DC Dumps Bill To Force Uber Into High Prices; Complains That The Bill Was To Help Uber

from the regulatory-capture dept

Earlier today, we wrote about the city of Washington DC working on a a bill that would require startup car service Uber to charge five times as much as a cab, arguing that they need to regulate what is considered a "premium class." They don't explain why one needs to regulate what's premium and what's not, but that's what you get in a massively regulated/anti-competitive market. The public outcry over this regulation, however, has resulted in the Councilmember who wrote the amendment, Mary Cheh, backing down and shelving it.

As we noted in our earlier post, Cheh had said all along that the amendment was actually an attempt to legalize Uber, after a Taxicab Commission "sting" earlier this year, which claimed that Uber was acting illegally. In response to all of this, Cheh seems upset, since she says that she worked with Uber to create the amendment, and was blindsided by the criticism:
"Several months ago, Uber contacted me and asked to work together to legalize services like Uber in the District... Since then, I have met with Uber many times, negotiated in good faith, and believed that I had reached an agreement with them last week."
Others have suggested that parts of the amendment could be acceptable if they remove the minimum pricing rules. Uber, for its part, claims that it's always believed the service was legal in DC, so it never believed that the amendment was needed to "make it legal." For what it's worth Uber clearly has benefited from this fight, as it drew an awful lot of publicity to the company's presence in DC (and elsewhere). Either way, it seems difficult to see how regulating a high price benefits Uber.

And, in the end, what you're left with are questions about why taxi licensing needs to be so restrictive and so all-encompassing. Are there concerns about keeping passengers from being ripped off and keeping them safe? Sure, but there seem to be ways to deal with that which don't involve entirely regulating every aspect of the market, limiting competition and setting the actual pricing. But, in the end, as we've seen in other markets, those in regulated markets tend to figure out ways to use the regulations to their own advantage...


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 10th, 2012 @ 10:39am

    Nice to see you complain about something other than IP law for once.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    John Doe, Jul 10th, 2012 @ 10:47am

    Concerns about being ripped off?

    Sure there should be concerns about not being ripped off; like not being charged 5 times the going rate.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 10th, 2012 @ 10:57am

    Re:

    IP law is a good thing to complain about wheen there's so much wrong with it

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    ScaredOfTheMan, Jul 10th, 2012 @ 10:58am

    Who are all these trolls that seem to negative comment everything you post?

    "Nice to see you complain about something other than IP law for once." ??

    Can you enable a filter, or a button to flag them, or vote system to vote them down?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    icon
    Chris-Mouse (profile), Jul 10th, 2012 @ 11:02am

    Re:

    So you're asking for a system to censor those you don't want to hear from?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 10th, 2012 @ 11:04am

    Good article Mike, and thanks for helping us keep up on these important stories. I recently read about a ferry service in Washington state going through something similar:
    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/07/09/washington-state-accused-giving-monopoly-to-fer ry-company/?test=latestnews

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 10th, 2012 @ 11:05am

    Re:

    It's more that the site always complains about rent seeking in all its myriad forms.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    icon
    el_segfaulto (profile), Jul 10th, 2012 @ 11:08am

    Re: Re:

    I wrote a greasemonkey script to remove Fox News articles from Google News results. It may be censoring, but when it's done by an individual to weed out twits, it's worth it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    Jacob Blaustein, Jul 10th, 2012 @ 11:19am

    Well it's nice to see something somewhat resembling a happy ending come about.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    icon
    Chosen Reject (profile), Jul 10th, 2012 @ 11:22am

    Re: Concerns about being ripped off?

    But I have to be charged 5 times the going rate at least (don't forget that it's a minimum) in order for me to be protected. It's what the friendly DC council members told me. They also showed a lot of concern about what might happen if I didn't buy that protection. So friendly and concerned, how could I not believe them?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    icon
    Not an Electronic Rodent (profile), Jul 10th, 2012 @ 11:47am

    Re: Re: Concerns about being ripped off?

    *briefly wonders why the phrase "protection racket" wanders across his mind about now*

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 10th, 2012 @ 12:02pm

    Re: Re:

    Usually it is called an ignore button and it is a pretty good tool to have in certain contexts. I am not sure it is really needed here since the tone is as raw and biased as it can get...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 10th, 2012 @ 12:12pm

    Re: Re: Re: Concerns about being ripped off?

    Because you're a dirty muslem commie nazi bent on destroying mah cunt tree!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 10th, 2012 @ 12:23pm

    "Complains That The Bill Was To Help Uber"

    Whenever someone says "Hey I'm the government and I'm here to help" ...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 10th, 2012 @ 12:50pm

    Re:

    Can you enable a filter, or a button to flag them, or vote system to vote them down?

    Oh, you mean like the "report" button?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    icon
    The eejit (profile), Jul 10th, 2012 @ 1:18pm

    Re:

    To be fair, Fox news has a known history and went to court because one of their employees refrused to lie on the news.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17.  
    identicon
    TM, Jul 10th, 2012 @ 1:21pm

    It's about the cabs

    "it seems difficult to see how regulating a high price benefits Uber."

    It's not to benefit Uber but to protect the cab companies. At least that's how it would work in Chicago.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  18.  
    identicon
    Arborist, Jul 10th, 2012 @ 3:12pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Concerns about being ripped off?

    You have a whole tree for growing cunts? That's must be where all these trolls come from... I feel compelled to suggest burning said tree.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  19.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 11th, 2012 @ 4:01am

    Re: Re:

    Those buttons don't show up if javascript is not enabled.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  20.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 11th, 2012 @ 9:17pm

    Is Mary Cheh Lying?

    Mary Cheh made a number of exculpatory statements. The question is, are those statements accurate? Can someone authoritative from Uber please comment:

    "Several months ago, Uber contacted me and asked to work together to legalize services like Uber in the District..."

    So, did anybody high up in Uber actually contact her several months ago? Who? When, exactly? Was it the understanding by Uber that she was being asked to work to legalize the service? Does Uber agree that the service needs legalizing?

    "Since then, I have met with Uber many times"

    Can we have a list of who she met when?

    "negotiated in good faith"

    Does Uber believe she was negotiating in good faith?

    "and believed that I had reached an agreement with them last week."

    So, is there a signed memorandum of understanding? If not, why not? Can the memorandum be made public?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  21.  
    icon
    orbitalinsertion (profile), Jul 11th, 2012 @ 11:17pm

    Re: Re:

    The choice I made to not listen to you any longer is not censoring you.


    Comment by person who doesn't understand what censorship or freedom of speech entail blocked. [unkill]​[show comment]

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  22.  
    icon
    Zangetsu (profile), Jul 29th, 2012 @ 12:27pm

    CNN hit the mark .. sort of

    In a recent news story on CNN, they commented on Uber and it's entrance into the DC marketplace. The comment that struck me as being astute was when the reporter asked the question "Should consumers be forced to pay a price so that the earnings of some workers won't be affected?" While the answer in the Uber case was "no", the question is applicable to technology in general.

    The MPAA thinks the answer should be "yes". The RIAA likewise. Like the taxi industry in Washington DC, there is an expectation that the introduction of new technologies should be done in such a way as to cushion the impact of that technology upon their pay cheque. Therein lies the problem that the 21st century needs to deal with: how to get people to move to a new job. Perhaps the education system needs to change so that people can get trainer cheaper, faster and on demand. Perhaps the funding of education from a municipal/state/federal level needs to be altered to pay for results instead of attendance.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This