Germany Tells Facebook To Destroy Face Recognition Database
from the no-innovation-allowed dept
I’ve already noted that I don’t understand the fuss over Facebook’s facial recognition feature — but plenty of people (including many of you) completely disagree. And, so do regulators in Germany, apparently. As they’ve suddenly re-opened their investigation of the feature (jumping on the bandwagon with Ireland and Norway) and told Facebook that it needs to destroy its database of faces collected in Germany, and change the system so that people have to opt-in, rather than opt-out.
Of course, I’m still wondering how this is different than existing tagged images. If my friend Joe “tags” me in an image, then Facebook already has that info. Is it that different if Facebook’s system tagged me or if Joe tags me? Should Joe have to first get permission from me to identify me in a photo? That seems like a stretch.
Filed Under: face recognition, germany, privacy
Companies: facebook
Comments on “Germany Tells Facebook To Destroy Face Recognition Database”
German laws are becoming less real every day. Okay, I don’t like facial recognition in facebook either, since it allows people to follow me on pictures taken by others, where I’ve been tagged. It could one day even result in some freak who takes a picture of my face on the street to use that picture to track my own facebook profile and all information that I share, plus what others share about me.
If this technique continues then I could end up with a bunch of stalkers who find out who I am, where I live, where I work, simply by taking a picture of me.
But having to destroy that database? That’s over the top. It should stay, but each facebook member must give permission first before she can be tagged. (Yes, opt-in instead of opt-out.)
Re: Re:
Just don’t let yourself be tagged by others (you can turn it off or only allow pre-approved tags), or make it clear to your friends that you do not appreciate them uploading pictures of you.
Re: Re: Re:
* that was in reply to the middle part, not the last line.
Re: Re: Re:
I prefer to turn on these kinds of things, not turn off these things. If Facebook would have used an opt-in option then they’d never have this problem. Then again, no one would use it either…
The biggest drawback of Facebook isn’t what I decide to put online about me. It’s what others put online about me.
Re: Re: Re:
True, and in isolation no big deal, but for me, the facial recognition was pretty much the final straw that got me to delete my FB account.
It was just getting to be too much of a burden to constantly have to defend myself against FB.
But I think my response (leave Facebook) was the correct one, and Germany’s response is over the top.
Same point as before
I can ask my friends not to tag me in certain scenarios, I can’t do the same with an automated system.
Re: Same point as before
You can opt out of the automated system though. That’s like telling your friends not to tag you.
Re: Re: Same point as before
You are not a product to be searched and followed by anyone.
You are a person with privacy rights.
Re: Re: Same point as before
The system should be opt-in. I too have nothing against this technology but it should be opt-in.
Re: Same point as before
It asks if you want to tag the person first. Then it asks the user if they want it to be an automated system.
Re: Re: Same point as before
Exactly. The system recognizes your face and asks your friend if they want to tag you. It doesn’t tag without human input.
Re: Re: Re: Same point as before
Ah, I did not understand this. I retract my criticism. Haven an insightful each. Thank you.
Re: Re: Re:2 Same point as before
Any time drew 🙂 Glad to have helped 🙂
Re: Re: Re: Same point as before
It doesn’t publicly display the tag without human input perhaps but it clearly does identify you without any input at all. Facebook knows it was you regardless of if you accept the tag or not and they can reveal the information to others, voluntarily or otherwise.
Huh???
“Is it that different if Facebook’s system tagged me or if Joe tags me?”
I’m not sure how you can ask this question with a straight face.
Of course it’s different if a human who knows you tags you in a photo vs an automated system. The human who is tagging you is doing it for a specific reason, it’s a social behavior between acquaintances/friends. I’m not saying there is anything wrong with the automated system doing it as well, but there is definitely a huge difference.
Suffice to say that there are some groups of friends that don’t tag photos because they don’t need to, as in everyone in the group knows each other. There may be many cases out there where people simply don’t want to be tagged automatically in a photo.
It may be that this is a generational divide.
Actually...
“Should Joe have to first get permission from me to identify me in a photo?”
At least one dutch political party supports this, not sure which it was though.
Re: Actually...
Tagging sends notifications. I always remove tags of my name. It’d be nice if it were opt-in rather than opt-out.
Re: Re: Actually...
Not if you’re not on Facebook it doesn’t.
Need more control
Maybe they have some reasoning we don’t know about. Maybe they’re afraid the data could be stolen and used to find the Chancellor’s daughter in a bunch of non-facebook images.
Whatever, I think terrorists having access to streetview is a bigger issue.
Stay out of other peoples’ pictures. Problem Solved.
What if
I think you’ll see the problems when you are automatically tagged in a photo of one of your friends. Your friend has a public profile. Your employer sees that photo, decides that he doesn’t like (for whatever reason) and kicks you out.
And yes, things like that do happen. Job experts are telling us to be real careful with photos and all, and that’s not for naught.
Re: What if
I think you’ll see the problems when you are automatically tagged in a photo of one of your friends. Your friend has a public profile. Your employer sees that photo, decides that he doesn’t like (for whatever reason) and kicks you out.
