Feds Threaten To Arrest Lavabit Founder For Shutting Down His Service

from the either-you-help-us-spy-on-people-or-you're-a-criminal dept

The saga of Lavabit founder Ladar Levison is getting even more ridiculous, as he explains that the government has threatened him with criminal charges for his decision to shut down the business, rather than agree to some mysterious court order. The feds are apparently arguing that the act of shutting down the business, itself, was a violation of the order:
... a source familiar with the matter told NBC News that James Trump, a senior litigation counsel in the U.S. attorney’s office in Alexandria, Va., sent an email to Levison's lawyer last Thursday – the day Lavabit was shuttered -- stating that Levison may have "violated the court order," a statement that was interpreted as a possible threat to charge Levison with contempt of court.
That same article suggests that the decision to shut down Lavabit was over something much bigger than just looking at one individual's information -- since it appears that Lavabit has cooperated in the past on such cases. Instead, the suggestion now is that the government was seeking a tap on all accounts:
Levison stressed that he has complied with "upwards of two dozen court orders" for information in the past that were targeted at "specific users" and that "I never had a problem with that." But without disclosing details, he suggested that the order he received more recently was markedly different, requiring him to cooperate in broadly based surveillance that would scoop up information about all the users of his service. He likened the demands to a requirement to install a tap on his telephone.
It sounds like the feds were asking for a full on backdoor on the system, not unlike some previous reports of ISPs who have received surprise visits from the NSA.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    icon
    Alana (profile), Aug 16th, 2013 @ 3:09pm

    The feds are like playground bullies, in the truest sense of the words.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      silverscarcat (profile), Aug 16th, 2013 @ 3:18pm

      Re:

      Don't insult playground bullies...

      At least they can be reigned in.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Rudd-O, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 1:05am

      Re:

      Playground bullies don't carry guns and bullets, nor can they murder you with essentially full impunity.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 6:29am

        Re: Re:

        Maybe not, but victims of playground bullies sometimes carry guns and bullets. And when they use them, THEY'RE the ones the media makes out to be the bad guys.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      stonedome, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 8:29am

      Re:

      but those bullies get caught alone by the mob eventually

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      rjoguillory (profile), Aug 17th, 2013 @ 1:06pm

      Re:

      ....I worked for US DoD for almost 25 years...over two decades as a protected whistle-blower...they abused and hounded me (still are) for years..because I would not go along with, nor cover-up the illegal conduct they were involved in...now...having lived /worked in Japan, Germany, Bosnia, Hungary, Croatia...Korea...etc...one would get the impression that my "whistle-blower" status is related to some deep, dark defense secret...some 007 type information that puts me in the cross-hairs of a Michael hasting type death....
      ...but actually..what they wanted me to do...was repackage out-of-date Burger King Whopper Meat....and sell it to unsuspecting Japanese locals...when i refused..they came down like a ton of bricks...except that I secretly tape -recorded the threats...and they "lost"..your government is corrupt to it's core..and we should be holding Grand Juries for treason and war-crimes..impeaching and convicting a lot of people..and hanging them immediately...

      Regards,

      RJ O'Guillory
      Author-
      Webster Groves - The Life of an Insane Family

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      jicama, Aug 20th, 2013 @ 2:41am

      Re: "playground bullies"?

      Are you kidding me? Playground bullies don't kill people; these people do. You probably meant well, but that comment is just stupid.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Kass, Sep 7th, 2013 @ 4:35am

      Re:

      You're exactly right but they're worse.
      Now they have a supercomputer in UT gathering data on every citizen they possibly can in America. Along with the pre-crime thing they are trying to get up and running.Where you can be arrested in order to PREVENT crimes you might POSSIBLY do in the FUTURE. How insane is this?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    M. Alan Thomas II (profile), Aug 16th, 2013 @ 3:58pm

    If the order included production of evidence stored on their servers and he destroyed that evidence in shutting down the service, that's an offense. I'm not sure if that's still true if the order was illegal. And if it was legal, I'm not 100% opposed to civil disobedience (although you would expect the consequences if you knew that was what you were doing).

    On othe other hand, I'm guessing that you can't destroy evidence that doesn't exist, so a purely prospective order doesn't have the same concerns attached to it. I could believe the U.S. Attorney's Office bullying someone without legal grounds, though.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Aug 16th, 2013 @ 5:07pm

      Re:

      He complied to court orders before. I am guessing these court orders were of the "produce what you have on your servers" kind. He says this one was different. So, I am guessing this one was not of the "produce what you have on your servers" kind.

      What it was, we can only guess. That is a problem the ones producing secret orders face: those left out of the loop will imagine the worst.

      So, let's start the guessing game? Ordered from bad to worse.

      * Putting a backdoor which will save everything done by one user.
      * Putting a backdoor which will save the password typed by one user.
      * Putting a backdoor which will save everything done by all users.
      * Putting a backdoor which will save the password typed by all users.
      * Putting code which will attempt to invade the computer of one or more users, as was done this month on Freedom Hosting, by the FBI or the NSA.

      Any other one I missed? Since we have to assume the worst, my current guess is "they wanted to add code to Lavabit to invade the user's computer".

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Manabi (profile), Aug 16th, 2013 @ 5:22pm

        Re: Re:

        * Putting code which will attempt to invade the computer of one or more users, as was done this month on Freedom Hosting, by the FBI or the NSA.
        I gotta say, I still don't understand that. Because they put it up indiscriminately on all the sites Freedom Hosting hosted, including all the most definitely not illegal ones (like TorMail), the resulting data they got is totally useless. They couldn't (or maybe that's shouldn't) be able to even use it to get a warrant, because they have no way to prove the IP in question actually was trying to access a site with illegal content (like child porn) instead of something like TorMail. The reality of the situation would be "well Your Honor, we have this IP that might have tried to access a child porn site, but it might not have and we'd like a warrant..." I can't see that flying in even the FISA court.

        So either it was incompetence on a grand scale, or someone didn't think things through very well...

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Eponymous Coward, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 1:35am

          Re: Re: Re:

          I think you misunderstand their motives on this in that they weren't out for actionable evidence to be used in court, but instead to locate targets for further operations. Once they decide to pursue legal action against a target they'll then retcon their reason for probable cause, or how they discovered the evidence to erase any trace of their surveillance. At least this is how I see it.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            icon
            Uriel-238 (profile), Aug 17th, 2013 @ 2:21am

            They're already sharing with the DoJ

            ...and requesting that they launder the evidence.

            Which implies that laundering the evidence trail to bypass forth-amendment protections has been a common practice for some time now.

            Note the whole to bypass forth-amendment protections part, because that's why there's an evidence trail in the first place.

            Crime committed to serve the state is still crime.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              identicon
              The Real Michael, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 7:32am

              Re: They're already sharing with the DoJ

              So true. They're intentionally violating the 4th Amendment in an effort to find people to target, profile and criminalize. I'm sure that if it were possible for them to monitor everybody at all times, they'd find a slew of illegal activity. However, that would defeat the entire purpose of the Constitution -- to protect the people from government overreach.

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            identicon
            Anonymous Coward, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 3:40pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            Yep as was recently reported about the DEA

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 10:19am

          Re: Re: Re:

          Well, they attempted to 'obfuscate' a client side language which was de-'obfuscated' in about 10 minutes and we know who it was because they hard coded an ip address.Really,the entire thing was implemented in the most ass backward way possible given the level of access they clearly had.I'd say we are fairly safe assuming incompetence is present here lol.

