How The Guy Who Didn't Invent Email Got Memorialized In The Press & The Smithsonian As The Inventor Of Email

from the damn-you-wikipedia dept

Late last week, the Washington Post reported that The Smithsonian had acquired "tapes, documentation, copyrights, and over 50,000 lines of code from V.A. Shiva Ayyadurai, who both the Smithsonian and the Washington Post insisted was the "inventor of e-mail." There's just one problem with this: It's not actually true. Lots of internet old-timers quickly started to speak out against this, especially on Dave Farber's Interesting People email list, where they highlighted how it's just not true. As is nicely summarized on Wikipedia's talk page about Ayyadurai, he was responsible for "merely inventing an email management system that he named EMAIL," which came long after email itself. The Washington Post eventually offered the following "clarification":
Clarification: A number of readers have accurately pointed out that electronic messaging predates V. A. Shiva Ayyadurai’s work in 1978. However, Ayyadurai holds the copyright to the computer program called "email," establishing him as the creator of the “computer program for [an] electronic mail system” with that name, according to the U.S. Copyright Office.
Except... that "clarification" seems to confuse copyright with patents. Copyright is only over the specific copyrightable work created -- which would be the specific code he used. It does not, in any way, establish him as "the creator" of "the" electronic mail system -- merely an electronic mail system -- and hardly the first one. I could write some sort of email management software tomorrow and copyright that... and it would no more make me an "inventor" of email than Ayyadurai.

There's a detailed history of email over at the NetHistory site, and you'll note that Ayyadurai doesn't warrant a mention -- which isn't surprising since his work comes way after most of the important stuff was done. Thomas Haigh sent a detailed email to the SIGCIS list, breaking down what happened. Apparently, Time Magazine ran a profile of Ayyadurai a few months back, calling him "the man who invented email," which resulted in the Smithsonian's interest. But even that article notes at the beginning that Ayyadurai actually just holds a copyright on EMAIL, rather than email itself. It even asks about the fact that Ray Tomlinson is often credited as being the inventor of email -- and his efforts came much earlier.

Either way, it appears that Ayyadurai has played up this idea that he's the inventor of email, despite little to back that up (apparently frustrating many people who actually know the history). Yes, he copyrighted a particular bit of code, but there's little to support the idea that he had very much to do with "the invention of email" in any way. But, that's not what the Washington Post (or, apparently, the Smithsonian) will tell you...


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  •  
    icon
    :Lobo Santo (profile), Feb 22nd, 2012 @ 12:58pm

    G.E.A.R.

    That's a heck of a plan!

    I think I'll code something whose name works out to 'GEAR' or 'WHEEL' or 'FOOD' and with any luck, I'll be in the Smithsonian as the inventor of food!

    Pretty crafty, that guy. On par with that Thomas Edison fellow...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Machin Shin (profile), Feb 22nd, 2012 @ 1:14pm

    The Smithsonian has a long history of doing this kind of thing. They are terrible at being historically accurate. They much prefer to just try and change history to fit their story. I found that out years ago when researching Tesla. I found a site created by a very angry history teacher who informed them of their errors in giving credit for several of Tesla's inventions to Edison.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Feb 22nd, 2012 @ 1:26pm

    sounds similar to the attitude of governments and the entertainment industries. always believe what they say as being right. never listen to anyone else even when what they are being told is the truth.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Zem, Feb 22nd, 2012 @ 1:38pm

    You fiends

    Oh shame oh shame,

    claiming that copyright isn't proof of invention and robbing this poor soul blind. What next, are you going to claim that WB doesn't own the wizard of oz!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Feb 22nd, 2012 @ 1:40pm

    So it's like Al Gore invented the internet, This is why the mainstream media is obsolete.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    drewmo (profile), Feb 22nd, 2012 @ 1:45pm

    From The Washington Post itself, August 4th, 1996:
    http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/10122849.html?FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS&date =Aug+4%2C+1996&author=Hafner%2C+Katie%3BLyon%2C+Matthew&pub=The+Washington+Post&edition= &startpage=WMAG9&desc=Talking+headers%3A++One+September+evening+in+1973

    "Electronic mail is the most important two-way communications medium since the telephone, which makes the serendipitous way it was invented in 1973 all the more astonishing."

