Judge Dumps Lawsuit Claiming Copyright Infringement Over Legal Filings

from the gone-gone-gone dept

Last year, we wrote about a couple of lawyers, Edward White and Kenneth Elan, suing Westlaw and Lexis-Nexis for daring to republish their legal briefs as a part of their legal databases. As we noted at the time, we hoped that any court ruling would make it clear that posting publicly filed legal documents was fair use. The case has had a few twists and turns. First, the court dumped Elan and rejected the attempt to include lawyers who had not registered the copyright in their filings as a part of a class. Since most lawyers don't bother filing a copyright in their own legal filings, that really shrunk the possible class. White refiled the case by himself and not as a class action... but the court has quickly dumped the case on summary judgment. The full ruling should follow, but for now it appears that the judge was not at all impressed by attempts to use copyright law to block the republishing of legal documents:
After carefully considering the parties' written submissions and oral arguments, the Court hereby grants defendants' motions for summary judgment and denies plaintiff's motion.
In other words, the case is over and the lawyer loses and the legal databases win. That's a good result, though we'll see what the eventual ruling says in terms of details.

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Feb 14th, 2013 @ 12:58pm

    The tempation to make yet another "Chubby" pun is too great, must use self control...

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2. icon
    Vidiot (profile), Feb 14th, 2013 @ 1:22pm

    "... and the legal databases win."

    Bravo. Now, if the legal databases could only lighten up about people using their collections of publicly-filed documents...

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Feb 14th, 2013 @ 1:42pm

    But we let people copyright their legal filings they can only file so many copyright lawsuits before they'll be infringing no matter what they put in their legal briefs!

    That'll end copyright lawsuits altogether! Or get the trolls to get sued by other trolls for filing copyright lawsuits.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4. icon
    WDS (profile), Feb 14th, 2013 @ 1:42pm

    The Opinion

    It would be nice if when the Opinion is published that it said only. "After careful consideration the court decided that 'Public Document' actually meant 'Public'".

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Feb 15th, 2013 @ 1:59am

    Damn, if only I was doing the sort of thing we do in our downtime -- running a Twitter search for the term "infringement."

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6. icon
    btrussell (profile), Feb 16th, 2013 @ 2:09am

    Without copyright, lawyers would have no incentive for filing.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Hide this ad »
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Chat
Hide this ad »
Recent Stories
Hide this ad »


Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.