Two $5,000 RECAP Grants Given Out In Memory Of Aaron Swartz For Improvements In RECAP

from the finally! dept

Back in January, we had mentioned that Aaron Greenspan had offered up three $5,000 grants in memory of Aaron Swartz, for certain key improvements to RECAP, the browser extension that automatically uploads PACER documents to the Internet Archive, making them publicly available. The Center for Information Technology Policy at Princeton -- where RECAP was initially developed -- and Greenspan have now announced that two grants have been awarded: one for creating a Chrome browser RECAP plugin and another for extending the capability to work with the appellate courts as well. While it's cool that these grants have been given out, it's even cooler that RECAP is now available for Chrome. If you're a PACER user and a Chrome user, go get the plugin now...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

  1. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 2 Apr 2013 @ 7:02pm

    I'm still waiting on the full opinion to come out in White v. West. The judge sided with West almost two months ago and promised an opinion "in due course." Link: [Link found using RECAP, by the way.]

    I presume that the judge thinks that West reproducing the files from PACER is protected by either implied license or fair use, since those were the only defenses raised and briefed. That opinion will likely give much needed legitimacy to RECAP by extension, I should think.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 2 Apr 2013 @ 9:34pm

    IP law needs only one improvement, total abolition

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 3 Apr 2013 @ 1:03am


    I disagree. However, wholesale reform at minimum is absolutely necessary.

    Here's my proposal:

    1) The creator gets all the rights, and they're non-transferable;
    2) Copyrights and patents to last a maximum of 3+5 years, except in the case of the creator's death, in which case, the copyright ends after two years from the date of the creator's death.
    3) Severe punishments for copyfraud (which will be somewhat easier to spot, seeing as, if it's not the creator of the work...);
    4) Slower patent applications, and a 6-month-to-prototype rule - if there's no prototype after six months, the patent is automatically invalid - moreover, you cannot sue a person/company during this period.

    ...That should solve a few problems.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: I Invented Email
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories


Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.