          In fact, that is the real reason we should be terrified.The best and brightest in the field aren't generally pining to get into a gov job lol (gov should also remember this if they want to keep pushing the boundaries in a place that they are not the home team). All that data is stored and protected by government IT people. Except that the way the nsa has decided to deal with the snowden situation is by getting rid of all of its network admins.So now,it won't just be incompetent gov IT safeguarding your data that you have to fear,its that no one will be.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          fgsdg, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 11:19am

          Re: Re: Re:

          ur not smart

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Edward, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 10:41am

      Response to: M. Alan Thomas II on Aug 16th, 2013 @ 3:58pm

      Evidence is a legal term. It implies there is a crime or civil cause of action that would tend to be proven by the information. Domestic spying involves a dragnet that does not assert that there is specific evidence sought, just all information under his control during a specific time frame. I'm under the understanding Lavabit does not store metadata or content.
      That is why the argument the Bully (good one Alana) is making is for contempt of court. Apparently they sought to dragnet future information which he foiled by shutting down. Apparently the Bully thinks it can order you to work for them. The question will be can the Bully force a person or business to work as an informant without his or its consent. Recently a court via a search warrant tried to order doctors to pump a man's stomach for cocaine. They refused. They won.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Father Time, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 4:40pm

      Re: Shutting down the service

      You can shut down the service and server. You could still comply because it doesn't say that he blew up the servers. The servers are still there it's just not able to continue to gather evidence or folly.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      znmeb (profile), Aug 17th, 2013 @ 6:02pm

      Re: lawyers and all that

      Well, neither of us know all the facts, but one of his public statements implied there were things he couldn't even discuss with his own lawyer! I'm deeply suspicious of that claim, but if that was in fact the case and it happened to me, I wouldn't go public like he did, and I wouldn't go to the press. But I'd call a lawyer anyway, and I'd call my Congressman and Senators for good measure.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Marty Robinson, Aug 18th, 2013 @ 3:04am

      Re:

      You cannot assume a fact not in evidence.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Cloudsplitter, Aug 24th, 2013 @ 8:41pm

      Re:

      If the Federal scum want to bring that into an open court room let them try, they would have to expose their so called secret court order, and its back ground support in the law. From where I sit the FISA Court and the NSA, are both on clearly shakey constitutional grounds, jurry nullification is still an important freedom fighting tool in this American Republic.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 16th, 2013 @ 4:03pm

    man the US has gone off the deep end. You guys really need to re-design the Patriot Act or give it a new name because the Lavabit guy is Patriotic but the act is anything but.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Not an Electronic Rodent (profile), Aug 17th, 2013 @ 2:14am

      Re:

      re-design the Patriot Act or give it a new name
      Nope, it's perfectly named....
      "Always dispose of the difficult bit in the title; it does less harm there than in the text"
      -Sir Humphrey Appleby

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Neil, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 1:08pm

      Re: Patriot Act

      What does one do when the Patriot Act itself is unconstitutional?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Marcus, Aug 24th, 2013 @ 9:55am

      Re:

      Yes our country that is going off the deep end but most of the people of the United States are shocked and want to put an end to the domestic spying program and abolish the Patriot Act. Unfortunately our politicians have listened to others instead of We The People. It's unbelievable our nation that use to be considered the land of the free is now turning into anything but the land of freedom. Sadly a lot of US citizens really don't care and figure "if it protects us from terrorist attacks then I'm all for it". Others figure that anyone who wants the Patriot Act along with the DHS and the TSA abolished is a supporter of terrorism. Most US citizens are not willing to give up freedom for a false sense of security and see right through the NSA when they tell us that it is necessary for them to spy on us to keep our nation safe from terrorists. We want the old USA back!

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous, Aug 16th, 2013 @ 4:03pm

    The government should be shut down.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      anon, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 6:58pm

      Response to: Anonymous on Aug 16th, 2013 @ 4:03pm

      I agree

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Someone, Oct 14th, 2013 @ 7:11pm

      Response to: Anonymous on Aug 16th, 2013 @ 4:03pm

      Agree entirely. If we feel the government isn't doing it's job we have an obligation to overthrow it. But most of the population is too stupid to open their eyes and see the corruption around them.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
     
    identicon
    out_of_the_blue, Aug 16th, 2013 @ 4:22pm

    The velvet glove is off the mailed fist.

    All this guy was trying to do was give people a way to avoid the spying as routinely done on Gmail!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Hephaestus (profile), Aug 16th, 2013 @ 4:45pm

      Re: The velvet glove is off the mailed fist.

      This is funny, that is the first time I have believed you. But not for the reason you mean ...

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Aug 16th, 2013 @ 4:52pm

      Re: The velvet glove is off the mailed fist.

      You're an idiot!!!!

      I choose to use google and they can have some of my info in exchange for the services they provide. I CHOOSE TO DO THAT!!!!! If I don't like it, I can use other services - and there are plenty of other service providers that I can CHOOSE to use.

      I DID NOT CHOOSE for the government to do so. I HAVE NO CHOICE in the matter, if I don't like it, well tough shit for me (everybody).

      If you don't understand that simple fundamental difference, then as I opened, you're an IDIOT!!!

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        stonedome, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 8:34am

        Re: Re: The velvet glove is off the mailed fist.

        yes, there is only one federal government, and you will submit.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Niall (profile), Aug 19th, 2013 @ 4:19am

          Re: Re: Re: The velvet glove is off the mailed fist.

          And apparently they're the federal government of the whole world.

          Hmm, that means we have (information) taxation but no representation - what could we do now? :) Revoke your hypocritical Declaration of Independence? Declare our own?

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Froogabadoodle, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 1:03pm

        Re: Re: The velvet glove is off the mailed fist.

        Thanks you. At least someone gets it.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Tionico, Aug 19th, 2013 @ 9:21am

        Re: Re: The velvet glove is off the mailed fist.

        major difference between your choice to use sellout Google, and Lavabit's users choice was based on Lavabit's policies of security, privacy, encryption, etc. Now Uncle Stupid is ripping the lid off the distinctive Lavabit used to have... no option. It truly IS a mailed fist with the velvet removed.... there is now no question the intent, and power behind, that fist. There SHOULD be rioting in the streets at such a travesty of liberty. This is a step way beyond anything acceptible. What, will Lavabit's owner have to seek asylum in Russia like Snowden has done?

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Cloudsplitter, Aug 24th, 2013 @ 9:11pm

          Re: Re: Re: The velvet glove is off the mailed fist.

          Constitutional Readjustment tool- cheap no name 22lr, front sight filed off, will take no named scope, one liter plastic coke bottle, duck tape- black, use your imagination, learn to shoot stright, extra coke bottles-don't drink the coke its not good for you. The Second Amendment was put there for a reason.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      PopeyeLePoteaux, Aug 16th, 2013 @ 8:56pm

      Re: The velvet glove is off the mailed fist.

      Ok, I'll try to explain it in a way your little brain can understand, ready?

      YOU CAN CHOOSE NOT TO USE GOOGLE SERVICES.

      Do I need to explain it using jellybeans?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Not an Electronic Rodent (profile), Aug 17th, 2013 @ 2:19am

        Re: Re: The velvet glove is off the mailed fist.

        Do I need to explain it using jellybeans?
        Evidence suggests that wouldn't work...

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Aug 19th, 2013 @ 10:54am

        Re: Re: The velvet glove is off the mailed fist.

        Cripes, I am pretty sure that was his whole point.

        Lavabit was providing a service so that people who don't like how Google and others handle things can have options.

        Seeing as the whole PRISM thing makes a lot of people wary of Gmail, it's not unreasonable.

        I understand the author of the comment has a sordid past around here, but once in awhile the comments aren't just trolling or ad hominems

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Aug 21st, 2013 @ 5:23pm

        Re: Re: The velvet glove is off the mailed fist.

        Explain it with jelly beans and without being an a-hole please.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      cheve, Aug 16th, 2013 @ 9:56pm

      Re: The velvet glove is off the mailed fist.

      I don't think it limits to gmail, hotmail, yahoo, outlook.com
      all are affected.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 16th, 2013 @ 4:24pm

    Sounds like the US Gov. wanted to intercept all user passwords for Lavabit, so they can decrypt and read all email messages stored on Lavabit.

    If Lavabit's software sent un-hashed user passwords over the wire, then a ethernet splitter inside Lavabit's LAN would be able to intercept ALL user passwords.

    If Lavabit's software sent hashed user passwords over the wire, then it would require a backdoor built into Lavabit's email software to intercept user passwords.

