am

    Re:

    I care.

    Clearly you don't give a damn about your rights, and that's fine.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 10:25am

    Re: Possible reason....

    While I understand the idea you put forward it should not matter. The negatives for abuse simply do not out weight the benefits of nailing the bastard in question.

    The founding fathers set up this nation and its liberties knowing and watching that whole towns could be, would be, or where burning down around their ankles, yet they did not bend over and blast liberty out of their ass so they could protect us from those pesky terrorists!

    Any "Wise" person would know that human kind has been reasoning with each other and twisting words since the beginning of time to justify all manner of evil that can be conceived. NSL, Secrets, & Classified are all born of these "reasonings"!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 10:29am

    It's easier to abuse power standing in the shadows, than it is standing in the light. That's why.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    icon
    DannyB (profile), Mar 4th, 2014 @ 10:32am

    Re: Re:

    Perhaps I can clarify the deeper issue.

    If there is a minor grammar or spelling error on TD, then TD has no credibility and can safely be dismissed as a bunch of thieving pirate kids and labeled as 'pirate central' facilitators, enablers and 'piracy apologists'.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    identicon
    jilocasin, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 10:34am

    Re: Re: Possible reason....

    I never said that I agreed with it.

    I just proposed a possible reason for those people who say that couldn't think of any reason why the government thought it was a good idea.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17.  
    icon
    DannyB (profile), Mar 4th, 2014 @ 10:34am

    Re:

    Being right doesn't mean you won't suffer consequences.

    Ask anyone who has lived in a police state. I think history has plenty of examples. Why would this newly forming police state be different?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  18.  
    icon
    Michael Donnelly (profile), Mar 4th, 2014 @ 10:34am

    Stop feeding the trolls.

    Guys, seriously.

    Just downvote and ignore. Otherwise, it will continue to get worse.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  19.  
    icon
    DannyB (profile), Mar 4th, 2014 @ 10:36am

    Re: Classified...

    Coming soon!

    The MPAA / RIAA is given power to classify information as top secret. After all, the global economy is at stake.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  20.  
    icon
    DannyB (profile), Mar 4th, 2014 @ 10:37am

    Re: Re:

    Why would that be surprising? Since when have copyright maximalists given a damn about anybody's rights?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  21.  
    identicon
    Brazenly Anonymous, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 10:39am

    Re:

    The grammar here is fine. Your reading comprehension might need some work. In indented form to show the nesting:

    We have yet to see
    >any good reason for why
    >>the government can claim
    >>>that the mere fact
    >>>>that a company has received a National Security Letter
    >>>Needs to be classified

    Does not exist (evidence supporting (government claim "item needs classification"))

    In fact, I'm having a little trouble figuring out how you managed to parse this any other way.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  22.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 11:09am

    Re: Re:

    That would mean they couldn't talk about the contents of the NSL not state who their client was.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  23.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 11:34am

    Re: Re:

    That is not fine because is enough people don't care then rights are removed from those that care as well.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  24.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 11:35am

    Re: Re: Re: Possible reason....

    You did mention that you had to twist your thought processes to produce that. I did not intend for my post to be directed at you in particular, so I apologize for that. I did still feel that a rebuttal would be good to have for anyone else that could use a nudge in the right direction, well hopefully.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  25.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 11:40am

    Re: Stop feeding the trolls.

    I used to think that feeding the trolls is a bad thing. Sometimes its okay to feed them. 2 Positive benefits can be had from it. 1 positive benefit is that they show how crazy they are and will drive others away from their drivel. 2nd positive benefit is that a well rounded and thoughtful retort may help another conflicted individual from succumbing. Either way... ignoring the troll is always a mixed bag and has negative consequences either way.

    In the name of freedom I would rather wade through troves to trolls than to be silenced as a troll myself. I have been called a troll myself because I felt that strongly about some subjects.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  26.  
    identicon
    Rich Kulawiec, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 11:45am

    A government of the people...

    ...should perform its duties in full view of the people (with EXTREMELY rare exceptions). A government which doesn't do this is not only failing to live up to its fundamental responsibilities, it's also incompetent.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  27.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 12:20pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    But sadly, people have a right to not care about their rights...

    They do not, however, have a right to tell others what they can or cannot care about :)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  28. This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
     
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 12:22pm

    Re: Re:

    What does the EFF have to do with rights except for the right of tinfoil hat nutters to whine about everything?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  29.  
    identicon
    Duh, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 12:46pm

    The reason they cannot even reveal the name of the service provider is because the ONE person that uses Verizon wireless will realize they he is being watched and change his communications!

    Duh.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  30.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 1:15pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    From https://www.eff.org/legal-victories

    Apple v. Does - https://www.eff.org/cases/apple-v-does
    EFF defended online journalists and their rights to protect the confidentiality of sources as offline reporters do.

    Online Policy Group v. Diebold - https://www.eff.org/cases/online-policy-group-v-diebold
    EFF protected online speakers by bringing the first successful suit against abusive copyright claims under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA).

    Bernstein v. US Department of Justice - https://www.eff.org/cases/bernstein-v-us-dept-justice
    EFF established that computer code is speech and shielded the developers of privacy-protecting software from government censorship.

    Steve Jackson Games v. Secret Service Case Archive - https://www.eff.org/cases/steve-jackson-games-v-secret-service-case-archive
    EFF set one of the first precedents protecting computer communications from unwarranted government invasion.

    MGM v. Grokster - https://www.eff.org/cases/mgm-v-grokster
    EFF defended the right of innovators to build new technologies without begging Hollywood's permission first.

    Sony BMG Litigation Info - https://www.eff.org/cases/sony-bmg-litigation-info
    EFF held Sony BMG accountable for infecting its customers' computers with software that created grave security vulnerabilities and let the company spy on listening behavior.

    USA v. Pen Register (Cellphone Tracking Cases) - https://www.eff.org/cases/cellphone-tracking-cases-usa-v-pen-register
    EFF fought the government's attempts to track the location of a mobile phone user without sufficient evidence.

    ALA v. FCC - https://www.eff.org/cases/ala-v-fcc
    EFF established that the FCC and Hollywood don't control your TiVo - you do.

    ACLU v. Reno II - https://www.eff.org/cases/aclu-v-reno-ii
    EFF extended free speech protections online, successfully challenging the constitutionality of Internet censorship laws.




    (post will probably be delayed for moderation with the number of URLs, but no big deal)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  31.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2014 @ 1:47pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    Think about which government you're talking about here. The NSLs state that the very fact that a company has received an NSL is an Official Secret. That's why the companies must remain anonymous, even if it's an open secret who the companies actually are.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  32.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 10th, 2014 @ 12:05pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    It won't read your posts. It's just a troll, probably computer generated.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
Advertisement
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Support Techdirt - Get Great Stuff!

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.