    I believe you can read the article itself, here: http://www.olografix.org/gubi/estate/libri/wizards/email.html

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    TOG, Feb 22nd, 2012 @ 2:16pm

    Please don't flame

    Not trying to throw gas on the fire here, and I have read only a bit of the history, but I'm going to defend Ayyadurai.

    Let's look at the article linked as "it's just not true" in the first paragraph:
    http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/2012/02/sort/thread/page/4/entry/4:99/20120219 141237:ADCAD69A-5B2D-11E1-8876-F3FC0C963953/

    What was around before was just messaging through an FTP server.

    There had been discussions of standards, headings, folders, etc., but as far as one can tell from the article cited above, Wikipedia, etc., it doesn't look like anything to that effect had been coded when Ayyadurai wrote his code.

    Also, if his code made electronic messaging more accessible to the general populace, and modern email did, in fact, evolve from his code, I think it's fair to call him the inventor of email (even without quotation marks).

    To me this seems like a case of bitterness and envy on the part of people who were in the field at the time who failed to recognize the steps that Ayyadurai took.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      identicon
      pkwooster, Feb 22nd, 2012 @ 5:37pm

      Re: Please don't flame

      As a person who received their first electronic mail message on May 1, 1974 I find your position ridiculous. That message came through a proprietary system that had been in use for at least a year before I joined. And it did not involve FTP .
      /peter

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      •  
        icon
        Devon Sean McCullough (profile), Feb 23rd, 2012 @ 6:03pm

        Re: Re: Please don't flame

        FTP is a red herring - transport by carrier pigeon, tom-tom drum, morse code, ARPAnet, InterNet, all means to the same end, not germane to the issue at hand.

         

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Devon Sean McCullough (profile), Feb 23rd, 2012 @ 5:50pm

      Re: Please don't flame

      A 14-year old building his own car - ok, brilliant
      but if he invented the car in 1978, what was
      that '76 convertible I used to drive?

      We had network mail with every one of these claimed innovations way before 1978.
      EMACS had at least two mail sub-systems, RMAIL and BABYL, pre-mouse so 1-key Delete, Forward, Reply, Output to another folder, delivery to, from, bcc, etc., etc., long before the fake 1978 claims.

      Peace
      --Devon

      PS: When a joker claims he invented the automobile in 1978 that's not news. When a reporter buys such a joke and the Washington Post prints it - now that's news. Give good interview and today's press'll give you a pass on facts?

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    •  
      icon
      Rohan Jayasekera (profile), Mar 8th, 2012 @ 7:05pm

      Re: Please don't flame

      The "it's just not true" article isn't a good one if all it covers is FTP-based; there most certainly were real email systems long before 1978. Like the one I used starting in 1973 (which I see that pkwooster has already mentioned above; we worked at the same company).

      In case anyone thinks I could be mistaken about long-ago dates, I still have a 1976 printout of some of my email, and it looks just like the usual email: for each message there are a few header lines (message ID and date/time, From, To list, CC list, Subject), a blank line, and then the body. The only thing that looks strange about it in 2012 is that all the letters are upper case (the online system it ran on gave up lower-case letters in favour of additional special characters), something you will also see if you look at old programming languages such as FORTRAN, BASIC, and COBOL. Back then a lack of mixed case was acceptable because people were used to it in telegraph messages etc., and today we often have the same thing where people don't bother with capitalization in SMS text messages or in instant messaging or chat. (Speaking of which, I first used IM in 1972 or 1973; it's not only email that's old.)

      That email system included an API, which I used when I wrote some software that archived emails I wanted to keep, complete with tags (back then we called them "keywords") that I could run searches on. This was one of the first "products" that I ever built, as some 60 people eventually used it.