    I believe Lavabit sends un-hashed passwords over the wire, so more than likely the US Gov. wanted to install an ethernet splitter inside Lavabit's LAN (local area network), and intercept all user passwords.

    Similar to the ethernet splitters used in AT&T and Verizon networks.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Manabi (profile), Aug 16th, 2013 @ 5:26pm

      Re:

      Or Lavabit sent hashed passwords and the US government wanted to install a device to do a man-in-the-middle attack, pretending to be Lavabit's authentication server, but really just saving all information typed and passing it along to the real authentication server to authenticate the user. They could have done a perfect one, demanding Lavabit provide their SSL certificates for the MITM device to use so no one would notice.

      I think that's more likely, Lavabit focused enough on security it's unlikely they were sending cleartext passwords over the wire.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 7:35am

      Re:

      No, passwords we're not sent in cleartext over the wire...

      First off they are called fiber optic splitters.
      The traffic is encrypted, passwords are hashed.
      The storage on the servers is encrypted and can't be unencrypted by Lavabit, only by the client with their password.

      The order was probably for access to the storage, which would require the users password, ie implementing the ability to get the users password.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      omar, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 8:37am

      Response to: Anonymous Coward on Aug 16th, 2013 @ 4:24pm

      Great response! Please keep sharing. It helped my interest on how things work.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      jms, Aug 18th, 2013 @ 6:36am

      Re:

      They wouldn't have to install a splitter inside Lavabit's LAN. They could install it just outside Lavabit's connection to the internet. They wouldn't even have to tell Lavabit about it.

      No, I think it's the backdoor option. I'll bet Lavabit hashes passwords and only sends encrypted email, so they wanted them to install a backdoor in the client software. That would be a "markedly different" order that would justify shutting down their business.

      My takeaway from this is that we are beginning to understand the importance of open-source privacy software like PGP. A proprietary security/encryption program could be rock solid -- unbreakable -- or perhaps not if the NSA were able to get to the author with a FISA order. If the software were open-source and people around the world were scrutinizing any alterations to the source code and compiling the software themselves, it would be very hard -- perhaps impossible -- to slip in any backdoors. I felt in the 1990s that the developing internet protocols should have all included strong encryption. I never thought that it would be to protect Americans from the government. Yet here we are.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Aug 18th, 2013 @ 2:59pm

      Response to: Anonymous Coward on Aug 16th, 2013 @ 4:24pm

      Maybe Obama wanted to check e-statements of Americans' Bank accounts. Lol...

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Applesauce, Aug 16th, 2013 @ 4:26pm

    Just Shut Up and Obey

    EOM

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    qw, Aug 16th, 2013 @ 4:34pm

    asking for it

    "It sounds like the feds were asking for a full on backdoor on the system"

    No. Nope. It doesn't sound like they were "asking".

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Nastybutler77 (profile), Aug 16th, 2013 @ 5:06pm

      Re: asking for it

      Exactly.

      It sounds like the feds were demanding a full on backdoor on the system, not unlike some previous reports of ISPs who have received surprise visits from the NSA.

      Fixed that for you.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Wally (profile), Aug 16th, 2013 @ 4:49pm

    Ok...just...wow...

    Whilethere was a warrant on one of Lavabits' users accounts who was under investigation, for trafficking child porn, issued back in April. Just this month Lavabit was told to shut down pending an investigation....and now that they shut down...they face federal charges?

    Does anyone else see this as a repeat of Megaupload's shut down save the fact that Megaupload was ordered to keep its "infringing" data as evidence? It's the same yet in a totally opposite direction.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      That One Guy (profile), Aug 16th, 2013 @ 6:39pm

      Re: Ok...just...wow...

      Uh, not exactly, might want to go over the articles again Wally. Lavabit had shut down rather than comply with what they felt was an unjust/illegal court-order, and given they had shown a willingness in the past to deal with law enforcement to investigate individuals, and the hints that have been dropped that this time was way bigger than those, I'd say whatever the order was, it was probably huge, along the lines of 'backdoor access to the entire system' huge.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      omar, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 8:31am

      Re: Ok...just...wow...

      Please reference first shutdown order with a link to further interest.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Cloudsplitter, Aug 24th, 2013 @ 9:48pm

      Re: Ok...just...wow...

      That did not work to well with Mega Uploads since legally the US government had no one to serve since Mega was a foreign entity with no US ties, other then foolishly using a server base in the US. The real deal here is that this government is out to destroy the multi billion dollar US computer industry, it will not take long before people realize that like the internet the work around is to off shore everything, run your secure email systems from Iceland, or Cyprus, there's a place looking for a new industry, and no love for the west that killed its last one, and looted its peoples wealth, and no servers, or comm traffic through the US, as Washington has shown
      by its action that it can not be trusted. people will pay good money for security. Cuba as a trans atlantic communication and cable nexus to Central and South America, Mexico as the hub from the Pacific. The unintended consequences of this governments actions is going to be the future of the American computer industry.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Rich Fiscus (profile), Aug 16th, 2013 @ 4:53pm

    It's too bad the Washington Post doesn't have half Ladar Levison's sense of civic responsibility. Remember that the next time they try to sell you the line about being public servants holding the government accountable on your behalf. If that were true we would have been reading John Delong's remarks today right next to a giant picture of a middle finger. Instead we got an excuse for caving in to the White House.

    The media cares more about their special relationships with government officials than informing the public. Fourth Estate my ass!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      omar, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 8:43am

      Response to: Rich Fiscus on Aug 16th, 2013 @ 4:53pm

      Cool!
      We need local news and editorials that are focused on old newspaper traditions.
      That will keep the fed controlled news to happen, and well to question, and challenge the happenings. Furthermore, to report how locally we are intertwined.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 16th, 2013 @ 5:02pm

    So is shutting down what is supposed to have "violated the court order", or is saying he's shutting down because he obejects to a federal order that's unlike anything he's gotten before and believes to be illegal what is supposed to have "violated the court order"?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Robert, Aug 19th, 2013 @ 5:19am

      Re:

      More likely they are pissed off by reading into what Ladar Levison meant by 'SUSPENDING' the service versus permanently terminating it ie screw you, I am not your stoolie slave, I will regain the quality of my honour and integrity be relocating the service over seas.
      The threats are utterly empty and are nothing more than the ego spouting of the individual agents concerned.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    kenichi tanaka (profile), Aug 16th, 2013 @ 5:10pm

    Do I really have to say it? The federal government certainly has a lot of chutzpah for complaining about Lavabit shutting down rather than cooperate with secret subpoenas issued by a secret court for secret spying.

    Not even the federal government has the right to force a business, company, corporation or website to continue operating simply because they are going to lose the right to spy on Americans.

    Good grief, has the federal government been taken over by Scooby Doo?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Aug 16th, 2013 @ 5:21pm

      Re:

      Scooby Doo villains, maybe.
      "And we would've gotten away with it, if it hadn't been for those meddling whistleblowers!"

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Rich Fiscus (profile), Aug 16th, 2013 @ 5:29pm

      Re:

      The problem with setting yourself up in an ivory tower is you can't see the mob of peasants coming until they're close enough to knock it over.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Aug 18th, 2013 @ 7:23am

        Re: Re:

        Also colloquated with "The Frankenstein Principle":

        Always have a back door to run out of when the mob appears.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      mr burns, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 3:50pm

      Re:

      if the federal gov can force you to buy insurance from a private company I don't imagine "justice" roberts will have much trouble rationalizing their ability to force you operate a business, or perhaps pick cotton .

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      dave, Aug 18th, 2013 @ 4:20pm

      Re: US govt takenover by Scoobie Doo

      Clearly the US govt is run by mass murdering, toturing war criminal scum. Vote with your wallet and boycott all US products! The citizens of the US who have failed to hold their war crims accountable only seem to 'get' 1 thing, money, so starve the evil artificial psychopathic entity to death then hold the individuals who compose the BEAST personally and individually accountable at international war crimes tribunals!!!!

