Denver News Crew Accidentally Livens Up Broadcast With An Inappropriate Image 'Borrowed' From The Web
from the of-the-two-titles-presented,-I-know-which-one-I'd-be-more-likely-to-read dept
On the other hand, members of industries that rely on the protection of copyright laws shouldn't have to be reminded that "running an image search" is not even in the same neighborhood as "properly sourcing a photo." This distinction is even more important if you're in a business that relies on integrity, along with various IP laws. Having a staffer just grab an image from "The Internet" for use during a news broadcast could, at the very least, put you in the situation of having to pay up and apologize publicly for using someone else's photo without permission. At worst, you could find yourself on the receiving end of a lawsuit.
Somewhere in between these two situations lies another scenario: the photo picked hurriedly from the lineup presented by Google Image search is quite possibly THE WORST PHOTO THAT COULD HAVE BEEN CHOSEN. Charles Apple of the American Copy Editors Society has the details on how grabbing a random image resulted in some serious embarrassment for a Denver news team.
The folks at Denver's ABC-affiliated 7News last night ran a story about the David Petraeus sex scandal, his "mistress," Paula Broadwell, and her biography of Patraeus, All In.
Except instead of pulling an actual copy of the book cover, somebody just ran a Google search and pulled in the first thing they found. Which, unfortunately for 7News, was an altered copy of the book cover.

On the left, here, is the actual book cover. On the right is that image 7News pulled, most likely from a Google search.

Now, this sort of thing could have happened to anybody, but it really shouldn't be happening to professionals. But, as Apple points out, this sort of sloppy work is far from rare and he's got a long, long, incredibly long list of links to prove it (scroll towards the bottom of the page). A combination of careless image sourcing and less-than-thorough copy editing resulted in a situation that was likely much, much funnier to everyone not employed in certain positions at KMGH-TV. The news director has since offered an apology for the "regrettable and embarrassing error" and has promised to take steps to make sure this sort of mistake doesn't happen again.
Well, we'll see. Apple's list contains a lot of repeat offenders. In the meantime, KMGH-TV can be happy it accidentally added a bit of levity to its viewers' lives and added to the pantheon of screw-ups forever enshrined on the web.
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
*Snicker*
"Mommy, what's a snatch?"
I can just hear the children asking that question now.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: *Snicker*
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
I like the fake title better.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
http://io9.com/5960510/thousands-of-australian-students-are-taught-that-robots-led-the- russian-revolution
:D
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
lol whut? (I've been aching to use that!)
Click here for Mike "Streisand Effect" Masnick!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect
Help make Mike the #1 quipper on the net! -- Click one for The Quipper!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: lol whut? (I've been aching to use that!)
If you were able to actually read and understand what Mike has written, you would realize how ignorant you sound.
I'm guessing that if you looked up your family tree, it would only go straight up, no branching at all.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: lol whut? (I've been aching to use that!)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: lol whut? (I've been aching to use that!)
Does anyone know what his "signature" is about btw? I've only noticed it recently, and I can't think of any sane or logical reason why he's putting it there. Maybe I missed the article where he managed to translate some of his thought processes into something resembling sanity? I doubt it, but who knows...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: lol whut? (I've been aching to use that!)
I don't think recording industry shills are capable of forming sane thoughts.
If however, you want to deal with lies and biased statements, then you need to look no further.
I wonder if the RIAA/MPAA pay him for each post, or is he on a retainer.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: lol whut? (I've been aching to use that!)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: lol whut? (I've been aching to use that!)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: lol whut? (I've been aching to use that!)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: lol whut? (I've been aching to use that!)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: lol whut? (I've been aching to use that!)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: lol whut? (I've been aching to use that!)
I'd swear that TopCoder from TheDailyWTF finally to residence.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: lol whut? (I've been aching to use that!)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: lol whut? (I've been aching to use that!)
Oh, you seem to have gone away.
I really wish it was for good.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: lol whut? (I've been aching to use that!)
dafuq man. if you want to be all 1337 on teh interwebz, get your shit together.
also why u mad bro?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: lol whut? (I've been aching to use that!)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: lol whut? (I've been aching to use that!)
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111208/12500917012/riaa-doesnt-apologize-year-long-blog-cen sorship-just-stands-its-claim-that-site-broke-law.shtml
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: lol whut? (I've been aching to use that!)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: lol whut? (I've been aching to use that!)
Idiot.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
In all fairness, the results of that search will have changed significantly once people started posting the screencap.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
True, but you'd think that the photoshopped version would now rank higher as well. Not the case.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Depends on where the picture came from. If it originally came from 4chan (looks like it to me), that original is gone. Possibly gone for days or even weeks, long enough for the viral aspect of the picture to go away.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
This is the most hilarious news article that Techdirt has ever posted.
"MOMMY? DO I HAVE A SNATCH?"
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Pohotoshop anyone
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Non sequitur, Tim
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Paying Attention
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Paying Attention
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Paying Attention
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Hopefully for such an easily confused name and on a Tech board that discusses Apple so often. He could be referred to Mr Apple and not just Apple.
Again nit picky and won't happen often however the use of just the last name completely threw me off and left me with a different message until I reread/continued to read
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
> for such an easily confused name and
> on a Tech board that discusses Apple
> so often. He could be referred to Mr
> Apple and not just Apple.
That has nothing to do with grammar.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
WTB More
Image if the first few 100 "mickey mouse" images that popped up on a google image search were all parodies of some kind.
It's a nice way of siezing back culture without breaking the law.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Add Your Comment