RSS
Yeah, It Turns Out That Technology Doesn't Make Us Lonely
from the the-lonely-moral-panic dept
Just recently, we were talking about the bizarre claims by Sherry Turkle that social networking makes us more lonely because we spend less time alone (don't try to make sense of it). Soon after that, the Atlantic published an equally vapid feature arguing that Facebook leads to loneliness. These kinds of arguments show up every so often, and they always seem supported by anecdotal evidence.
Perhaps that's because the actual evidence suggests it's a load of crap. Boing Boing points us to a good piece by Claude Fischer in the Boston Review noting that the idea that we're living in an age of increasing loneliness is complete hogwash and not supported by the data at all. First, the article notes just how many articles and books have been claiming the opposite. It seems that claiming that we're all getting more lonely is a lucrative niche sector for the publishing industry. It's one of those things that lots of people want to believe, so books that support that worldview are apparently quite popular. Fischer has compiled a bunch of data looking at their social connections from 1970 to 2010, and finds that "Overall, Americans reported no more loneliness in the 2000s than they did in the 1970s."
It is true that the nature of social relationships has changed, but the difference is just different, not "bad."
Perhaps that's because the actual evidence suggests it's a load of crap. Boing Boing points us to a good piece by Claude Fischer in the Boston Review noting that the idea that we're living in an age of increasing loneliness is complete hogwash and not supported by the data at all. First, the article notes just how many articles and books have been claiming the opposite. It seems that claiming that we're all getting more lonely is a lucrative niche sector for the publishing industry. It's one of those things that lots of people want to believe, so books that support that worldview are apparently quite popular. Fischer has compiled a bunch of data looking at their social connections from 1970 to 2010, and finds that "Overall, Americans reported no more loneliness in the 2000s than they did in the 1970s."
It is true that the nature of social relationships has changed, but the difference is just different, not "bad."
The results, which I compiled in Still Connected (2011), show that some aspects of social involvement have changed since the 1970s. In particular, Americans these days sit down to fewer family dinners and host guests in their homes less often; eating and sociability continues, but outside the home. Americans communicate more frequently with their relatives and friends. Critically Americans are not discernibly more isolated—few were isolated at any point in those decades—and Americans remain just as confident of the support family and friends provide.What the research really shows is that technology is a tool, and people use it for a variety of purposes. Some use it to avoid contact with people, while others use it to increase their contact with people. You can't blame the technology for how people use it. The technology just amplifies the individual aspects of different people:
People using the Internet, most studies show, increase the volume of their meaningful social contacts. E-communications do not generally replace in-person contact. True, serious introverts go online to avoid seeing people, but extroverts go online to see people more often. People use new media largely to enhance their existing relationships—say, by sending pictures to grandma—although a forthcoming study shows that many more Americans are meeting life partners online. Internet dating is especially fruitful for Americans who may face problems finding mates, such as gays and older women. Finally, people tell researchers that electronic media have enriched their personal relationships.As the article notes, this doesn't mean loneliness isn't a problem for those who experience it, but it's not a growing problem, and there's no evidence to suggest that social networking or Facebook in particular increases loneliness.
People typically turn new technologies into devices for doing what they have always wanted to do. And people like to stay in touch. A century ago, Americans, especially women, turned two new technologies marketed for other purposes, the telephone and automobile, into “technologies of sociability.” Developers of the Internet meant it to be a tool for the military and for scholars, and only a few imagined it might even serve business. Now users have made the Internet a largely social technology.
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I'm lonely
I blame the internet - it is the root cause of piracy, facebook, and loneliness, not to mention IE. The world is going to &%%^&
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I'm lonely
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Those who blame will always blame
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Those who blame will always blame
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Those who blame will always blame
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I'm lonely
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Technology makes me more social because I don't have to call someone or figure out a good time to be social. With the internet, I can just be social when I feel like it.
Without the internet, I'd still be asocial, I just wouldn't have as many outlets for being social on the occasions when I actually want to be.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
All in all, social media is a tool for interpersonal interaction, just like the pen, the phone or the CB radio. Whether it's a force for good or replaces more valuable forms of communication depends on how you use it, and the value you actually had for those old forms to begin with.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Jake
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Jake
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Jake
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Lonely?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Yup
Very true! And by the same token, you can't excuse people for their unlawful/unethical actions because of the technology they happen to be using. You can't hide behind technology, either way.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
And all these stories about romances and marriages, of all things, via the post couldn't be true. How can you find true love there? Don't you know that the girl on the other end of that exchange is a charwoman, M'Lord? You just can't go about romancing the lowest of the low as if she's your equal!
