Nielsen Sued For Billions; TV Network Claims It Manipulated Ratings
from the gatekeepers dept
In a somewhat massive legal filing, in a NY State court, India-based New Dehli Television Limited (NDTV) has sued Nielsen for billions, claiming that the famous TV ratings service manipulated ratings in India in a way that harmed its own offerings. The accusations suggest massive corruption, which NDTV tries to blame on Nielsen's investor-owners, claiming that the company's owners were trying to cut expenses, leaving the Nielsen process (which has always been somewhat suspect, relying on a relatively small number of "Nielsen households" with tracking boxes) open to manipulation. In India, which already has the reputation of a fair bit of corruption among politicians, there's the added bonus that many "politicians also own cable networks"It is common knowledge that there are a number of television channels owned by politicians and political parties. Furthermore, politicians also own cable networks in certain Indian states. At the household level, in certain instances PeopleMeters have been installed at the residences of government officials, where tampering of the data also takes place.It's interesting to see that Nielsen, nominally a Dutch company, is being sued by an Indian TV company... in the state of NY. Part of the reason may be that Nielsen's headquarters are in NY, but also the fact that the main investors are all based there as well.
I have no idea if the charges (and there are many, many of them) leveled at Nielsen are accurate or not, but it's somewhat amazing that we haven't seen more such charges. The lawsuit does suggest similar problems in the odd combination of "Florida, Turkey, the Philippines and across the planet." The lawsuit expands each of those charges into paragraph levels, but with no citations or backup. For example, this is how it explains Florida:
In Florida, many television broadcasters have been complaining about inaccurate ratings data resulting from inadequate sample sizes. Those television broadcasters have been unable to get alternate ratings because Nielsen has a monopoly in that market.Seems somewhat lacking without more details. Either way, if anything, this should simply raise questions about why we use systems like Nielsen? Nielsen boxes have always been somewhat questionable, providing tremendous influence to the small number of people who have them. In a data-driven, always connected age, it would seem that there are much more effective -- and much more robust -- means of tracking what people are watching on TV.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: manipulated, ratings
Companies: ndtv, nielsen
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Evolve or die.
For example, if you have a YouTube channel, you can get accurate analytics of who/when/where/age-group your video is being watched. It's really neat.
Why doesn't cable TV have this? Oh yeah, because there's a solid monopoly and they have absolutely no reason to innovate or improve.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Evolve or die.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Evolve or die.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Manipulation Has Been Known For A Long Time
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Actually...
Of course, if you leave your DVR on, it's hard for them to tell if you watched the next show or not, but maybe that's why all the DVRs are going to power save now.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Actually...
http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/about-us/nielsen-families.html
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Why haven't the networks been able to get hyper-accurate numbers from people watching their show? It IS doable over the web, so why aren't networks or advertisers demanding this?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Holy shit that would be disturbing.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Voice from TV: Hullo, citizen! How are y-...just what the hell are you doing?!?
*Fap Fap Fap* [pause]
*Shrug*
*Fap Fap Fap Fap Fap Fap Fap Fap Fap Fap Fap Fap Fap Fap Fap*
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
As has been pointed out before, Youtube has accurate analytics that even get double checked after 300 views. why aren't advertisers falling over themselves to support this system?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Clearly you don't understand statistics. You only need to sample .00000000000000001% to get a 100% accurate picture of what everyone wants. How else do you think that they know to keep the shows that everyone watches, like Dancing With the Stars, and to cancel the stuff that nobody wants, like Terra Nova?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
But the real question is why use this fairly complex system when they can easily survey all DVRs (and probably all televisions)?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
I can only guess that there are still existing contractual relationships and/or embedded customs in the industry which lead contracts to explicitly use Nielsen ratings as benchmarks for compensation/ad rates.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Oh it can be accurate but some of the Nielsen selection criteria worked against accuracy. I was on the survey book in 1998. I liked doing it but they would call you. You had to be willing to answer your land line for unidentified numbers.
I got calls back because I used to watch Tech TV and I guess I was a fairly rare bird in the the sampling. They wanted specific feedback on the Screen savers among other things. A whole series of 1 to 5 ratings. You could tell by the questions they asked that they were figuring out how to fix what wasn't broken.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Cable Data
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Cable Data
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
But a lot of old guys have money in this Nielsen thing so we will keep just monitoring a few thousand families per country and extrapolate that for the hundreds of millions of people actually watching TV because we wouldn't want to upset these useless old rich fucks.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
The answer is: Too Many Lawyers.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
So the networks are using Neilsen
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
It looks like the suit is under the FCPA (Foreign Corrupt Practices Act), which is a US law. I'm not sure if the Netherlands has an equivalent, but that might be one reason. In the US, New York has the most experience with complex international commercial suits (probably more than Dutch Courts), so it is the logical forum state.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
monopoly secure
Shows that deserved attention but didnt get it from mainstream. We also tried to help kill popular shows we despised.
Im sure favortism an games like that play out across their families.
After this years later we created a startup and worked with set top box makers to allow cable companies to collect data anonymously (or not) for program creators.
The result of honest accurate real time collection? Lets just say that crap like American Idol isint nearly as popular as they want you to think.. have faith in the american public.
That said the threats and legal action against us concerning privacy and other trumped up issues and we were dead on arrival.
But thats just the way they want it.
Id love to have the financial backing to make another stab
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Add Your Comment
Add A Reply