by Mike Masnick
Mon, Mar 12th 2012 8:03pm
Over the years, we've written about the Section 230 safe harbors -- which protect service providers from being liable for certain actions of their users -- a number of times. This is perfectly common sense legislation: the blame should be placed on the person who actually committed the action, rather than the tools they used. Yet, for some reason, some still have trouble understanding this. A frequent target of those misunderstandings has been online ticket reseller Stubhub. A few years back we wrote about a ruling in a case in Illinois where the court effectively ignored Section 230. Apparently there was a similar move by a state court in North Carolina some time ago, but thankfully, the appeals court has reversed it, and once again made clear that you don't blame Stubhub for illegal actions performed by its users.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Secret Sorority Handshakes, Questionable Lawsuits, Free Speech, The Right To Be Forgotten And Section 230
- FBI Arrests Creator Of Remote Access Tool, Rather Than Those Abusing It To Commit Crime
- Congressperson's Sex Trafficking Bill Looks To Carve Holes In Section 230 Immunity
- Appeals Court Says Section 230 Does Not Protect Stubhub From Having To Pay 'Amusement Tax' On Tix Sold
- StubHub Says Ticket Resales Are Booming, Thanks To Lower Prices