European Court Of Justice Hands Down Big Win For Transparency in Europe

from the nice,-but-lots-more-needed dept

After a five-year battle by Access Info Europe, Europe's highest court has made an important ruling that will help boost transparency in the European Union:

the European Court of Justice today rejected arguments by the Council of the European Union that it should be able to keep secret the identities of Member States making proposals in the context of negotiations on future EU legislation.
The Council of the European Union had fought to defend its policy of releasing legislative drafting documents with the names of Member States tabling amendments blacked out.
Access Info Europe won access to the document it requested before the General Court in March 2011 but the Council appealed, joined by the Czech Republic, France, Greece, Spain and the UK.
The Council of the European Union is one of three bodies that jointly run the European Union, along with the European Parliament and European Commission. Some countries wanted their names blacked out from official Council of the European Union documents because it would have revealed which of them had blocked or tried to water down proposals they were hostile to. Now that it will be possible to name and shame Member States that act in this way, they will probably be less willing to be seen objecting to important and popular measures.

As Access Info Europe explains:

This ruling means that members of the public at the national level will find it easier to know what is going on in Brussels, and will make it easier for national parliaments to follow and scrutinise the EU legislative process, and in particular the positions taken by delegations of Member States.
Helen Darbishire, Executive Director of Access Info Europe, is quoted as saying:
"We call on the Council to respect this ruling and to go a step further by henceforth proactively publishing documents containing legislative drafting positions of Member States on the Council's public register as soon as they are created, as this will allow the public to follow the decision making process."
Given the Council's dogged resistance to even minimal transparency, that's unlikely to happen, but at least things have started moving in the right direction.

Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or, and on Google+

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  • icon
    Not an Electronic Rodent (profile), Oct 30th, 2013 @ 5:12am

    A matter of colour

    Given the Council's dogged resistance to even minimal transparency, that's unlikely to happen
    Brown is the correct colour... Transparency means you can see the wads of notes through the envelope...

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Anonymous Howard (profile), Oct 30th, 2013 @ 6:06am

    Let's outlaw secret trade negotiations, and I call that a step in the right direction.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 30th, 2013 @ 8:07am

    Legislating in secret. What will they think of next? I suppose the next logical step is for the judiciary to interpret the secret legislation, in secret courts. ;)

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Hide this ad »
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Chat
Hide this ad »
Recent Stories
Advertisement - Amazon Prime Music
Hide this ad »


Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.