TV Network Execs Contemplate Going To Court To Say Skipping Commercials Is Illegal

from the that-won't-go-over-well dept

Late last week Charlie Ergen and the folks at Dish Networks presented the TV networks with a bit of a conundrum. You see, the company decided to actually give consumers what they want: setting up a special DVR system, called Auto Hop, that would let viewers not just automatically DVR the entire primetime lineup of all the major networks with the single push of a button -- but also to automatically skip commercials when watching the playback, as long as it wasn't the same day the shows aired. This is something that consumers clearly want -- which Dish execs were pretty upfront about:
“Viewers love to skip commercials,” Vivek Khemka, vice president of DISH Product Management, said in a statement
But, of course, who is a consumer in this market gets complicated pretty fast. The TV networks, of course, make a fair bit of money from advertising on these shows, and they're not happy about any idea that means people might skip commercials. Those of you who have been around for a bit may recall a few relevant stories. First, there was Jamie Kellner, the former chair of Turner Broadcast Systems, who once claimed that walking away from your TV while commercials aired was a form of theft. Then, of course, there was the famous ReplayTV case. If you don't recall, ReplayTV was an early competitor to TiVo, and in many regards a better product. Among its features, it took an already considered legal feature from VCRs called "commercial skip" and added it to DVRs. The industry sued, in large part because of this feature, which they considered to be breaking the law.

Of course, the expense of the lawsuit resulted in Replay's parent company SonicBlue declaring bankruptcy. It then sold off the remains to D&M, who tried relaunching a version of the product without all the cool features people liked, and it went nowhere. Eventually, DirecTV bought the remnants. However, the basic lawsuit died out with the bankruptcy. A bunch of ReplayTV users, led by Craig Newmark from Craigslist, actually tried to continue the case on their own, to have those features declared legal, but after the networks promised not to sue those users for using the features, the judge tossed the case.

Left unresolved, of course, is whether or not features like commercial skip are actually legal.

As some are pointing out, the TV networks may have missed a golden opportunity by not continuing the fight against Craig and the other users, since they wouldn't be able to afford the bigtime lawyers that Ergen and Dish can easily toss out here. So the TV networks basically have to make the decision if this is really a battle worth fighting.

It does seem clear that the anti-consumer folks who run the TV networks would certainly like to slap Dish around for this move:
"I think this is an attack on our eco-system," said NBC Broadcasting chairman Ted Harbert on a conference call Monday. "I'm not for it."
Isn't it just like NBC to think that a tool that the public actually finds useful is an "attack" on their ecosystem? At some point, in the way, way distant future, perhaps we'll live in an age where companies like NBC Universal recognize that, when things are more efficient and easier for consumers, it is a good thing, rather than something to freak out about and declare evil?


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    icon
    Kevin H (profile), May 15th, 2012 @ 1:02pm

    Didn't SCOTUS already rule on time shifting TV shows?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Mike Masnick (profile), May 15th, 2012 @ 1:36pm

      Re:

      Didn't SCOTUS already rule on time shifting TV shows?


      This isn't about time shifting. It's about commercial skipping. Not quite the same thing.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 2:22pm

        Re: Re:

        Nah, see I'm shifting the first part of the show to where I want it, then when the commercial break starts, I'll shift the next part of the show foward to that moment. I'll shift all the commercials till the end... well actually I probably want to watch another episode then. I'll shift the commercials a bit later...

        Plenty of time to watch commercials when I'm dead.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 2:22pm

        Re: Re:

        Nah, see I'm shifting the first part of the show to where I want it, then when the commercial break starts, I'll shift the next part of the show foward to that moment. I'll shift all the commercials till the end... well actually I probably want to watch another episode then. I'll shift the commercials a bit later...

        Plenty of time to watch commercials when I'm dead.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Kevin H (profile), May 15th, 2012 @ 2:46pm

        Re: Re:

        The fact that someone made that distinction is the problem. How is this any different than when used to record a TV show using my VCR prior to the TiVO and DVR services. When I watched those shows I skipped the commercials too. What dish did was automate the process for the end user so they didn't need to keep the remote at the ready.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 4:36pm

        Re: Re:

        Nah, it's the same thing... I'm time shifting my viewing of the commercials into the future. The far, far future...

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Gypsy, May 25th, 2012 @ 7:32am

      Re: skipping commercials?

      Just one word: "Idiocracy" If you haven't seen it, you need to, much too close to the true way our society is evolving. Also incredible waste of the courts' time - which is a waste of our tax dollars, courtesy of Big Media.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 1:09pm

    TV executives, like Newspaper and other publishers, fear one thing the most. That companies who advertise realize just how overpriced their 'ad space' really is. And how factually impossible it is to measure the success of it. Its ironic that internet advertisement, which has a far better reach, and a much better way to see the effects of ads in real time, are considered cheap by comparison. Just goes to show you how the legacy entertainment is nothing more then a scam, relying on outright lying to companies to get their money.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 1:12pm

      Re:

      Internet advertisement? I haven't seen an ad online in years. Firefox + AdBlock Plus = Perfect browsing.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 1:15pm

        Re: Re:

        You have seen it, its just less obvious these days.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 2:08pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          Anything less obvious than those annoying Flash ads that waste valuable CPU time, I'd be okay with. Seriously, what is it with web ads and Flash?

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            identicon
            Anonymous Coward, May 16th, 2012 @ 7:56pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            Adobe spinddoctors that is why.

            Although the porn websites already discovered the magic of GIF ads that bypass known adblockers LoL

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Chosen Reject (profile), May 15th, 2012 @ 2:27pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          I'm sitting here in my Aeron chair, sipping my refreshing Coca-cola, browsing the Comcastic web, and I'm telling you that's nonsense. I don't see any ads. Perhaps you could have had a V8, then you wouldn't be so ignorant.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            icon
            G Thompson (profile), May 15th, 2012 @ 8:57pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            I'm sitting here in my chair, sipping my refreshing, browsing the web, and I'm telling you that's nonsense. I don't see any ads. Perhaps you could have had a, then you wouldn't be so ignorant.

            There skipped it for you..

            Yes I'm a dirty dirty ad thief.. I have stolen them and will sell them at the local bar/pub for a tidy sum..