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 16th, 2013 @ 5:49pm

    So they are going to arrest you for deciding not to work or for not doing a specific job? They can force you to work and to continue doing your job? Sounds like slavery, no? Communism? The government chooses your job and says you must do this like it or not?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Aug 16th, 2013 @ 6:39pm

      Re:

      I'm pretty sure the threats are over what he said as to why he was shutting down. He basically indirectly said it was to avoid being forced to do something the feds wanted him to do, and that it was not a standard "Hand over all data on this one user" order.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 9:44pm

        Re: Re:

        "I'm pretty sure the threats are over what he said as to why he was shutting down"

        So they want to force him to work for the NSA (probably for free even), like it or not.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      btrussell (profile), Aug 17th, 2013 @ 3:55am

      Re:

      Most people are slaves. Get too close to freedom and they will extend credit so as to enable buying the next new shiny thing. Now get back to work. Compound Interest never sleeps.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Urgelt (profile), Aug 16th, 2013 @ 7:09pm

    Democracy, Anyone?

    The FISA court's rulings are secret. We aren't allowed to know how they interpret Federal statutes.

    FISA court orders are secret. We aren't allowed to know what they order people to do.

    In the last two years, the FISA court has approved every government request for surveillance submitted to it - including requests for mass surveillance of American citizens' phone and internet communications.

    FISA court proceedings are not adversarial. No dissenting argumentation is permitted.

    We only know about all of this stuff because Snowden leaked documents (illegally).

    How can anyone reach a conclusion different from Jimmy Carter's conclusion? He said that America no longer has a functioning democracy. I'm finding it very difficult to disagree with him.

    How can we take back our democracy, folks? It seems to have been stolen from us.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Rich Fiscus (profile), Aug 16th, 2013 @ 7:44pm

      Re: Democracy, Anyone?

      You're doing it right now. And when you tell the next person you talk to about this you'll be doing it even more. You stand up and call out the liars and you tell them no.

      That's what the care and feeding of democracy looks like.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        RyanNerd (profile), Aug 18th, 2013 @ 6:54am

        Re: Re: Democracy, Anyone?

        The challenge of course is finding a voice. If you don't have any influence or a way of reaching a large audience in an engaging way you may as well be an old man yelling at the cloud.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          John Fenderson (profile), Aug 19th, 2013 @ 1:17pm

          Re: Re: Re: Democracy, Anyone?

          I understand your point, but I disagree. Influential voices reaching large audiences are important, but what's even more important is people hearing their neighbor's opinions.

          Lots of people won't take a position (even if they agree with it in their heart) if they feel like they're the weirdo for taking the position. The only way to make those people feel less isolated is for them to hear similar opinions from their friends, family, and neighbors.

          While it's not the total solution (no single thing is!), speaking your voice to other individuals is not only nothing like "old man yells at cloud", it's an essential activity.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      David, Aug 16th, 2013 @ 10:22pm

      Re: Democracy, Anyone?

      Oh, it's worse than that. The FISC only gets to see what the NSA wants it to see, and still there were more than 2500 violations of rules in 2012, most of them unintentional. So there are regular intentional violations of the FISC regulations that are reported, and they can choose themselves what to report. There are apparently no consequences either.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 8:42am

      Re: Democracy, Anyone?

      Congress authorized the FISC, they can deauthorize it. Congress funds the NSA, they can de-fund it. Start holding Congress accountable for the mess they've created.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        PT (profile), Aug 17th, 2013 @ 12:42pm

        Re: Re: Democracy, Anyone?

        I wrote to my congresscritter to ask why he voted against the Amash amendment. Part of his reply reads as follows:

        [S]ince this disclosure a substantial amount of misinformation about these programs has been spread, mostly through independent, unaccountable media sources. ... The simple truth is that this authority has thwarted 54 terrorist plots since its creation.

        If this is what you get from a member of a group allegedly committed to reducing the size of the Federal Government, there is no hope.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          That One Guy (profile), Aug 17th, 2013 @ 6:38pm

          Re: Re: Re: Democracy, Anyone?

          Speaking of 'misinformation', sounds like another congresscritter getting his talking points straight from the NSA's PR department.

          I do love the 'independent, unaccountable media sources' bit, he might as well have come out and called them what he's probably really thinking, that of 'sources that don't answer to the government'.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      mrsethshoe, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 10:56am

      Re: Democracy, Anyone?

      We actually never had a democracy until about now.... This is what democracy looks like with an "elected ruling elite". What we used to have was a Republic and that is long gone... That was where the people actually held their elected officials accountable.

      And all this govt spying is absolutely just another go round of the Nazi SS and the whole "see something, say something" where we start to turn neighbor against neighbor and end up with mass genocides - ours which would be just taking out the "terrorists" I.e. Govt dissenters.

      If George Washington and Thomas Jefferson and several others saw us now, they would be mortified at what we the people have let happen to this great country - everything from Pres Lincoln and his forcing states to comply (which was a huge overstep of the federal govt - and yes, I do think all people are created equal and slavery was wrong but he fixed the problem the wrong way) to the creation of our illegal currency we are forced to use today (the Treasury is still the only one legally allowed to print legal tender and mint coins). It goes so much further than this aggregious overstep, I'm not sure it can be fixed without a major overhaul which will not be pretty - esp with all those who rely on govt handouts for their daily living.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Geoff Barto (profile), Aug 17th, 2013 @ 4:39pm

      Re: Democracy, Anyone?

      Now, now. If people can’t trust not only the executive branch but also don’t trust Congress, and don’t trust federal judges, to make sure that we’re abiding by the Constitution with due process and rule of law, then we’re going to have some problems here.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Naner, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 7:03pm

      Re: Democracy, Anyone?

      The answer to that question is in a newly released book called, "The Liberty Ammendments", by Mark Levin. The Constitution has been breached all the way around by all the politicians independent, democrat, and republican...the book explains how the people at the bottom are going to have to amend the constitution at the state level and 3/4 of the states must vote in the additional ammendments.....Congress and President have no say or convention....Article V, Section II, written by George Mason in the final two days before ratification, wanted to make sure that if the leaders became corrupt, that the people had recourse of their own accord, before another revolution would have to take place: The country is a state centered country with a minimal federal government, until Woodrow Wilson, the first progressive president, installed the income tax and added the 17th amendment: the people vote on Senators instead of state legislators.....this has been detrimental to the people because the states are closer to the people and the senators used to be beholden to their constituents directly...now these jackwagons get to DC and they are only worried about themselves and their party, and screw the people......bottom line, it is up to each one of us to change this metastasized cancer that is our Federal Government.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      joecrouse, Aug 20th, 2013 @ 11:58am

      ummm 4 guys from liverpool had an answer

      They say you want a revolution well you know wed all love to see the plan. You tell me it's the instituition well you know we're all doing what we ca-an.

      but when you talk about destruction well dont you know that you can count me out....

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 16th, 2013 @ 7:26pm

    There is a difference between a hashed password, and a clear text password encrypted with SSL/TLS.

    So you are correct about needing the Certificate Authorities private key, in order to see clear text passwords encrypted with SSL/TLS, and encapsulated in a TCP/IP packet.

    Unless SSL/TLS 'forward secrecy' is being used. In which case, have the Certificate Authorities private key won't do an adversary any good, because the session key keeps rotating forward to a new, unique, key for each new connection made to the server. Very few companies have implemented 'forward secrecy' though. It's still a new technology.

    However, if the passwords are hashed before being encrypted with SSL/TLS and encapsulated inside a TCP/IP packet. Then having the Certificate Authorities private key doesn't do an adversary any good. All the adversary would be see when looking inside the decrypted packet, would be a hashed password instead of a clear text password.

    If Lavabit did send clear text passwords encrypted with SSL/TLS, then we can conclude that the US Government does not have access to Lavabit's Certificate Authorities private key. If the Gov. did have access to it, they could have just captured the packets at one of the major backbone routers on the internet, instead of contacting Lavabit and trying to get them to comply.

