by Mike Masnick
Thu, May 17th 2012 12:40am
For many, many years, we've had a number of debates on the site about whether or not an open WiFi network connection should make the owner liable for what users do on that network. The perfectly common sense response is that, no, they should not be responsible under basic principles of protecting third parties from liability from actions of their users. But, common sense isn't always so common, so we might as well cheer it on a bit when we see it. So, kudos to a Finnish court for ruling that an open WiFi user is not automatically liable for copyright infringement done via her network. As the press release about the case states, the anti-piracy group that brought the lawsuit failed to show any evidence that the owner actually did any infringement. The court also rejected the idea that an injunction be issued against the woman blocking such usage in the future. Thankfully, the court rejected that, recognizing that this would unfairly burden WiFi hotspot operators.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- SalesForce Says It Doesn't Support CISA After Signing Letter That Suggested It Did
- Court Order Takes Another Stab At Stripping Away Ripoff Report's Section 230 Protections
- Appeals Court Says Topix Can't Be Held Responsible For Overdose Death Of Forum Member
- Kenya Pushes New Copyright Law Which Will Blame ISPs For Not Magically Stopping Piracy
- Washington State Court Confused By Section 230, Says Backpage May Be Liable For User Posts