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Jim, May 15th, 2012 @ 8:58pm

      Re: TV execs aren't scared, it's Marketing people

      TV commercials, as ineffective as they are, are around because Marketing departments in thousands of businesses have to do something convenient and visible with their money. Now, Marketing people know that advertising is useless, certainly compared to word-of-mouth and other campaigns that don't involve media buys. But if their bosses knew that, their budgets (and jobs) would go up in flames. So, Marketing people don't market a company's product to consumers, they market the value of Marketing to their bosses. There's a million exaggerations and outright lies told every day in this respect. And as long as there's Marketing people, they will be commercials on TV. The only thing TV execs worry about are ad rates, hence the obsession with ratings, but I don't think that Marketing people are worried about the price of ad space, as long as their budget spigot stays open.

      It's not TV people who lie to companies, it's Marketing people lying to their bosses.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 1:10pm

    Do the TV people not realise that they are destroying their credibility every time they come out with stuff like this?

    Someone needs to lose their job in the worst kind of way.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 1:13pm

      Re:

      That portion of their brain was removed in the lobotomy required upon becoming a TV executive.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 1:17pm

      Re:

      C'mon - a TV exec with credibility? When shows like Jersey Shore, Toddlers and Tiaras and "Real Housewives of Beverly Hills" dominate TV? Pull the other one!

      They don't care about credibility, they care about money.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        DannyB (profile), May 15th, 2012 @ 1:36pm

        Re: Re:

        Funny thing is, the more this kind of crap takes over TV, the less I watch.

        Real quality TV with science or education, or an actual plot, or good documentary, or hard news without talking heads, or anything that makes you think is getting pretty hard to find.

        They want advertising dollars. But they seem to want, or maybe their advertisers seem to want only the eyeballs of the stupidest part of the population.

        Give us real news like Cynthia Torqueman of Interstellar Network News (ISN). :-(

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Zakida Paul (profile), May 15th, 2012 @ 1:42pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          Don't get me started on news. The best local news available to me is still sensationalist drivel. It's depressing.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Lauriel (profile), May 16th, 2012 @ 3:11am

          Re: Re: Re:

          +1 internets for the B5 reference. I'm not sure whether Babylon 5 did a great job mocking news outlets with ISN, or a great job at portraying reality though...

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        John Fenderson (profile), May 15th, 2012 @ 2:41pm

        Re: Re:

        They don't care about credibility, they care about money


        Many executives seem to believe that money buys credibility.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          ltlw0lf (profile), May 16th, 2012 @ 7:32am

          Re: Re: Re:

          Many executives seem to believe that money buys credibility.

          Was it that or more hookers and blow? They have expensive tastes, expensive wives, and expensive houses to maintain, and that leaves less for hookers and blow, so they need to make up the difference somehow.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      :Lobo Santo (profile), May 15th, 2012 @ 1:52pm

      Re: Content is Content

      This rolls right back around to the "Content is advertising/advertising is content" argument which we've had around here on more than one occasion.

      TV Execs: Either stop putting on stupid/annoying commercials, regress to the good ol 2 second "this show brought to you by:" spot, or stop bitching...

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 4:34pm

      Re:

      Crack slam?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Difster (profile), May 15th, 2012 @ 1:17pm

    Next up...

    You will be required by law to watch a certain amount of network programming along with the commercials of course.

    If you choose not to purchase a cable or satellite tv package, you will be penalized by the IRS.

    How much programming you watch will be determined by an always active iris scanner that works closely with the Microsoft Kinect system which you will also be required to purchase.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 3:37pm

      Re: Next up...

      Morning exerciese in front of the tele?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 5:42pm

      Re: Next up...

      I've been thinking for some time now that technology will eventually allow them to copywrite all sight and sound with an implant in every newborn's brain.

      If you don't pay up, you can't hear nor see anything.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 1:24pm

    What law is being broken when I go take a whiz during the commercial break?

    I pay for cable. Extra for on-demand services. More for HD. More for internet...how many times am I supposed to pay these fuckers for the same damn thing?!

    Seriously - what law is being broken by skipping commercials?! Is it imaginary law? I think it's imaginary law.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 1:30pm

      Re:

      Imaginary Property begets Imagery Laws.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      MonkeyFracasJr (profile), May 15th, 2012 @ 2:21pm

      Re:

      You and I pay for cable and then the cable co. sells programming time to infomercial producers. Depending on my schedule I can't even watch the regular "entertainment" programming I wanted cable for because there is "paid programming" on at that time of day/night.

      WTF ABOUT THE PROGRAMMING I PAID FOR!?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 9:28pm

        Re: Re:

        We pay to watch adds, and we can get sued for not watching them, but we can sue them if they're system fails for any reason, that's sad.

        I'd rather watch "funny comertials" on youtube, where "funny" is everything and anything that can make me laugh.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    TasMot (profile), May 15th, 2012 @ 1:24pm

    It's all about the Double Dipping

    The TV execs really like that they get paid by the advertisers to put on the advertisements (you know the ones you don't watch for the 4000th time when you walk away to go get a snack) and they like it when DISH or the cable company pays them again to re-broadcast it. They just don't want to give up the double dip. If I pay DISH to see the show, why to I have to "pay" again by watching the commercials. They are getting paid, they just want to get paid twice. What a great business plan, get paid (at least) twice for the exact same content. How do I get in on that scam?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 1:27pm

    Does it make me a criminal then if I decide to boycott all the commercials I see out of annoyance? I'm costing those companies money after all if I buy my mustard from someone else who doesn't advertise on TV. They won't keep buying up ads if viewers just buy their competitors products that don't have to mark up their prices to pay for expensive TV ads.

    Also, it's cases like this that make me wonder if the pro-IP people are TRYING to burn all their bridges and screw themselves over long term by destroying any good will people may have towards them?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Another AC, May 15th, 2012 @ 1:28pm

    NBC / Comcast

    Doesn't comcast own NBC?

    Comcast makes a TON of money on the DVR boxes and charge for the DVR service, and now an NBC exec comes out and criticizes skipping commercials?

    Seems to me comcast could easily restrict the fast forward function of the DVR.

    Of course they might lose some customers, but they could solve a big part of their own problem without legislation.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Zakida Paul (profile), May 15th, 2012 @ 1:31pm

    So, I am a criminal because I channel hop during ad breaks? Who knew?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Robert (profile), May 15th, 2012 @ 1:34pm

      Re:

      What am I if I channel hop to watch multiple movies or shows at once? (Well... when I visit the family, we don't have cable/internet cable or even an antenna and don't want it - for now we borrow from the library or I buy movies when they are a reasonable price).

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Zakida Paul (profile), May 15th, 2012 @ 1:40pm

        Re: Re:

        A filthy pirate and terrorist who will burn in hell.

