USTR Promises Congress TPP Will Have Strong Environmental Protections; Then Immediately Denies Saying That

from the but-of-course dept

Back in January, you may recall that Wikileaks helped leak out the TPP's environmental chapter. It showed fairly weak efforts to protect the environment, many of which appeared to be there more for show than anything else. While it did reveal that the US had been negotiating for greater environmental protections, it also revealed that it was somewhat alone in that position, leading many to believe that any final agreement is likely to be even weaker than what's currently in the chapter. In response to this, the USTR put out what appeared to be a fairly strong statement that it won't accept weak environmental protections in the TPP.

However, over at Huffington Post, Zach Carter notes that USTR Michael Froman isn't convincing anyone in Congress, because he's doing what he's always done best: talking out of both sides of his mouth, first promising strong environmental protections, then denying he ever said any such thing:
"Ambassador Froman was asked on I think it was four different areas, and each time he said it was absolutely non-negotiable from a U.S. standpoint," [Rep. Mark] Pocan told The Huffington Post. "So then at the end, I listed those four areas to make sure I had the U.S. position right. And he said again it was non-negotiable. And then right after that, Lloyd Doggett got up and said, 'So does that mean that if we give you fast track, you won't send us a deal that doesn't have that stuff in it?' And right off the bat, the answer was, 'I didn't say that.' And to me, non-negotiable is, you know, non-negotiable."
And, of course, one of those four key areas was strong environmental protections.
"Froman said we're not gonna sign it unless there's an enforceable environmental chapter," another attendee told HuffPost. "And Doggett says, 'What does that mean? … If we give you fast track, you're not gonna come back with a deal that doesn't have an enforceable environmental chapter?' Then Froman says very emphatically, 'I can't speak for the president. All I can tell you is we're working as hard as we can to get an enforceable chapter in there.'"
Except that, as USTR, it's kind of Froman's job to speak for the President on this issue.

But, even more to the point is that this highlights (yet again) how the USTR is flat out lying about fast track (also known as "trade promotion authority"). As we've pointed out, Fast Track gets Congress to abdicate its (Constitutionally-granted) powers to regulate international commerce, by denying it the ability to actually explore what's in these agreements. Instead, fast track more or less gives the USTR a form of "pre-approval" to come back with a final agreement, such that Congress can only give the total thing a yes or no vote.

The USTR has attempted, ridiculously, to mischaracterize fast track authority as the opposite, pretending that it allows Congress to set the parameters for what the USTR must negotiate. Yet, here it's pretty damn obvious that's not the case at all. These members of Congress are asking about environmental protections, and are being told its "non-negotiable" -- suggesting that the USTR understands Congress' intent here. Yet, when pressed specifically on whether, if given fast track, he is guaranteeing those proposals will be in the final TPP, Froman immediately pretends he said no such thing.

And while some may argue he can't promise that because he's only one of many parties involved in the negotiation, that very point highlights why fast track authority is totally inappropriate. Congress can't give up its sole authority in regulating international trade, based on a weak promise from the administration that it will try its best to get them what they want.

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  1. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 28 Feb 2014 @ 4:04pm

    not that it's gonna make any difference, but if Congress cant/wont see what USTR is up to here and doesn't have or want to have the balls to do what it should, ie, throw this and every other fast track attempt over 'trade deals' that are going to fuck up everything you can think of, for everyone you can think of, everywhere you can think of except the entertainment and, possibly, the pharma industries in the USA, which inevitably will cost countless lives because the people wont be able to afford to buy the expensive, only available, USA medicines, they should be ashamed of themselves and bloody well resign! for all the good they are doing they may just as well not be there, which is the way the USA is heading, so that it is a totally corporate run nation that does exactly zilch for anyone except the wealthy and those running industries! damn disgrace and those responsible need arresting for treason the way they are selling out the population in return for personal monetary gain!!

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2. icon
    saulgoode (profile), 28 Feb 2014 @ 5:22pm

    I think that by non-negotiable the USTR means "you don't get any say in the matter".

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3. icon
    That One Guy (profile), 28 Feb 2014 @ 6:00pm

    I'm still wondering why FTA is even being considered at this point, instead of clearly being stated as something that will not be happening.

    Want your 'trade agreement'? Then the government and the people get to look over it first, accepting, and throwing out, the pieces of it on an individual basis.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 1 Mar 2014 @ 1:29am


    IT's all about the bullions.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    C E Krause, 5 Mar 2014 @ 11:37pm

    Re: Anonymous Coward's Comment of 02.28.14

    I wholeheartedly agree, AC. But what of our shame? We must restore the rule of law, so we can make amends for the death and destruction the US has wrought on the World. We must arrest and convict Bush et al of High Treason and War Crimes Against Humanity in the International Criminal Court [to which, btw, the US is too arrogant and cowardly to belong!]. We’ll be free to go on from there.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Techdirt Logo Gear
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads


Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.