Turns out his Lordship had been when they tied the knot a few days later and the resulting partnership not only survived but it was made in heaven. (No mention was ever made about the possibility these two people actually got to know each other deeply in the exchange of letters. So much so that things like social conventions of the time, how they looked, and age became the trivialities they mostly are became...well, trivial. Welcome to the world's first social network(s).
How people choose to communicate is less important that the fact that they are communicating. It doesn't matter whether it's by mail, in the coffee shop, bar, Facebook, LinkedIn or where ever. They're communicating. That alone makes the vast majority of us less lonely not more lonely. Even trolls.
No matter how hard one tries one can't shoehorn the life post Web and broad scale use of the Internet and Web into what came before it. Any more that one couldn't shoehorn life before telegraph, radio, telephone and television with what had come before and judge things like happiness and loneliness by what came before.
With each new introduction in communications technology there have been those insist on what came before was far preferable socially than what it's like now. In each case they've misunderstood, often deliberately, what these changes actually do accomplish in their link to some kind of past utopia that only they can remember.
Many of these people, today, seem to be IP extremists, those married to the past as if God given and the only way to live. (God him/her/them/self strongly disagrees but they aren't listening to any deities at the moment.) Not all are but they still have a personal axe to grind when facing different methods and norms of interpersonal relations.
I guess my partner and I were doing it all wrong all those years before we decided to "shack up" rather and remain "IRC up'd"! Even if we were we're happy, deeply in love and isn't that what it's supposed to be?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
dreck and malarky
i read her numerous books as a student -- her early work is lucid to the point of genius, blending a rheingold-esque ethnographic eye with an accute postmodernist psychoanalytic sensibility.
it's sad to see such an accomplished and celebrated thinker -- at MIT, no less -- delve into such self-absorbed, unscientific, one-dimensional ranting, apparently situating this one unjustified claim as the lynchpin of her contemporary oeuvre.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
dreck and malarky
i read her numerous books as a student -- her early work is lucid to the point of genius, blending a rheingold-esque ethnographic eye with an accute postmodernist psychoanalytic sensibility.
it's sad to see such an accomplished and celebrated thinker -- at MIT, no less -- delve into such self-absorbed, unscientific, one-dimensional ranting, apparently situating this one unjustified claim as the lynchpin of her contemporary oeuvre.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
really?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
I don't have to put words in your mouth though to reveal the idiocy of your post though:
"The technology just amplifies the individual aspects of different people: "
Really? Putting aside the issue of moral "blame", which I think is a complete misreading of anything Sherry Turkle wrote, is this what you think the relationship between technology and social change is? It just amplifies, period--nothing to see here; not worth looking under the hood? This crap is making me question the sophistication of your mental model of how the world works.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Here, an excerpt from Neil Postman's book, Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology
more excerpts from the book may be found at this URL---(another of the many social-networking sites which also demonstrates that, as a means of thoughtful discourse, these sites are a flagrant and pathetic bust--- (all the same, as a source for further quotes, I refer you to):
http://www.librarything.com/work/46821
for example,
and, more generally, a reading list which I compiled and called, "A Reading Course in 'Technology and Society' -- Main text" :
http://www.librarything.com/tag/A+Reading+Course+in+%27Technology+and+Society%27+-+main+text
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
The Denial Of Loneliness
Seems like this article was written by someone who may be lonely but doesn't want to believe he/she is lonely. This, is the denial of loneliness.
Its hard for someone to admit to loneliness - especially when information is presented to them that may confirm the feeelings they've been feeling. Loneliness can make you feel unwanted, weak, maybe even a reason for the Facebook syndrome which we all want to deny, yet is completely prevailing in our everyday lives. You know FB Syndrome right? The developmental disorder which alters the intentions of social interaction of an individual characterized by impaired social norms.
FB Syndrome Side effects include; heightened unwarranted interest in other peoples lifestyles as well as intense publication of otherwise private or unsubstantial personal information. rhyming the word lonely.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
So, when you get to meet them in person, you have already gotten past the first-meeting awkwardness.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
tech doesnt make us lonely
i was neglected by the society, i was lonely but someone saved me, a girl called shimla, we dont see eachother or hangout..when everyone left me
she was the only one there to boost me up,give me courage, and im so happy that i have a friend like her who saved me from loneliness,
withought this technology i wouldnt have spoke to her and who knows i would have ended up depressed.... i strongly say that tech doesnt make us alone
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Dgdgyg
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Add Your Comment