        \sarc

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Robert (profile), May 15th, 2012 @ 2:05pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          "or I buy movies..."

          But you're right, because I use the library to check some stuff out first, yeah, I guess I'm a "pirate."

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            icon
            ltlw0lf (profile), May 16th, 2012 @ 7:39am

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            But you're right, because I use the library to check some stuff out first, yeah, I guess I'm a "pirate."

            In the eyes of the MAFIAA, you are a pirate because you exist and you are not them. Just listen to the shills here. We say over and over again that we buy their product and they still accuse us of torrenting (I torrent all the time, linux distros and other open source/legal and even some quasi-legal stuff) their stuff. I get the feeling that they would prefer a system where we get taxed part of our paycheck, which goes to them, whether or not they produce anything.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 1:32pm

    I had exactly the same thought as TasMot. I found him here ahead of me with the double dip.

    Remember The Weather Channel? A place you could get the weather all the time without commercials? Somewhere along the line that changed. It became a bundled broadcast along with commercials.

    All the broadcasters want you to buy into the idea that without commercials, it's gonna cost you more. Yet no one but the broadcasters like commercials. Like Anonymous Coward posted, I haven't seen a commercial on the net in years. Not planning on seeing them either.

    With the problems that show up from time to time with Google Adsense, with infected iFrames passing out malware, it's as much a matter of personal computer safety as it is eliminating annoyances.

    Despite all the pitches to sell the commercial as a necessary and needful thing, people flat out don't like them. They are as bad as spam; a pest industry.

    Thank you but no thank you. Commercials and ads are something I will joyfully pass up.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      John Fenderson (profile), May 15th, 2012 @ 2:21pm

      Re:

      All the broadcasters want you to buy into the idea that without commercials, it's gonna cost you more.


      The funny thing is that one of the main reasons that I rarely watch TV (and don't subscribe to cable TV at all) is the commercials. For many shows, I would gladly pay a reasonable fee to watch them if commercials were omitted. Oh wait, I already do: it's called Netflix.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Nathan F (profile), May 15th, 2012 @ 3:56pm

        Re: Re:

        This is exactly why I do NOT watch TV. At most I get 15 or 20 minutes worth of National News/Local news depending on when we sit down to eat, but otherwise I could live my life just fine without a television.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        I-Blz, May 16th, 2012 @ 7:18am

        Re: Re:

        Exactly. I use Netflix for all the TV I actually care about (except for the DC Nation block on CN, but that's more for the sake of getting my ass up early on saturday than anything else), and if Netflix doesn't have it, one of the thousands of repository websites will (AnimeFlavor, AnimeFreak, etc.)
        I have no need for TV anymore, because everything on it is already on the internet, sometimes minutes after the first airing.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 5:51pm

      Re:

      If you are watching the content they are broadcasting, you're still being exposed to commercials/ads. They just include them in the shows now. But they aren't very good at it.

      The car "commercials" are the worst offenders.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 5:52pm

        Re: Re:

        Oh and Subway. I love Community, but the Subway commercials embedded in the show are horrible.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          Lauriel (profile), May 16th, 2012 @ 3:20am

          Re: Re: Re:

          Hawaii Five 0 has had some clangers too - especially the Microsoft ones. Using the internet on the mobile phone to "bing it" sounded as natural and comfortable as wearing swimwear to Mt. Everest. And your right, the car 'commercials' are pretty obvious too.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            icon
            btr1701 (profile), May 16th, 2012 @ 8:09am

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            > Hawaii Five 0 has had some clangers too - especially
            > the Microsoft ones.

            No, their absolute worst one was also a Subway product placement. They were in the middle of a time-sensitive murder investigation, but the characters actually took the time to stop at the beach where the big fat guy who runs the shrimp truck told them all about how delicious his Subway sandwich was.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, May 16th, 2012 @ 1:49am

      Re:

      The Weather Channel, where you turn 'On The 8's' to see the weather without commercials. Unless you skip the weather to read the tiny, tiny crawl on the bottom of the screen.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, May 16th, 2012 @ 7:52pm

      Re:

      On that note I would like to add that if I want to see ads I go to Youtube and search for them, there are so funny ones.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    weneedhelp (profile), May 15th, 2012 @ 1:33pm

    Not like you still cant hear them

    Damn commercials jump 50 decibels so even when I walk away I still hear the damn things.

    Ohhh I might miss a dozen or so:
    http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=56750

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Andrew F (profile), May 15th, 2012 @ 1:44pm

    Solutions

    Product placement. Or some other way to display ads while the actual content is playing (kind of how YouTube ads work). Or, better yet, make your ads worth watching (e.g. like SuperBowl ads).

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      John Fenderson (profile), May 15th, 2012 @ 2:25pm

      Re: Solutions

      Yes, but poorly done product placement is as bad as, if not worse, than commercials. There are a number of shows that I think are well-done, well-written, well-acted, and that I can't stand watching because the product placement annoys me so much.

      And those overlay ads are the worst possible option.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        G Thompson (profile), May 15th, 2012 @ 9:04pm

        Re: Re: Solutions

        They are beginning to do Augmented Reality product placement too now.

        For example: the actors are sitting around a table having breakfast, they show a breakfast cereal being poured into the bowls, with some juice on table. Both are specific brand names.

        What you don't realise is those boxes, products are actually coloured green or blue (like blue/green screen technology) and that the actual product design is computer generated dependant on who pays, and what market/region the show is being sold into.

        That's the new product advertising and can be carried across to online streaming as well.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          John Fenderson (profile), May 16th, 2012 @ 8:40am

          Re: Re: Re: Solutions

          This type of thing is fine with me. What annoys me is when the product placement is so heavy-handed that it actually draws my attention away from the show. If I've noticed the product placement, then it has failed.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, May 16th, 2012 @ 9:23pm

          Re: Re: Re: Solutions

          Youtube: X-Ray Vision Tank Experience: See Through Walls

          The future is going to be realtime placement of anything sadly that include ads.

          Motion tracking is evolving and being used in other areas besides special effects.

          This is why marketeers should be throwing themselves at the feet of Google so the Google Glass takes off, imagine what they could superimpose on those.

          On another matter it is full to update the special effects of old public domain movies.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        That Anonymous Coward (profile), May 15th, 2012 @ 11:51pm

        Re: Re: Solutions

        I dunno its entertaining seeing them slipping current products into old shows.
        There was a repeat of a tv show and in the background was a poster for a movie not even being made when the show was originally shot.

