Microsoft Hires Key Anti-Google FTC Lawyer To Be Its New Chief Anti-Google Lobbyist

from the paying-a-little-too-much-attention-to-the-competition dept

There's something a little... disturbing about how gleefully Microsoft seems to want to sic antitrust regulators on Google. Given that the company went through its own long antitrust battle, you'd think that it would know better than to continually invoke the government's antitrust legal beagles against others. Instead, it seems to have taken the position that if it had to go through the antitrust rollers for so long, why shouldn't other successful companies. We've noted in the past Microsoft's fingerprints showing up on bizarre and silly antitrust claims against Google -- which have so far gone nowhere -- but Microsoft seems really intent on saddling Google with a long and costly antitrust battle. I guess Microsoft thinks it's easier to fight Google that way than, you know, actually innovating and competing in the marketplace. It's pretty sad just how anti-innovation these efforts are.

Either way, Microsoft appears to be stepping up its "saddle Google with antitrust charges" battle by hiring Randall Long from the FTC. Long was the key "anti-Google" lawyer within the FTC, who led multiple antitrust investigations into Google, and recommended that the FTC block Google's acquisition of AdMob (something he was outvoted on). Microsoft doesn't even seem to want to hide the fact that his role will be to lobby politicians in DC to hit Google with antitrust charges. The WSJ's report on the hiring is pretty explicit:
As part of his new job, Mr. Long will likely continue those efforts before the FTC and other agencies, a person familiar with the matter said.
Of course, if Long actually follows the rules, he shouldn't be allowed to do anything concerning any FTC investigations into Google for quite some time. The ethics rules are pretty clear -- even barring "behind-the-scenes" help on such investigations:
Except as provided in this section, or otherwise specifically authorized by the Commission, no former member or employee (“former employee” or “employee”) of the Commission may communicate to or appear before the Commission, as attorney or counsel, or otherwise assist or advise behind-the-scenes, regarding a formal or informal proceeding or investigation...
That certainly suggests that Long cannot and should not "continue those efforts before the FTC" for some time. Either way, it's yet another example of the questionable revolving door between government and the private sector, where ex-government officials end up in roles that have a very close connection to their former government role (or vice versa). Even assuming that Long follows all the rules, as I'm sure he intends to do, this kind of thing just looks really bad.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    icon
    Tor (profile), Mar 2nd, 2012 @ 1:33pm

    Smear campaign in EU parliament

    This refresh blog post by Falkvinge is perhaps relevant to this story:
    How Microsoft Pays Big Money To Smear Google In European Parliament

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Tor (profile), Mar 2nd, 2012 @ 1:44pm

      Re: Smear campaign in EU parliament

      I meant to say "fresh" - not "refresh".

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Ronzo, Apr 4th, 2013 @ 6:03pm

      Re: Smear campaign in EU parliament

      So what, you must think Google deserves preferential treatment. I think we all know who put the Fed's on Microsoft so what goes around come's around. God Bless America because the rest of the world is cursing us.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Mitchell Featherston, Mar 2nd, 2012 @ 1:42pm

    Wonderful

    This is our system at work... love it, hate, whatever.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    [citation needed or GTFO], Mar 2nd, 2012 @ 1:43pm

    Better prepare...

    Prepare for the "Masnick's a Google lobbyist" trolls!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Designerfx (profile), Mar 2nd, 2012 @ 1:43pm

    actually, no - let them take him out

    if he's out of the FTC he has far less direct power than before. Being in the FTC vs lobbyist? no question.

    Microsoft just shot themselves in the foot with the power grab here.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Chosen Reject (profile), Mar 2nd, 2012 @ 2:31pm

      Re: actually, no - let them take him out

      You're just looking at it from the wrong direction. You're looking at it as if Microsoft just hired an FTC lawyer to perform a service in the future. Things change if you look at it as Microsoft now rewarding an FTC lawyer for performing an earlier service.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 2nd, 2012 @ 1:45pm

    Oh No! Microsoft hired someone with *gasp* experience and *shudder* knowledge.

    Truly they should be sent to hell for doing such horrible things!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      Anonymous Coward, Mar 2nd, 2012 @ 1:52pm

      Re:

      Oh No! Microsoft hired someone with *gasp* experience and *shudder* knowledge.


      Oh, so that is why nobody want to hire you.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      MrWilson, Mar 2nd, 2012 @ 1:52pm

      Re:

      You beat me to it!

      I was going to saying: [insert obvious troll remark about how Microsoft is just hiring someone with relevant knowledge and experience for the position that completely ignores that there is even a possibility of something being ethically wrong with this hiring, because everyone knows that ethics get in the way of profit]

      But your straight-faced parody of the absurdity of the usual troll position on the revolving door works really well too.

      You were joking, right? :-)

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      The Other AC, Mar 2nd, 2012 @ 2:10pm

      Re:

      News: Microsoft hires assassin to take down Google execs.