       

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Bjorn, Feb 22nd, 2012 @ 2:35pm

    reminds me of the wright brothers

    while there is some dispute over who actually flew first, there is significant evidence that whoever it was his last name was not Wright. When they received the Wright's plane in 1948 the Smithsonian secretly agreed that if they could have the plane they would never say anyone else had flown before the Wrights. This contract was eventually exposed through a FOIA request by Stella Randolph and William O'Dwyer. The first in flight may have been Gustave Whitehead, or it might have been someone else, but because of the financial incentive of being able to say that they possess the artifact associated with the Wright Brother's myth the smithsonian continues to advance something as fact which they know is likely not true.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    That TD regular again, Feb 22nd, 2012 @ 2:47pm

    "any single development is stepping on the heels of the previous one and is so closely followed by the next that most advances are obscured. I think that few individuals will be remembered." That's true - to catalogue all the developments would be a huge task. - Ray Tomlinson

    Guys like ray just want to create and keep creating.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Feb 22nd, 2012 @ 3:29pm

    The most disappointing thing about this story is that it has apparently become acceptable to write "e-mail" as "email."

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Feb 22nd, 2012 @ 6:30pm

    Telegraphy Is Email

    Dear old telegraphy is email. The term "email" is simply a modern made-up word for something which is old. Customers would go to their local telegraphy service provider, give them a message, then the message would be sent electrically to its destination. The sending was via electric pulses over wires and via radio, exactly the same as happens today. Sure the technology has improved, but the basic idea of sending messages by electricity has been around for hundreds of years. Wireless telegraphy was commercialised (not invented) by Marconi over 110 years ago.

    The term "email" is simply putting an "e" (for "electronic") in front of the existing word "mail". Golly, what an advance, someone tell the Smithsonian.

    The Smithsonian really should be doing a whole lot better at providing the historical context. After all, that is supposed to be their job. It would be nice if they were to actually do it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Daniel Hawkins, Feb 23rd, 2012 @ 12:40am

    We're working without definitions here...

    The Washington Post is obviously confused and/or lazy, but I want to point out that everyone in this discussion seems to be operating on their own personal definition of what email is (not to mention what it means to "invent" something).

    I'm actually in Shiva's class this semester (Systems Visualization), and based on my limited interaction with him so far, I would guess that his concept of email is very systems-oriented. He would likely say that lumping all "electronic messaging" together is unwarranted, and that he's never claimed to have invented that. I am not defending him, as I'm unaware of all the facts here; I am merely suggesting that there may be different ways of thinking about this.

    If you say email is a way to send messages between computers, Shiva did not invent it. If you say email is a system that manages the sending and receiving of electronic letters (as opposed to short messages or public messages), acting as the digital version of a postal service, then it is less clear. As others here have pointed out, invention is quite a vague thing to attribute to a single person.

    Anyway, the class meets again on Friday, so if you want me to ask him something directly, reply to this comment.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Feb 23rd, 2012 @ 5:58am

    ... and the band 76ixties owns The World.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    icon
    Cyphase (profile), Feb 23rd, 2012 @ 9:51am

    I while back I created a system called the Uber-synchronous N-dimensional Information Visualizer and Extrapolator with Reduced Speed Extension. Recently I decided that the Reduced Speed Extension, along with a few other things, might have been a bad idea, but since I can't change those things now that the system is live, I've been thinking of creating The Admittedly Complex and Hard Yet Obviously Necessary System to sidestep some of the issues I've found. This add-on is currently in alpha testing.

    If you find any issues that I might have overlooked, please contact the General Oversight Desk and let the guy who answers the phone know what's up. I'll take a look when I can.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    willie watson, Nov 21st, 2012 @ 9:31am

    email

    It was this poor guy who did really proved himself as a source of email system. No other person or persons can claim to be its inventor. Just don't try to degrade a real inventor just on the basis of his color and race. Need to know how to accept these facts.
    If these engineers from countries like india and china hadnt been here, we would have been just like Africa.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  •  
    identicon
    Din, Feb 19th, 2013 @ 10:51am

    Pathetic article.. Just plain bashing

    The history of the email you provide in the article mentions an email 'system' developed in 1988 but misses out on the 1978 one made by Ayyadurai. This article is just for bashing and in no way tries to gather the facts.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This