        I find it amazing they find a way to sell the slot in the show for characters to drink soft drink x and then sell commercial slots to soft drink y.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          icon
          John Fenderson (profile), May 16th, 2012 @ 8:41am

          Re: Re: Re: Solutions

          I dunno its entertaining seeing them slipping current products into old shows.


          I haven't seen it, but I hate the very idea. If I'm watching an old show, it's as much for nostalgia as anything else. I don't want anything about it to be altered.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Franklin G Ryzzo (profile), May 15th, 2012 @ 1:53pm

    The day skipping commercials actually becomes illegal is the day I build a ship and leave the planet to try and find some intelligent life elsewhere.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Robert (profile), May 15th, 2012 @ 2:10pm

      Re:

      Franlin,

      Are you telling me that making skipping of commercials illegal is indicative of loss of intelligence for our species, to the point where you'd like to leave?

      What about pollution? What about our governments or corporate greed or basic lack of humanity and respect for one another, let alone other species or the planet in general?

      There's so much to be embarrassed about with regards to the things humans have and continue to do, we should have built that ship and left a LONG LONG time ago!

      "Everybody knows, that the world is full of stupid people, so meet me at the mission at midnight.."

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Franklin G Ryzzo (profile), May 15th, 2012 @ 5:22pm

        Re: Re:

        Agreed... it's just straws and camels and all that...

        The things that actually motivate me to action, I find curiouser and curiouser every day.


        Personally, I blame Tesla for the fact that we're all still here with "them". What I wouldn't give for a delorean!

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    :Lobo Santo (profile), May 15th, 2012 @ 1:53pm

    Very Relevant

    This is very relevant, to I'm'a just leave this right here:
    SMBC on commercials

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    orbitalinsertion (profile), May 15th, 2012 @ 1:55pm

    This happens every time the ability to automatically skip commercials, whether or not they were initially recorded, is offered. Some of you may be old enough to recall when VCRs briefly had this capability.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 3:04pm

      Re:

      I remember! Remember the screaming, that is. Heck, I remember the death of beta. Our hole-in-the-wall local rental place carried both for a while, even after it was nearly impossible to get a beta player anymore.

      Dear content industry: please stop shooting yourself in the foot because you didn't think of it first. ~Kthx, no longer a customer

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 1:59pm

    I don't watch tv, period. I also screen all calls and throw out all junk mail without reading it. And I have a policy of permanently boycotting anyone who tries to sell me something (on the first attempt).

    So sue me, assholes - go a head and try.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Almost Anonymous (profile), May 16th, 2012 @ 7:20am

      Re:

      Not watching tv (and sitting through every commercial) is theft. Please report to the nearest Media Education Center for rehabilitation.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 2:02pm

    Of course it's an attack on their ecosystem. And nobody cares about their ecosystem who's not part of it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 2:25pm

    Once upon a time...

    Television was free and paid for by the advertising. You couldn't skip the ads let alone record a show to watch it later. That was the price of that content, the ads. Those ads paid for the shows creation and the studio cost and even the provider costs. Ad revenue hasn't gone down over the years at all. It's grown just as everything else has and in most cases its skyrocketed.

    These days you pay a provider to bring you what used to be free content. Not only that but you still end up having to put up with MORE ads per content volume than you ever used to! So now the system is paid from both sides; companies paying for ads and consumers paying for content. Isn't it wonderful to have a system like that? NOT! There are of course workarounds but they're not generally consumer friendly and the system tries to shut them down / make them more difficult to implement so that there isn't an "out" that one can actually use.

    As a consumer if I cannot skip the ads in shows I'm actually paying money to see every month then I'll simply stop paying for that content. The advertisers lose out AND the providers lose out AND the content creators lose out. On the other hand I end up with extra cash in my wallet to go buy a few movies or a series which I can then rip to my media PC conveniently without ANY commercials or ads. That puts cash back into the pockets of the creators while still leaving the advertisers and providers out.

    It may be old school relatively speaking but if that's what they want to drive their own market to I don't have an issue with it at all. After all, does anyone really like ad garbage? And hey, if that is suddenly illegal as well then why bother with their content at all? Get outside, pick up a new hobby, learn a language, start gardening, do something more productive than sitting in front of the idiot box. *shrug*

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 3:33pm

      Re: Once upon a time...

      I cut the cord specifically because I was tired of paying to see commercials. I will NEVER pay for television again.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 3:42pm

        Re: Re: Once upon a time...

        Hulu + FreeTV + topdocumentaryfilms + a few other sites = all the time I have to waste in my life on silly entertainment.

        Cut the cord on your cable... then your fast food, soda, plastics, oil...

        If we all did it, this world would change for the better, methinks

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 6:31pm

          Re: Re: Re: Once upon a time...

          Fast food, soda, and cable were easy. There are lots of alternatives that are honestly better.

          Plastics and oil are a whole different ball game.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            identicon
            Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 7:00pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re: Once upon a time...

            I know... there are probably many steps in between.

            But I feel that people think they will live forever (at least that the human race will, not talking about the delusional folks). And oil/plastic is of finite amount. Therefore... it will happen, just how. Better to quit the stuff before you run out and need to go cold turkey.

            We are addicted, like a heroin addict. If we stopped for one day... imagine the withdrawls this dependent society would feel.

            Oil has allowed for ~7 billion people to live on this earth. Take it away tomorrow and the number would likley crash below 1 billion in fairly short order. I suppose the earth could live with over 7 billion people, just not in the current fashion, nor is there an easily solution to transform into this reality.

            The choices made in the past, along with those made today, can't be undone. Everything you do has an impact whether you decide to convince yourself otherwise or not.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

            •  
              identicon
              Anonymous Coward, May 16th, 2012 @ 3:18pm

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Once upon a time...

              Truth.

              The problem is, we're dependent. Out current setup doesn't give good alternatives. I heat my house with natural gas (finite & contributing to greenhouse), but heating it with wood or coal isn't any better. I drive my car on oil, but electric cars get electricity somewhere, and our current battery systems in high efficiency cars are poorly developed and don't last all that long. (I like to keep a car for 10-15 years, because that's a big hunk of metal and plastic to throw out any sooner than than.) I ride my bike, but I've been almost hit several times, and the weather's terrible here most of the year.

              Many problems can be fixed or mitigated on a personal level, but some really need a society-wide or technological fix.

              (My favorite intermediate steps: composting, setting A/C-heat gaps of at least 10 degrees, and not putting junk all over my garden and yard to run off into the water system.)

               

              reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      btr1701 (profile), May 16th, 2012 @ 8:12am

      Re: Once upon a time...