And yes, things like that do happen. Job experts are telling us to be real careful with photos and all, and that’s not for naught.
Again, how is that different than if that same friend tags you directly?
Re: Re: What if
What if you’re not friends and you don’t even know each other?
Re: Re: Re: What if
Facial recognition only suggests to tag people who are actually in your friends list. Not people you don’t know.
Re: Re: Re:2 What if
Immaterial, this is what facial recognition makes available to you the user, not facebook itself or law enforcement and government agencies.
Re: Re: Re:3 What if
Took the words right out of my mouth.
Re: Re: What if
“Again, how is that different than if that same friend tags you directly?”
Let’s say your friend tags you sitting at dinner with your parents… nice shot, right? A couple of weeks later, you guys sneak out the the night club for a wild time with stripper twins you met, and your friend says “Don’t take any pictures of me”, so you are careful to avoid him. Sadly, in a single image, he is in the background getting his head slapped by stripper titties.
Automated system tags the image, and everyone suddenly knows that he was there, automatically pushed out as an update for everyone to enjoy. How nice!
If you cannot understand why an automated system is bad, just go back and consider your objections to the various “infringement bots” that are out there. Are you suggesting that automated is actually okay?
Re: Re: Re: What if
“Sadly, in a single image, he is in the background getting his head slapped by stripper titties.”
I imagine facial recognition software would struggle with that scenario…
Re: Re: What if
Are you trolling Mike ? (playing devils advocate)
Tagging is bad enough for people, but facial recognition is a whole different ballgame.
Facial recognition is dangerous for everyone.
With the rise of cctv everywhere, you will be constantly followed, STALKED by whoever has access.
Facebook using this tech will only cause problems for peoples privacy.
It has no valid use except for “law” enforcement.
We all know that the people in power never misuse the law as a tool to get/maintain power and control.
Maybe they have to pay GEMA first…
Perhaps..
Every individual should take out image rights and sue anyone who uses your image in any way without consent. That’s the MPAA way.
If you don't like being tagged...
… by humans or software don’t join facebook. You do have a choice.
Re: If you don't like being tagged...
I did this. Unfortunately, it doesn’t stop idiots from adding my name to public images anyway. Given that I’ve been stalked recently, I’m not at all sanguine that there really is any way to protect myself, especially since many people (mostly the men in my family) don’t seem to understand why they really really need to stop uploading pictures that include me and putting my name on them.
Facebook is so ubiquitous at this point that simply not joining is inadequate protection against privacy breeches of various sorts. User stupidity cannot be routed around.
Facebook’s policy of assuming its users want something (opt out vs. opt in) is why I finally shut it off permanently. For me, the last straw was hijacking my displayed email address and changing it to the Facebook email.
I’d say that I’d keep in touch with my friends via email, but they’re all such Facebook addicts that my emails get ignored for days, even weeks at times, while they share the minutia of their lives on an hourly basis.
I believe, I may be dumb!
Just had a thought. Does this mean that even though i’m not on Facebook, if someone tags me in a photo of theirs i will automatically be tagged in others photos?
If so, where the fuck is my opt out!
Re: I believe, I may be dumb!
Bloody hell, you may have a good point there. I deleted my Facebook account ages ago but my friends are still there and any photos they take on nights out are still there. I’m curious now as to where we stand on this.
Re: I believe, I may be dumb!
You cannot be tagged if you aren’t a FaceBook user.
Re: Re: I believe, I may be dumb!
So it’s not like metadata tags on music files then?
I was under the impression that it was just tagging so that there was a nice caption under the picture saying the names of the people in them.
Re: Re: Re: I believe, I may be dumb!
It is totally different from Metadata in a music file. If you download the image, the tags won’t be there in the downloaded image.
As for the caption, yes you can tag people in your comments just by typing their names (again optional). The caption is just a commentary really. Sort of like a “Me and Joe Schmo were here having a good relaxing time in the sun” kind of thing.
Re: Re: Re:2 I believe, I may be dumb!
And what stops them from parsing that information to identify the faces of people without accounts? Not a damn thing.
Re: Re: I believe, I may be dumb!
Yes you can.
Just as most people do not understand that socialism is nothing but another form of slavery most people do not understand that being able to constantly track people is a form of totalitarianism.
On socialism if you are responsible for your neighbor then your neighbor has a lean on the products of your labor which for most people represents a uninvited liability. The only different between that demand on your labor and chattel slavery is that in chattel slavery you would receive your subsistence directly from the person who commands your labor while in the present form you receiv your subsistance directly from the government an organization of slave masters.
On that take tracking is nothing more than electronic chains which have the same function as real chains nothing but a means of forcing people to provide the required commanded level of involuntary work.
Re: Re:
I’ve always wondered: Is left field a nice place to come from?
Getting ‘tagged’ in Facebook is something you can opt-out of.
You fucking buffoon.
Let?s Nationalize Facebook
Let?s Nationalize Facebook
Only then will the social network protect users? rights and share valuable data with researchers.
http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2012/08/facebook_should_be_nationalized_to_protect_user_rights_.html?wpisrc=slate_river
Re: Let?s Nationalize Facebook
If we’re going to get into wishful thinking how about we just get rid of facebook!
