When Transparency Is A Matter Of Life And Death

from the spread-the-word-not-the-disease dept

Against a background of the leaks about NSA spying, transparency -- or lack of it -- is a hot topic at the moment. But there are situations where it can be even more important than just a matter of enhancing confidence in government actions and acting as a check on them, as this Wired story about Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) makes clear:

The virus is new, recorded in humans for the first time in mid-2012. It is dire, having killed more than half of those who contracted it. And it is mysterious, far more so than it should be -- because Saudi Arabia, where the majority of cases have clustered, has been tight-lipped about the disease's spread, responding slowly to requests for information and preventing outside researchers from publishing their findings about the syndrome.
In fact, it's even worse than that. Researchers had hoped one new technique would allow them to track nascent epidemics and pandemics in the face of government reticence to admit there is a problem is to monitor casual online discussions about outbreaks of illness. But even that's failing here:
public-health researchers have believed that Internet chatter -- patterns of online discussion about disease -- would undercut any attempts at secrecy. But they've been disappointed to see that their web-scraping tools have picked up remarkably little from the Middle East: While Saudi residents certainly use the Internet, what they can access is stifled, and what they are willing to say appears muted.
That's a clear demonstration of how lack of transparency, when coupled with pervasive censorship and knock-on self-censorship, can have much wider implications than simply blocking the free flow of information.

Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and on Google+

Filed Under: health, mers, middle east, safety, transparency, virus


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 27 Aug 2013 @ 8:57am

    Re: Bubonic plague outbreak feared in Asia after teenager ate infected barbecued marmot...

    Bubonic plague is well understood and easily treatable with antibiotics.

    See:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bubonic_plague

    Certainly it killed many people during the middle ages...but that was due to a combination of factors which no longer apply to our modern world.

    MERS, however, is a completely different beast. In case your still believe that they somehow imagined this disease, see:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_East_respiratory_syndrome_coronavirus

    and this (SARS is a related disease caused by another coronavirus):

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Severe_acute_respiratory_syndrome

    MERS is a new virus, which scientists are still trying to understand. Prognosis doesn't look too good, with a current total fatality rate of 48% (note that even in developed countries, namely France and the UK, the death rate is quite high, see the MERS article). There's no actual cure (note that, being a virus, antibiotics don't work) or vaccine. You just ride it out and hope the patient doesn't die.

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Show Now: Takedown
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.