      > You couldn't skip the ads

      Sure you could. It's called leaving the room and making a sandwich, taking a whiz, reading a book, or throwing a ball for the dog.

      We had all sorts of ways of skipping commercials in those pre-VCR days.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    John Fenderson (profile), May 15th, 2012 @ 2:27pm

    Just to clarify....

    A number of the comments here indicate that people are thinking this is about making skipping the commercials illegal for the viewer. That's not quite what they're talking about. They're talking about making it illegal for DVR manufacturers to include the ability to automatically skip commercials.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 2:36pm

      Re: Just to clarify....

      I think we should make it illegal for the government to grant cableco and broadcasting monopolies. What we need here is more competition, not whiny government established monopolists complaining that they want more monopoly power.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 2:37pm

      Re: Just to clarify....

      Comcast lets you skip ahead at 5x speed... simply skipping the commercials entirely isn't really all that different. This whole issue is splitting hairs. If they manage to make it illegal then they'll start pushing from that side until eventually you won't have any control at all. Just wait!

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Avatar28 (profile), May 15th, 2012 @ 3:06pm

        Re: Re: Just to clarify....

        It's actually a lot more than 5x speed. I think it's more like 32x speed. I believe each step doubles it.

        Also if you've got the Motorola DVR with the gray or silver remote you can program a button (I use the A button) to do a 30 second skip. Makes breezing through commercials a cinch. Skip skip skip skip skip skip oops, too far, jump back 10 seconds and there we go.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 6:54pm

          Re: Re: Re: Just to clarify....

          Gasp! Funny how no cable person ever let me in on that. Gonna futz with that later, thanks!

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 2:41pm

    "It's illegal because we make money off it and charge you for a paid service and want to make more money off you."

    Eat a fat dick.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Whatduno, May 15th, 2012 @ 2:42pm

    I suspect the future of ads will be ads that are written into the scripts of the shows you're watching, like on "Bones" where a character will go on and on AND ON about how great his car is, in a way that no actual human being ever would. They even worked it into the script as a major plot-point; the character driving was showing the passenger in the car how the car had "drift control", drifting over the line on purpose and then turning it on, and a cop pulled them over and tossed them both in jail. Was it clunky and forced? You bet! But nobody fast-forwarded through it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      John Fenderson (profile), May 15th, 2012 @ 2:53pm

      Re:

      I suspect the future of ads will be ads that are written into the scripts of the shows you're watching, like on "Bones" where a character will go on and on AND ON about how great his car is,


      In an earlier comment, I mentioned how there were some shows that I thought were well done, but the product placement is so annoying that I can't watch them. Bones is the #1 example of this.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 5:59pm

        Re: Re:

        Community and Chuck both come to mind as well. Like I said earlier, the Subway commercials are just horrible.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        ltlw0lf (profile), May 16th, 2012 @ 7:55am

        Re: Re:

        In an earlier comment, I mentioned how there were some shows that I thought were well done, but the product placement is so annoying that I can't watch them. Bones is the #1 example of this.

        I'm still out on product placement. Overall, I agree with you, but I remember watching this fantastic movie once with Helen Hunt and Bill Paxton about an indestructible red Chevy truck. And it had a scientist saying "That's no moon, that's a space station." But that is all I really remember about that movie. I thought it was very good product placement at the time, but then I went out and bought a Dodge, so apparently it wasn't all that effective. (At the time, though, I did have a Chevy.)

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 6:28pm

      Re:

      @Whatduno,

      I watch Bones, but when they started injecting those ads into the show, I almost quit watching. They did that a number of times last season. Theres product placement and then there are full blown commercials, and thats what they were doing. So yeah, any show that puts a 15 to 30 second ad right into the show, I'll just stop watching.

      You were right, it was clunky and forced and had nothing to do with the show in most cases.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        orbitalinsertion (profile), May 15th, 2012 @ 8:55pm

        Re: Re:

        They are even running out of slack for the self-referential broken-fourth-wall silly product placement, such as seen in Seth MacFarlane vehicles.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      btr1701 (profile), May 16th, 2012 @ 8:16am

      Re:

      > They even worked it into the script as a major plot-point

      I used to laugh on '24' when they had Jack Bauer chasing terrorists around L.A. in a Ford Focus.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Travis, May 15th, 2012 @ 2:45pm

    Wake up

    I haven't watched a commercial in years. When are they going to wake up and realize that almost everyone is already skipping their commercials? If they want to advertise, it's all product placement ads now, and small banner ads at the bottom during the show. Nobody enjoys having their show cut into to have some twit shaking a product we don't really need or want in our face.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 3:01pm

    I think they are hitting this from the wrong direction. If I were the media companies who licensed my content to dish/etc, and the ads were a part of the content package, then I would argue that there is a breach of good faith on the contract level. I am selling you a package which includes the ads, for which I generate revenue. Dish et al know this. They agreed to the ads when they signed the licensing contract. They are now providing the users a way of skipping the ads for which they contract with me to provide to the users.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 6:04pm

      Re:

      I think it's likely they will charge a surcharge for every Hopper DVR install Dish has when the next round of price negotiations hit.

      I wouldn't be surprised to see Dish having another major battle with content providers and losing/cutting off several channels (Disney alone could cripple them if they pull ESPN, ABC, ABC Family, Disney channels, etc).

      Sorta like they are in the process of doing now with AMC, only ten times worse.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        That Anonymous Coward (profile), May 15th, 2012 @ 11:57pm

        Re: Re:

        The downside is that Disney would be shooting themselves in the foot as well. If you take away things from consumers they will find another source for the content. Then they can both bitch about it.

        Or they could behave like grownups and work out a better system than trying to keep something for the dawn of television as the system we "have" to use.

