Senate Minority Leader McConnell Tells Reid/Leahy To Kill PIPA
from the ouch dept
Looks like the next domino in the SOPA/PIPA fight just fell. Tony Romm is reporting that Senate minority leader, Senator Mitch McConnell is calling on Democrats to drop PIPA. That has a high likelihood of killing off what little Republican support is left for PIPA, because where McConnell goes, so go most Republican Senate votes. As we predicted this morning, it's looking like this is becoming a partisan issue -- with the Republicans lined up with internet users... and Democrats lined up with a couple of big Hollywood studios who don't want to innovate. The real shame in that, of course, is that for many, many months, the only person keeping PIPA from moving forward was Senator Ron Wyden -- a Democrat... and it appears his entire party has totally abandoned him. I'm still worried this now becomes a partisan issue, but it's still pretty stunning that Democratic leadership appears to have made a really, really bad calculation on the politics of this bill.Update: Here's McConnell's official statement:
“While we must combat the on-line theft of intellectual property, current proposals in Congress raise serious legal, policy and operational concerns. Rather than prematurely bringing the Protect IP Act to the Senate floor, we should first study and resolve the serious issues with this legislation. Considering this bill without first doing so could be counterproductive to achieving the shared goal of enacting appropriate and additional tools to combat the theft of intellectual property. I encourage the Senate Majority to reconsider its decision to proceed to this bill.”Reading between the standard DC political lines... McConnell is making this partisan.
Filed Under: copyright, democrats, harry reid, mitch mcconnell, partisan, patrick leahy, pipa, protect ip, republicans, ron wyden, senate, sopa
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
8/10
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Don't celebrate.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Don't celebrate.
Yes. Possibly very, very soon. This is not over.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
If that's where this is going then there is ONE thing that will over rule almost a hundred million in donations to politicians and that's an upset electorate who don't like what the donations are buying.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
We have college students being extradited from Britain, Megaupload seized and other sites blocked on current legislation alone but somehow for some people there is a shared goal of enacting additional tools to combat theft of intellectual property.
Any politician who got this issue would be talking about reviewing copyright legislation from the ground up, anything else just means, we'll have to go at this legislation again when people aren't paying attention.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
"You got that right
Said, you got that right
Sure got that right"
Lynyrd Skynyrd and me.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
No kidding. The R's saw what the net roots did for the D's in the last election. Neutralize, the net root effect, retake the Senate and the White House and run the show for the next 4-8 years. So billionaires will continue to pay a lower percentage tax rate than their secretaries and you get to delay implementation of SOPA until after the election. Did you forget that SOPA is the US CoC's #1 issue. The CoC is the lobbying arm of the Republican party. What do you think will happen the day after President Gingrich takes office?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Indeed. No doubt that the Rs and Ds are equally bad and equally untrustworthy.
However... even if it's the #1 issue for CoC, what happened this week suggests that perhaps the public won't let it happen.
Oh, I know that you and your friends will fight for this, but you've been on this site for nearly a year underestimating the people on the internet. One of these days you'll learn. I mean, I recognize that you're paid not to... but... it might help keep your bosses happy if you explain reality to them.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Maybe Celebrate, But Keep On Keepin' On
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0112/71672.html
i.e. call your Sens tomorrow, Monday and Tuesday to re-enforce that they need to listen to their constituents FIRST.
And beware the weasel words:
http://www.publicknowledge.org/blog/fake-promises-vote-no-sopa-and-pipa
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Public: YES!
Congress Democrats: Republicans are being RACIST against corporations! Corporations are people, too!
Insane Republicans: See, this is proof that Democrats are all stupid!
Sane Republicans and Non-Congress Democrats: *sob*
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
This is the most horrible statement to ever come out of congress. YOU SHOULD DO THAT WITH EVERY SINGLE PIECE OF LEGISLATION YOU PASS YOU ASSHOLES!
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Also, far more laws need sunset clauses and via the same agencies we should prove that they have been working with no unintended consequences. If all is good then we can vote to renew, if not then it is trashed.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
However, it also means that PIPA would would likely not survive a presidential Veto, as they would need at least 67 votes to override a veto.
While PIPA will likely pass the Senate, it will not survive a poresidential Veto. That 62 to 38 was before McConnell chimed in against it. So PIPA will likely pass cloture, with a 61 to 39 margin, 6 votes short of what would be needed to survive a presidential veto.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
abandon ship!
It's proof that when you get organized and get loud you can change things.
I have noticed however, that there is a nascent effort on Fox News to try to paint opponents of SOPA and PIPA as being mostly dirty hippies like the Occupy Movement.
They're trying to spin it like "Oh the bill was no good because it was big government, but we have to find a way to do everything the bill does but not until a Republican takes over so we can get all the Hollywood contributions."
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Reading comprehension of Congress?
Who said they even bother to do that after it's passed?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Here lies the truth about SOPA/PIPA that even TechDirt has yet to report: what MPAA, RIAA, and Hollywood execs do not want you to see.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzS5rSvZXe8
The truth behind why these big companies responsible for SOPA and PIPA are also responsible for piracy itself is far more insidious than even their outmoded business model.
Hint: can you say, do as I say so I can crush you under heel?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Wyden...
To his constituents, I beg them to vote for him even if he remains a Democrat. He was an opponent of PIPA from very early on and if it wasn't for his efforts in opposing it, SOPA/PIPA would be law by now, or at least, there would never have been enough time to build up such huge amounts of opposition to them. If that doesn't count for something, what does?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]
Add Your Comment
Add A Reply