Comcast's Biggest Lobbyist Dodges Lobbying Rules By Pretending He's Usually Not Lobbying
from the jack-of-one-trade dept
Comcast’s David Cohen is the company’s most influential policy and lobbying guru, being described by the Washington Post in late 2012 as a “wonk rock star” in telecom circles. Cohen, whose official title at the company is simply Executive Vice President, has spent the last decade helping Comcast navigate a stream of significant mergers and acquisitions, most notably the company’s 2011 acquisition of NBC Universal. In fact, Comcast’s NBC acquisition went through largely thanks to a list of merger conditions that were proposed by Cohen himself, including the offering of $10 broadband to homes that qualify for the school lunch program (a program that resulted in protests in Comcast’s hometown by folks who claimed the company made it intentionally difficult to actually qualify).
Cohen’s a lobbyist in all the ways you’d expect a lobbyist to be, from hob knobbing with regulators and fund raising for President Obama, to penning a litany of awful editorials about bad policy in papers nationwide. Every month or so Cohen can be found busily pretending the U.S. broadband market is competitive, or pretending that the United States’ mediocre showing in every meaningful global broadband stat actually means we’re leading the world at broadband. Yet despite spending the lion’s share of his time lobbying, Cohen doesn’t have to follow the disclosure rules for lobbyists — and hasn’t since 2007 — because he’s able to simply pretend he doesn’t spend much time lobbying:
“Only employees who spend 20 percent or more of their work on lobbying or related activities have to register in Washington. Comcast says Cohen, an executive vice president, doesn’t reach that threshold as he puts in 18-hour days spread across a wide array of responsibilities….by not registering as a lobbyist, Cohen doesn’t face limits on travel with lawmakers and doesn’t have to file reports on his contributions to campaigns or lawmakers’ pet foundations.”
By technically not being a lobbyist while being a very obvious lobbyist, Cohen is also allowed to dance around Obama’s rules prohibiting lobbyists from having close ties to the administration (rules we’ve long noted were rather toothless). Comcast’s top PR rep Sena Fitzmaurice points out that Comcast is just following the rules, but adds a little flourish in pretending that Cohen’s really just quite a gifted fellow who wears many hats:
“There are very clear legal definitions of what is a lobbyist, and we check them for all of our people who make government contacts every quarter and comply accordingly,” said Sena Fitzmaurice, Comcast vice president of government communications. Based in Philadelphia, not Washington, Cohen is responsible for government affairs, legal issues, communications, community investment, corporate real estate, and diversity, among other duties, Fitzmaurice said.”David has a quite broad portfolio.”
Yes, golly, David really is a jack of all trades, and also helps prune the rose bushes, clean the cat’s box, and occasionally can be found down in the motor pool giving tips on catalytic converters! Cohen’s a walking, breathing example of the uselessness of current lobbying rules. The current rules allow you to self-report your time spent with nobody anywhere in government bothering to confirm if you’re telling the truth or not. Cohen is almost certainly logging sixty-hour-plus work weeks pushing for Comcast’s attempted takeover of Time Warner Cable but worry not — the majority of that time is actually spent making copies, providing moral support to sad cable install technicians, and baking delicious cupcakes.
Filed Under: congress, david cohen, lobbying
Companies: comcast
Comments on “Comcast's Biggest Lobbyist Dodges Lobbying Rules By Pretending He's Usually Not Lobbying”
Brilliant
If the rules only apply to lobbyists, just say you’re not a lobbyist, problem solved! /s
The fact that such a laughably obvious strategy apparently works shows just how pathetically weak the rules are.
And technically,
I’m not a commentor. Nope, not commenting. Don’t look.
There should be a drone with this guy’s name on it.
Technically the robot used the gun and not me. So I’m totally not guilty the robot is.
Details Matter
“Soylent Green is People!!!”
-That’s Horrible!!!
“But it’s LOBBYISTS!!”
-Damn, why didn’t you say so? In that case, smashing idea!
Re: Details Matter
Delicious!
BFD, half of the non-profit research organizations do the same thing
All of the people you lovingly quote from places like the EFF are also doing much the same thing as lobbying. They’re trying to influence public policy. Why do you only focus on the enemies of Google?
Re: BFD, half of the non-profit research organizations do the same thing
How about because the people at the EFF follow the law, where as, your pay masters don’t.
Are you really that stupid that you could not figure that out for yourself?
Re: Re: Re:
bob just hates it when due process is enforced.
Re: BFD, half of the non-profit research organizations do the same thing
Why do you always pose EFF and techdirt authors as Google puppets?
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140221/09525626310/comcast-paying-minority-rights-groups-to-parrot-merger-support.shtml#c592 (Mike responding to you about a week ago, bold emphasis mine)
Here’s more Google puppetry (link only for brevity’s sake)
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140110/12395525837/ford-vp-claims-company-is-tracking-everyones-driving-habits-then-denies-it.shtml#c243
More Post-Apocalypse Fun
Some pics on HuffPo nicely complement any discussion of D.C. lobbyists. Sculptural art by Issac Cardal
“The sprawling installation mocks the collapse of capitalism, envisioning what would happen to the skyscrapers and men with briefcases once the financial system disappears.
If you trade money/favors/material possessions for laws/bills/favors/regulation you are a lobbyist. I don’t care if you spend 20 hours or 20 seconds.
Re: Re:
I’d like to know why that is not considered criminal bribery?
Re: Re: Re:
Because considering it bribery would be UN-AMERICAN, of course.
Re: Re: Re:
Because money, lots of it.
There’s also the fact that those that should be cracking down on this… are also involved in it, quite enjoying those revolving doors and the perks they bring, and therefor not likely to want to rock the boat and put at risk the possibility for a lucrative ‘retirement’ for themselves down the road.
Re: Re: Re:
Because bribery creates a bond between two parties. They’re both in trouble if it comes to light. We need to make it legal to accept bribes, and illegal to give them. That way you can take someone’s cash and then turn around and call the cops.
Re: Re: Re: Re:
We need to make it legal to accept bribes, and illegal to give them. That way you can take someone’s cash and then turn around and call the cops.
Even better would be the other way around: bribe a politician, then turn him in to the FBI. Or maybe whoever reports the crime first gets immunity. Then bribers would never be sure they wouldn’t be turned in, and neither would the politicians, making it too risky to do for most people.
I would think that if MPAA head (and former career politician) Chris Dodd is not technically a lobbyist, then Comcast’s David Cohen is probably not either.
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110221/14490613193/chris-dodd-breaking-promise-not-to-become-lobbyist-just-weeks-after-leaving-senate-joining-mpaa-as-top-lobbyist.shtml
Thanks! Now when I call Comcast Customer Support and get “David” on the line, I know exactly who I am talking to.
Follow him to see if he really is doing 18 hour days. If he isn’t then the under 20% number he claims is just fiction.
By the same token, Masnick and Bode aren’t really shills for the anti-copyright interests, they just look like it.