      AC's response: Oh No! Microsoft hired someone with *gasp* experience and *shudder* knowledge.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 2nd, 2012 @ 3:45pm

    Linux hires anti-Microsoft all the time.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 2nd, 2012 @ 6:26pm

    "There's something a little... disturbing about how gleefully Microsoft seems to want to sic antitrust regulators on Google."

    Microsoft is engaging in anti-competitive behavior and it ought to be investigated for this.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    John Lenihan, Mar 2nd, 2012 @ 8:25pm

    Microsoft vs Google

    Microswift has money to burn harassing Google, but little to spend taking care of their real business. Yesterday, their new cloud app failed because they didn't know it was leap year!

    Last year their SW failed on the London Stock Exchange, making Linux obligatory for Exchanges. The more incompetent they get, the more childish they act.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    TimK (profile), Mar 3rd, 2012 @ 2:04pm

    Its times like this I wish companies were more human....
    So I could punch them in the face. Apple first, then Microsoft.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous, Mar 3rd, 2012 @ 2:10pm

    toothless regulations

    Those rules state this guy could be "suspended, reprimanded, or disbarred" by his buddies and former cow-orkers at the FTC. None of which would prevent him from doing his new job, lobbying. And none of which is likely to happen, anyway. Laws for the rest of us tend to have teeth, but this code is no more likely to cause him problems than what we've seen for bankers.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Suzanne Lainson (profile), Mar 3rd, 2012 @ 2:18pm

    Watching the war from all sides

    It used to be that Microsoft had all the power. Now Apple, Google, and Facebook are in the mix, all fighting each other for one reason or another.

    It does make me think that big public (or soon to be public) companies behave in certain ways, no matter what the industry. I don't view the big tech companies as looking out for my interests any more than I view Walmart or McDonald's looking out for my interests. When it's all said and done, a lot happens to keep Wall Street happy. You need those quarterly numbers to look good to keep those stock prices high.

    I'm hoping that all these battles keep these big companies in check. I don't want any of them to become so big they can't be taken down a bit.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Suzanne Lainson (profile), Mar 3rd, 2012 @ 10:04pm

      Re: Watching the war from all sides

      As I read the various tech bloggers, some are unbiased, but others definitely favor one of the big players over the others. It gets really interesting reading who is justifying which company's actions.

      This article, by Aaron Levie, co-founder and CEO at Box, touches upon one coming war.

      Google Drive And The Cloud Wars | TechCrunch: "So get ready for a number of years of absolute rock-your-world style competition among major players fighting for your content and the cloud. Every photo you upload, every song you listen to, every video your capture. These guys want it. With around $200B in cash between Microsoft, Apple, and Google alone, cost is no issue; they see your data as the center of their universe. Theyll probably get it. Im just happy to be swimming in enterprise waters."

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 4th, 2012 @ 6:19am

    I remember that antitrust stuff. But Microsoft actually broke the law and ripped off a bunch of technology. Compression, tons of algorithms. They made promises to developers they broke "Pay us 3,000.00 a year for our development package and we will never compete on the software market." BULL and double BULL, ask Word Perfect (who?) and the other software houses they brought down with Microsoft Office! Also they have buggy products and as far as I'm concerned Internet Explorer is an extremely inferior product constantly running out of memory and it just crashes with any more than 5 tab open. What a developer nightmare to have to write 8 lines of code to account for Internet Exploder and only 1 line of code to account for the other browsers. What a joke! Microsoft products have turned into nothing but nagware that you have to pay for. I spent a whole day just turning off stuff because the idiots that designed it think everybody's stupid like all of their friends. They put 20,000 nags into their product. Someone in their design department should get a copy of RedHat or CentOS 6 which does everything Windows, Windows Server do combined. Plus they are free with all the free software ever produced. Crazy. We only have 2 machines left with Windows on them and pretty soon that will be and remain only 1.

    As to Google they have never asked me for a dime. They Give me Code, free OS's (Android), free Microsoft work arounds and a cool website. They give me an HTML 5 and CSS3 browser that is completely compliant for free. This is a beautiful thing. They are even developing new apps and programming interfaces for the web. FREE! How can you fault these guys. Sure they are a big and bad corporation and their support sucks (non-existent) but they do the web community a great service. jQuery wouldn't even exist under a Microsoft world. It became possible because of Google and the great help they give coders by hosting and making available the Google Code site. When was the last time Microsoft gave anything away?
    Huh?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    macromedia dreamweaver download, Mar 12th, 2012 @ 11:44am

    thanks for the post. its really helpful for us.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Attorney, Mar 25th, 2012 @ 8:49pm

    If you have been accused of taking someone else's personal information, you need to know that it is vital that you hire an identity theft defense attorney. Whether or not you are guilty, these are very serious accusations and carry strict penalties and fines. In fact, this is considered a federal offense, and thus you need a lawyer with experience in federal crimes.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    lrobbo (profile), Jun 7th, 2012 @ 9:21am

    Microsoft suck even worse than the G

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This