Anonymous Participant Who Drew Attention To Steubenville Rape May Face More Years In Jail Than Rapists

from the that-doesn't-seem-right dept

As many of you know, one aspect of the infamous Steubenville rape case was that Anonymous drove a lot of attention to the case, and some participants hacked a website that was a "fan page" for the high school football team, which had two members convicted of the rape, and demanded apologies from those trying to cover up the story, and then leaked some video. That hack and demand actually helped generate significantly more media attention to the case. Now, however, one participant of Anonymous (they don't really have "members" since there's nothing to "join") who had helped publicize the case (though, he claims, did not hack the site) has revealed himself as Deric Lostutter, after a SWAT team raided his house, and he may be facing significantly more time in jail than the rapists.
If convicted of hacking-related crimes, Lostutter could face up to 10 years behind bars—far more than the one- and two-year sentences doled out to the Steubenville rapists. Defending himself could end up costing a fortune—he's soliciting donations here. Still, he thinks getting involved was worth it. "I'd do it again," he says.
Once again, as if it needs to be repeated, the CFAA is completely broken.

Separately, the raid of his house seems like yet another extreme overreaction:
At first, he thought the FBI agent at the door was with FedEx. "As I open the door to greet the driver, approximately 12 FBI SWAT team agents jumped out of the truck, screaming for me to 'Get the fuck down!' with M-16 assault rifles and full riot gear, armed, safety off, pointed directly at my head," Lostutter wrote today on his blog. "I was handcuffed and detained outside while they cleared my house."
If you read his full blog post, there are many more descriptions of overreaction from law enforcement (reposted without correcting his typos or grammatical errors):
I was detained on the back patio, I asked if I was going to jail, they said no, they said who are you, I responded KYAnonymous. They asked me a few questions, asked me for my passwords for my account, stated that I could not tell anyone I was raided or I would face additional charges such as "destroying/tampering with evidence". They pulled out ALLEGED emails between me and @justbatcat aka Noah McHugh from Noah's inbox indicating that someone is trying to "sell me down the river". They stated they had been watching me for a long time, prior to Jim Parks, and that I was a good guy, and even joked around a bit about the good things I have done, none the less, sincere or not, They are the FBI and to them I am Anonymous, the embodiment of a dangerous threat according to their m16 assault rifles aimed at me for a computer.

Before they departed, I asked them for names and badge numbers of each involved. I got none of them as I requested and subsequently it took me the better part of a month just to get a phone call returned for the status of my belongings let alone tracking down my case agent to columbus ohio.  I asked Agent Bixby (who in all fairness seems to be fighting for me and believes I am a good guy) the status of my belongings and they had no time table, as of this post they are still with the FBI being analyzed. I was emailed their intent to send out a "Target Letter" which means they are going to try to indict me for a Federal Offense, (most likely a felony and two misdemeanors) to a secret Grand Jury of 23 individuals, for which I can not be present to state my side, nor state my innocence.
So now the FBI is creating chilling effects for those who are seeking to expose and shame those trying to cover up the rape of a minor?

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. icon
    special-interesting (profile), 11 Jun 2013 @ 2:48pm

    CFAA. What a political fart/joke that act/bill/law seems to be. Any time the CFAA is implemented its always bad news.

    Related but not; Better news is that congress is trying to reign in, somewhat, the ridiculous minimum sentencing guidelines (of a lot of weird special-interest-group sponsored laws) by allowing judges to ignore them when they feel they are not appropriate.

    The penalties set forth in the CFAA are way, WAY out of proportion to the crimes they describe/create in the legislation they enacted. (Create?)

    Its most likely that this act was written by malicious-special-interest-groups with no other intent but to further their own interests.

    CFAA is spoiled meat. Rotten even in its inception.



    Jail and major fines are life threatening in that they destroy lives and force a self re-boot/reorganization of the accused's life. If the accused was guilty of a violent/physical/brutal crim then thats good.

    However. If the accused is only guilty of some imaginary victim-less crime... why does this tragedy even happen? What class warfare is involved to bring this to horrible reality?

    The total economic expense of such a political end is enormous. Its a minimum of three times the amount of the accused's earnings.



    There are other mitigating circumstances in this case. Its certainly White Hat hacking. (however easy it was) The skilled use and implementation of ones abilities were for the benefit of a person/society. There were no moral breaches in any way.

    The CFAA is its own problem. Its another bad law that properly chosen/elected sheriffs/agencies would not enforce. (you voted for your local sheriff... what does he/she enforce???)



    Reactionary,

    Due process is essential. Period... (x-three)

    Mobs are a problem that we as a society must avoid. Contrast; Mass protest must be preserved. (providing that ambulances and other vital civic functions are not jeopardized.) Any Peaceful protest is a wonderful event.

    Note; For every peaceful protest there are likely violent groups that want to destroy the peacefulness. Idiots! If police were actually doing their job they would be able to discriminate between them.

    Peaceful protest is a vital function of any democratic society. It disrupts commerce but not society.

    --

    It is likely that the only viable participants in the fight for YOUR democracy are “Anonymous” and the “New World “ protesters. (excepting some now famous individuals) Praise them for fighting for YOUR freedoms.



    Prosecutors seeking the maximum sentence for minor hacking charges is normal. A good example of this is the Arron Swartz's case where the prosecution had no sense at all. An example on steroids! What reality does the DoJ relate to?




    flouting the law? In what way is current law relevant to American Society? American Constitution law was supposed to protect the individual.




    Not being charged with anything has noting to do with the investigation procedures. Innocent until proven guilty is a fact of any democratic society.


    10 years maxim8m is irrelevant to t he minimum statuary sentence guidelines;. Community service is not an option when CFAA sentencing guidelines are used.

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.