Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

1. 

   Cake97, Oct 1st, 2012 @ 9:17pm

   
   

   Surprising? Nope.

   P*ssies
   
   That is all

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

2. 

   Anonymous Coward, Oct 1st, 2012 @ 10:41pm

   
   

   of course they wont....Obama told them not too..until after hes bought his reelection...I mean the November election....

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

3. 

   That Anonymous Coward (profile), Oct 1st, 2012 @ 10:44pm

   
   

   So lets add entry to SCOTUS to the naked scanner required areas.
   
   I've often thought that if we forced them to put up with the crap they inflict upon us lesser folks they might suddenly change their tune about caring.
   
   While he's been over the top, the sheer amount of BS being peddled in the name of safety requires someone making as absurd things in response.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

4. 

   Anonymous Coward, Oct 2nd, 2012 @ 12:28am

   
   

   Of course SCOTUS won't hear it - there isn't really anything to resolve here that isn't being dealt with in the lower courts. SCOTUS generally wants contradictory rulings, or wants a legal challenge to be based in some way on something that cannot be decided at a lower level.
   
   This doesn't make it there at all.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

5. 

   abc gum, Oct 2nd, 2012 @ 4:53am

   
   

   Re:

   Corporations are people my friend.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

6. 

   abc gum, Oct 2nd, 2012 @ 4:55am

   
   

   Re:

   Today I learned violation of your rights is ok if the lower courts agree to it.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

7. 

   Michael, Oct 2nd, 2012 @ 5:03am

   
   

   Who knows who they're selling access to their database of semi-naked pictures to, that is besides the government which only wants to protect you.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

8. 

   Anonymous Coward, Oct 2nd, 2012 @ 5:10am

   
   

   Re: Re:

   SCOTUS resolves issues when they are big enough. There isn't enough here for them to waste their time. There are plenty of better cases to have on the docket. Maybe a year or two from now, maybe this one might rise up to that level, but for the moment, it's still in motion in the lower courts and in the real world. Why would SCOTUS get in now, on what appears to be a fairly light argument to start with?
   
   They did the wisest thing, they passed on it.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

9. 

   abc gum, Oct 2nd, 2012 @ 5:45am

   
   

   Re: Re: Re:

   Oh, so now SCOTUS resolve the really big issues even when the lower courts are all in agreement. Got it.
   
   I see you are scheduling the docket, any additional insight?
   
   Wow, it's a good thing you are on top of this - otherwise the SCOTUS might have heard cases which should be left on the back burner for a few more years.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

10. 

    abc gum, Oct 2nd, 2012 @ 5:46am

    
    

    Re:

    I doubt the naked pics are worth much, the real money is being made selling worthless machinery.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

11. 

    Anonymous Coward, Oct 2nd, 2012 @ 6:32am

    
    

    Put the scanners at all entrances to all government buildings, including the white house.
    After all, we can’t be too safe with our government leaders.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

12. 

    Anonymous Coward, Oct 2nd, 2012 @ 7:35am

    
    

    Why?

    Why are Americans all so uptight about being seen naked?

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

13. 

    Anonymous Coward, Oct 2nd, 2012 @ 7:39am

    
    

    Re:

    Obama buying his re-election? I guess you must be one of the half-wits planning to vote for that cardboard cut-out Romney.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

14. 

    Chuck Norris' Enemy (deceased) (profile), Oct 2nd, 2012 @ 7:45am

    
    

    Re: Re:

    They are all puppets to me, man. A vote to either candidate is a half-wit vote. You have to turn a blind eye to 80% of either candidates' actions to believe either is worth your vote.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

15. 

    Anonymous Coward, Oct 2nd, 2012 @ 3:14pm

    
    

    The supreme court can SUCK IT!

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

16. 

    Anonymous Coward, Oct 2nd, 2012 @ 11:43pm

    
    

    Re: Re:

    no, I am one of those "half-wits" who know that my and your vote for the President of America, has no meaning, American citizens do not choose their President

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Add Your Comment