Former Maple Leaf GM Sues Bloggers For Posting Rumors About His Firing, Spreads Rumors Far & Wide

from the streisand-effect,-eh? dept

By now, you probably know the Streisand Effect storyline. Obscure person X says something famous person Y either doesn't want known or doesn't like, famous person Y sues or threatens to sue, thereby vaulting the entire episode into a media spotlight it wouldn't have enjoyed otherwise. Whether that disliked information is true or not, the entire point is that what amounts to a massive overreaction doesn't achieve the ultimately desired effect. True, it can take a thick skin to ignore some of the nonsense that occurs on the internet, but it's for the best.

You know who I would have thought would really have thick skin? A guy who had played hockey and had, up to recently, served as an executive in the NHL. Turns out I was wrong, since former Maple Leafs general manager Brian Burke is pissed about rumors of why he was fired spreading online, so much so that he's going to court.
The former general manager of the Toronto Maple Leafs filed a court action Friday alleging defamation against several unidentified Internet commenters believed to have authored and spread rumours about his dismissal.

“Brian has decided that it is time to stop people who post comments on the Internet from thinking they can fabricate wild stories with impunity,” read a letter penned by Burke’s lawyer Peter A. Gall of Heenan Blaikie LLP. “Brian is determined to find the authors of the lie about him and those who have circulated the lie. He is pursuing them in court and will obtain orders compelling them to pay damages for their illegal actions.”
The rumors in question suggested that Burke had been fired over an affair with a reporter covering the team and had had a child with said reporter. As it turns out, this wasn't at all true. If ever there was going to be something on the internet to piss you off, that one might be it. The problem, of course, is that the bloggers in question appear to be obscure netizens with no following at all. Almost nobody knew of the rumors -- and for the few who did, it was really no different than some random fans at the bar or in the stands tossing around silly rumors. Until the lawsuit, that is. Hell, most of the bloggers haven't even been identified beyond screen names to date, since they aren't important or followed enough for anyone to know anything about them.
The defendants, whose identities are currently unknown to Burke, are listed only by their online usernames: “NoFixedAddress”, “CamBarkerFan”, “Lavy16”, “mbskidmore”, “Tulowd”, “Loob”, “Naggah”, “mowerman”, “Aaronp18”, “Steve”, “KaBoomin8”, “THEzbrad”, “Slobberface”, “Poonerman”, “isolatedcircuit”, “Kanada Kev”, and “sir psycho sexy”.
Now, I know what you're thinking: surely, Tim, you are "sir psycho sexy." Well, I'm not. My other handle is "jock itch mcglitch" thank you very much. But at least THEzbrad's website has been identified, now that he's written a response to the lawsuit. I give you one person that Burke's lawyers claim acted with "actual and expressed malice and had the intention of damaging the Plaintiff’s reputation.”
Up until three weeks ago very few people had visited this blog. If you are one of my new readers you are probably aware of my current situation. Recently I have been involved in a lawsuit regarding a post I made on this blog earlier in the year. That blog post was merely speculation; just a rumour I heard and had read on hockey forums... It needs to be noted that the blog post I made specifically stated that what I was writing was based on speculations and that it was just rumours...Hopefully, Brian Burke and Hazel Mae will read this and understand how I feel, and what my intentions were. I want to sincerely apologize to them for any personal or professional damages my actions may have caused them.
That's the kind of malice you can really sink your teeth into, amirite? But, the bigger point is that this guy also made it quite clear that what he was posting was a rumor in the original posting, rather than a statement of fact. Could it still be defamatory? Possibly -- especially with Canada's stricter defamation laws. But consider the context, and think about how this was really little different than some fans at a bar tossing around some rumors which no one actually paid any attention to. If it's defamatory, it's fleeting and meaningless. But, when we see a public person bring a spotlight to themselves over obscure information, even if it's not true, what we end up with is him reminding everyone that he is willing to sue over rumors. Of course, the end result might just be that people also reconfirm that he was fired for just being a really crappy GM. Nicely done.

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  1. icon
    droozilla (profile), 14 May 2013 @ 2:04pm

    Good one, Burkie.

    Anything to cover up your failure as a GM, I guess.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Anonymous, 14 May 2013 @ 2:20pm

    Well, what can you say about someone who doesn't even know the plural of "leaf"?

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 14 May 2013 @ 2:44pm

    "Brian has decided that it is time to stop people who post comments on the Internet from thinking they can fabricate wild stories with impunity,"
    Big talk coming from the man who is secretly Bigfoot (last of the Atlanteans).

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4. icon
    crade (profile), 14 May 2013 @ 2:56pm

    " Could it still be defamatory?"

    Not just here, but in many places, apparently, republishing libel is still considered libel even if you make no claims about it being true. Even though you are telling the complete 100% truth, you can still get in trouble. Awesome, eh? Plus, the universal "I'm richer than you so I win" rule obviously still applies as well.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 14 May 2013 @ 4:25pm

    If you know anything about Brian Burke it's that he LOVES blowing the littlest slights against him into gigantic big overthetop deals. He does this publicly on radio and TV, not just the net. He LOVES this kind of attention.

    I'm sure he's heard of the Streisand effect and was like "I gotta get me some of that"

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 14 May 2013 @ 4:58pm

    Sounds like the Maple Leaf Rag...

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7. identicon
    Leafs fan, 14 May 2013 @ 7:04pm

    Why he was fired

    Brian Burke was fired because the team he was supposed to rebuilt sucked. He made bad trades, bad signings, hired a coach that was later terminated, and generally contributed to the losing attitude with the Maple Leafs. He was fired because his team never made it into the playoffs in the time he was there. Get that - fired because of incompetence.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 14 May 2013 @ 7:52pm


    You have been misinformed sir! He is actually a Goa'uld by the name of Sokar.

    "the one that pretends to be Satan"

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9. icon
    Trails (profile), 14 May 2013 @ 9:48pm

    He wasn't fired

    He quit, to take a job as Chief Hitler Fan Boy at the Bin Laden Lollypop Theft Academy and Puppy Abbatoir.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10. identicon
    anonymouse, 15 May 2013 @ 3:10am

    Re: Why he was fired

    What i would like to know is where the rumors came from that he had fathered a child with a secretary while still married. I would like to know if there is any truth to the rumor and if he in fact did have an affair with this woman and if he had sexual relations with any other women during his marriage.

    So the questions are, does he had an illegitimate child with someone else, is he a disgrace and is he still married or has this all been brushed under the carpet with the fact that he says it is not true. Normally when people fight so hard to stop rumors like this there is some truth in them , no?

    Ok i actually don't care either way i don't know the guy but if he is going to fight this and use it for marketing himself then he has to accept that people are going to ask questions and questions they sometimes don't care about but are asking because of the rumors they have now heard , where they might not have heard about them if he had not made them such a big thing.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11. icon
    JustMe (profile), 15 May 2013 @ 5:48am

    I heard that

    Brian Burke was fired for being a crappy GM. Also, I heard Brian Burke was fired for wearing dresses at practice and pretending to be a pretty ballerina.

    But mostly because the Leafs sucked under his mis-leadership (true statement). He couldn't even manage to pull off a winning season last year (true statement).

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12. identicon
    Matt Reed, 2 Oct 2013 @ 10:22am


    Anybody with half a brain knew why Brian Burke was fired. In professional sports you're judged by your accomplishments. Unfortunately Burke didn't get the job done is all.

    Matt Reed

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Special Affiliate Offer
Anonymous number for texting and calling from Hushed. $25 lifetime membership, use code TECHDIRT25
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads


Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.