        Like the MPAA/RIAA... they are clinging to hard to the old models, that should be a textbook example to the TV execs that trying to do the same things is a stupid idea.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, May 16th, 2012 @ 11:12am

          Re: Re: Re:

          The content providers don't see it that way though. They are willing to take a hit from one MVPD not carrying their channels in order to extort what they want from them

          There's a reason Disney gets away with charging 5+ dollars per subsciber for ESPN and has the power to demand it be included in the lowest tier the MPVD offers so that ALL subscribers have to pay for it, regardless of whether they watch it or not. They get that same treatment from every MVPD, Dish, comcast, Directv, Time-Warner etc. The Multichannel video distributors would be far more hurt by Disney cutting off the signal to all their networks than Disney would be.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            identicon
            Anonymous Coward, May 16th, 2012 @ 11:22am

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            Sorry, should have been multichannel video programming distributor. Sucks not having an edit button.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            identicon
            Anonymous Coward, May 16th, 2012 @ 11:22am

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            Sorry, should have been multichannel video programming distributor. Sucks not having an edit button.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    fb39ca4 (profile), May 15th, 2012 @ 3:02pm

    All the nteworks have to do is not make a big scene over it. Then, advertisers won't know and will still buy ad space at the same prices. The networks can now have even more ads without consumers complaining as well. A win-win for everyone except the consumers.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous, May 15th, 2012 @ 3:25pm

    This is Amerikkka. What ISN'T illegal?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 3:34pm

    'the expense of the lawsuit resulted in Replay's parent company SonicBlue declaring bankruptcy'

    typical move by the deep pocketed industries. them winning is inevitable simply because they have more money. being right is NOT then the issue!

    what right has anyone got to tell a person they have to watch a single advert? how is anyone going to be monitored? what punishment is going to be handed out to non-conformists? statutory $150,000 damages and jail time per infringement? will the next thing be that people are forced to buy a magazine that contains nothing but adverts and are then monitored reading them all? which thick fucking senator is going to champion a bill to get this into law? and the next invasion of privacy is going to be...........??????????????

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 6:07pm

      Re:

      As someone said above, it's not a matter of making it illegal for the end user/viewer, it's a matter of making it illegal to include the functionality in the DVR.

      Consumers can't do what the technology in front of them won't allow.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 6:57pm

        Re: Re:

        But if the consumer is somehow able to mod the DVR to skip commercials, is the consumer then a criminal?

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 7:08pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          IMO no, but my opinion doesn't mean much to the law.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            identicon
            Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 7:10pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            But then again, at least with Directv, they are constantly pushing out new firmware updates, so any exploits and hacks are likely to be eliminated pretty quickly (not to say new ones one pop up of course).

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    harbingerofdoom (profile), May 15th, 2012 @ 3:42pm

    by all means guys... just keep driving me further towards options that give me a way to NOT watch commercials.... dont worry one bit about the fact that these options give you NO money as opposed to at least some...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Digitari, May 15th, 2012 @ 3:47pm

    Remember when:

    cable first came out, it was WITHOUT Commercials; That was the incentive to pay for it. I was in the USMC in 1980 at Camp Lejeune NC, we had cable for free on the Base (thanks to TBS) no commercials, and free Porn after midnight...........

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    JBDragon (profile), May 15th, 2012 @ 4:03pm

    My VCR!

    Years ago when VCR's were really popular, I had a VCR with built in Commercial Skip Feature. It worked pretty good most of the time. What happened is you Record the show(s), then it would Auto Rewind and then FF though the Tape and Mark where the Commercial started and ended. When you went back to watch the tape, when it got to a commercial, it would automatically FF right though them all and start playing once again when the program started again. It wasn't always perfect, but the few times it would screw up, you could see it and rewind back or whatever if need be.

    I use Media Center now to record OTA HD programs sometimes. I also have it setup to skip Commercials. It kind of works the same way, just without a tape. It's not 100% perfect, but it works pretty darn good.

    Even my HD Comcast Cable box, It's not Automatic, but I can FF at the correct speed, and count just right, and stop it before the program starts again about 80% of the time. Generally if I'm off, it's because the commercials happen to be running longer them normal.

    What's really bad, charging $1.99 per TV Episode. What a Rip-Off!!!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 6:10pm

      Re: My VCR!

      I do that with my skip button on my Directv DVR. Hit it a few times really fast, and you can skip across all the commercials and end up right back at the show without seeing a single frame of the commercials.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    benjamin roberts, May 15th, 2012 @ 4:18pm

    australia pay tv

    Here in Australia, we have Foxtel,, the first big pay tv service here. I had it, and it was ok.. but then I got sick of it, because I realized I'd been watching tv for free all my life, and why should I pay through the nose for endless re-runs and total crap, which (again), I could watch for free. Now Foxtel too has commercials, and there is no way in HELL I'm paying for the privilege of watching commercials during re-runs of Greenacres, or the latest bloody documentary about the pyramids. TV series on DVD or (for the more free spirited out there), illegal downloads are the future of TV. I'm sick of big corporations telling us what to do. If a corporation is legally a person, that means it should be able to die a bloody, agonizing death, just like a real person. I'd pay to see that.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 6:50pm

      Re: australia pay tv

      But you get a bigger selection of total crap. More is better yes? /s

      I haven't bothered with Foxtel. I have a PVR and rarely watch live TV and skip through ads. I've noticed I tend to watch non-commercial stations (ABC) anyway, the programming is better.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 5:19pm

    I am amazed to see I am not the only one who has cut the cord here. I cut it for two reasons.

    The first reason was the programming was so subpar, I felt like an idiot watching it. I got more entertainment out of watching other people watch it than the show that was on.

    The second reason I quit tv, was the commercial. The programs are made around them. It's the excuse to give you the commercial, not the other way around.

    This thing with compressing the sound so they can jack the signal level up and keep it under peaks, has gotten totally out of hand. So much so, they lost me as a viewer. I no longer have a tv, don't want a tv, and sure not going to pay for broadcasting.

    So how is idiot going to sue me for skipping commercials I don't receive, since I have no interest in his broadcast products?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    silverscarcat (profile), May 15th, 2012 @ 6:18pm

    I must be old...

    I remember when Disney would show their cartoons and other shows, without commercial interruption, until the show was over, then play all the commercials at the end of the episode before the next show would start up.

    I'd run to the bathroom because I was so enraptured with the show, I held off for over 26 minutes.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    PacWestViewer, May 15th, 2012 @ 6:25pm

    Dish vs Hulu - Diff Standards

    I recently purchased the "Hopper" from Dish. The added local broadcast auto record with commercial(less) viewing is an option, is not on by default and the consumer is required to Opt In (via menu) to use it.

    It fills the hard disk with a weeks worth of ABC, CBS, NBC and Fox. If viewed the next day it removes (most) of the commercials.

    Compare this to Hulu
    If we view any of programs from these stations that stream through Hulu the local commercials aren't there, new ones are that Hulu added, and even those are shorter in duration and come with a banner telling us how long we have to raid the fridge or use the restroom before the program resumes.

    Why one set of standards for streaming and another for Dish, at least Dish keeps all the commercials when viewed live, something Hulu doesn't even attempt and it's subsidized by the media giants to begin with...