    It's interesting, because every time the US Gov. makes a move, we can deduce a little more about their technical capabilities.

    I could have sworn I read somewhere that Lavabit does not used hashed passwords. If true, then we've just learned that US Gov. does not have access to all, or least some, of the private keys for Certificate Authorities around the world.

    Sorry for geeking out. I just find cryptography interesting. :)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 10:11am

      > Very few companies have implemented 'forward secrecy' though.
      > It's still a new technology.

      The Diffie-Hellman key exchange algorithm achieves forward
      secrecy and it is 37 years old. SSL 3.0 included ephemeral DH
      key exchange ciphersuites and that was released in 1996.

      It is hardly a new technology, its lack of deployment is mostly
      down to apprehension ("will this slow down my service?") and
      laziness ("can't be bothered, it works already and my private
      key is secure").

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Lance, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 4:15pm

      Re: Certificate authority

      You can be your own Certificate Authority. The reason it's not commonly done is that both parties in the communication have to have a shared CA key. Browsers ship with root cents for most of the commercial CA's out there which avoids the need for users to go out and get a cert. Being your own CA would mean you'd have to ship root certain to all your users.

      Of course then the govt would just come to the company and require them to hand over the root cert.

      How long until they start requiring this of non-communication businesses, like GE or Exxon-Mobil?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Saltynoob, Aug 16th, 2013 @ 7:47pm

    Four elements of contempt

    Ya know the feds might just get away with it.

    A person found in contempt of court is called a "contemnor." To prove contempt, the prosecutor or complainant must prove the four elements of contempt:
    1)Existence of a lawful order
    2)The potential contemnor's knowledge of the order
    3)The potential contemnor's ability to comply
    4)The potential contemnor's failure to comply

    Judging by Lavabit's own statements. He is guilty of the last three, but the first element is problematic. The lawyer would have to prove it wasn't a lawful order. By common sense standards obviously no, but were not dealing with common sense.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Gwiz (profile), Aug 16th, 2013 @ 8:09pm

      Re: Four elements of contempt

      I would argue that Lavabit (the company itself) did not have the "ability" to comply with the order because doing so would destroy the trust that is the foundation of their business model. Can the Federal Government really force a company to choose between flat-out lying to their customer base or committing financial suicide?

      I would also argue that "failure to comply" wouldn't be applicable since shutting down the company beforehand removed the ability to comply.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Saltynoob, Aug 16th, 2013 @ 8:22pm

        Re: Re: Four elements of contempt

        Hey Gwiz
        Being the arm chair lawyer that I am I would say your first point doesn't matter in the courts eyes. This is not a financial court case issue. So I think trust is an irreverent aspect.

        Your second point is applicable because he shut down the server after receiving """something""". What we don't know,but we all assume it was a backdoor request/don't say nothing letter.

        Could be wrong though, Ive been though 10 minutes of internet/google search lawyer school.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        G Thompson (profile), Aug 16th, 2013 @ 11:11pm

        Re: Re: Four elements of contempt

        Your first point rests on what 'reasonableness' is and in this respect what the 'norm' of other organisations in the same sector also do (ie: google, Yahoo, Facebook, ISP's et. al.)

        Your second point though is highly relevant. Since it brings into question how much control an actual private owner has over their own company when it effects allegedly (I'm going to assume it was not a warrant/subpoena to produce evidence) some fishing expedition by the authorities that may or may not produce relevant evidence for future & unknown cases.

        The USG is basically (Based on the information we have) stating... "we require you to give us access to your business data and keep running the business for as long as we deem necessary no matter the consequences or burdens placed upon said business and if you violate this by enacting the absolute lawful right of liquidating the property (business) at your whim we will prosecute you for contempt of authority"

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Gwiz (profile), Aug 17th, 2013 @ 6:21am

          Re: Re: Re: Four elements of contempt

          (I'm going to assume it was not a warrant/subpoena to produce evidence)


          Yes. I am making that assumption also.

          If it was the normal "preserve and/or turn over this evidence" type of order, shutting down the company wouldn't even be an issue for the Feds since it wouldn't matter either way. It's pretty obvious now that this order required the service to continue in order to be effective.


          PS @ Saltynoob: I am not a lawyer either. Just your average working stiff with an inquiring mind.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      GreatWhiteWalrus, Sep 13th, 2013 @ 4:58am

      Re: Four elements of contempt

      The ability to comply, in this instance, only exists as long as the business exists. Lavabit is in no way obligated to stay in business, for any reason whatsoever. Therefore, failure to comply is also invalid when the business no longer exists.

      One might liken this to the IRS demanding that you maintain or increase your level of income(and thus taxes paid) year over year, or face prosecution for failure to comply. The only thing that Lavabit *may* be liable for, if at all, is failure to comply with the order in accordance with its *existing* capability.

      In any event, the inexorable march toward a police state continues.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Josh in CharlotteNC (profile), Aug 16th, 2013 @ 8:07pm

    Mistake

    Big mistake by the government. If they wanted this kept quiet, its a huge tactical mistake that will be an all out strategic mistake.

    We argued on the last story whether him having to shut down his business gave him standing to challenge this in open court. Now there's no question - he's being threatened by the government with imprisonment.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    kenichi tanaka (profile), Aug 16th, 2013 @ 8:19pm

    I wish the federal government would send me a FISA order requesting the personal information on my members because not only would I refuse to hand that info over but I would blab my mouth to every TV reports and print journalist that I could find.

    I simply do not believe in gag orders issued by secret courts who rubber stamp subpoenas.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 16th, 2013 @ 8:22pm

    I made a mistake about Certificate Authorities in my above post. Having the Certificate Authorities private key, would allow man-in-the-middle attacks. As mentioned by the above poster.

    The only thing a Certificate Authority does is hold the public key for Lavabit's server.

    Lavabit's private key is stored on Lavabit's server, itself.

    So it does indeed appear the US Gov. is after access to Lavabit's private session key, stored on it's servers.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Uriel-238 (profile), Aug 16th, 2013 @ 10:13pm

    My nation hasn't yet gone Full Gestapo...

    but this was one big step in that direction.

    This is a really bad time to be someone of interest to the state.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Shimkus, Aug 16th, 2013 @ 10:45pm

    AT&T succombed to this same brow-beating ages ago.
    everything that passes through at&t is easily accessible to gov agencies.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Rudd-O, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 1:04am

    Not very long...

    ...till people start being disappeared in the middle of the night, oppan Argentina style.

    Remember these words.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Ken, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 1:32am

    government agents need to do prison time

    We've gone past the point where just getting our freedom back is the order of the day.

    These government agents all need to stand trial for treason.

    Once we get our freedom back, the government agents who have participated in the destruction of American freedom and the abrogation of Constitutional law need to be subjected to Nuremberg style trials.

    -Ken
    Laser Guided Loogie

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 1:43am

    these types of 'requests' from the NSA or other law enforcement/security agencies put the receiver(s) between a rock and a hard plate. you are screwed if you do what they want when your customers discover that you complied and you are screwed if you dont because you are then threatened, or worse, with arrest, prosecution and conviction. and that is something that needs addressing now! how can Congress and others allow companies, the heads or others be treated in such a way that the choice they have is go to prison or go broke! that is disgraceful!!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Eponymous Coward, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 1:51am

    What's the next Lavabit?

    Not being very technical myself, I wonder where this will go with new services coming up to counter these operations. Basically if Lavabit were Napster what will be the eventual µtorent? Will it be a distributed, encrypted, email service not prone to this line of attack since it lacks a central hub? Or will it be something totally different then my too easy comparison? Whatever it is I hope smarter minds than mine are working on it now!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Ben S (profile), Aug 17th, 2013 @ 7:04am

      Re: What's the next Lavabit?

      BitMessage is an attempt at a completely distributed email service using public/private key pairs. Your public key also acts as your email address with this system. They're currently looking for security experts to test the current cryptography, so there is a question as to the degree of security, but there has been at least one person to answer the call, break the crypto, and send the creators of the program a fix for the issue.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Ben S (profile), Aug 17th, 2013 @ 7:08am

        Re: Re: What's the next Lavabit?

