Windows 8's Arbitrary App Certification Rules Could Block Skyrim And Other Huge Games

from the arbitrary-guidelines-are-the-best dept

We have already mentioned that some game developers were having a hard time accepting Windows 8 as a viable gaming platform. The primary concern is with Microsoft's insistence on walling off its Metro UI and accompanying Windows Store. When a distribution system is walled off, new restrictions come along that limit the type of content that can be made available. As application and game developers learn more about the restrictions Microsoft plans to implement, their concern is growing.

Take for instance the recent discovery that Microsoft plans to limit the games made available through its Windows Store and Metro UI. In a broader piece on what a closed Windows 8 platform means for developers, Casey Muratori highlights one of the strict and ultimately contradictory restrictions on game content. Using the 2011 Game of the Year, Skyrim, as a hypothetical Windows 8 candidate, Casey asks the question, would it be allowed on the Windows store and Metro UI.
Because no software can ship on this future platform without it going through the Windows Store, the team that built Skyrim would have to send it to Microsoft for certification. Then Microsoft would tell them if they could ship it.

Do you know what Microsoft's answer would be?

I do. It would be "no".

This is not speculative; it is certain. Skyrim is a game for adults. It has a PEGI rating of 18. If you read the Windows 8 app certification requirements you will find, in section 5.1:

"Your app must not contain adult content, and metadata must be appropriate for everyone. Apps with a rating over PEGI 16, ESRB MATURE, or that contain content that would warrant such a rating, are not allowed."

And that's the end of it. No Skyrim for the Windows Store, unless of course the developers go back and remove all the PEGI 18-rated content.
Unfortunately, Casey does not highlight the contradictory nature of this arbitrary rule -- what if a game has both an M rating by the ESRB and an 18 rating by PEGI, as Skyrim does. What will Microsoft do? Will it block the game entirely, region-restrict it to only ESRB regions or make an exception to its own rule and allow it for all the world? These are the kinds of questions that frustrate developers. Apple has had its fair share of arbitrary enforcement of content restrictions and you would think that Microsoft would at least attempt to learn from that example.

To further highlight the problem with this restriction, Casey lists four games that are in competition to be 2012's Game of the Year. Of those four games, none would be allowed on Windows 8 for the same reason, they got an ESRB M rating and a PEGI 18 rating. Microsoft has set itself up to exclude some of the best selling games of the future. Hardly a way to attract the support of developers.

Filed Under: certification, closed platforms, games, restrictions, windows
Companies: microsoft


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 21 Oct 2012 @ 11:53am

    Re:

    The misinformation and FUD around the Windows store is amazing. It's like it's cool to hate Microsoft so lets beat them up over something that is already on andriod phones, apple devices and likely eventually available on the OSX desktop as well.

    First it is important to note that there are two versions of Windows 8. Windows RT is meant for ARM processors and will only feature the Windows app store. This is mainly due to the fact that legacy applications cannot be built to run on ARM processors. My understanding is like most mobile operating systems side-line installs without the app store will still be possible.

    Then there is the full blown version of Windows 8 meant for the x86 processors. In this case the Windows store is a feature of the OS but is by no means the only way to get an application for the operating system. Traditional installs, steam, orgin etc are all still valid and can be used. This is no different than my cell phone where I might have a provider specific store with a limited catalog and then also have amazon app store and the web to get software.

    You don't have to use the app store for Windows 8, just like you don't have to use the app store for apple or andriod systems, it's just the built in default store. Why is this OK for everyone except Microsoft?

    It seems to me the complaints are similar to the empty complaints during the days of having IE by default. Granted there were some technical issues that Microsoft was required to comply with but the core argument of many was that users won't install alternate browsers so MS should not be allowed to include one. On the other end of that war now I would say that argument is hallow. So what else is there? What is the real problem here if the app store is optional and all other installation methods for software are still supported?

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: I Invented Email
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.