Copyright

by Mike Masnick


Filed Under:
constitution, copyright, patents



Can We Kill The Myth That The Constitution Guarantees Copyrights And Patents?

from the it-doesn't dept

We've seen it all too frequently: copyright and patent system supporters insisting that these forms of government-granted monopoly privileges are guaranteed by the Constitution, due to Article I, Section 8, Clause 8. People like to claim that, for example, the First Amendment can't conflict with copyright law since "both are rights provided by the Constitution." Of course, that's not even close to true. The Constitution does not grant rights. It just defines what the government can and cannot do. The "free speech" right we often discuss is not granted by the Constitution, but rather preserved by the Constitution... As for the copyright and patent clause? That's very often misinterpreted. All that clause does is give permission to Congress to create such laws -- but solely for the purpose of "promot[ing] the progress of science and the useful arts."

The latest person to make such a bizarrely incorrect claim is Colin Hanna, who purports to run an organization "advocating for a constitutional approach to public policy making." Kind of surprising that he'd say that when it's not clear he's all that familiar with the Constitution, as he argues at length about the supposed Constitutional "rights" of "authors, scientists and inventors."
Protecting intellectual property is in fact a property rights issue. Protecting free speech is not the same as stopping the outright theft of another's property. It's the difference between liberty and lawlessness. We must be in favor of the former and opposed to the latter.

On this Constitution Day, we should begin to rethink the protection of intellectual property rights on the Internet not as a limitation of Internet freedom, but rather as a logical contemporary interpretation extension of the basic Constitutional rights of authors, scientists and inventors that our Framers set forth so plainly two and a quarter centuries ago.
The title of the article is "our forgotten constitutional right: intellectual property." But, again, that's ridiculous and wrong and not what the Constitution says at all. Section 8 enumerates the powers of Congress, not the public. To interpret that to mean there's a Constitutional Right to patents and copyrights is not just ridiculous, but would open up all sorts of bizarre "rights" on other issues in Section 8. Let's go through a few examples, if Hanna's interpretation is correct.
To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;
Under "Hanna-logic," where he believes the powers given to Congress to do something mean that Americans have a "right" to the output, it would appear that the Constitution clearly grants the public the right to have all the money they want. Clearly, this line is the "right to money" line. Where's mine?
To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;
I'm declaring war! Anyone want a letter of marque? Let me know! It's my right!
To provide and maintain a Navy;
I do live near the water... and apparently, under Hanna-logic, I have a "right" to make use of the Navy... Hmm...

Point made? Section 8 does not grant any rights to the public at all. It simply gives Congress the power to enact laws -- in the case of the copyright clause, solely for the purpose of promoting the progress of science and the useful arts. That has no bearing on whether or not such laws or their output are a "right" in any sense of the word.

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. icon
    art guerrilla (profile), 1 Oct 2012 @ 11:12am

    Re:

    (parasitizing on your post)

    1. while the constitution is a fine document, not only does it have its flaws (anyone think they are 3/5ths of a human being ?), and not only didn't have to deal with many issues which arise because of new technologies, but i also do not worship at the altar of the almighty, 'infallible' forefathers...

    2. having said that, they did a pretty good first draft, as well as allowing for changes as times changed...

    3. however, as it happens with many/most laws: it isn't the words on the paper, it is the people charged with keeping us within those legal principles who determine what is/isn't adhered to...
    (as andrew young once famously observed: the law is what 100 businessmen say it is.
    *that* is the on-the-ground political reality...)

    4. it ain't dead forefathers who concern me here, it is their 'descendants' who have weakened, watered-down, avoided, and -oftentimes- simply ignored any/all constitutional proscriptions...

    for example, our right to not have unreasonable searches and seizures should NOT simply apply to our persons, houses and luggage, etc, as originally semi-defined; but EVERYTHING that has arisen in the meantime which *NOW* comprises 'our papers' etc...
    that means WHATEVER the container is -a purse, a phone, a computer, an MP3 player, a storage locker, a cloud storage service, ANYTHING which houses OUR 'stuff' should be subject ot that same protection... whatever the form: actual paper, bits, or whatever...
    instead, that 'right' has been chipped away and wished away based on nothing other than people in power being able to get away with it...
    in other words, instead of strengthening our rights and updating them for new technologies, the new technologies have served as an excuse to erode our rights...

    5. and, as a final bonus, just where is below-average joe on how we have simply ignored those bits of the constitution which are too onerous for 'our' (sic) gummint servants to follow...
    i -for one- am now thinking the idea of 'no standing armies' makes a hell of a lot of sense... (not to mention monies)
    where stand you on *that* little tidbit of 'strict constitutionalism' ? ? ?
    yeah, thought so...
    authoritarians are so predictable...

    art guerrilla
    aka ann archy
    eof

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Copying Is Not Theft
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.