        I forgot to mention, the keys aren't really interacted with by the user, merely saved then used automatically as needed. Aside from your public key acting as an email address, you don't need to see the keys at all. The public key is also just text, so one can copy/paste the one line as a key quite easily. This gets rid of the hassle for the casual user, while still providing the protection you're after.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        WorBlux, Aug 18th, 2013 @ 9:22pm

        Re: Re: What's the next Lavabit?

        Bitmessage is not an email-protocol as if you don't check it every 2 days your messages are dropped from the swarm. It's more along the lines of an SMS/twitter replacement. Both I2P and freenet contain internal mail system that hold onto data for longer.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 8:34am

      Re: What's the next Lavabit?

      The encryption technologies to protect communications exist, and requires user involvement if key creation, key exchange and encryption messages. Asking a third party service to deal with these issues introduces potential man in the middle attacks.
      At a fundamental level, security and convenience are incompatible.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Davidj2, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 6:10pm

      Re: What's the next Lavabit?

      I think you are on the right track. Kim Dotcom is already at work - over seas, ready to fill the void. Email is a mature technology that will be replaced mostly. It's too slow for our youth. (!= Everything, everywhere, now)

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      AskTheGoats, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 7:13pm

      Re: What's the next Lavabit?

      Maybe we should all just go back to using Fidonet. Or packet radio.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    G, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 4:33am

    Run your business, slave, and let us watch everything you and your users do. Do as your told or we'll take you down as a message to others: resistance is futile.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Ben S (profile), Aug 17th, 2013 @ 7:10am

      Re:

      That's not necessarily true. If the officers are coming with a warrant for specific information, and not one from the secret courts, it means the request was subject to actual oversight, and deemed worthy of obtaining the information because law enforcement was able to prove there's just cause to have that information revealed.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Ross, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 5:05am

    The fact that he cooperated with the the federals at all means he is not one of the good guys.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Michael Price, Aug 18th, 2013 @ 5:14pm

      Re:

      What you expect him to hide customer details even when there is good evidence that they are committing crimes? There is nothing wrong with complying with a legitimate, lawful court order. Or would you prefer that murderers and pedophiles get away with anything as long as it's planned via email.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Aug 18th, 2013 @ 5:47pm

      Response to: Ross on Aug 17th, 2013 @ 5:05am

      Some level of cooperation is inevitable in compliance with the DCMA. Every net entity more of less will face it at some point. When chasing child molesters, eg. It's not always 'evil'

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Aug 21st, 2013 @ 5:25pm

      Re:

      says the agent provocateur

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    ducat, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 5:24am

    lavabit

    If i were this fellow, i'd be looking into plane tickets to ecuador.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    thejynxed (profile), Aug 17th, 2013 @ 5:56am

    Lavabit & evidence

    They are going to get him for destruction of evidence and obstruction of an ongoing investigation.

    There was a similar case locally a few years ago, where a small mom & pop ISP got into a bit of a bind because they swapped to newer equipment (a new database server). The regional drug task force and the DEA + FBI had "requested" they maintain the older server while they completed the investigation of someone running a rather large meth lab who happened to be a customer of their ISP.

    The new system they installed had software that was incompatible with the data formats they previously used for email and account storage, and when they swapped, the old stuff went "poof".

    Needless to say the owner barely got out of being jailed themselves, but did have to pay a rather large fine, perform community service, and was reprimanded by a judge.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Gwiz (profile), Aug 17th, 2013 @ 6:43am

      Re: Lavabit & evidence

      They are going to get him for destruction of evidence and obstruction of an ongoing investigation.


      Possibly. But I see a couple problems with the government's case if they choose that tact:

      1) This really doesn't seem like it was a normal "warrant/subpoena to produce evidence". Lavabit has stated that they have complied with those in the past.

      2) Shutting down the company doesn't really indicate that any data wasn't preserved. Lavabit would have to be fools to destroy anything at this point. The Feds seem more pissed about the service shutting down (ie: access to future info) than any evidence that already exists.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Aug 18th, 2013 @ 7:29am

      Re: Lavabit & evidence

      Nah, the NSA will simply run a "private" prosecution in lieu of even a slightest modicum of self-reflection. No need to prosecute for destruction of evidence, as I'm sur ehte NSA can come up with something...

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 6:15am

    Went to DMV with friend so she could acquire US driver license.

    While waiting in line one dude in line in front of us suddenly bolted and rain out door with cops in pursuit.

    Found out later he had unknown to him warrant out for his arrest.

    Ask later what meaning of warrant is in this location.

    Warrant is issued for anything from unpaid parking ticket to maximum.

    Also ask about traffic computer cameras.

    Found out that warrants are issued for unpaid camera traffic citations.

    Can hear this now.

    Black guy goes to DMV to renew driver license shot in back for unknown camera traffic citation.

    Welcome to the police state of America.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 6:33am

    Atlas is Shrugging, and a whole lot of us are going "we told you do."

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Niall (profile), Aug 19th, 2013 @ 4:28am

      Re:

      Notice your big corporate masters are the ones blindly complying? Atlas couldn't give a toss what happens to the little man, so long as he gets his steady paycheck. And doesn't get *his* liver ripped out.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Shon Gale, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 7:20am

    The tighter your grip, the more systems will slip through your fingers.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    sudopinion, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 8:11am

    NEVER

    The U.S Government will NEVER allow unbreakable encryption on its networks. This is about something bigger than your nudes.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      That Crazy Freetard (profile), Aug 17th, 2013 @ 10:25am

      Re: NEVER

      There's no such thing as unbreakable encryption. All encryption does is buy you time. How good the encryption is determines how much time you have.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Uriel-238 (profile), Aug 17th, 2013 @ 12:06pm

        Unbreakable encryption

        There is encryption that is as good as unbreakable, which is to say that hacking it would take an unreasonable length of time (millenna or even eons) unless the analyst got very, very lucky.

        This doesn't take into account advancements in technology. Quantum computers can break ElGamal encryption, on which most secure webcommunications depend. The NSA doesn't have one, but they're having a D-Wave installed in the Utah base (it's not done being built yet).

        After that, we'll have to find a better way to encrypt our data... which will be a necessity even if we shut down the NSA, as that will only delay time before some nation (e.g. Germany) has a Quantum-computer-equipped cyber-intelligence agency. We're ultimately going to have to accept that our communications are being observed by people who don't like us.

        We can counter cryptanalytic efforts by encrypting everything, and if necessary adding decoy messages into the mix. This would require such agencies to triage their workload (quantum machines are still expensive to obtain and run).

        Sometimes cryptanalysis will be ahead of encryption. Sometimes vice versa, but this way we reduce the probability that our data is prioritized over someone else's data. It also increases the likelihood that what they are decrypting is useless data (letters to Aunt Millie) rather than meaningful data (your company books for the last year).

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      WorBlux, Aug 18th, 2013 @ 9:25pm

      Re: NEVER

      There's not such thing as unbreakable encryption. There's just encryption that's so hard to attack it's not even worth trying. And they have to allow strong encryption, for one to keep the financial system running.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Jack Straw, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 8:36am

    TIME TO SUE GOOGLE & MICROSOFT

    The government is UNABLE to crack PGP encrypted emails and I suggest everyone get a free and legal PGP key and use it all the time. Best advice is to buy a new or used laptop computer, download, create DVD and boot TAILS as your very private and ultra secure operating system which never uses your real computer hard drive and stores no trace of your activity on the actual laptop (this is all legal by the way), and with PGP, and free wireless from your neighbor or coffee shop, you are pretty pretty much untraceable. Remember: it is the State VS. The People, so lets stop the B/S and realize our own government is the real enemy of freedom. Hey you don't like my comment? FU

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Aug 22nd, 2013 @ 4:29pm

      Re: TIME TO SUE GOOGLE & MICROSOFT

      "Hey you don't like my comment? FU"
      I love your comment — and your ideas and ideals.