    P.S. the Dish Hopper rocks, here we have 4 TVs watching 4 different programs (3 live) and even connects to DNLA devices to view our own homemade content.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 6:36pm

      Re: Dish vs Hulu - Diff Standards

      Hulu ads only bring a fraction of the price linear tv ads bring. Hulu views only count for a fraction of the ratings that Nielson viewers bring as well.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    cord slasher, May 15th, 2012 @ 6:52pm

    cut it now!

    Umm no. I will not pay cable execs to watch commercials.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    MikeVx (profile), May 15th, 2012 @ 6:58pm

    I went off all forms of broadcast video years ago...

    Cut to minimum TV service on Comcast, only kept that much, which I never watched except for weather emergencies, because it cost more for internet-only, and on U-Verse I don't even have any TV service. All the programs I watch either arrive on plastic discs (Netflix) or are downloaded (Pioneer One, anybody?). The commercials were bad enough, but when all channels became all-ads-all-the-time (those {censored} logos count, I simply cannot tolerate them} I left and am better off for it.

    Before TV elected to cease to exist for me, I had not watched a real-time show for years. My primary use of the VCR was commercial-skipping. I would tape shows, then blow past the ads when watching them.

    Every now and then I'll be visiting friends and see the horrible cesspit that TV has become. I expect that my current tube-display TV will never die because it gets so little use. The only reason I have a digital broadcast converter is for news and weather emergencies. I think I used it once last june when my U-Verse went out for an hour due to severe weather and I wanted to see how bad things were.

    I simply do not put up with ads any more. I stopped listening to radio and now burn CDs for my car CD player (no easy way to interface an MP3 player, but the book lied when it said burned discs wouldn't work). I've let my various magazine subscriptions lapse. I've got Trueblock Plus installed (Adblock Plus went to the dark side in allowing "unobtrusive" ads, {no such thing} while you can change this, it is reset with each update, at least it was when I gave up on it), and I even have an ad-blocker installed on my Android phone.

    I don't put up with the rubbish on DVDs, either. After some tinkering, I can skip anything, no matter what the disc wants.

    Make things annoying and I'll work around the annoyance. Make it too hard to avoid the annoyance and I just stop dealing with the things entirely.

    If you want my money, make it worth my while. I can always find somewhere else to spend it, or I can not spend at all in some categories.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, May 16th, 2012 @ 9:17pm

      Re: I went off all forms of broadcast video years ago...

      No easy way to interface an MP3 with a car???
      Do you not have an AUX input in your car audio device?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 7:07pm

    LOL I always skip commercials.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, May 15th, 2012 @ 7:25pm

    Odd. By this point I would have expected the frequent troll these days to scream at us claiming us we're all unethical, since according to him, newspapers include ads for us to look at and not looking at them is criminal.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    A Guy (profile), May 16th, 2012 @ 4:20am

    Really TV execs?

    I wonder what drugs these guys are taking? It must be something good, because I hope no one is that dumb.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    A Guy (profile), May 16th, 2012 @ 4:20am

    Really TV execs?

    I wonder what drugs these guys are taking? It must be something good, because I hope no one is that dumb.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Think a little bit?, May 16th, 2012 @ 5:24am

    I think you need to realize that the majority of commercials pay for TV's existence. Doesn't that count for something?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      John Fenderson (profile), May 16th, 2012 @ 8:45am

      Re:

      This is true. I think the point is that commercials and product placement represent a price we pay for the show. In many cases, that price is simply too high.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    bbandeveywheuh (profile), May 16th, 2012 @ 5:54am

    It seems to me that unless there is advertising of some sort that all the shows that people watch will go away. Last time I checked production costs for TV shows still existed...so someone tell me how you constantly make everything accessible (for free) without commercials. Pretty soon there will be no network TV and it will all be accessible via Netflix, Roku, etc. Golly gee, Netflix, et al, are pay models.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      ToFit, May 16th, 2012 @ 7:53am

      Re:

      Ownership is extended from the free channels these days- i.e. NBC = Comcast and ABC = Disney. You can't realistically tell everyone that the profits from Avengers couldn't cover ABC Nightly News for a while. Also they could trim some of the crazy salaries. How much do they pay some of these people to read a teleprompter on the air? I'd bet there are plenty of other talented people that could do the exact same job at a lower rate. The artifical media construction of celebrity causes an artifical inflation of a job that thousands of local individuals do or could do at a much lower to almost no cost.

      The overly broad ownership rules allow for high production costs to continue increasing. Oligopic businesses own the majority of "free" distribution channels and use these artificial limits to push costs higher and force competitors out of the market by looking like 3rd rate productions.

      After 30 plus years why are there still only 3 to 5 free channels in every market? Just wait till technology allows for high quality production values to allow everyday web bloggers to compete with Disney and Comcast. At that point the only way to compete is to sue everyone for infringement and reduce P2P communication transfer.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        identicon
        Anonymous Coward, May 16th, 2012 @ 8:48pm

        Re: Re:

        At that point the only way to compete is to sue everyone for infringement and reduce P2P communication transfer.

        Your comment implies the companies in question are actually thinking 10-15 years down the line and already adopting the necessary model to counteract free/open source entertainment.... I just don't think they're that prescient or give us peons that much credit.

        I think the way the oligopolists will compete is by finding those business models that work and suing anyone using them on any slim pretext until the new companies declare bankruptcy. It also helps to attack any individual or group developing new platforms on which such material could be centrally organized and distributed, preferably using the excuse that the platform might possibly be used by some people to infringe on copyrights the company might possibly have some claim to if the courts don't look too closely at the papers.

        ...Oh wait.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      John Fenderson (profile), May 16th, 2012 @ 8:46am

      Re:

      Golly gee, Netflix, et al, are pay models.


      So? There's nothing wrong with a pay model.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    fairuse (profile), May 16th, 2012 @ 6:27am

    You don't see that purty [sic] picture cycling thru your subconsciousness

    Advertisements on TV are not limited to hard breaks during your viewing. The large screen HDTV has real estate development a la suburban sprawl.

    Every bit of the screen is 'Sponsored by' some brand. Bottom popups cover 1/3 of my TV when watching sports; 10 sec is a long time. Network self promotion? I won't go there. Top of the screen is reserved for more advertising in the guise of 'who is winning the game'.

    That brings me to 4:3 side bars. In time that space will look like a bad layout in google ad space. I think the reason it is not done yet is due to fear of backlash; in time web site layout will come to TV screens.

