Now That The NSA Has Made It The Norm, Total Surveillance During The Sochi Olympic Games Is No Longer Noteworthy

from the welcome-to-the-(permanent)-olympics dept

In addition to being an opportunity to stretch copyright and trademark rules way beyond the law, over the years, the Olympics has also become an occasion when the feeble "because terrorism" excuse is deployed to justify all kinds of additional restrictions on personal freedoms. It will come as no surprise to learn that the Winter Olympics in Sochi, Vladimir Putin's pet project, will continue the tradition:

every phone call, every email, every social media message in Sochi will be accessible, traceable by Russia's Federal Security Service -- the FSB -- the organization in charge of securing the Olympics.
The CBC News report quoted above goes on:
it's the extent of all the surveillance the FSB is planning that has deepened much of the disquiet, at home and abroad, over the coming games.

For Russia, surveillance measures may be something of a force of habit.
If this piece had been written a year ago, those paragraphs could have been read unironically. But today, in the post-Snowden world, it is impossible not to replace "FSB" with "NSA" or "GCHQ". Since we now know that practically "every phone call, every email, every social media message" in the world -- not just in Sochi -- is accessible to the US authorities, it's as if we find ourselves in a global Olympics lockdown. But unlike the quadrennial Olympics, this particular circus shows no sign of moving on.

Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and +glynmoody on Google+



Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    identicon
    MWL-G, Jan 21st, 2014 @ 3:52am

    There's a difference

    ...the Olympics has also become an occasion when the feeble "because terrorism" excuse is deployed to justify all kinds of additional restrictions on personal freedoms.
    There's not just an actual clear and present threat of terrorism from Chechens, there have already been deadly acts with more promised by people who don't seem to care about what happened the last time they did this. I'm waiting for reports on the deployment of another FOAB.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Jan 21st, 2014 @ 4:30am

      Re: There's a difference

      Screw that, I'm just waiting for the time an ICBM is fired because of 'perceived threat'.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Jan 21st, 2014 @ 4:56am

      Re: There's a difference

      There is a huge difference between monitoring suspected terrorists, and monitoring everybody. Foreigners talking to, and meeting with Russian political activists, such as Pirate party supporters could be dangerous for their health.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Jan 21st, 2014 @ 5:15am

        Re: Re: There's a difference

        Maybe there should be a sign:

        ATTENDING OR PARTICIPATING IN THE SOCHI OLYMPICS MAY BE HAZARDOUS TO YOUR LONG-TERM HEALTH.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Nick (profile), Jan 21st, 2014 @ 8:59am

      Re: There's a difference

      Honestly, I'm actually kind of fine with it in this case. As MWL-G said, there have already been multiple attacks on foreign and civilian targets - possibly at random - in the area BECAUSE of the Olympics. Once they get underway, there are going to be many factors of 10 more people around, making for better targets.

      But, this surveillance MUST be temporary. As soon as the threat is over with, and things return to normal, it should be scaled back.

      The difference between this period leading up to / including the Olympics and our own situation is CLEAR and PREVIOUS evidence of a threat. Unlike our own, in which we are told to "trust" in the NSA that they need to stay vigilant despite a large, organized attack not having happened for over a decade (Boston was by two guys who did it without massive support from any group).

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        John Fenderson (profile), Jan 21st, 2014 @ 9:35am

        Re: Re: There's a difference

        Also, the Russians aren't trying to keep the surveillance a Big Secret.

        This is less egregious that the NSA programs if only because of that. Of course, I don't find it any more palatable, but I can avoid it by not going to Sochi (not that that's a risk, anyway, as the Olympics never fail to irritate me under the best of circumstances.) If a place is so dangerous that that level of surveillance is actually necessary, that's a place that people would be very wise to avoid.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    JCDavis, Jan 21st, 2014 @ 4:50am

    Those words on the statute of Liberty

    Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free--
    thanks to our government, that is no longer just a description of the old world, but also of the new.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 21st, 2014 @ 5:05am

    every phone call, every email, every social media message in Sochi will be accessible, traceable by Russia's Federal Security Service -- the FSB -- the organization in charge of securing the Olympics.

