HideTechdirt is off for the long weekend! We'll be back with our regular posts tomorrow.
HideTechdirt is off for the long weekend! We'll be back with our regular posts tomorrow.

Is Trolling Just A Form Of Practical Jokes?

from the it's-all-fun-and-games-until-the-rickrolls-begin dept

As the news of 4chan hitting 1 billion posts has come out, it only seems appropriate that the Surprisingly Free podcast has a fascinating discussion with Stefan Krappitz, the author of the book Troll Culture: A Comprehensive Guide, in which Krappitz tries to suggest that the common view of trolling as being a negative thing is mostly inaccurate. Instead, he suggests, trolling is more a form of practical joking -- "disrupting people for personal amusement." He even suggests that Socrates may have been an original troll, baiting people with silly questions and then mocking them. The overall discussion is quite interesting, even if it seems to underestimate the collateral damage that trolling can cause at times. Still, it does raise some good points, that certainly counter the more common view of completely condemning trolling.

Filed Under: practical jokes, trolling


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. icon
    PaulT (profile), 10 Aug 2012 @ 1:42am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: No, trolling is worse. IT's a way to live in denial

    "Interesting that you demand citations yet have none of your own to offer to support the usual Techdirt narratives surrounding judicial corruption, AA control over DoJ, Demonoid and Megaupload seizures, etc. "

    That's because - stop me if I'm going too quickly here - I've NEVER made those claims. Those claims have been made by others, sometimes backed with citations, sometimes presented purely as opinions. I happen to agree with some of those opinions, partially agree with others (although I feel they overreach) and don't agree with the rest.

    Unfortunately, your pea brain appears incapable of separating my personal opinions from those of others, so you attack a strawman based on claims I've never made and opinions I've never held.

    On the other hand, YOU are making the claim that the opinions held by others here are wrong. I'm simply asking you to cite the data on which you're basing that conclusion.

    "Unless your citation consists solely of your observation of "suspicious timing"- which isn't worth a bucket of warm spit."

    I stated an opinion based on the evidence currently available to me. Unless you have more/alternative evidence (in which case, cite it), my opinion is just as valuable as yours. We can discuss it if you wish, but you've already shown yourself unwilling to do anything other than reject the opinions of others because they don't match yours. Pathetic.

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown for basic formatting. (HTML is not supported.)
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Insider Shop - Show Your Support!

Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.