by Mike Masnick
Thu, Apr 26th 2012 12:02am
One thing I always find particularly silly in the mainstream media is when they claim "exclusive" on a story. News is not "ownable," and the second someone gets a story out, that news is out there and the facts are available to anyone else. So every time I see publications claim "exclusive!" it makes me laugh. It may be exclusive for a few seconds, at best. But, old school journalists seem to get really really picky about those things, as evidenced by this particularly stupid argument over who gets "credit" for a story. It seems that the NY Times and Reuters both had reporters working on the story, and the NYTimes tweeted the news out about 26 seconds before Reuters did -- but the Reuters reporter is still demanding credit -- first claiming (incorrectly) that he tweeted it first, but then noting (correctly) that they published first. The simple fact is that no one cares, other than a couple of journalists. No one keeps score, and no one owns the news. After all, if we have to go back to the "original" source, then wouldn't it be the person the story is actually about?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Court Dismisses Trademark Suit Brought By Racetracks Against Gaming Company Referencing Historical Races
- Oil Industry Group Claims Copyright On Oil Pricing Data, Gets Twitter To Delete Tweets
- The Way You Ask The Questions Matters: Reuters Poll Says People Support Apple Against FBI, But It's All In The Questions
- Writer Claims Libel, Copyright Infringement When Screencap Of Her Tweet Is Used In An Online Article
- Reuters, Re/code Care So Very Much About 'Conversation' That They're Asking Commenters To Leave