    This is where code caves come in handy because it's extremely hard to detect.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Jack, Jan 21st, 2014 @ 9:01am

      Re:

      @AC - I think you just heard the programming term "code cave" and decided to repeat it not knowing what it meant... A code cave is simply a place in memory where run-time generated code is stored. They are also created by compilers between functions for alignment... They don't have anything to do with communications...

      Had you said something like "this is where encrypted VPNs come in handy", "steganography is a handy skill to have", that would have made sense...

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        John Fenderson (profile), Jan 21st, 2014 @ 9:36am

        Re: Re:

        But, come on, "code cave" sounds both cool and ominous. Like a geekier Bat Cave!

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Gwiz (profile), Jan 21st, 2014 @ 9:53am

          Re: Re: Re:

          But, come on, "code cave" sounds both cool and ominous. Like a geekier Bat Cave!


          Sounds like the basement at any big tech corporation to me.

          You know, that dark place downstairs where they keep the really good programmers. They slide pizza under the door every now and then and let them out into the sunlight on weekends to keep them happily coding along.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Matthew A. Sawtell, Jan 21st, 2014 @ 5:17am

    Yet for all of the security, if an incident was to occur...

    Yet for all of the security, if an incident was to occur, it would prove yet again that all of human endeavors are not infallible.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Ninja (profile), Jan 21st, 2014 @ 7:45am

      Re: Yet for all of the security, if an incident was to occur...

      It can happen any time anywhere regardless of how insanely strict security becomes. The question is how can such people be dissuaded from carrying such crimes with a good measure of security, justice and also understanding of the motives. Simply putting on some security theater will solve nothing.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        plaguehush, Jan 21st, 2014 @ 8:43am

        And yet...

        The point in fighting with guerilla-style tactics is not to win a 'war' by killing and maiming your way to victory with superior numbers. It is to cause the enemy to destroy themselves in the panic caused by small, isolated, (comparitively) low impact events. The 'terrorism' comes from the internal response to a guerilla action, not the action itself.

        The best defense against this has always been the equivalent of the british "stiff upper lip". A "Keep Calm and Carry On"-style resolve to not let the bastards grind you down. To move on and show that even a bomb-going off in your home town isn't going to change the way your society is, or the way you choose to live your life.

        The way the US (and much of the western world) is reacting, they are playing right into the hands of what small guerilla organisations exist. It's our lockdown of our society that is causing us damage, not the guerilla acts themselves.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
     
    identicon
    Just Sayin', Jan 21st, 2014 @ 5:36am

    replace

    replace it with McD and you can have a burger with it.

    Stretch much? Trying too hard? Did Mike give you an order as to how many NSA hater-aid stories you had to write this month?

    Seriously, not everything is NSA.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 21st, 2014 @ 7:19am

    This reminds me of that vacant old house (The World) on every block in America that gets the label of having Ghosts (terrorists) .. what it boils down to in the end is an over active imagination, and older kids scaring the collective poop out of their younger more naive siblings.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    krolork (profile), Jan 21st, 2014 @ 10:34am

    We need a revolution.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    @blamer, Jan 21st, 2014 @ 4:42pm

    to access-trace Vs to surveil

    Merely logging all Sochi comms is NOT crime prevention.

    Even if it were to dissuade a majority of the would-be crims.

    Traceability (and accessibility, with/without warrants) can help the backwards-looking, forensics, prosecutions. Again justice isn't fully dissuasive to the violently criminal.

    The key issue is how much it helps the forward-looking. If it saved 1 local's life (or pick a number) was it all worth it? That's surely the nub of our genuine security-privacy disagreements. Is it not??

    Moreover, to "surveil" is (historically merely of suspected spies/crims, now of everyone) is to "notice or perceive something and register it as being significant".

    Whilst those "somethings" are non-existent or top-secret, then what hope can we have that the NSAs of the world aren't over-reaching into invasions of their citizens' privacy.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 22nd, 2014 @ 7:19pm

    HOW DARE THEY

    How dare the damn Russians have an actual reason to engage in this program!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This