by Mike Masnick
Thu, Jul 11th 2013 8:04pm
While the "big" Prenda appeal is in the central district of California, back in May, we noted that a ruling in the northern district had also said Prenda needed to pay legal fees to Nick Ranallo, in the amount of $9,425. Paul Duffy quickly appealed, but never paid the $455 fee for an appeal. He was warned a few weeks back that he needed to pay up, and still didn't, so the court has now dumped the appeal and locked in the $9,425 fee that Prenda is required to pay. Of course, if they're not even going to pay the $455 for the appeal, I'd imagine that it's going to be nearly impossible to get the $9,425. As we already know, Duffy has claimed that Prenda is winding down its operations... even as a nearly identical operation, with the same basic participants, but called the Anti-Piracy Law Group, sprung up in its place. How long until someone connects those two, and says that the attorneys fees owed can come from the latter as well?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Paul Hansmeier Argues Convicting Him Of Fraud Would Seriously Damage The Judicial System
- If You're Going To Forge A Fake Court Order To Delete Search Results, Maybe Don't Choose A Prenda Case
- DirecTV's 'Regional Sports Fees' Make No Coherent Sense, Company Won't Explain Why
- Comcast's Decision To Charge Roku Users A Bogus Fee Highlights Its Uncanny Ability To Shoot Innovation In The Foot
- Judge Says Lawsuit Over PACER Fees Can Continue... As A Class Action