    Back to ad skipping: It is all about margins. The insurance lizard contracts x amount of time. The end result is we get to see it 4 times an hour. If insurance lizard knows the ad will be skipped it demands a better price; lower. And increase the cycle rate. This goes for Flo insurance, broken dick Rx, telecomm and all that snake oil advertising.

    Mute buttons will be next.
    .

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    btr1701 (profile), May 16th, 2012 @ 7:59am

    Confused

    How is this feature any different than a FFW button on a remote?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Marcel de Jong (profile), May 16th, 2012 @ 8:47am

      Re: Confused

      Because it's over the internet, that makes everything illegal.

      I hate clueless and/or shrewd legal people.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, May 16th, 2012 @ 11:39am

      Re: Confused

      This doesn't have anything to do with the internet. This is about a feature Dish includes in it's hardware.

      Anyway, it's similar in difference to the way that digital is different from analog. In a lot of cases, it's more desirable so the studios want more control/limitations placed on it(digital copying, DRM), but they have to put up with the old method because there's laws already in place to allow for it (analog copying, analog loophole).

      FF button is an established feature that has been around for decades now. Auto-skip on the other hand is still up in the air, legally speaking.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        btr1701 (profile), May 16th, 2012 @ 10:56pm

        Re: Re: Confused

        > FF button is an established feature that has been around
        > for decades now. Auto-skip on the other hand is still up
        > in the air, legally speaking.

        Actually, it's not. LEGALLY speaking, neither one violates any actual law. This isn't even a copyright issue. This is an entirely new and separate right being asserted-- the right to force people to watch advertising-- and no such law exists. And even if there were such a law, if the auto-skip violated it, so would the FFW button.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        •  
          identicon
          Anonymous Coward, May 17th, 2012 @ 9:55am

          Re: Re: Re: Confused

          It's not about forcing people to watch advertising, it's about preventing Dish from giving people the ability to auto-skip advertising.

          They can't force you to sit in front of the TV and watch commercials. Nothing is preventing you from getting up and leaving the room, turning the channel, etc.

           

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          •  
            icon
            btr1701 (profile), May 21st, 2012 @ 8:08pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re: Confused

            > They can't force you to sit in front of the TV and
            > watch commercials.

            They also can't legally force Dish or any other company to remove an auto-skip feature from their devices.

            Once again, it's important to to note that there's NO LAW against enabling consumers to avoid viewing advertising. As draconian as copyright law has become, this is not even a copyright issue. Avoiding commercials is not a copyright violation.

             

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Jeff MacDougall, May 16th, 2012 @ 2:58pm

    "I think this is an attack on our eco-system," said NBC Broadcasting chairman..."

    Reality is an attack on Television's eco system. As well as every other business that depends on copyright to make money. They better start thinking outside the box. (see what I did there?)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Blaine, May 16th, 2012 @ 8:18pm

    whats this?

    What the hell is this suppose to be Cuba or some thing? Well if this is how TV watching is going to be I will not buy cable or any thing like that. I will buy DVDs and watch DVDs or VHS tapes and play nentendo wii. If I watch TV it will be over the air.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    PacWestViewer, May 16th, 2012 @ 9:20pm

    Outdated Business models make consumers angry

    Find a program on broadcast television that doesn't have the station logo permanently placed in one corner of the screen. Find a premium (pay for) movie channel that doesn't do the same thing. Even the world of premium content is filled with marketing via logos, on set product placements in the actual movies, TV ads every few minutes on your streaming service, ads every 8 minutes on your broadcast show unless "sponsored" by a company with limited commercials.

    We pay for the internet connection
    We pay for the video connection (Dish/Cable)
    We pay providers for streaming (Dish/Hulu/Netflix)
    We pay for premium content (rentals/on-demand/premium stations)

    We're the ones having to buy the receivers, the smart device, the Televisions and even the power bill.

    How about the consumer getting a break for a change. It's not asking for much to skip commercials for products we have no interest in. The business models don't let us Opt Out and for potential revenue they don't ask us to Opt In to select which "ad" genres or categories we would be interested in.

    Media companies are abysmal, to be sneered at with contempt - not only for the low quality programming but for not adapting to this era and changing the way they do business - to align with what we the viewers want. Their heads are so far up their own reality programming that they've abandoned actual reality in favor of self deception.
    There's many reports showing that treating the consumer with respect earns their business. How about some?

    Entertainment isn't when we're bombarded with ads. When they cut open a show to place advertising, I for one am not pleased and the commercial that comes up is likely to receive my scorn and not my dollars for interrupting my show as opposed to advertisers that sponsor limited commercial shows - they earn my praise.

    Point being there are other ways to advertise than breaking into shows. Those other methods get more "product" respect. Don't ask us --AGAIN-- to change our behavior to fit outdated business models. Media companies need to come up to speed on their era, our way of thinking if they want our business.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    btr1701 (profile), May 16th, 2012 @ 10:57pm

    Horrible

    I'm going to bash my DVR to bits if it has that auto-skip feature. It's like inviting terrorism into my home.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Angelica, May 18th, 2012 @ 10:13pm

    Let's Be Honest

    I could hardly believe the title of this article when I first read it because I think the entire nation will have to be charged guilty for skipping commercials. Not to be a nerdy perfectionist, but since I work for Dish, I know that the Auto Hop feature is only available on the whole-home HD DVR, the Hopper. The Hopper has a function called PrimeTime Anytime that can be enabled to record primetime of NBC, ABC, CBS, and FOX. When someone goes in to their PrimeTime Anytime recordings, a message pops up and allows he/she to choose to watch the episode with or without the commercials. The only one skipping the commercials is the customer, and to be honest, we all do it anyway.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Jack Sparrow, May 21st, 2012 @ 3:42pm

    A Solution

    Just pirate all of your media, and poof! Problem solved

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Sebastian, May 21st, 2012 @ 3:45pm

    I avoid _ALL_ this

    not watching TV.
    Works like a charm.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Clayton Simms, Jun 9th, 2012 @ 5:05pm

    Why donít CBS, FOX, and NBC execs want consumers to enjoy commercial-free TV?

    Why donít CBS, FOX, and NBC execs want consumers to enjoy commercial-free TV? Itís what we want! Iím a customer and employee of Dish, and I think Auto Hop is great because you can easily watch commercial-free TV. A well known consumer advocacy group, Public Knowledge, agrees that people should have the right to control how they watch TV. Theyíre taking a stand for consumers by creating a petition that tells CBS, FOX, and NBC media to keep their hands out of your living room and DVR. Sign their petition to keep control of how you watch TV http://bit.ly/KigXAn

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This