Re: Let?s Nationalize Facebook
“Were Facebook nationalized, its privacy problems would not evaporate. They would double. The obscure (and, for some, concerning) uses Facebook makes of data in commerce would be joined by secret uses of data and equivocal denials by military spymasters.
Would Facebook be prevented from ?serving authoritarian interests?? Tell that to the activist/whistleblower who has been driven into the arms of Ecuador, of all countries, because he fears extradition to the United States.
Public utility regulation of social media has already been made mincemeat. Nationalizing Facebook is indeed a nonstarter.”
from http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/yes-nationalizing-facebook-is-a-nonstarter/
Imagine when people find out how much they are tracked by their cellphones and cars.
I agree with Germany
Cameras are everywhere and you never know when you are going to wind up on someone’s list somewhere.
One or two of those people that you don’t know may commit a crime and during the course of the investigation all of the social media sites that they subscribe to will be looked at and if your picture pops up on the account then you will become a “person of interest” even though you don’t know the person or their friends.
You have not committed a crime but you may wind up getting yourself a lawyer and losing time from work.
Guilt by association may get you some jail time.
Zuckerberg thinks that everyone should share everything.
He doesn’t have a clue what the real world is like.
Google does the same thing and I have tried to opt out of all their crap and so far I’m still opted in
The only way to really protect yourself is to not leave the house!
Two things:
In agreement with you: Many of Germany’s laws suck and don’t deal in reality.
In disagreement with you: This is still a matter of scale. Human identifying me through photo much less problematic than computer identifying me through photo on Facebook.
“Of course, I’m still wondering how this is different than existing tagged images.”
A human is going to tag you in the photos they took of you or the photos they were in with you. The automated system can tag every photo of you regardless of source, even if you’re not the primary subject of the photo and are what would normally be a nameless face in the background of some stranger’s photo? Seems like a pretty big difference in terms of systemic identification to me. Regardless of if the system actually does so publicly it’s certainly capable of doing so and revealing that information to whoever Facebook wishes, starting with their own people, or are ordered too reveal it to…
It’s a very good law actually.
Any work performed by the user for Facebook has to be agreed by the worker, so it’s only natural that if some work can be done without my permission granted every time separately, noone has a right to assume I granted such permission en masse.
wow, so other coutries have thier own ideas or pirvacy, and pirate mike can’t stand it
people shouldn’t be able to tag you in a photo at all
Re: Re:
“people shouldn’t be able to tag you in a photo at all”
Because of pirvacy in your coutrie?
Re: Re:
That comes down to:
People shouldn’t be allowed to identify a particular person and hyperlink to an associated webpage which is about this person.
That will definitely, 100% not break the internet. Good idea.
are germans that ugly
lol
Here is how it is different
If your friend tags you on a photo then anyone viewing that photo can learn who you are and, likewise, anyone searching your name can potentially find out what you look like and where you were at that time. That’s it. A government agency with expanded access will face similar limitations. Even with access to all profiles and photos, the agency would still have to start somewhere (a name, a location, a crime) and do real detective work.
On the other hand, if facebook maintains a facial recognition database of all its users and their photos, it CAN build orders of magnitude more connections between names, faces, and events. Publicly it might only let users who are connected make use of that feature, but privately it can and likely will eventually connect everyone it possibly can. Whether that is done for its own financial benefit or on behalf of a government agency doesn’t matter. The huge database would be instantly searchable, internally, with any photo – or portion of a photo.
Think about that. If 10,000 people join a peaceful protest rally then their own uploaded photos, along with shared media photos, would be used automatically to identify many or all participants. With a little data mining you have a handy dandy database of everyone there, where they were and when, and who they were near or with, and what they may have said or done.
Can you imagine ANY law enforcement agency in ANY country not taking advantage of that. Can you imagine ANY of these agencies, or individuals within them, not using this data and ability illegally or to label, monitor, and/or persecute those who hold views they don’t understand or find agreeable?
WTF is Facebook anyway?
IF you don’t want to be identified, don’t use a public system.
Should Joe have to first get permission from me to identify me in a photo?
Yes, Joe should have to first get permission from you to identify you in a photo. One of my biggest problems with Facebook is that awful tagging without permission feature. I’m glad people can hide tagged images now, but back in the old days of Facebook you could wake up and have photos tagged of you that you don’t want tagged. They could be unflattering or whatever. Any photo can be made to look worse than it is, too, so please no one start with “well, if you weren’t doing anything wrong…” Bottom line: I control my image and I don’t wish to have it tagged without my permission.
No difference
“Is it that different if Facebook’s system tagged me or if Joe tags me?”
In my book, no. I get just as upset at friends tagging me without permission. It’s a huge privacy issue, AFAIC, and until such time as FB offers the same privacy protections as the real world, I will continue to use FB only pseudonymously, via FB accounts that I have stuffed full of fake info.
To folk who say, “But you’re missing the whole point of Facebook,” I say, “No, YOU’RE missing the whole point of Facebook.”