Former DHS/NSA Official Says You Should Blame Privacy Advocates For The TSA Groping You

from the wait,what? dept

Remember Stewart Baker? He's the former Homeland Security and NSA officials who recently argued that civil liberties activists were to blame for 9/11. Apparently, that sort of thinking (blame the activists for what it leads the government to do) worked so well the last time, he's back for more. According to him, all the bullshit you've had to go through with the TSA at our airports is because of those darn meddling privacy advocates. Yes, we've now learned that the reason a TSA measured the weight of my little friend and his bag of tricks is because privacy advocates just wouldn't let the TSA do invasive background checks on all of us. The privacy advocating jerks.
TSA ended up taking more time to inspect everyone, treating all travelers as potential terrorists, and subjecting many to whole-body imaging and enhanced pat-downs. We can't blame TSA for this wrong turn, though. Privacy lobbies persuaded Congress that TSA couldn't be trusted with data about the travelers it was screening. With no information about travelers, TSA had no choice but to treat them all alike, sending us down a long blind alley that has inconvenienced billions.
Of course! It isn't the TSA's fault the TSA debased me. It's because privacy advocates (also me) didn't want the TSA to debase me by massively invading my privacy. It makes perfect sense! Never mind that this is all a theater show ostensibly designed to up the suicide count of Americans worldwide, because they sure aren't catching anyone important. It's the privacy people who are to blame. Also, all those women who are sexually assaulted? Pshh, they were dressed to provocatively. Blame the short-skirt makers or whoever.

Then, because apparently Stewart Baker hasn't been reading the news lately, he testified that instead the government just needs more data on all of us, while driving home the point that the current security screenings are stupid.
No one wants to be against privacy, but we've tried the privacy campaigners' preferred solution, denying even the smallest scrap of data to the government, and they saddled us with ten years of stupid screening at our airports, where a lack of data forced TSA to treat everyone like a suspected terrorist. No one liked that solution, with good reason. It's time to recognize that failure and encourage experiments in smarter, faster, more informed screening based on data-sharing.
Okay, no. The TSA has not tried the privacy campaigner's preferred solution, because I've yet to hear a privacy campaigner stamp her feet over the fact that her nipples haven't been tweaked lately. And, while everyone would like better and safer solutions for traveling, making the "our government just doesn't have enough data on us" argument at this point in time might be the most tone-deaf thing since Bob Dylan. The TSA is full of misconduct, the government is collecting too much data on us and is overloaded with it, all while even the TSA's advocates are calling their current screening processes "stupid."

Drop the curtain on this theater, because the show has been going on too long and it sucks anyway.



Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    icon
    Ninja (profile), Sep 12th, 2013 @ 11:48am

    Who here thinks Mr Baker has been molested by a civil liberty activist and a privacy campaigner when he was just a tender little boy? *raises hands*

    Next: Environmental activists responsible for British Petroleum disaster on the Gulf - brought to you by Stewart Baker and Green Leprechaun

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 12th, 2013 @ 12:11pm

    "Why do you make daddy hit you?"

    -TSA

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 12th, 2013 @ 12:19pm

    It's one more reason why the public no longer has any trust in government. It is exactly this mind set that has put the NSA far over the limits of what is legal and the TSA has yet to prove it has any results for all the taxpayer money it has spent to date.

    Confiscating baby bottles and partially filled bottles of water doesn't count as a real security value.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Charles (profile), Sep 12th, 2013 @ 12:23pm

    "Drop the curtain on this theater, because the show has been going on too long and it sucks anyway."

    Tell us what you really think. :-)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 12th, 2013 @ 12:58pm

    privacy campaigner stamp her feet over the fact that her nipples haven't been tweaked lately

    love the image, feisty girl

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Tehrm (profile), Sep 12th, 2013 @ 1:38pm

    "In order to eliminate debasing practices and alleviate concerns of authoritarian encroachment, we will instead begin reading everyone's thoughts. This 'Thought Prevention" method renders physical assessment obsolete. In fact, you'll be notified even before leaving your home for the airport whether you've been selected for further interest. We hope to continue to streamline the process with more 'don't come to us, we'll come to you' services."

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 12th, 2013 @ 1:44pm

    It's Bob Dylan's fault....

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    nasch (profile), Sep 12th, 2013 @ 2:57pm

    Preferred solution

    we've tried the privacy campaigners' preferred solution, denying even the smallest scrap of data to the government

    When did we try that? I must have missed it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 13th, 2013 @ 6:32am

    Slapstick

    If this guy wasn't actually serious and believing this, faulting the groped privacy advocates, I would have believed it was slapstick parody, laughable humor brought to you by a government with a sense of humor. Is this in any way an indication why this is a former DHS/NSA official? What with 300,000,000 potential terrorists living within the US borders alone, its surprising that the TSA isn't going door to door with their groping activities and data collection.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    burdlaw, Sep 13th, 2013 @ 4:40pm

    TSA stands for there's something amok!

    TSA=Those Stupid Asses
    TSA=Thousands Standing Around
    TSA=Tough S#*t Airlines
    TSA=Tough, Stupid & Arrogant

    From a former TSA "officer" who got fed up with its incompetence and left years ago.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This