      I want to add: I believe that a utility that randomizes the client's local MAC address (or at least the less-significant octets) would further aid in covering one's tracks, particularly in the event one happens to offend (by way of (for example) naming & shaming an individual amongst the ranks of...) our dear leaders or their criminal TLA henchmen.

      Also, it is (IMO) needless to point out the "legality" of any particular action — (at least to those who are paying attention); in a nation where a war criminal gets a peace prize and an innocent pleb protecting his family gets a death sentence, persecutors instead of prosecutors — there is no law. Until/unless it gets fixed, we just have our own judgement: morality, humanism, risk assessment... These days I find the moral code of La Cosa Nostra to have more integrity than unfunny joke called the Department of "Justice."

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 9:27am

    SHUT THE NET DOWN

    If there was a switch, or cables to shut the internet off, I would do it, no matter what it took, if I lived or died. And I would be the savior of the planet. The WEB is pure evil, especially when the people we're suppose to trust most are lying and spying on us. You'll find another job.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Bill Bellroth, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 9:28am

    Feds threaten to arrest.

    So Lavabit is threatened with criminal proceedings for shutting down their own service. Wonderful. So will the government charge me for refusing to send an email that might incriminate me? Suppose I decline to say anything about terrorism, am I thereby committing an offence? It really is a time where Truth is Lies, War is Peace, Sanity is Madness. God help us all.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Uriel-238 (profile), Aug 17th, 2013 @ 11:49am

    We've always had a democracy.

    We actually never had a democracy until about now.... This is what democracy looks like with an "elected ruling elite"...

    I don't think that word means what you think it means. We have a
    representative democracy (i.e. a republic) that has been gamed. But neither of those terms ceases to qualify because the representatives are not held accountable.

    There are numerous ways for this to be fixed, some within the system, some peaceful. But those for whom the current regime is favorable are going to resist with all their might.

    We may have a democracy at the end of it. It might be representative, and our representatives may actually serve the will of their constituents. But no matter what we have, there will always be forces trying to wrench the system back towards a dictatorship, if in tiny amounts.

    Our constitutional framers knew this going in. The only thing they underestimated was the organizational powers of technology that sped the process.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Coyne Tibbets, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 1:31pm

    They wanted the master key

    LavaBit encrypted all mail in an effort to make it hard for anyone (even the government) to peek.

    However, for technical reasons, virtually any such design has to have a master key to control the overall system of keys.

    After thinking about this for a while, I'm guessing that what the government did was demand his master key. That would have allowed them to decrypt any message from any user, not just Snowden.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Chops, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 1:55pm

    Property

    In the United States, the government views the citizen as property. As long as you do as you are told, you will be permitted the illusion of freedom, but make no mistake citizen. You. Are. Property.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 2:18pm

    its pretty obv that the govt was using secret laws to gather and spy on snowden using lavabit, once they knew about it.. connect the dots. the owner of lavabit merely shut it down in order prevent the measures that snowden has been talking about. It's a matter of character.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Chris Bray, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 3:23pm

    When state power descends into organized psychosis....

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    ironjustice (profile), Aug 17th, 2013 @ 3:43pm

    Stifling Research

    Monitoring of Google has been going on for awhile. I was trying to do some research as to when, who and how the special rights of the homosexuals came about and why, who and how the special rights are so quickly leading us to war. I had discovered a tree and was following its branches and it had led to the Democratic leader in New York being caught for child pornography and was trying to research how and who he had to know in order to secure that job. I , as a researcher , typed in the proper search terms in Google, and what do I get back? I get back a message that my search was inappropriate and has been recorded , scared the sht out of me, for a second or two and I never captured the message to prove it had happened.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Niall (profile), Aug 19th, 2013 @ 4:32am

      Re: Stifling Research

      Which 'special' homosexual rights are these? The rights not to be persecuted, hounded or jailed for doing what everyone else is doing? The right to marry the one they love? The equality that blacks and women have already had to fight for?

      And how are these 'special' rights 'leading you to war'? The only people picking a fight are the reactionary bigots who spout the same crap they have for nearly 200 years, losing every step of the way.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    gmathol, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 3:55pm

    Don't use any US based service - period.

    The only way for these companies being stopped for being accomplices of the Washington junta is to suffer financially.

    Get rid of smartphones, too - don't pay for your own tracking.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    MeD8R, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 4:40pm

    Our Government Is Scary

    I am 72 years old and for the first time in my lifetime, I am truly becoming frightened of our government. This surveillance on us becomes more and more scary, and we have to stop it. Thank goodness there are at least a few good men willing to stand up to tyranny in government.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Aug 24th, 2013 @ 12:15am

      Re: Our Government Is Scary

      We The People do have the ability to force a vote on a bill outlawing these practices. There are 300 million of us and, about 25% of the working people are government employees. Clearly we non-government employees are the majority. The first thing we do is pass a law reducing the number of government employees to no more than 8% of the working population. Then We The People write our own bill making all forms of communication private regardless of the transmission medium. Then We force a vote on that bill. Next We criminalize telemarketing. Next We criminalize the acts of companies compiling information on individuals. Next we pass a bill stating that Our right to privacy includes anonymity. And so on.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Skipper, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 4:40pm

    Outrageous

    This is preposterous! I'm going to publicize this, it's the least I can do, I wish I could do more. I'm so furious over this surveillance crap! >_>

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    sounder, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 5:08pm

    Wave of the future in America.

    All internet based company's need to leave the US or you will suffer the same fate.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Nick C, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 6:19pm

    Can the government make a company stay in business? Would it be a violation even if it were for financial reasons?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Bram Cohen, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 7:37pm

    Getting out of contempt

    If you were held in contempt of court for shutting down your service, how are you supposed to get out of contempt? By turning your service back on again? Do you continue to be in contempt until you wave your magic wand and get back all the goodwill and users which you had prior to the whole fiasco?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Dougie Fresh, Aug 17th, 2013 @ 9:38pm

    I'm ashamed. MY government is overstepping it's bounds in the name of 'security.'

    I would rather be terrorize by a real enemy than scrutinize by my government.

    Eliminate their funding ASAP. Let's see how patriotic THEY are without funding.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Mats Svensson, Aug 18th, 2013 @ 12:35am

    N in NSA is for "Nelson"

    Stop incriminating yourself!
    *punch*

    Stop incriminating yourself!
    *punch*

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    gregd01, Aug 18th, 2013 @ 7:04am

    Tyranny

    Its funny how many liberals I know are all for this. If a Republican were in the White House, I can only imagine their complaining. True Kool-Aid drinkers.

    I always thought the patriot act went too far but now we see just how far beyond that we've gone.

    There is no turning this ship around until the people stop seeing this as a pawn in the game of politics and realize that we are headed down a slippery slope - no matter who is in office at the time.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Aug 18th, 2013 @ 7:32am

      Re: Tyranny

      This, i think, is the bitter pill of the whole thing - apparently, a good number of Democrat supporters are arguing that the US Government and the NSA should be trusted.

      Because, from where I'm sitting, the media outlets are complicit in the fascistic machinations of a small number of people (perhaps as few as 6).

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Uriel-238 (profile), Aug 18th, 2013 @ 2:04pm

      Same as the old boss.

      Its funny how many liberals I know are all for this. If a Republican were in the White House, I can only imagine their complaining. True Kool-Aid drinkers.

      Well, speaking as a raging liberal, I'm all for not this.

      But what you are seeing is the human tendency towards community solidarity. Many vote according to their identity and not (as is our duty as voters in a democracy) according to our personal best interests. Hence gazillions of poor folk voting Republican because it's pro-family-values (e.g. hating on women and gays.)

      The parties and their differences are a sham. The nation is drowning in Kool-aid. And it may fall in our lifetime because of it.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    suzy000, Aug 18th, 2013 @ 7:07am

    Where Am I Living?

