Sony Issues The 'Bob Dylan Copyright Collection Volume' Solely To Extend Copyright On Dylan's Work

from the copyright-at-work dept

It's almost as if the major labels aren't even trying to hide how they like to abuse the spirit of copyright law in order to keep things locked up as long as possible. Sony Music recently "issued" (and I use the term loosely) a special limited release Bob Dylan collection and didn't even bother to try to hide the real reason for putting it out. It's in the name of the damn release: "Bob Dylan: The Copyright Extension Collection Vol. 1."
Yes, the entire purpose of releasing this is so that Sony Music can keep Bob Dylan songs under copyright in Europe for a longer period of time. As they're all too happy to explain, copyright term extension for recordings happened in Europe recently, bumping it up from 50 years to 70 years -- but there's a "use it or lose it" clause in there:
Two spokesmen for Sony confirmed that the set was legitimate, its bootleglike appearance notwithstanding. They explained that the point of the release was to keep the recordings under copyright protection in Europe, where the laws are in flux. Currently, recordings can be copyrighted in Europe for 50 years, a much shorter term than in the United States, where recordings made since 1978 will remain copyrighted until 70 years after the death of the last surviving author.

In 2011 the European Union revised its copyright laws to extend copyright to 70 years. The change is not yet in effect but will be by 2014. And there’s a catch, a “use it or lose it” provision: recordings cannot benefit from the 20-year extension unless they were published before the 50-year term expired. The recordings on “The 50th Anniversary Collection” were about to fall over that legal precipice.
Of course, since this is all about protectionism rather than actually getting people to hear the music, this collection is somewhat difficult to find (well, unless you go to unauthorized sources for digital downloads -- not that we recommend such things). That's because they only made 100 copies of them and gave them to a few stores in key European countries.
Only about 100 copies of the four-CD set were produced, with sparse packaging and an insert listing the details of the set’s 86 tracks, all previously unreleased studio outtakes and live recordings from 1962 and 1963.

It also comes as a downloadable version, available through the singers’s Web site, bobdylan.com, but only to fans who log on from France or Germany. (Prices for the CD set vary from country to country, from the equivalent of $39 to, in Britain, $138)

American collectors are locked out, although for those desperate to have an original CD set, several have made their way to eBay, where bids have gone as high as about $1,450.
Anyway, I'm sure all of this activity is creating incentive for Bob Dylan to make more music from 1962.

Reader Comments

The First Word

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. icon
    Robert (profile), 9 Jan 2013 @ 11:13am

    Re: Re: Re: Bob Dylan of all people

    Can you back any of that up with a fact? A link maybe?

    How about you call Google, talk to their HR, and confirm that Masnick is an employee, recording the conversation, put it up on YouTube and come here and post the link?

    How about you email Bob Dylan or his reps and ask them who owns the copyrights to the Copyright Extended material, then paste portion of their reply to here?

    Or better yet, since you know so much, why not ask Bob Dylan to comment here?

    Two can play at your game of non-proven "i know" facts:
    I know you're a failed musician, because you would not be so bitter otherwise.
    I know you're not worth purchasing OR your anger is so great you've turned off a majority of your paying market, who'd rather freely acquire (assuming they do - you don't post at real ID so we just have to guess) than support you (again assuming your music is even available).
    I know Bob Dylan is not relevant to the youth of today and is only supported by old farts who can't hear anything and love getting high, listening to Dylan.
    I know people go up to Ozzy Ozborne and say they only know him from his TV show, not his musical artistry (true actually - he says it).
    I know the industry is not dead, but thriving, and the labels have loads of money in offshore bank accounts and are distracting everyone with the piracy tirade, to hide their true intentions - make all music works for hire, they own everything, nothing ever goes into the public domain.
    I know the labels intend to simply steal credit for all work in the public domain, re-release it with a 808 kick drum and call it a house track, so they can copyright it.

    I know you're a true coward, you spew adhominem attacks, you spew a stupendous number of logical fallacies, you have no real career in music (probably afraid to try something new - fuck, even Dylan's website store has interesting reasons to buy - like a harmonica approved by Dylan), and have nothing better to do than to bash others because you don't agree but can't back up your views with facts.

    I know that's a run-on sentence.

    Since I know, I win, woo hoo!

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Special Affiliate Offer

Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.