    This is getting bad, guys. I am starting to feel like we live in a Communist state. Congress needs to do something and quick. These guys are out of control. I know they are reading this as I type and you know what...they KNOW it too and don't give a darn. This is a bi-partisan issue and there is no reason for Congress NOT to get the NSA in line.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Uma Spankhurst, Aug 18th, 2013 @ 7:31am

    Congress needs to do something? As if. Over half of them have been apparently in the dark about what's happening.

    There is somebody who could do something about this. His name is Obama. He's the guy running this show. It's not like the NSA is doing this without his oversight. It's his DOJ going after these whistleblowers, and attending to the FISC court.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Thingumbob, Aug 18th, 2013 @ 7:57am

    The Prisoner

    That erstwhile British distopian TV series The Prisoner had nothing on the Panopticon Leviathan that our constitutional democratic republic has become. If you resist doing the bidding, they will simply flout the law and secretly spirit you away. It would seem that there is absolutely no bounds to this arrogating tyranny. The fact that these fellows work for the power of the City of London and Wall Street is proven by who they are protecting. For instance, the Saudi royal family's financing of the 9/11 hijackers is an open secret. And to this day they roam the planet scot free.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    DavidS, Aug 18th, 2013 @ 8:23am

    Lavabit

    We have gone from access to Internet services being a human rights issue to the US Gov. saying it is illegal for us not to us them. I guess all those other dictatorships had it all wrong, you don't shutdown Internet services, you require their use.

    Stop before you destroy the country.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    jk, Aug 18th, 2013 @ 10:12am

    Im not US citizen. Looks like u are loosing ur freedom. If this trend goes on, soon ur country will become another Iran..

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Ian Mathers, Aug 18th, 2013 @ 3:17pm

    Don't forget

    Everything that the German government did from 1933 to 1945 was legal as well.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Michael Price, Aug 18th, 2013 @ 5:21pm

    Fundamentally if someone is allowed to operate with only a secret court, where noone else can submit evidence, limiting their actions, they are the government. Welcome to NSAian please enjoy the congress and other decorations put up for your entertainment.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 18th, 2013 @ 5:56pm

    Everyone complicit in these crimes against the american people, including those in government and those in the attorney's office will end up in jail for life soon enough

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 18th, 2013 @ 6:04pm

    Re: the Constitution. Only two possibilities exist. (1) The out of control leviathan we have today happened because the U.S. Constitution authorized it, or (2) the U.S. Constitution was powerless to prevent it from happening.

    Time for conservatives to get over their Constitution-worship. Time for liberals to get over their "U.S. government is great if we could only ensure everyone participates" line.

    The U.S. government and its Constitution ARE the problem. Read Lysander Spooner.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    jingoi, Aug 18th, 2013 @ 6:18pm

    seriously, you fuckers need to die. I'm tired of this we can do whatever we want because we have money and guns crap. We just need everyone in america to stand up and fight against this illegal crap.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    pesti (profile), Aug 19th, 2013 @ 11:14am

    Scared

    I'm wondering if anyone else sees the pattern that I think is there:
    The Government gets called out for lying about Iran having nukes, We get 9/11, now we conceed
    The government wants our guns, We get the Boston Marathon Fiasco, will we conceed???
    Manning/Assange/Snowden et all. Lets see..hmm what was this BS that flew around last week about our embassies shutting
    down because the Gov had good info that a plot was in the works, with the inferrance that it was the great and observant NSA that would save us from this threat...
    It makes me afraid to wonder what kind of things they might come up with next, something to convince the people that these intrusions into our private lives are necessary for our safety.
    Should we be thinking of how to go about monitering them before they make a plan to sacrafice another large number of us in the name of safety...Jesus who are these people
    and what made them think that they have the right to play "Gods"

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Richard P. Martin, Aug 19th, 2013 @ 11:33am

    Government Survelience

    ....it's time for a Constitutional Convention to shut down this disgraceful "corporate UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and reinstitute the Constitution for the united States of America.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Digger, Aug 19th, 2013 @ 12:06pm

    Dear Mr. President (NSA/CIA/FBI/OHS/ABC/DEF/GHI/JKL/ETC)

    Here's a little fact, that all of you appear to have forgotten or chosen to ignore.

    9/11 did NOT change the constitution.

    The Patriot Act is illegal, it violates the constitution.
    The NSA snooping is illegal, it violates the constitution.
    The FBI creating, funding and then arresting groups of people that they coerced into thinking about terrorist acts is the worst kind of entrapment, also illegal.

    This means that all of you, up to and including you Mr. Obama are criminals, thugs, Constitutional Terrorists of the worst sort.

    What you have done is just as bad as what Osama did on 9/11.

    Worse in that you keep doing it, even when you've been caught red-handed.

    Disband the NSA.
    Disband the TSA.

    Repeal The Patriot Act.

    Arrest every member of the NSA, the FBI, the CIA, the TSA and OHS that had anything to do with tramping on our citizens rights.

    Then you need to impeach yourself, step down, and go sit in a prison cell for the damage you've done to this country, it's people and the constitution which YOU SWORE TO UPHOLD.

    All of you are a bunch of lying criminals.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    cd1951 (profile), Aug 19th, 2013 @ 7:34pm

    LAVABIT ISSUES

    Being a UK national, i find it hard to believe that Lavabit just 'closed down'!!

    I found Lavabit very useful for my everyday emails, as i could send and receive through my isp (which i frequently change for economic reasons), without the need to keep changing email addresses.

    Any sensible proprietor/government would allow at least one email to be snet out advising of the closure-this would make good business sense??

    I have seen reports that about 350000 users have had their 'backs put up', with this closure? Whom does one blame, especially when one has to arrange a new email address at short notice and advise/change all the correspondents of this, something that took me a few hours!!

    It does also make one wonder (myself not included), why so many people get an anti American attitude to things, especially where they are not fully explained? Posting of the court order onto the website should have given users some insight into what was going on-this cannot surely be against the law??

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Reply-cd1951, Aug 22nd, 2013 @ 6:04am

      Re: LAVABIT ISSUES

      US is worse that China ATM mate. Just THINK and research before you ask such silly questions.
      I would not trust any company in US with any data nowadays. They share it even with private companies. YES without you knowing it.
      LavaBit's service -I think it was either this or everyone using it would of lost any trace of privacy.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 20th, 2013 @ 4:14am

    I grew up in a communist dictatorship, one of the very worst. Albania under Enver Hoxha.

    Why do I feel like I've seen this movie before?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 20th, 2013 @ 5:14pm

    Lavabit was hosting copyrighted material illegally!














    /s

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Capt Fud, Aug 21st, 2013 @ 3:43pm

    Path forward?

    Bullies must be put to death.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Sheogorath (profile), Aug 21st, 2013 @ 8:23pm

    Experiment

    I'ma purchase me a shit ton of PE-4 so I can go to Fort Meade in Maryland and pull a Guy Fawkes on a certain government building there. Pass this around to see the affect it has, to see if I get arrested.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Uriel-238 (profile), Aug 21st, 2013 @ 9:28pm

    Experiment

    Oh crap, Sheogorath. I hope your account here is well anonymized.

    They seem eager to send the police after you for crap like that.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Sheogorath (profile), Aug 23rd, 2013 @ 9:58pm

      Re: Experiment

      That's kinda the point, Uriel. I might get a free trip to the States, no passport required. At the same time, the US government ironically makes my apparent intention more possible than if they simply ignored my post.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Uriel-238 (profile), Aug 23rd, 2013 @ 11:16pm

        Re: Re: Experiment

        That's a relief. Maybe they won't be as troubled.

        Offshore dissenters, when they're interesting enough, seem to get shuttled to one of our blacksite affiliates that torture for the president so that he can still say he doesn't.

        If you have people who will miss you that might help, but in the past the US has been able to disappear people thoroughly enough to make Stalin jealous.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 27th, 2013 @ 11:58am

    It's wrong

    No matter how you look at this... It is wrong to be forced to comply wih snooping on anybody. This has got to stop.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Linda W, Sep 24th, 2013 @ 11:12am

    Email Account

    How can I access the information in my Lavabit email account? I just found out it was closed and I have some important information in the folders.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This